[00:00] leftyfb: I've a lot of machines to patch [00:02] ksplice is not free, so use our livepatch. [00:07] pycurious: Technically, you *can* livepatch kernels yourself, but that puts the task of maintaining your own kernel squarely into your own hands. Preparing the patches for insertion into a running system looks something like this: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel_live_patching You end up building your own bits of the kernel yourself, and inserting them in. Unless you know the Linux kernel like the back of your hand, I wouldn't try [00:07] it - it could end so very poorly (security and stability wise). There's a reason Canonical charges for the service if you intend to use it commercially, and it's not because it's an easy service to provide. [00:08] arraybolt3: thanks [00:09] pycurious: If you can just work in reboots into your workflow, you're golden. And if you really need livepatch, the pricing info is here: https://ubuntu.com/advantage [00:11] pycurious: Glad to be able to help! [00:11] arraybolt..sounds like some people are making money off many computers without wanting to pay back some of their profits to support the computers [00:11] arraybolt...you might tell the profit seekers you get what you pay for [00:15] the qt license says if people use their code to make money then they have to pay qt money in return [00:15] !ot | BayouBilly [00:15] BayouBilly: #ubuntu is the Ubuntu support channel, for all Ubuntu-related support questions. Please register with NickServ (see /msg ubottu !register) and use #ubuntu-offtopic for other topics (though our !guidelines apply there too). Thanks! [00:18] so the ubuntu pricing info for livepatch is not out of line and consistent with qt [00:20] for private use, at no charge for up to 3 machines (desktop, server, virtual machines, or cloud instances) [00:20] oerheks yes 3 machines was stated but some people are in it for money and were talking about lots of machines [00:21] Offtopic, please. [00:22] eickmeyer ok i will mention the issue in #ubuntu-offtopic [00:23] BayouBilly: Thanks. Please note your presence here is not to be Ubuntu's police. [00:23] pycurious join #ubuntu-offtopic [00:24] Eickmeyer ok i am not police i spent many of the last 20 years in and out of prisons and jail cells so i don't qualify to be police [00:26] Eickmeyer but i do try to pay attention to the license agreements of author's and distributors as it is important to the community [00:26] BayouBilly: But that's not the topic here, nor is any argument. Please do not discuss that here. [00:26] BayouBilly, all you did is rumble about payment. please stop. [00:27] oerheks ok i am in ubuntu-offtopic to discuss the issue with pycurious [01:03] is there a recommendation from ubuntu for this failing service? https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/3037 [01:03] Issue 3037 in fwupd/fwupd "systemd changes have caused fwupd-refresh.service to start to fail" [Closed] [01:07] hey, I am trying deadsnakes to install python3.5 in ubuntu, https://launchpad.net/~deadsnakes/+archive/ubuntu/ppa, but can't find python3.5 [01:08] !ppa | RealKiller [01:08] RealKiller: A Personal Package Archive (PPA) can provide alternate software not normally available in the offical Ubuntu repositories - Looking for a PPA? See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas - WARNING: PPAs are unsupported third-party packages, and you use them at your own risk. See also !addppa and !ppa-purge [01:08] RealKiller: did you apt update? [01:09] RealKiller: what version of ubuntu? [01:09] yea, I did, update [01:09] ubuntu 22.04 [01:10] I get this https://pastebin.com/AbeG5xWm [01:10] RealKiller: why do you think you need python3.5 over python3.10 that is available in ubuntu 22.04? [01:10] (installed by default) [01:10] so for some legacy stuff [01:11] run a vm with bionic and 4.6, do not wreck your system [01:11] RealKiller: type aptitude search python | grep -i 3.5 [01:11] err finger mismatch, 3.5 [01:11] RealKiller: are you sure 3.10 won't work for your needs? [01:13] https://pastebin.com/aN3LHyMa [01:14] there is no 3.5 in the repos, nor that ppa for your version. [01:14] RealKiller: python3.5 was released 7 years ago. It's not available on modern OS's [01:14] RealKiller: you are probably better off updating whatever python script you have to work with modern python [01:15] RealKiller: did you add the ppa? sudo add-apt-repository ppa:deadsnakes/ppa [01:16] deego: 3.5 isn't available