[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phosh [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.20.0-2] (no packageset)
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.182~22.04.1]
[00:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phosh [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.20.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:02] <jbicha> vorlon: libgovirt currently only builds on some arches 🤷
[01:04] <jbicha> there's a second blocker bug if you want to let it into kinetic anyway
[01:07] <jbicha> I'm working on fixing gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect so no need to remove it fully from kinetic yet
[01:07] <jbicha> (but I'm ok either way with libgovirt)
[02:22] <vorlon> jbicha: well, built on some arches is not a regression vs built on no arches
[02:22] <vorlon> which is, after all, the consequence of it having been removed from the release pocket
[06:27] <rs2009> vorlon and tsimonq2: I actually get the same build error locally, just with archive.ubuntu.com instead of ftpmaster.internal, and looks the contents of /etc/resolv.conf are empty after running 'apt install' the first time
[06:27] <rs2009> s/looks/looks like/g
[07:07] <rs2009> hey sil2100
[07:32] <rs2009> hey sil2100, thanks for your vote :) also, was wondering if it would be possible to update https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live (made some changes in https://code.launchpad.net/~unity7maintainers/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-unity just now)
[07:33] <rs2009> ^ sil2100 and vorlon
[07:40] <aciba> sil2100: if you have SRU vanguard review time, cloud-init has an unapproved upload 22.3-13 from SRU to Bionic, Focal and Jammy. We've sync'd changes for two bug fixes found and fixed before our previous 22.3.-3 SRU unapproved upload was accepted https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318, thanks!
[07:40] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1987318 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.3 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]
[07:45] <sil2100> rs2009: I'm a bit occupied with 20.04.5, but I should have more time next week if anything :)
[07:45] <sil2100> aciba: hey! Sure o/
[07:46] <rs2009> also, it looks like lb's using syslinux as the bootloader if BINARYFORMAT=iso, and that seems to result in this error: "E: /usr/share/syslinux/themes/ubuntu-oneiric - no such directory."
[07:47] <rs2009> ah sil2100, completely forgot about 20.04.5 :facepalm: I'll start working on it too now
[07:48] <sil2100> Wimpy: hey hey Martin! I still see no test results for Ubuntu Mate for .5, are there some Mate people around to do some iso-testing? Thanks! :)
[07:48] <rs2009> I've started our 20.04.5 ISO build
[07:51] <sil2100> \o/
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [10.4.0-4ubuntu1~22.04]
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [18ubuntu1.1]
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [19ubuntu1.1]
[08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [11ubuntu1.1]
[08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [8ubuntu1.1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5ubuntu2.2]
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1ubuntu1.1]
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [sync] (jammy-proposed) [12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04]
[08:51] <schopin> Would it be reasonable to hint rust-object/s390x through? It fails not because of a regression but because new tests uncovered an old bug, and it's not fixable without breaking API (see LP: #1988385)
[08:51] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1988385 in rust-object (Ubuntu) "rust-object: endianness issue in s390x" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988385
[09:04] <sil2100> Hello everyone! I'd appreciate some help in testing .5 images - we're still missing test results for Xubuntu and Ubuntu Mate flavors, can someone take a look at those?
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[09:52] <rbasak> sil2100: o/ I can spare some time today to work on more SRUs if that's not going to step on your toes? As there's quite a backlog.
[09:56] <tumbleweed> schopin: that sounds reasonable to me. I'll hint it.
[10:51] <stgraber> what's going on with langpacks on focal ppc64el? https://jenkins.linuxcontainers.org/job/image-ubuntu/architecture=ppc64el,release=focal,variant=default/2126/console
[10:51] <stgraber> did we miss a package in a SRU release or something?
[11:09] <rs2009> tested Ubuntu Unity 20.04.5, and releasing it now
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-mysql2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.5.3-3ubuntu4.22.04.1]
[11:21] <jbicha> rs2009: I think that ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live page gets updated automatically
[11:22] <rs2009> jbicha: yep, looks like it got updated automatically
[11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[11:47] <sil2100> rbasak: that's fine, I'll just get back to it after .5
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:06] <sil2100> Marking server as ready since all is green
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ovn [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.03.1-0ubuntu2]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.5]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sudo [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.9.9-1ubuntu2.1]
[12:24] <sil2100> rbasak: in-between stuff I'll review cloud-init
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[12:28] <rbasak> ack
[12:30] <rbasak> vorlon, juliank: I just noticed that Focal and Bionic unapproved also have a hidden source for grub2-unsigned. I don't know if that was the case before or not.
