[03:04] <vorlon> rbasak: are you taking care of the revdeps of pypy-six that need fixed due to its removal? (python-packaging)
[03:38] <rs2009> vorlon: would be great if you could take a look at the upload queue (ubuntu-unity-backgrounds)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-1.18 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~22.04]
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [s390x] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core)
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [armhf] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core)
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [arm64] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core)
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core)
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5]
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [i386] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [s390x] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [armhf] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [arm64] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:29] <rbasak> vorlon: pypy-six/python-packaging> sorry I'm not sure what you're referring to. LInk please?
[10:22] <bluesabre> Are kinetic daily builds turned off, or is there a bug with Xubuntu? We haven't had a build since 8/29.
[10:23] <bluesabre> https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/current/
[10:26] <RikMills> bluesabre: apparently new systemd broke DNS in the build containers
[10:27] <bluesabre> RikMills: Oh, that's exciting. Thanks for the info. :)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php8.1 (jammy-proposed/main) [8.1.2-1ubuntu2.4 => 8.1.2-1ubuntu2.5] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pipewire [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.48-1ubuntu2]
[13:01] <rbasak> sil2100_: ^ FYI I accepted this following discussion with seb128
[13:03] <sil2100> rbasak: ACK
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (focal-proposed) [245.4-4ubuntu3.18]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [i386] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5]
[13:15] <ginggs> rbasak: six 1.16.0-4 dropped the pypy-six binary, which is a build dependency of python-packaging
[13:16] <ginggs> can be seen on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html
[13:30] <rbasak> ginggs, vorlon: thanks. Seems like a bit of a rabbit hole. Isn't this just a regular +1 maint task? I did sync six, but this issue is unrelated and would have happened anyway had six not had a delta.
[13:37] <RikMills> how often does the update phasing page update?
[13:46] <ginggs> rbasak: isn't +1 mainly for universe packages?  anyway, i pinged someone about python-packaging
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gzip (jammy-proposed/main) [1.10-4ubuntu4 => 1.10-4ubuntu4.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[13:47] <rbasak> ginggs: I don't think there's a distinction: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam
[14:44] <rs2009> would be great if someone could take a look and approve the ubuntu-unity-backgrounds package in the Jammy upload queue
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (focal-proposed/main) [1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.5 => 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.6] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:07] <sil2100> rs2009: looking o/
[16:07] <rs2009> sil2100: thanks :)
[16:08] <sil2100> rs2009: hmm, jammy? I don't see it in neither Unapproved or New, i.e. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[16:09] <rs2009> sil2100: oops, meant kinetic :facepalm:
[16:10] <rs2009> (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=)
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.07+dfsg-1ubuntu3] (core)
[16:20] <sil2100> rs2009: ah, okay, so it's a new NEW package. My 'shift' for archive admin stuff is on Wednesday, so I'll try to get to it then o/ (I'm on my SRU shift right now)
[16:21] <rs2009> sil2100: ah thanks :)
[16:51] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, hello, I don't like/ask movements too often, so please forgive me if this is not the case, but can we move casparcg-server to universe from multiverse?
[16:51] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019122
[16:51] <LocutusOfBorg> they removed the non-free dependencies
[16:54] <arraybolt3[m]> LocutusOfBorg: I *think* you mean from multiverse to universe?
[16:57] <paride> sil2100, reading of your archive admin shift :) We (qa team) would like to upload a New package: auto-upgrade-testing, which is meant to run upgrade tests of different Ubuntu releases
[16:58] <paride> sil2100, it used to be in the archive in the past, but was RMd as it ended up being unmaintained
[16:58] <paride> but now it's maintained again
[16:58] <paride> sil2100, is it OK if I upload it to kinetic?
[17:21] <ginggs> rbasak, vorlon: there'll be a fix for python-packaging in debian in ~1week which can sync, see deferred upload mentioned in debian bug #1016775
[18:01] <vorlon> rbasak: you synced a package that included changes governed by feature freeze, so I don't think it's merely a +1 maintenance task
[18:18] <rbasak> vorlon: I synced it well before feature freeze.
[18:23] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Happy Labor Day. Any luck on the networking issues causing Lubuntu dailies to fail?
[18:30] <seb128> tsimonq2, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/1988772
[18:32] <tsimonq2> muchas gracias
[18:49] <vorlon> rbasak: ah then I read the publishing history wrong
[18:52] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: casparcg-server: is this being moved in Debian?
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (kinetic-proposed/primary) [22.10-0ubuntu1]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-unity-backgrounds [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10-0ubuntu1]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-unity-backgrounds [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10-0ubuntu1]
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:28] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I guess it will be, but no bug yet