| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| === Scotty_Trees2 is now known as Scotty_Trees | ||
| === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung | ||
| rs2009 | "wasn't sure how to create tasks for the Ubuntu Unity seeds (for example, ubuntu-unity-live^). do you have any suggestions?" | 04:00 |
|---|---|---|
| rs2009 | ^ vorlon | 04:00 |
| jbicha | rs2009: tasks are done in the tasksel package. There was a proposal to remove tasksel completely but that hasn't happened yet | 11:58 |
| rs2009 | jbicha: ah, so do I need to create an MP for this in the tasksel repo? | 12:00 |
| jbicha | rs2009: there isn't a repo (except for git-ubuntu). You can open a Launchpad bug and attach a debdiff | 12:04 |
| rs2009 | jbicha: ah, I'll do that. thanks :) | 12:15 |
| jbicha | and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors so it shows up at https://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/index.html | 12:15 |
| rs2009 | jbicha: sure, I'll do that | 12:16 |
| rs2009 | jbicha: where should I add the task? I can't find any of the flavors' tasks (like kubuntu-desktop^) | 12:36 |
| rs2009 | jbicha: (the ubuntu-tasks folder doesn't seem to exist in the repo version) | 12:51 |
| ogra | as i told you in PM before, tasks are generated by germinate in conjunction with the upload of your flavours metapackage ... if you have a fully working seed and the first set of metapackages are in the archive, your task should appear automagically | 12:56 |
| ogra | (unless that changed since i last looked ... which is admittedly a few years now) | 12:56 |
| rs2009 | ogra: that's actually what we did and the task still wasn't created, and I noticed that Ubuntu Budgie and Ubuntu MATE had to update the tasksel package for adding their tasks: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntubudgie-dev/tasksel/ubuntu-budgie-tasksel-proposal.zesty | 12:58 |
| rs2009 | the tasksel repo maintained by cjwatson hasn't been updated in a really long time though, and the tasksel package doesn't contain any of the Ubuntu-specific tasks | 12:59 |
| ogra | right, i dont think tasksel has any meaning anymore since a while | 13:03 |
| ogra | apt-cache show ^ubuntu-budgie | 13:05 |
| ogra | it clearly has a task in jammy | 13:06 |
| ogra | apt-cache show ^ubuntu-unity as well ... | 13:07 |
| rs2009 | ogra: I checked the changelog and looks like the Ubuntu version of tasksel was simply replaced with the Debian package recently, so yeah, I guess tasksel isn't where new flavors are supposed to be added now | 13:07 |
| rs2009 | ogra: ah, looks like it got created a few hours ago :) was checking for the wrong package name :facepalm: | 13:09 |
| rs2009 | tysm, updating the germinate script does indeed seem to have helped | 13:09 |
| rs2009 | ogra: ubuntu-unity-live^ doesn't seem to exist though | 13:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity (kinetic-proposed/primary) [22.10] | 15:52 | |
| rs2009 | vorlon: would be great if you could take a look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/+queue?queue_state=0 (plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity and unity-indicator-appearance) | 15:55 |
| vorlon | RAOF: the fwupd SRU you accepted into -proposed includes packaging changes that break image builds; aside from protobuf-c not being in main in jammy (and it's unclear to me from the MIR bug that we should promote 1.3.3, there's mention of 1.4.1 fixing vulnerabilities?), it makes libfwupdplugin5 from the release pocket uninstallable, which by virtue of how tasks work prevents any images from building | 19:58 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | vorlon: FWIW, RAOF is on Matrix, and the Matrix bridge is very broken right now. I can relay the message if you'd like. | 20:17 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[l]: feel free; it's the weekend anyway and I've tagged one of the bugs verification-failed | 20:17 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | vorlon: Relayed. But yeah, weekend and all.. | 20:18 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | It's completely broken in this room. Some rooms the bridge is one-way, here it's nothing at all. | 20:19 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | s/room/channel to your heart's conent | 20:20 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | *content | 20:20 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[l]: btw I'm in and out today myself, but my reaction to your mail is that FFes should go in bug reports on packages (in this case ubuntustudio-meta), not to the mailing list | 20:21 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | vorlon: Fair, I just wanted to see what the general consensus would be on an entirely new package in Jammy would be. Should I do the FFe on ubuntustudio-meta now or can I wait until plasma-distro-release-notifier is accepted? | 20:22 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[l]: I think you should go ahead and file it | 20:22 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | vorlon: ack | 20:23 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | vorlon: FFe filed. | 20:35 |
| Eickmeyer[l] | bug 1989263 in case anybody is interested | 20:38 |
| ubottu | Bug 1989263 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[FFe] plasma-distro-release-notifier for Ubuntu Studio" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989263 | 20:38 |
| === Eickmeyer is now known as NotEickmeyer | ||
| === Eickmeyer[l] is now known as Eickmeyer | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!