| === arraybolt3_ is now known as arraybolt3 | ||
| RAOF_tmp | vorlon: Aaah. libfwupdplugin5 doesn't have any non-fwupd rdepends, but is explicitly seeded, which is why that SRU breaks image builds? | 03:00 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF_tmp | (Why is it explicitly seeded? I would have thought fwupd would be explicitly seeded, and then the relevant libfwupdplugin would get pulled in as a dependency?) | 03:01 |
| RAOF_tmp | FWIW, I thought https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protobuf-c/+bug/1956617/comments/24 made it pretty clear that the protobuf-c MIR is good to go in focal and jammy. | 03:02 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1956617 in OEM Priority Project "[MIR] protobuf-c" [High, In Progress] | 03:02 |
| amurray | RAOF_3: hey chris, could you please promote intel-microcode from -proposed to -updates for B/F/J for LP: #1984166 (as in previous security updates, I would like to release this first to -updates and wait for it to be fully phased and will then publish it to -security) - thanks | 04:11 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1984166 in intel-microcode (Ubuntu Jammy) "Update to latest upstream 20220809 to fix CVE-2022-21233" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1984166 | 04:11 |
| RAOF_3 | amurray: I would love to, but those SRUs haven't been verified yet? | 04:15 |
| amurray | gah apologies - will update the bug report with details | 04:16 |
| amurray | RAOF_3: ok I've updated the bug report - please let me know if you need any other details | 04:20 |
| vorlon | RAOF_3: not explicitly seeded, but germinate tags all dependent packages with the Task: field when it expands the seed, and the image building machinery installs by task which means all packages in the archive with that field get installed | 04:21 |
| vorlon | there is discussion about not using the tasks for image builds going forward, but that doesn't help us now | 04:22 |
| RAOF_3 | Nope, that looks good :) | 04:22 |
| RAOF_3 | vorlon: Ah, that makes more sense. | 04:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (jammy-proposed/main) [8.0.0-1ubuntu7.1 => 8.0.0-1ubuntu7.2] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 06:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (focal-proposed/main) [19.1.0-1 => 19.1.0-1ubuntu0.1] (desktop-core) | 08:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu [source] (focal-proposed) [19.1.0-1ubuntu0.1] | 08:16 | |
| fossfreedom | Hi all. Me being a numpty here ... budgie-extras on kinetic isn't migrating. For an unknown reason to me it's a i386 regression test (??) and it is failing on a systemd crash. I am not sure how to proceed to resolve. Help please :) https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-kinetic/kinetic/i386/b/budgie-extras/20220908_103557_276ee@/log.gz | 08:28 |
| juergh | sil2100, when you have some cycles, could you release linux-firmware in jammy -proposed? | 08:33 |
| RikMills | fossfreedom: I suspect that is related to the 'kernel hang around udev' that was mentioned as an ongoing issue with x86 test runners | 08:34 |
| RikMills | there are a couple of retries of the test pending in the queues, so hopefully that will pass on one of those | 08:36 |
| sil2100 | juergh: sure! Let me start with that. Wanted to do a pass on the -proposed pocket anyway | 08:36 |
| fossfreedom | RikMills: cheers for the info. Will monitor over the next few days. | 08:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mmdebstrap (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.8.4-1 => 0.8.4-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 09:05 | |
| RikMills | sil2100: could I perhaps get an ack on LP: #1989274 | 09:27 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1989274 in plasma-framework (Ubuntu) "[FFe] KDE frameworks 5.98.0 into Kinetic archive" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989274 | 09:27 |
| RikMills | we have done a frameworks FFe at this time for at least the last 6 releases I think | 09:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sudo (jammy-proposed/main) [1.9.9-1ubuntu2 => 1.9.9-1ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 09:35 | |
| juergh | sil2100, ta! | 09:37 |
| sil2100 | RikMills: let me just finish some plumbing business and get to it! | 09:45 |
| RikMills | ty :) | 09:45 |
| ricotz | hello :), it seeems to x86 autopkgtests are processed quite slowly? the queue doesn't look that large though | 10:33 |
| seb128 | ricotz, https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/09/09/%23ubuntu-release.html#t16:38 | 11:17 |
| ricotz | seb128, ah, I see :( -- "amd64 autopkgtests are hindered by a regression in the base image, there's a kernel hang around udev as yet unexplained" | 11:19 |
| seb128 | ricotz, unsure if that is reported and where though | 11:35 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: hey! I have a question re: the MIR for protobuf-c for jammy. I have found an MIR bug for this source package and I see it has been approved for kinetic, but is it possible to get it promoted for jammy? Or does the package version there need some adjustments first? | 12:24 |
| sil2100 | (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protobuf-c/+bug/1956617) | 12:24 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1956617 in OEM Priority Project "[MIR] protobuf-c" [High, In Progress] | 12:24 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: asking as recently we accepted the new fwupd SRU which now depends on libprotobuf-c1, which is still in universe for jammy | 12:25 |
| sil2100 | And this (possibly) causes all of our daily images to FTBFS | 12:25 |