for 22.04 [01:16] deego: https://launchpad.net/~deadsnakes/+archive/ubuntu/ppa please read [01:17] ah, i was confusing 20.04 with 22.04 there :) [01:18] the only valid way is to create an ancient bionic vm, which comes with python3.6 .. [01:57] hi all ! [01:58] i asked before but i wiped my memory notes [01:58] how can i see a log of what my pc was up to the last days/weeks? [02:01] !journalctl | VIA [02:01] VIA: journalctl is a command for viewing logs collected by systemd-journald. E.g. "journalctl -f" reports system messages as they are logged until you press Ctrl+C. See the journalctl !man page for other options. [02:04] how can i dump it into a file ? [02:07] journalctl !man doesnt do stuffs [02:07] journalctl --since "00:00" --no-pager 2>&1 | tee file [02:08] esv: where will it be saved for meto access? [02:10] it will be dumped into a file called file on your current working directory [02:12] i dont know what m< "working directory" is i just open a new console [02:12] so should i find it in root\usr ? [02:12] trying to learn linux ? [02:13] ye as you can see im not a unix master [02:16] if thers a way to save a backlog of anything possible id would be nice to know [02:18] Linux in general is mostly experienced in the command line mode, this looks like a very basic introduction to it: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/an-introduction-to-linux-basics [02:18] then: https://archive.ph/xDb8o [02:19] now, why are you interested in the journalctl logs? [02:19] im overburdened by so many things im just asking for one specific thing .. and/or of thats even possible [02:20] thx for nothing esv [02:20] sure, np. [02:25] ._. [02:32] VIA: I think the main suggestion before was atop. [02:51] Just to confirm [02:51] did ubuntu 20.04 change the Elementary xfce icon theme to a brown shade? [02:51] I was wondering what was feeling odd about the 20 machine compared to the 18 one and then I realized its the brown icon theme [02:51] I copied the 18 theme to 20 to get back the blue === Guest7625 is now known as synapt [04:33] pikapika, why not look at the changelog; https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/e/elementary-xfce/elementary-xfce_0.15-1/changelog though it generally only shows applying upsteam newer version changes [04:33] hi all, plz help me, i am very newbie into linux , i needed to install SRILM on ubuntu, i followed the instructions at https://hovinh.github.io/blog/2016-04-22-install-srilm-ubuntu/ but when i reached to this instruction "sudo make NO_TCL=1 MACHINE_TYPE=i686-m64 World" i got this error ==>>> make: /usr/share/srilm: Permission denied make: *** /usr/share/srilm: Is a directory. Stop. [04:41] ibn-batot, very old i686 project.. https://pyzone.dev/install-srilm-on-ubuntu/ [04:41] maybe that url is any help [04:43] and this manual gives a docker example ' docker run -it ntudsp2020autumn/srilm ' https://speech.ee.ntu.edu.tw/DSP2021Autumn/hw3/dsp_hw3.pdf [04:44] i never used this, myself [04:44] oerheks i am very newbie into linux, so handling installation error is impossible for me [04:45] oerheks can we chat in /msg ? [04:45] no, only here please [04:46] i am afraid i cannot help with that build, look at docker? [04:46] someone provided a working example [04:47] docker ? i have no idea what docker is [04:47] well [04:48] ibn-batot: what version of ubuntu are you trying to install it onto? [04:48] samy1028c i just downloaded it yesterday from ubunto.com and i think it is 20.04.4 [04:48] i dunno how to check the version [04:49] but i just installed it on vmware under win 10 [04:49] so, the docs on their website are from 2016, or approximately Ubuntu 11/12/14(?) timeframe. That's a bit old and lots of things may have changed. [04:50] Here's a very recent item (this year) for SRILM? https://pyzone.dev/install-srilm-on-ubuntu/ [04:50] Have no idea, never even heard of it before but just found this via a google search of: srilm install ubuntu [04:51] samy1028c the site u mentioned has the same steps as in https://hovinh.github.io/blog/2016-04-22-install-srilm-ubuntu/ [04:51] plz give it a look [04:51] i just stopped at this step "sudo make NO_TCL=1 MACHINE_TYPE=i686-m64 World" [04:52] and i am inside this folder "h@hu:/usr/share/srilm$ " [04:55] to know exactly which version you of ubuntu type: lsb_release -d [04:55] I would start over from scratch. Delete /usr/share/srilm [04:55] Description: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS [04:55] (I'm assuming