/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/09/07/#ubuntu-release.txt

LocutusOfBorglibghc-gitit-dev/amd64 has unsatisfiable dependency05:34
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, ^^ rebuilt gitit05:34
vorlonbecause of the abi instability I suppose05:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: loguru (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1 => 0.6.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)07:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mypy (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.942-1 => 0.942-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)07:05
RAOFIf anyone felt like a quick FFe review, the Mir one should be pretty simple: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/+bug/198870207:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1988702 in mir (Ubuntu) "FFe: Upstream 2.9.0 release" [Undecided, New]07:59
RAOF:)08:01
RAOFThis GNOME MRE script is coming along nicely.08:05
RAOF😃08:05
seb128RAOF, great!08:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtksourceview5 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1] (ubuntu-desktop)09:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtksourceview5 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1] (ubuntu-desktop)09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtksourceview5 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1] (ubuntu-desktop)09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtksourceview5 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1] (ubuntu-desktop)09:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtksourceview5 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1] (ubuntu-desktop)09:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: fonts-yas (kinetic-proposed/primary) [4.0-0ubuntu1]09:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gtksourceview5 [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1] (ubuntu-desktop)10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gtksourceview5 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gtksourceview5 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gtksourceview5 [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gtksourceview5 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gtksourceview5 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gtksourceview5 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [5.5.1-2~fakesync1]10:13
waveformpart of the reason u-boot is currently stuck in proposed is because the version (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/2022.07+dfsg-1ubuntu3) introduces a new binary pkg, u-boot-microchip, to support a RISC-V board -- would I be right in assuming an AA needs to ack that new package?10:37
ginggswaveform: yes, it waits here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/+queue10:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.34-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.38-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)11:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.34-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.38-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)11:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.34-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 6.1.38-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.22.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)11:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.34-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 6.1.38-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] (no packageset)11:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.34-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.38-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)11:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.34-1 => 6.1.38-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] (no packageset)11:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.34-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.38-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms)11:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.34-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 6.1.38-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.22.04.1] (kernel-dkms)11:32
waveformginggs, thanks! If any AA wants to take a look at u-boot-microchip in the new queue, I'd be happy to answer any questions (should be a fairly simple one; it's "yet another" u-boot binary pkg in support of a new board -- LP: #1987505 is the related bug)12:45
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1987505 in u-boot (Ubuntu) "Package U-Boot for PolarFire SoC Icicle Kit" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198750512:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jansson (jammy-proposed/main) [2.13.1-1.1build3 => 2.14-2~22.04.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)13:42
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, sil2100  I would *really* appreciate virtualbox SRU review/accept for jammy/focal13:51
LocutusOfBorgthe current version is broken by kernel in security pocket13:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [2022.07+dfsg-1ubuntu3]13:52
LocutusOfBorgis this the ghc migration run?14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sptag [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20220729.a192a17+ds-2] (no packageset)14:01
ginggswaveform: somebody did it ^^^14:06
waveformginggs, thanks -- I think that was sil_2100 :)14:06
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, seb128 LP: #1988230 is now holding the whole ghc migration14:11
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1988230 in glib2.0 (Ubuntu) "glib 2.73 breaks modemmanager" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198823014:11
LocutusOfBorgshouldn't we just remove the blocking tag since new modemmanager is available?14:11
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: the new modemmanager is in kinetic-proposed, not kinetic yet. We're working on it14:11
LocutusOfBorgotherwise we can revert to old glib2.0, let ghc migrate, and restore?14:12
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: could you wait maybe one more day? if people depend on modemmanager for internet, it's not nice to break it14:13
LocutusOfBorgremoving/restoring shouldn't affect end users, or not?14:13
jbichayou would need to rebuild your ghc stuff against an old glib. Or you could just wait a day14:15
LocutusOfBorgoh... I wound't know that14:15
LocutusOfBorgbut is the mir getting also sorted out?14:15
jbichaSeb is going to revert the universe dependency because the MIR got stuck14:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (jammy-proposed/main) [1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)14:16
LocutusOfBorgoh ok makes sense thanks14:22
jbichasorry for the delay, glib ended up being more disruptive than we originally thought but the good news is that it's no longer using the old pcre314:25
=== popey6 is now known as popey
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, this is why we have devel releases, to check/build/test :)14:27
LocutusOfBorgand that pcre2/pcre3 story is really a sad story, too difficult to do the porting14:28
LocutusOfBorgsame for ffmpeg 514:28
LocutusOfBorgfor ettercap I did the pcre2 move recently, hopefully bugs are now fixed14:28
LocutusOfBorgwhile for ffmpeg 5 I still can't make hedgewars build with it14:29
LocutusOfBorg:/14:29
seb128LocutusOfBorg, jbicha, technically glib still has known regressions around regexp handling which Marco is working on fixing upstream so letting it that version migrate isn't going to be ideal14:52
