[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.44.4-0ubuntu1]
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.17]
[07:18] <rs2009> sil2100: would be great if you could merge this: https://code.launchpad.net/~rs2009/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/429863
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (jammy-backports/universe) [276-1~bpo22.04.1 => 276.1-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [276.1-1~bpo22.04.1]
[09:09] <ricotz> hello :), I noticed the jammy 20220906 daily-live iso ships with enabled -proposed. I am hoping this is not intentional?
[09:18] <sil2100> ricotz: hey! Daily images for stable series are always built with -proposed enabled
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireplumber [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.4.11-4]
[09:20]  * rs2009 pings sil2100 - "would be great if you could merge this: https://code.launchpad.net/~rs2009/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/429863"
[09:20] <sil2100> rs2009: eek! Yes yes, looking now, I'm only on IRC with one eye right now due to meeting
[09:21] <ricotz> sil2100, hi, I see, I guess I missed that in the past :\
[09:22] <rs2009> sil2100: ah sure :) also, would be great if you could update the ubuntu-unity-desktop package (I updated the seed just now). won't disturb you again ;)
[09:23] <sil2100> rs2009: ah, refreshing it? Sure o/
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lttng-modules [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.8-1ubuntu2~18.04.4]
[09:42] <sil2100> rs2009: meta updated and pushed to kinetic
[09:48] <rs2009> sil2100: ah thanks :) also, I made a few changes in the MP just now
[10:20] <RikMills> sil2100: hi, any chance of an ack on LP: #1989263
[10:20] <RikMills> thanks if you have time
[12:40] <rs2009> sil2100: could you also run the ISO build after merging the branch?
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nautilus-dropbox (kinetic-proposed/primary) [2019.02.14-1ubuntu2]
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:21] <sil2100> rs2009: ok, now reviewing, sorry for the wait o/
[13:23] <rs2009> sil2100: np and thanks o/
[13:26] <sil2100> rs2009: I might be a bit out of the loop here, what's the status on getting a live task for ubuntu-unity?
[13:27] <rs2009> sil2100: I did ask _vorlon_, and neither of us are aware of how to create one (even though the live seed does exist)
[13:30] <sil2100> hmm, since we generally probably want to stop using tasks, wonder if we can use a metapackage for the live parts as well hmmm
[13:30] <sil2100> But having another task for that would be needed anyway to get the meta generated. But just ranting here
[13:32] <rs2009> sil2100: I'm kinda confused. wouldn't getting rid of the task and using a metapackage result in the installed packages not being marked as auto-installed?
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sudo [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.9.9-1ubuntu2.1]
[13:41] <sil2100> rs2009: another quick one: memtest86+, I don't see this in the live task for let's say desktop
[13:41] <sil2100> (but maybe I missed that)
[13:43] <rs2009> sil2100: ah yes, didn't think it would be required in desktop, which is why I only added it to live. should I add it to desktop too?
[13:51] <sil2100> rs2009: actually, nvm, I now see it in other flavors as expected, wonder why I didn't see it earlier
[13:51] <rs2009> sil2100: ah
[13:52] <rs2009> we do have all of our packages in universe now, so should have a successful ISO build today
[13:53] <sil2100> \o/ I'll have to sponsor the livecd-rootfs changes before
[13:55] <rs2009> sil2100: ah, hope there aren't any issues with the changes?
[13:57] <sil2100> rs2009: it's fine, but is the inline comment still accurate? I'll add a comment explaining why we're not using tasks there but instead a list of live packages after merging
[13:58] <rs2009> sil2100: sure
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssh [source] (focal-proposed) [1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.6]
[14:26] <sil2100> rs2009: merged and sponsored o/
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ilmbase from i386-whitelist in kinetic
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libdazzle from i386-whitelist in kinetic
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed mozjs91 from i386-whitelist in kinetic
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added dh-cargo to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-10-cross to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-10-cross-ports to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[14:29] <Eickmeyer[m]> Release team! Any chance of an ack on LP: #1989263? We're pretty eager to get rolling on this both for Kubuntu and Ubuntu Studio. Please and thanks! :)
[14:37] <sil2100> On it! Sorry, I'm stuck in meetings and juggling a bit
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected exim4 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.90.1-1ubuntu1.10]
[14:38] <sil2100> Eickmeyer[m], RikMills: done o/
[14:39] <Eickmeyer[m]> sil2100: Thanks!