you have the file in your home directory [04:56] then start the install process again by recreating the directory, and follow the steps once more [04:56] see if it does the same thing. [04:59] well, how to completely remove directry ? i clicked right button on the srilm and i did not find delete or remove option [05:02] how did you create the directory? Are you trying to do this via the UI or the command line? [05:03] samy1028c i wrote rm -rf srilm from the share [05:03] and it gave me permission error [05:03] yeah, that's the problem, it seems you were root or sudo when you created the folder initially. Do you remember how you created the folder? [05:03] rm: cannot remove 'srilm': Permission denied [05:04] Now, to delete it, use: sudo rm -rf srilm [05:04] ok [05:05] okay, I see in the instructions it does say to use sudo to do everything. [05:05] so, now that it's deleted, start over by recreating the file, copying where you need to, etc. [05:06] should i use the root account ? [05:07] the instructions state to use sudo, so use that for now [05:08] okay [05:10] i will follow the older version fo srilm 1.7.1 [05:11] why not 1.7.3? [05:11] cuz it does not exist :) [05:12] and 1.7.2 made some problem in the first trial [05:12] so i will follow exacty what the instructions say [05:12] anyone experienced this error with the nvidia repo ? https://termbin.com/ce6v [05:13] 1.7.3 does exist, I just downloaded it from http://www.speech.sri.com/projects/srilm/download.html [05:14] ibn-batot: the problem is 1.7.1 is 8 years old. There is lots of stuff that's changed system-wise since then. At least a few people have made 1.7.3 work on a modern Ubuntu distro. [05:16] well the size of 1.7.3 for me is zero bytes [05:16] on contrary to 1.7.1 [05:16] i am using IDM to get it [05:16] hmm. yeah, didn't check, just saw it created and downloaded a file. [05:16] yup, it's 0 bytes. odd. [05:16] so it does not exsist as i told u [05:17] gebbione: I see others having the same issue: https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/issues/1632 [05:17] Issue 1632 in NVIDIA/nvidia-docker "GPG error 'public key is not available' in Ubuntu 20.04 CUDA 11.4.0 image while building" [Open] [05:17] https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/invalid-public-key-for-cuda-apt-repository/212901/27 [05:18] thank you, i ll try that [05:19] ibn-batot: are you running desktop or server image of 22.04.01? [05:19] desktop [05:20] samy1028c i got it from https://github.com/BitSpeech/SRILM/archive/refs/tags/1.7.3.zip [05:21] but the IDM told me the name changed to srlim 1.7.3 === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [05:21] i am getting it [05:22] samy1028c, that key fails too [05:22] gpg: WARNING: unable to fetch URI https://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/repos/ubuntu2004/x86_64/3bf863cc.pub [05:22] i wonder what the name of the pub key is [05:23] gebbione: no idea - I just posted links relating to the issue that others had already solved. I don't have an Nvidia CUDA device myself. [05:34] ibn-batot: I'm spinning up a 22.04 desktop to give it a try to since I'm curious now also. [05:37] great :D [05:37] the download speed is very low [05:38] i had to redownload it [05:39] i got SRILM-1.7.3.zip === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia [06:01] Any application that constantly monitor fine grain precision of cpu computation? like cores and threads usage [06:26] "Desktop" not appearing in the upper left in Nautilus, with Home, Documents, Downloads, Pictures. How can I fix that? [06:31] `nautilus -c` just sits and never returns. [06:36] `xdg-user-dir DESKTOP` returns the correct directory. === o is now known as niko [06:55] I've had this issue since update 20.04 -> 22.04 [07:33] hows it going [07:33] whos online [07:41] Hello guys, I need help with some script I cannot seem to run successfully [07:41] https://www.tenable.com/audits/items/CIS_Oracle_Linux_8_Workstation_L1_v1.0.1.audit:509744e6c9257f7fa546a5b45845a43d [07:41] 👋 [07:41] this script to be exact [07:42] Guest80: You're trying to run this on Ubuntu? [07:42] rhel [07:43] Guest80: Ah. Sadly, we in #ubuntu don't know how to work with RHEL. [07:43] alright [07:43] ty tho [07:43] If you're using true RHEL, you should have support bundled with your subscription. [07:43] If you're using AlmaLinux or something, then you might see if they have any community support options. [07:43] developer version [07:44] it is actually