seb128but maybe it's ok and better than holding the ghc transition...14:52
LocutusOfBorgI see Marco is working right now on upstream branch (and pushing)14:56
LocutusOfBorgso maybe if we fix modemmanager to avoid universe dependency and we upload patches... we can go?14:57
seb128LocutusOfBorg, could be, but it means another upload and queue of autopkgtests triggers14:57
Trevinhoper se glib changes are good to go for MM, as for gtksourceview i think we uploaded another version not-using gregex, even if not ideal isn't the best14:57
seb128Trevinho, those components have been handled so it's not the issue, more than until your branch lands there are known regressions in glib which could impact on other components15:01
vorlonseb128: I do want to get the ghc transition done and cleared off my list; can you make a call right now to whether it's better to let glib2.0 in with the potential regressions, or to temporarily pull it out of -proposed and rebuild the haskell revdeps against old glib?15:59
vorloni.e. if you can't give me a green light right now to unblock LP: #1988230 then it's better to temporarily pull it from -proposed so I can trigger rebuilds during my workday and get ghc through16:00
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1988230 in glib2.0 (Ubuntu) "glib 2.73 breaks modemmanager" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198823016:00
rs2009any progress on fixing systemd-resolved's postinst when installing in a chroot? (to fix the livecd builds)16:40
bdmurrayrs2009: There is a new version of systemd in -proposed and it is currently waiting on some autopkgtests16:59
LocutusOfBorgbdmurray, sadly systemd autopkgtests shows broken machine17:09
LocutusOfBorgNo UUID given. Instance won't be deleted!17:10
LocutusOfBorgUnexpected error:17:10
LocutusOfBorgmeh17:10
bdmurrayLocutusOfBorg: I'm talking to enr0n about that in #ubuntu-devel17:12
jbichavorlon: we'll drop the blocker tag today as soon as modemmanager migrates; should be soonish now that it no longer needs the universe dep17:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sptag [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0~git20220729.a192a17+ds-2]17:52
cjwatsonOh yeah, that systemd-resolved fix looks pretty plausible to me17:52
seb128vorlon, what Jeremy said, let's unblock glib, we covered the known issues and we can do a follow up bugfix upload tomorrow18:01
vorlonjbicha, seb128: cheers18:18
sergiodjhello, can someone take a look at this FFe for sssd, please?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/198861518:33
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1988615 in sssd (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Merge sssd 2.7.3-2 from Debian unstable" [Undecided, New]18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-sahel [source] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.0-0ubuntu1]18:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fonts-sahel [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: llvm-toolchain-15 (kinetic-proposed/primary) [1:15.0.0-1~exp1]19:29
vorlonsergiodj: I see you've identified a change in sssd that's useful to have, but what about other changes that are less important to us and introduce risk?20:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-podman (jammy-backports/universe) [51-1~bpo22.04.1 => 53-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)20:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (jammy-backports) [53-1~bpo22.04.1]20:30
sergiodjvorlon: the other upstream changes are really minor and don't introduce any new features, as far as I have investigated.  I can update the FFe bug to detail them if that's preferred.  the debian changes are also minor and the most controversial one has been reverted20:31
vorlonsergiodj: yes, please detail on the bug (and note that you consider them minor)20:59
vorlonrs2009: oh hey look https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-unity/daily-live/current/20:59
sergiodjvorlon: will do, thanks.20:59
vorlonrs2009: note that this is "oversized" because we do not have a size limit declared for Ubuntu Unity images so it uses the default of "CD sized"; feel free to let me know what you think the limit should be (increments of 100MB only)21:00
vorlonjbicha: are there going to be breaks: declared from libglib2.0-0 to the old modemmanager?21:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-yas [source] (kinetic-proposed) [4.0-0ubuntu1]21:15
sergiodjvorlon: bug updated.21:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fonts-yas [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)21:16
jbichaTrevinho: ^ breaks21:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-sahel [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.0-0ubuntu1]21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-yas [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.0-0ubuntu1]21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted roger-router [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [2.4.2-3]21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: roger-router [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [2.4.2-3] (no packageset)21:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: roger-router [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [2.4.2-3] (no packageset)21:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: roger-router [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [2.4.2-3] (no packageset)21:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: roger-router [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [2.4.2-3] (no packageset)21:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: roger-router [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [2.4.2-3] (no packageset)21:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted roger-router [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.4.2-3]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted roger-router [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.4.2-3]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted roger-router [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.4.2-3]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted roger-router [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.4.2-3]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted roger-router [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.4.2-3]21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: roger-router [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.4.2-3] (no packageset)21:52
bdmurrayvorlon: what is being held up in -proposed?22:20
vorlonbdmurray: modemmanager, e.g.22:20
bdmurrayvorlon: it looks like it is running now22:22
vorlonbdmurray: thanks22:22
bdmurrayoh, sorry its network-manager triggered by modemmanager22:22
vorlonyeah22:23
vorlonI've retriggered the fwupd test22:23
bdmurrayhello passed for me22:23
bdmurrayhttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-kinetic/kinetic/amd64/h/hello/20220907_212119_895ea@/log.gz22:24
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: do you happen to have any idea why various haskell packages are still blocked in -proposed as 'has unsatisfiable dependency'? (Rather rude of britney to say this without saying what dependency it thinks is unsatisfialble, since apt seems perfectly happy)23:08
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: ah I think it's an issue of ghc having migrated but having missed a publication run, making everything momentarily unhappy23:11
bdmurrayI'm gonna run `retry-autopkgtest-regressions --only-unknown`23:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!