| sil2100 | RikMills: done o/ | 12:29 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: it was reviewed on the level of jammy and everyone agreed that jammy is fine for a promotion of libprotobuf-c1, so yes it should be ok there | 12:30 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: IIRC it was even discussed for Focal, but I'm not sure about the state there without rechecking - do you need just J or J+F now? | 12:30 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: yes also valid for Focal if you already look at both | 12:31 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: thank you for the confirmation! :) | 12:32 |
| sil2100 | I'll promote the one in jammy and guess the one in focal-proposed then (since I see it's a version with some MIR related fixes) | 12:32 |
| cpaelzer | yeah we asked to carry back some of the improvments | 12:32 |
| cpaelzer | +e | 12:33 |
| RikMills | sil2100: thanks! | 12:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (jammy-proposed/restricted) [515.65.01-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 515.65.01-0ubuntu0.22.04.3] (i386-whitelist) | 12:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (focal-proposed/restricted) [515.65.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 515.65.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (i386-whitelist) | 12:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.9.0~0.20.04.7 => 1:0.9.0~0.20.04.8] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 12:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (jammy-proposed/main) [1:0.9.6.1 => 1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.1] (desktop-core) | 13:05 | |
| sil2100 | paride: hey! Finally reviewed/accepted the auto-upgrade-testing package o/ | 13:31 |
| sil2100 | Apologies for the wait, I got completely side-tracked last week | 13:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted auto-upgrade-testing [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3] | 13:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: auto-upgrade-testing [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3] (no packageset) | 13:33 | |
| paride | sil2100, no problem at all, thank you! | 13:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted auto-upgrade-testing [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3] | 13:46 | |
| rs2009 | hey sil2100, would be great if you could take a look at plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity and unity-indicator-appearance in the kinetic new queue | 13:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.5 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.6] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:58 | |
| sil2100 | rs2009: okay, checking | 14:03 |
| sil2100 | rs2009: which one should I look at first? Since I won't have time to review both today | 14:03 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | sil2100: plasma-distro-release-notifier is in source NEW and FFe is bug 1989263 | 14:14 |
| ubottu | Bug 1989263 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[FFe] plasma-distro-release-notifier for Ubuntu Studio" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989263 | 14:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.20201112-1~18.04.4] | 14:20 | |
| === Scotty_Trees2 is now known as Scotty_Trees | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.9.0-0ubuntu1] | 15:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crdts [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.0+dfsg-1] | 15:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxwidgets3.2 [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] | 15:24 | |
| bdmurray | FTR I've opened bug 1989258 and the kernel team (in separate communications) has suggested a workaround I'll try implementing today. | 15:35 |
| ubottu | Bug 1989258 in linux (Ubuntu) "multiple kernel oops regarding hung tasks delaying boot" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989258 | 15:35 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[m]: fyi CC0-1.0 is shipped in base files and you can include it by reference in debian/copyright instead of reproducing the full text (plasma-distro-release-notifier) | 15:36 |
| bdmurray | This is in regards to the amd64 / i386 backlog | 15:36 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[m]: wrong use of Vcs-Git in debian/control; you are pointing at an upstream repository that does not include packaging. This should always point to a VCS branch for the package | 15:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxwidgets3.2 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 15:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxwidgets3.2 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 15:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxwidgets3.2 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 15:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxwidgets3.2 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxwidgets3.2 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 15:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (jammy-proposed/main) [4.3-1ubuntu2 => 4.4-1ubuntu1.22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:41 | |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[m]: it appears you're depending on update-notifier-common and relying on this to pull in python3-update-manager indirectly (update-notifier-common -> update-manager-core -> python3-update-manager); I think you should have a direct dependency here in case package relationships change in the future | 15:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier [source] (kinetic-proposed) [20220521-0ubuntu1] | 15:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxwidgets3.2 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] | 15:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxwidgets3.2 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] | 15:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxwidgets3.2 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] | 15:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxwidgets3.2 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] | 15:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxwidgets3.2 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-2] | 15:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-distro-release-notifier [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [20220521-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-distro-release-notifier [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [20220521-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-distro-release-notifier [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [20220521-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-distro-release-notifier [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [20220521-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-distro-release-notifier [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [20220521-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:48 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | vorlon: So, should it depend directly on python3-update-manager, is that what you're suggesting in the future? | 15:58 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[m]: yes | 16:00 |
| vorlon | rather than assuming that a dependency on update-notifier-common will pull in python3-update-manager | 16:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unity-indicator-appearance [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.2] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.6] | 16:01 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | vorlon: Ok, sounds good. I can make that change in another upload. I didn't realize it needed only the python3 component. | 16:01 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[m]: I'm not saying you should drop the existing dependency - I don't know if it's needed or not - but there is a python script and it should depend on the packages providing the modules it imports | 16:02 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer[m]: also fyi: I: plasma-distro-release-notifier: hardening-no-bindnow [usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/kf5/kded/distroreleasenotifier.so] | 16:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unity-indicator-appearance [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.2] (no packageset) | 16:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [20220521-0ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [20220521-0ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [20220521-0ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [20220521-0ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | vorlon: Thanks for the clarification. And... interesting... I'll have to figure out 1) what that means, and 2) how to fix that. | 16:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [20220521-0ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| teward | isn't that provided by setting the hardening flags to +all in d/rules? | 16:04 |
| teward | coulda sworn it was | 16:04 |
| vorlon | should be yes | 16:04 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | d/rules is pretty much empty in this case. | 16:05 |
| teward | still sets up the environment proper. | 16:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unity-indicator-appearance [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.2] | 16:05 | |
| vorlon | export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=hardening=+all | 16:06 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | I can add that to d/rules along with the fix to d/control in a new upload. | 16:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-distro-release-notifier [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220521-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-distro-release-notifier [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [20220521-0ubuntu1] | 16:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-token-bucket (kinetic-proposed/primary) [0.1.0.1-12] | 16:09 | |
| rs2009 | vorlon: would be great if you could take a look at plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity in the NEW queue for kinetic | 16:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.6] | 16:25 | |
| vorlon | rs2009: yes, already have it downloaded and will get to it shortly | 16:38 |
| vorlon | rs2009: a bit inconsistent to state in debian/copyright that the software is distributed under GPLv2 or later, and to ship a copy of GPLv3 as LICENSE | 17:21 |
| vorlon | rs2009: also, you appear to have an unnecessary separate 'Files: debian/*' block in debian/copyright, given that it's the same copyright and license so is covered by the 'Files: *' block | 17:22 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: oops, didn't realize that :facepalm: I'll update the copyright file | 17:22 |
| vorlon | rs2009: why do you have a Replaces: line referencing a version of plymouth that's older than any supported Ubuntu release? | 17:22 |
| vorlon | (it's also probably wrong, I wouldn't expect this package to ship any files that plymouth used to ship) | 17:23 |