scripts of hardening, similar ones exist for ubuntu [07:45] so is there no react channel on libera.chat ? [07:49] MaNa2k: #reactjs maybe? [07:51] Guest80: Hey, there's a Libera.Chat channel, #rhel, where you might find people who know more about your question. === mickey77 is now known as mickey7 === diskin_ is now known as diskin [09:06] after trying upgrading from 20.04 to 22 i am stuck with error https://askubuntu.com/questions/41930/kernel-panic-not-syncing-vfs-unable-to-mount-root-fs-on-unknown-block0-0 and i cannot boot another kernel because grub will not show up if i press SHIFT or ESC. Any suggestions on how to fix this? [09:08] i tried changing grub config from a live CD and using chroot but adding a different timeout and menu config still does not show grub menu [09:08] nothing specific gebbione but maybe using boot repair after booting a live cd could help? [09:08] how do i try this? [09:09] do i google it? === diskin_ is now known as diskin [09:11] i can see a page about it [09:11] will it be able to repair a boot on another disk from the live usb ? [09:13] yes look for ubuntu boot-repair on the forum, it should fix your issue. [09:13] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Boot-Repair [09:36] Morning [09:39] welcome MonoL [09:55] Is a 6700XT a navi card? [09:55] RT6700 XT [09:56] Yes [09:58] ok so i m trying boot-repair but also it gets stuck [09:59] i tried to run update-initramfs but i get this error https://termbin.com/mdfr [09:59] any suggestions or details i can share to see what solution is out there? [10:01] reiserfs ? [10:02] you won' t find much support for that. [10:02] and if you use reiserfs, you should tell so? [10:07] No one knows how I can get Desktop listed back in my Nautilus Panel (not bookmarks)? `xdg-user-dir DESKTOP` returns correctly. This has been failing since 20->22 upgrade. [10:08] looks like 22 upgrade causes too many troubles [10:08] my system is stuck since [10:08] Diagon, remove ~/.config/nautilus and start nautilus again? [10:08] I could try that ... [10:09] oerkeks - wait, all i find in there is a file named "search-metadata", which is 2 lines. [10:10] I don't think removing that is going to help ... [10:12] basicly the 1st place to look for a reset. i have just 2 lines too. [10:25] I spent all of yesterday trying to get stable diffusion working on this machine and I think it won't work now because the rocm AMD modules only support navi 21 cards and I think I've got a navi 22 [10:26] I'm proud of what I managed to do yesterday but to plow so much time into something and have nothing to show is gash [10:26] indeed, MonoL https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-6700-xt.c3695 [10:30] Shame but I think I'm just gonna have to wait till AMD add support for the 22 [10:30] Really wanted to play with that [10:34] Maybe there's some online service I can find that will offer me the same unrestricted image licences in the mean time [10:44] Hi all. Is there a way to set MAILTO for cron globally? That is, not in /etc/crontab, not in /etc/cron.d/* or anything similar. I've tried /etc/default/cron: deprecated. I've tried systemctl edit cron.service: no juice. What now? [11:03] Hi [11:04] I am trying to use noveau driver. but no driver is in use still when I do lspci -k [11:14] Has anyone had issues using live-build to make a jammy ISO? [11:54] Hey there. Is there anybody in here with experience in helping blind people to customize and work with Ubuntu? [11:55] Elliria. Ubuntu uses the Gnome desktop environment. https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html [11:55] Gnome comes built in with adjustments to help disabled or impaired users. [11:56] almost identical https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/a11y.html.en [11:57] There's someone in the ubuntu-users mailing list who could use some help with that and I'm hoping to find that someone in here. [11:57] What kind of help? [11:57] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2022-September/308357.html [11:58] Elliria, https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility ... [11:58] point them there [11:58] hah ... you are littlegirl ? 