[12:30] <rbasak> However I probably won't end up reviewing these anyway
[12:31] <juliank> nothing has changed there
=== leosilva1 is now known as leosilva
[12:32] <halves> hello ubuntu-release! could I kindly ask for a coredev to review LP: #1986611 for K, when you have some time?
[12:32] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1986611 in sosreport (Ubuntu Jammy) "[sru] sos upstream 4.4" [Medium, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1986611
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.14-1ubuntu1 => 2.4.18-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[12:48] <rs2009> thank you vorlon, sil2100 and rbasak for voting on our proposal :)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[13:01] <sil2100> Okay, marking Kubuntu as good as well, since I see all tests are passed
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[13:06] <sil2100> Anyway, since I see sufficient testing for all, I'll now start the release o/
[13:07] <sil2100> THanks everyone for the swift testing!
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.4 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-json-jwt [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.13.0-1ubuntu0.1]
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boxbackup [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.13~~git20200326.g8e8b63c-1ubuntu2.20.04.1]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lighttpd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.4.66-1ubuntu1]
[13:49] <mparillo> Will you be able to post the URL of the release announcement?
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.4-4ubuntu3.17 => 245.4-4ubuntu3.18] (core, i386-whitelist)
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.5] has been disabled
[14:00] <sil2100> Okay, time for the reelease
[14:01] <sil2100> mparillo: sure, but I usually send that thing last. I'll send it here once it's done o/
[14:02] <mparillo> TY.
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, pandoc restore please?
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10-cross-ports (jammy-proposed/universe) [19ubuntu1.1 => 19ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [19ubuntu1.1]
[14:54] <sil2100> We are now released!
[14:54] <sil2100> (well, mirrors still syncing)
[14:55] <sil2100> waveform: hey! Can you update the raspi installer JSON for .5?
[14:55] <sil2100> bdmurray: can you take care of updating the meta-release files?
[14:55] <waveform> sil2100, on it
[14:56] <bdmurray> sil2100: I'll do it after waveform's MP
[14:56] <sil2100> \o/
[14:56] <sil2100> Thanks!
[15:01] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: what do you mean by restore?
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-10-cross to i386-whitelist in jammy
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-10-cross-ports to i386-whitelist in jammy
[15:02] <vorlon> rs2009: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live gets updated automatically every 5 minutes
[15:02] <rs2009> vorlon: oh noice
[15:20] <vorlon> xnox: have you seen my request for a sourceful upload of linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency to drop the obsolete binaries from -proposed?
[15:21] <icey[m]> hey sil2100 : wanted to circle back around on what next steps are for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1967139 ?
[15:21] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1967139 in python-cheroot (Ubuntu Jammy) "unable to enable ceph-mgr dashboard module" [High, Fix Committed]
[15:22] <sil2100> icey[m]: hey! One moment, let me look
[15:30] <icey[m]> sil2100: thanks! NO super rush but it would be nice to get it done :)
[15:30] <sil2100> aciba: hey! Quick question about the debian/*.postinst of "fix_1978422_redact_sensitive_logs_on_invalid_userdata_schema()"
[15:31] <sil2100> aciba: could you give me an overview what is the purpose of this postinst? Is it to basically remove sensitive info from existing logs?
[15:33] <sil2100> (in the cloud-init SRU)
[15:35] <falcojr> sil2100: (aciba is at end of day), yes, it is to remove sensitive info from the logs. It is part of a hotfix that has already been released
[15:36] <vorlon> xnox: incidentally, if I just remove the binaries from -proposed, they'll grow back when britney copies the package to the release pocket :P
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (jammy-proposed/main) [17.2.0-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 17.2.0-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (ubuntu-server)
[15:37] <waveform> bdmurray, think I've managed to propose the rpi-imager changes to the right place; https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/meta-release/ubuntu/+merge/429306
[15:37] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I have removed pandoc from -proposed, it's blocking netplan.io so I'll copy it back again once netplan.io has a change to build.  Any other packages that were dep-wait?