[14:40] <sil2100> That being said, please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta/+bug/1989263/comments/5
[14:41] <Eickmeyer[m]> sil2100: I tested it in a Focal VM pretty extensively and it worked exactly as one would expect. It already notifies users of the existence of 22.04.1.
[14:44] <RikMills> we can likely test in kinetic by making a fake metarelease file somewhere, and pointing the notifier to that
[14:45] <RikMills> so it thinks JJ exists
[14:45] <RikMills> test up to a point anyway
[14:46] <Eickmeyer[m]> RikMills: Well... that might require modifying the update-notifier code a little since it relies on that.
[14:47] <RikMills> the url is set in a config file somewhere
[14:49] <RikMills>  /etc/update-manager/meta-release
[14:49] <RikMills> but anyway, we can work that out
[14:50] <Eickmeyer[m]> RikMills: And by JJ I think you mean LL.
[14:51] <RikMills> indeed
[14:51]  * RikMills was going backwards!
[14:59] <sil2100> Would be awesome if we had such a test case planned out on the FFe bug!
[15:15] <sil2100> rs2009: hm, okay, someone did a direct push of livecd-rootfs without updating the vcs, so my dput got rejected (version conflict). He's looking into syncing that and then hopefully your change will be finally available in the archive
[15:27] <Eickmeyer[m]> sil2100: What's going to be even easier is the test case for the SRU bug when I write that one.
[15:27] <Eickmeyer[m]> Because, yes, both Jammy and Focal both need this.
[15:28] <Eickmeyer[m]> heh, I type redundantly apparently.
[15:34] <rs2009> sil2100: ah great
[15:36] <rs2009> sil2100, ah, I see, you've uploaded 2.778. thanks :)
[15:36] <ogra> evil cowboys  🙂
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nfs-utils [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:2.6.1-1ubuntu1.1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nfs-utils (jammy-proposed/main) [1:2.6.1-1ubuntu1 => 1:2.6.1-1ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (jammy-proposed/universe) [22.04.26 => 22.04.26.1] (ubuntustudio)
[19:55] <Eickmeyer[m]> SRU Team: Upload of ubuntustudio-default-settings for Jammy reverts a workaround for the previous kdesu bug.
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: plasma-distro-release-notifier (jammy-proposed/primary) [20220521-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: plasma-distro-release-notifier (focal-proposed/primary) [20220521-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[20:57] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: Looking at your comment in bug 1989494 - I don't recall if I mentioned this before but it should be possible to add an upgrade quirk to ubuntu-release-upgrader to prevent upgrades from Ubuntu Studio 20.04 to Ubuntu 22.04.
[20:59] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: I don't think that has ever been mentioned. Would that just be based on the install media?
[21:00] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: You could check that or if 'ubuntustudio-desktop' is installed.
[21:01] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: Probably safer for ubuntustudio-desktop.
[21:01] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: You can find all the quirks here https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-upgrader/tree/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeQuirks.py#n352
[21:05] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: I'm assuming we'd need a PR?
[21:06] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: I don't have the time to work on it but can review a MP and an SRU. You would not need to fix it in Kinetic as there is precedent for quirks not existing in the devel release.
[21:11] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: Not to mention in Kinetic we just uploaded a release upgrade notifier for Plasma.
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.06-2ubuntu10 => 2.06-2ubuntu11] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.06-2ubuntu10 => 2.06-2ubuntu11] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nfs-utils [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:2.6.1-1ubuntu1.1]