[03:04] rbasak: are you taking care of the revdeps of pypy-six that need fixed due to its removal? (python-packaging) [03:38] vorlon: would be great if you could take a look at the upload queue (ubuntu-unity-backgrounds) === arraybolt3__ is now known as arraybolt3 [06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset) [06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset) [06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset) [06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset) [07:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-1.18 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~22.04] [07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset) [07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3] [07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3] [07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3] [07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3] [07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-charts [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3] [07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-charts [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset) [08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] [08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core) [08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core) [08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [s390x] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core) [08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [armhf] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core) [08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [arm64] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core) [08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.3-1~22.04.1] (core) [08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [i386] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [s390x] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [armhf] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [arm64] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:29] vorlon: pypy-six/python-packaging> sorry I'm not sure what you're referring to. LInk please? [10:22] Are kinetic daily builds turned off, or is there a bug with Xubuntu? We haven't had a build since 8/29. [10:23] https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/current/ [10:26] bluesabre: apparently new systemd broke DNS in the build containers [10:27] RikMills: Oh, that's exciting. Thanks for the info. :) === juergh_ is now known as juergh [11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) [12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php8.1 (jammy-proposed/main) [8.1.2-1ubuntu2.4 => 8.1.2-1ubuntu2.5] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pipewire [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.48-1ubuntu2] [13:01] sil2100_: ^ FYI I accepted this following discussion with seb128 [13:03] rbasak: ACK [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (focal-proposed) [245.4-4ubuntu3.18] [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted systemd [i386] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5] [13:15] rbasak: six 1.16.0-4 dropped the pypy-six binary, which is a build dependency of python-packaging [13:16] can be seen on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html [13:30] ginggs, vorlon: thanks. Seems like a bit of a rabbit hole. Isn't this just a regular +1 maint task? I did sync six, but this issue is unrelated and would have happened anyway had six not had a delta. [13:37] how often does the update phasing page update? === woky_ is now known as woky [13:46] rbasak: isn't +1 mainly for universe packages? anyway, i pinged someone about python-packaging [13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gzip (jammy-proposed/main) [1.10-4ubuntu4 => 1.10-4ubuntu4.1] (core, i386-whitelist) [13:47] ginggs: I don't think there's a distinction: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam [14:44] would be great if someone could take a look and approve the ubuntu-unity-backgrounds package in the Jammy upload queue [15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (focal-proposed/main) [1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.5 => 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.6] (core, i386-whitelist) [16:07] rs2009: looking o/ [16:07] sil2100: thanks :) [16:08] rs2009: hmm, jammy? I don't see it in neither Unapproved or New, i.e. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= [16:09] sil2100: oops, meant kinetic :facepalm: [16:10] (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=) [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.07+dfsg-1ubuntu3] (core) [16:20] rs2009: ah, okay, so it's a new NEW package. My 'shift' for archive admin stuff is on Wednesday, so I'll try to get to it then o/ (I'm on my SRU shift right now) [16:21] sil2100: ah thanks :) [16:51] vorlon, hello, I don't like/ask movements too often, so please forgive me if this is not the case, but can we move casparcg-server to universe from multiverse? [16:51] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019122 [16:51] Debian bug 1019122 in casparcg-server "casparcg-server: Move to main as the dependency on non-free fdk-aac is gone?" [Normal, Open] [16:51] they removed the non-free dependencies [16:54] LocutusOfBorg: I *think* you mean from multiverse to universe? [16:57] sil2100, reading of your archive admin shift :) We (qa team) would like to upload a New package: auto-upgrade-testing, which is meant to run upgrade tests of different Ubuntu releases [16:58] sil2100, it used to be in the archive in the past, but was RMd as it ended up being unmaintained [16:58] but now it's maintained again [16:58] sil2100, is it OK if I upload it to kinetic? [17:21] rbasak, vorlon: there'll be a fix for python-packaging in debian in ~1week which can sync, see deferred upload mentioned in debian bug #1016775 [17:21] Debian bug 1016775 in src:python-packaging "python-packaging: please drop pypy-packaging to support python2.7 removal" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1016775 [18:01] rbasak: you synced a package that included changes governed by feature freeze, so I don't think it's merely a +1 maintenance task [18:18] vorlon: I synced it well before feature freeze. [18:23] vorlon: Happy Labor Day. Any luck on the networking issues causing Lubuntu dailies to fail? [18:30] tsimonq2, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/1988772 [18:30] Launchpad bug 1988772 in live-build (Ubuntu) "kinetic livefs builds are failing on dns errors" [Undecided, New] [18:32] muchas gracias [18:49] rbasak: ah then I read the publishing history wrong [18:52] LocutusOfBorg: casparcg-server: is this being moved in Debian? [19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (kinetic-proposed/primary) [22.10-0ubuntu1] [19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-unity-backgrounds [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10-0ubuntu1] [19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-unity-backgrounds [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10-0ubuntu1] [20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [20:28] vorlon, I guess it will be, but no bug yet