[15:40] <bdmurray> waveform: that looks correct to me, thanks!
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.13-2ubuntu0.5 => 2.0.29-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:27] <vorlon> ginggs, schopin: wrt busco being arch: all, we don't require arch: all packages to actually be installable across archs for migration
[16:28] <vorlon> I believe in the current configuration we check for installability only an amd64
[16:31] <ginggs> i think debian are now checking on amd64 and arm64, previously it was amd64 and i386
[16:32] <vorlon> yeah, I don't see us switching to check on arm64; it would cost us a lot of time picking apart the uninstallables and there's no reason for us to preference arm64 over ppc64el and s390x (and contractual reasons not to ;)
[16:34] <vorlon> slyon, LocutusOfBorg: netplan.io built successfully on armhf, and pandoc copied back to -proposed
[16:34] <vorlon> I can always rip it out again if we need to
[16:44] <slyon> vorlon: yay! Thanks a lot
[17:07] <vorlon> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-gtk/3.0.38-1/+build/23849534 <table flip>
[17:11] <vorlon> and did not happen in Debian
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isa-support [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [13] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isa-support [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [13] (no packageset)
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isa-support [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [13]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isa-support [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [13]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]
[18:09] <teward[m]> any not-busy SRU members able to get something past unapproved and into -proposed for testing of the SRU?  universe, torbrowser-launcher has been broken since Jammy, Kinetic has a fix in it, just needs the Jammy SRU to go through.
[18:10] <teward[m]> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/1963286 if you'd be so kind :)
[18:10] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1963286 in torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] torbrowser-launcher crashed with   move(self, int, int) in main(): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float'" [Medium, Confirmed]
[18:10] <teward[m]> (this affects me which is the only reason I'm poking)
=== sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 22.04.1 Jammy Jellyfish, 20.04.5 Focal Fossa | Archive: kinetic open | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Kinetic Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or whiskey | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-unity-settings (kinetic-proposed/primary) [22.10-1]
[18:38] <guiverc[m]> sil2100: focal.5 ML ETA?
[18:39] <sil2100> guiverc[m]: sent it out, but needs moderation!
[18:39] <guiverc[m]> ack & thanks
[18:43] <bdmurray> will moderate
[18:49] <guiverc[m]> thanks bdmurray
[19:04] <sil2100> Thank you!
[19:05] <sil2100> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2022-September/000283.html
[19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[19:28] <kanashiro[m]> if anyone from the release team could take a look at this FFe bug would be appreciated: LP #1988474
[19:28] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1988474 in ruby-daemons (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sycn version 1.4.1-1 from Debian unstable" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988474
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[20:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted torbrowser-launcher [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.3-6ubuntu1.22.04.1]
[20:52] <kanashiro[m]> ubuntu-archive: a removal request (also submitted to Debian) to unblock ruby-rack migration: LP #1988478
[20:52] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1988478 in ruby-rack-mount (Ubuntu) "[RM] Abandoned upstream and blocking ruby-rack migration" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988478
[21:21] <bdmurray> vorlon: Could you fully phased casper for focal given it was on the install media?
[21:30] <vorlon> bdmurray: done
[21:48] <teward> for whoever accepted torbrowser-launcher into jammy-proposed, thank you kindly!
=== handsome_feng_ is now known as handsome_feng
=== mapreri_ is now known as mapreri
=== madhens_ is now known as madhens
=== Wimpy_ is now known as Wimpy
=== haggertk_ is now known as haggertk
=== Guest8328 is now known as krytarik
=== bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray
[22:57] <bdmurray> vorlon: Can I get a +1 on an early release of tzdata?
[23:05] <bdmurray> or RAOF ^
[23:07] <rbasak> bdmurray: +1 in principle, if verification looks good
[23:08] <rbasak> But can't you issue a +1 yourself? :)
[23:08] <bdmurray> Given that it's less than 7 days I thought having a second approval would be good.
[23:09] <rbasak> Sure
[23:09] <rbasak> I had thought that we'd agreed an early release could be approved by any SRU team member on pretty weak grounds.
[23:09] <rbasak> tzdata seems like an obvious candidate to me; hence my +1
[23:10] <bdmurray> Okay, if that's what we'd agreed on!