| vorlon | rs2009: debian/postrm should really be split between debian/prerm and debian/postrm; the alternatives should be removed before the package contents have been removed from disk. I guess you were following some other plymouth theme package as a reference - which one? | 17:25 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: ah, I actually didn't package this theme (muqtxdir from the Yaru team did). Guess I'll update the packaging and make all these changes | 17:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10] | 17:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [22.10] (no packageset) | 17:28 | |
| vorlon | rs2009: and in fact, lintian warns about this ;) W: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity: postrm-removes-alternative "update-alternatives --remove" [postrm:17] | 17:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plymouth-theme-ubuntu-unity [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10] | 17:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-token-bucket [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0.1-12] | 17:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-token-bucket [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0.1-12] (no packageset) | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-token-bucket [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0.1-12] (no packageset) | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-token-bucket [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0.1-12] (no packageset) | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-token-bucket [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0.1-12] (no packageset) | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-token-bucket [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0.1-12] | 18:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-token-bucket [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0.1-12] | 18:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-token-bucket [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0.1-12] | 18:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-token-bucket [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0.1-12] | 18:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-token-bucket [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0.1-12] (no packageset) | 18:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-token-bucket [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0.1-12] | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: vmware-nsx (kinetic-proposed/primary) [17.0.0+git2022091214.0253265f7-0ubuntu1] | 18:25 | |
| rs2009 | vorlon: was checking if the Ubuntu Unity tasks exist, and looks like the ^ubuntu-unity-live task doesn't exist, even though the others like ~ubuntu-unity-desktop do | 18:41 |
| rs2009 | do I need to do anything on my side to create the task? (the live seed does exist in the repo) | 18:43 |
| coreycb | ubuntu-archive: hi, please can you reject vmware-nsx from the new queue in kinetic? | 18:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected vmware-nsx [source] (kinetic-proposed) [17.0.0+git2022091214.0253265f7-0ubuntu1] | 18:45 | |
| apw | coreycb, ^ | 18:46 |
| coreycb | thank you apw | 18:47 |
| vorlon | rs2009: sorry, I don't immediately see anything that explains to me why the ubuntu-unity-live task isn't appearing in the archive | 19:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, roll back ghc? WDYT? | 20:15 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: I don't think I knew there was a ghc to roll back? | 20:16 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: anyway, I did say I don't think it's worth rebuilding the world to get fix armhf performance | 20:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep, this is why I asked to kick it out from proposed :) | 20:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'll commit on debian git | 20:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so on next debian sync we will have the performance boost | 20:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw ghc on armhf is not building anymore vorlon | 20:23 |
| vorlon | oh? | 20:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | simple no change rebuild | 20:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/24337009 | 20:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | goes sigkill from linker | 20:23 |
| vorlon | hngh | 20:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, this is also why I tried unregisterised builds | 20:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and they worked really nice | 20:24 |
| bdmurray | I've added a workaround to the amd64 autopkgtest instances now and the queue should start being processed more quickly | 22:08 |
| vorlon | \o/ | 22:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-copilot-theorem (kinetic-proposed/primary) [3.10-1] | 22:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-filtrable (kinetic-proposed/primary) [0.1.6.0-1] | 22:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-list (kinetic-proposed/primary) [0.6.1-1] | 22:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-snap-server (kinetic-proposed/primary) [1.1.2.0-2] | 22:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-rfc5051 (kinetic-proposed/primary) [0.2-1] | 22:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wireplumber [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.4.11-4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:02 | |
| === Scotty_Trees2 is now known as Scotty_Trees | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!