🙂 [11:58] He is having an issue with Firefox not being accessible from Orca. This seems to have been fixed, but perhaps his version of Ubuntu doesn't offer the fix yet. [11:59] It's a CB handle that was given to me years ago because of my size rather than my age. [11:59] 🙂 [11:59] I offered some help with that in that thread. [12:00] it might be a snap issue though, not sure how well things like orca work with the FF snap [12:00] He also has pretty much given up on trying to use Braille TTY for the moment because the instructions he found are for Red Hat. I'm not finding myself capable of helping with that and am hoping one of you might. [12:00] You don't have to use snaps with ubuntu. You can remove snapd, but the default firefox and chromium debs won't work anymore because they're just installers for the snap version. You'll have flatpak as an option. [12:00] It's a Snap issue and I already gave him information and links about the Snap issue in the next message in that thread I linked above. [12:00] right, i see that [12:01] He then also has an issue with two Orca or Oracle processes running when only one should be, but that part is unclear. [12:01] And finally, he has an unspecified question about using Ubuntu under Parallels in Mac. [12:02] i'm not sure we do have any a11y specialists in here ... but that snapd bug you linked was supposed to be fixed in snapd 2.55 [12:02] (in late feb, early march) [12:02] Yep, and that's available in Focal and Jammy. [12:03] well, snapd is a snap ... the deb version does not matter [12:03] I'm not a specialist either, but am hoping to get any of you who would be willing to join in and offer some help. [12:03] (it is only to put some rules in place but not actually used at runtime) [12:04] Elliria, well, his chances on the ubuntu-accessibility list are probably better ... there are other blind people on it that might be able to help better [12:04] Ah, very cool. I'll check into that. Thank you! [12:32] Heya ogra, when do-release-upgrade hangs at "Waiting for automatic snapd restart" for the firefox snap upgrade, is there any way to gently restart it without killing the process and failing the upgrade? [12:33] alkisg, no idea, snapd and snap packages are completely separate and one has nothing to do with the other usually ... i doubt the snapd restart is in any way firefox related at all [12:34] The main issue could be some race condition that involves bad internet connections; but a workaround would be nice to have [12:34] anything in your logs ? [12:35] Uploading the ps tree for starters; but the connection is in the range of kbps, moment... [12:35] https://termbin.com/7tih [12:35] That's after `apt full-upgrade; reboot; update-manager gui update`, so it's in a clean state [12:36] sudo killall firefox && sudo snap refresh [12:37] oerheks: firefox isn't running [12:37] alkisg, looking at /var/lib/dpkg/inf👋firefox.preinst there should be a lot info printed somewhere (dpkg.log ? apt log ?) [12:38] tsk ... silly emoji plugin [12:38] Heh. The connection is so bad that I wonder if it's still downloading firefox, after 2 hours... [12:39] Or the opposite, if that issue also slows down the connection... [12:39] it should whine about bad conectivity according to the code i see in preinst [12:40] are you running with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive ? [12:40] Nothing in syslog, trying the other files... [12:40] Whatever update-manager uses, I started it from the menu [12:41] that should be fine (not noninteractive) [12:41] 2022-09-06 12:43:58 status unpacked firefox:amd64 104.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 [12:41] 2022-09-06 12:43:58 status half-installed firefox:amd64 104.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 [12:41] That's from dpkg.log, and it's 3 hours ago [12:42] yeah, thast just standard dpkg stuff [12:42] i wonder where all the echos go from the preinst ... [12:42] Hi all [12:44] alkisg, that is from your old install, pre-upgrade it seems 1:1snap1-0ubuntu2 is the deb version in jammy [12:45] and FF has a pre-depends snapd ... [12:45] so the deb install would not start unless snapd is readily available [12:45] this is why these echos do not show up [12:46] Maybe the race condition is when snapd gets installed as a deb in preinst, but didn't have enough time yet to get started as a daemon? [12:46] *in pre-depends [12:47] nah, you want the deb ... but the deb should then install the snapd snap [12:47] and your ps output shows the snapd snap in use [12:48] (last line in pstree) [12:48] And it does, but it hangs at that exact point [12:48] does "snap list" return properly ? [12:49] (should give a list of installed snaps= [12:49] ) [12:50] I tried `snap refresh` that oerheks suggested; it said: error change finished in status "Hold" with no error message [12:50] Two minutes later, the hang is no more. The Internet is again fast, and the installation continues normally [12:51] nice [12:51] have fun! [12:51] "snap changes" and "snap change " should be able to give some more detail [12:51] Thanks oerheks :) [12:52] A quick wget now says 252KB/s; nope, even with such a low speed, it shouldn't need 3 hours to download firefox.snap... [12:52] (this is snapd's way of logging) [12:52] Testing the snap commands... [12:53] https://termbin.com/eshi , the last line says "refreshing all snaps, no change" (although I used LANG=C...) [12:54] So it took 2 hours to initialize snap, and 1 hour to install firefox... [12:55] (the funny thing is that after the installation finishes, we're just installing the firefox.deb from the ppa and uninstalling snap, so it's all in vain... :/) [12:56] OK let's see what happens with the next schools, if `snap refresh` works around the issue [12:56] Thank you both :) [12:58] alkisg, well, "snap change 4" ... should have a lot ore info [12:59] *more [12:59] (and you want LC_ALL=C ... not LANG= ) [13:00] ogra: Status Spawn Ready Summary, just the headers line, nothing more [13:01] wow, thats a bug i guess ... it should tell you why it is on hold and stuff [13:01] Maybe the upgrader put snap updates on hold? [13:01] nah [13:01] hi folks, anyone can suggest what to try or add to this post to fix an upgrade? https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2478833&p=14111208#post14111208 [13:02] could be a connectivity issue though ... "snap debug connectivity" ... might tell [13:03] ogra: LC_ALL=C LANGUAGE=C LANG=C snap changes stills hows Greek. Checking the connectivity... [13:03] * PASS [13:03] heh [13:04] yeah, thats fine then ... [13:04] still wird why it puts the task on hold ... [13:04] *weird [13:24] I have to turn off DyanamicUser for fwupd-refresh.service to get it not to error out and crash. Is this a security problem? And how can I check if Ubuntu has an actual bug on this? [13:24] whoever wrote that unit file it is really locked down [13:29] hays: can you see the full output in your journal logs of what happens with fwupd? === EriC^ is now known as Guest1933 [13:38] hays, "ubuntu-bug fwupd" ... it will check on launchpad if similar bugs already exist and point you to them ... if there isnt one, it will let you open a new one [13:44] lotuspsychje: there is surprisingly little in the logs... people debugging it online have had to insert straces into the unit to get anything. [13:44] ubuntu-bug fwupd [13:46] !ubuntu-bug fwupd [13:52] well i found this [13:52] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1969976 [13:52] Launchpad bug 1969976 in fwupd (Ubuntu Focal) "DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with services that need dbus-daemon" [Undecided, Confirmed] [14:02] how do I search jammy-proposed? apt-cache search fwupd/jammy-proposed doesn't do it === Alastor226276 is now known as Alastor2262 [14:11] hays: apt search jammy? [14:18] hello there [14:27] Hi, [14:28] hi [14:28] I am trying to use nouveau driver. but from the output I see that it is loaded with nvidiafb and no driver is in use. https://pastebin.com/43Aszmtv [14:28] so I can not connect to external screens and it is really annoying. [14:38] hello [14:40] gebbione, sounds a bad issue [14:41] hays, if you have it listed in your sources, then `apt search` should find it. [14:41] if you ever see one of those "there are additional versions" thing, thats probably why [14:42] enigma9o7[m]: thanks. found it [14:53] I'm shopping for a wireless network adapter, I want to make sure its going to be compatible a long time with the future versions of the linux kernel and LUBUNTU.. htere's the specs: Windows 11 Plug-n-Play, Windows 7/8/8.1/10/11, Mac OS 10.7~10.15, Linux 2.6.24~5.11 (Fedora & Ubuntu)Windows 11 Plug-n-Play, Windows 7/8/8.1/10/11, Mac OS 10.7~10.15, [14:53] Linux 2.6.24~5.11 (Fedora & Ubuntu) [14:53] it says until 5.11 [14:53] what happens after? [14:54] cnnx: whats the brand/chipset? [14:55] Brand EDiMAX chipset not mentionned in amazon decription [14:56] cnnx: that sounds like realtek based [14:56] which is no longer supportede natively [14:57] need to mod it in [14:57] right [14:57] cnnx: i would avoid realtek chipsets when possible, but thats only 1 opinion [14:58] whats the better chipsets [14:58] for lubuntu [14:58] i know they use up alot fo energy [14:59] its for a robogt application [14:59] *robot [14:59] cnnx: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WifiDocs/WirelessCardsSupported === keypushe- is now known as keypusher [15:01] lotus|NUC quite a bit of selection there, thanks [15:02] cnnx: intel wifi chipsets are pretty solid on ubuntu too, but we cant much generalize statements [15:10] Hey all. I am having trouble with the Firefox snap due to what seems like policy decisions around updates. There's a popup that is extremely persistent notifying that an update is available. This seems to pop up once an hour, which when you work on your system full time becomes extremely aggravating. It reminds you that you have 13 days left to update. [15:11] Having 100+ tabs open and working in them it's frustrating to have to close firefox on snap maintainer's schedule to update. But even if I do... there's likely a new update the next day or later that day.. and it comes back again. [15:11] What can be done to disable this behaviour? [15:11] I tried removing the snap and going to a flatpak but it has issues with video stutter so it's not really a workable option. [15:12] do your best to ignore it, or find another browser. [15:12] This has been going on for over a month and it's at the point where I'm wondering if I need to install from binaries and not have any easy update path at all. Or even switch distros to get away from the snap. [15:12] Thoughts? [15:12] I got exceptionally annoyed when it kept prompting me for an update, when there was no update [15:12] How can you ignore a popup that's on your system __all__ the time? [15:13] imbezol, to disable the auto update, you can download the snap manually (snap download) and then snap install or figure out hw accel on flatpak (or go the ppa way) (or tar.gz from mozilla) [15:13] I have a hard time comprehending the decision to make it behave like this. [15:16] murmel: ok, i've removed it, and done a download and install. i hope you're right that this will disable auto updates. [15:16] to update it i'd have to manually download and install again? [15:16] imbezol, it thinks it's a locally installed snap, so it doesn't connect it to the store version [15:16] yes [15:16] i see it doesn't show anything in the Tracking column for it now [15:16] thank you === funhouse_ is now known as funhouse [15:28] on 18.04LTS minimal image: The following packages have unmet dependencies: [15:28] systemd : Depends: libsystemd0 (= 237-3ubuntu10.53) but 237-3ubuntu10.54 is to be installed [15:28] Recommends: libpam-systemd but it is not going to be installed [15:28] Recommends: networkd-dispatcher but it is not going to be installed [15:28] E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. [15:28] Error: error building at STEP "RUN apt update && apt -y install tzdata systemd wget curl git gawk rsync nano sudo cron logrotate software-properties-common" [15:29] rajkosto, what are you trying to do? (it helps if you give us all the lines (incl command) and use a pastebin service) [15:29] !paste [15:29] For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use https://dpaste.com | To post !screenshots use https://imgur.com | !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. [15:30] https://dpaste.com/6GH2XWVNB the command is in the last line, running on minimal ubuntu 18.04LTS image, this has worked for 4 years now, broke recently [15:31] what image are you talking about exactly? [15:32] rajkosto, you have probably -proposed repo enabled [15:32] rajkosto, checkyou /etc/apt7sources.list [15:33] FROM docker.io/ubuntu:bionic [15:33] make sure to apt update, as I think they are pushing 54 right now [15:33] apt-get update is in a previous line [15:34] ah k [15:34] is it just mismatched online atm [15:34] overlooked it :( [15:34] dont have docker installed. the official minimal lxc image works just fine [15:35] https://pastebin.com/qY2PY9CN here's the lines of the Dockerfile until they fail [15:35] rajkosto, 18.04 has 53 not 54 ; paste your sources.listand we can have a look [15:36] how ? its a dockerfile [15:36] ioria, the servers have already 54 [15:38] !info libsystemd0 bionic [15:38] 'bionic' is not a valid release [15:38] i still see -53 [15:38] check apt policy on that libsystemd0 [15:39] ioria, https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/13090 [15:39] Pull 13090 in docker-library/official-images "Update Ubuntu 2022-09-02" [Open] [15:40] rajkosto, apt-cache policy libsystemd0 [15:41] ravage, nice find [15:42] ok so i just wait for them to fix then [15:42]