[14:59] <jawn-smith> o/
[14:59] <alexghiti> o/
[14:59] <ogayot> o/
[15:00] <ginggs> o/
[15:00] <bdrung> \o
[15:00] <dbungert> o/
[15:00] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:00] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:00:35 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:00] <waveform> o/
[15:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:00] <schopin> o/
[15:01] <jawn-smith> The weekly status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-15-september-2022/30552
[15:01] <jawn-smith> Let's take our usual time to read and ask questions
[15:01] <sil2100> o/
[15:02] <bdmurray> o/
[15:02] <schopin> Welcome adrien \o/
[15:02] <adrien>  \o
[15:03] <xypron> o/
[15:04]  * juliank is distracted by mattermost discussions
[15:06] <jawn-smith> Would any of the archive admins on the team be able to take a look at bug 1989597
[15:07] <sil2100> jawn-smith: hm, I might *try*, maybe I'll have a cycle
[15:07] <jawn-smith> if not no worries, I'll pester someone else
[15:08] <jawn-smith> Any other questions?
[15:09] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
[15:09] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:09] <jawn-smith> Two in this list
[15:10] <jawn-smith> bug 1988710
[15:10] <jawn-smith> schopin: last week we discussed that we would card this and you would work on it
[15:10] <jawn-smith> Looks like a card was created, so can we remove rls-kk-incoming from this?
[15:11] <schopin> I haven't had time to look at it. Has the card been added by us or server team?
[15:11] <schopin> s/card/tag/
[15:11] <bdmurray> The server team escalated it to us
[15:12] <jawn-smith> The tag was added by the QA team
[15:12] <bdmurray> The current issue they are facing was in the description but is now in comment #3
[15:12] <schopin> also, apparently my intuition was proven wrong as per comment #9 (last one)
[15:13] <jawn-smith> With our new bug process the correct thing to do is changing rls-kk-incoming to foundations-todo
[15:14] <jawn-smith> thanks bdmurray for editing the tags
[15:14] <jawn-smith> The other kk bug is one that we are waiting on d_oko, so let's skip for now
[15:14] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:14] <jawn-smith> Just one
[15:14] <jawn-smith> bug 1988398
[15:15] <jawn-smith> So let's card that and assign to adrien
[15:17] <jawn-smith> That's it for jj
[15:17] <jawn-smith> ff is empty
[15:17] <jawn-smith> Now we're going to do something new
[15:18] <jawn-smith> During bug triage shifts this week Brian and I have tagged some bugs with foundations-triage-discuss
[15:18] <jawn-smith> Here's a massive LP query
[15:18] <jawn-smith> #link
[15:18] <jawn-smith> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.searchtext=&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INVALID&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=EXPIRED&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=FIXRELEASED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Al
[15:18] <jawn-smith> ist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.tag=foundations-triage-discuss&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_n
[15:18] <jawn-smith> o_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on&orderby=-id&start=0
[15:19] <jawn-smith> bug 1988843
[15:23] <jawn-smith> we have tagged this foundations-todo
[15:23] <jawn-smith> The todo is to first document a workaround
[15:24] <jawn-smith> bug 1988299
[15:25] <jawn-smith> Oh I tagged this
[15:25] <jawn-smith> We upgraded the boot partition size in 22.04 because the kernel was getting bigger
[15:25] <jawn-smith> but people who installed before then and try to upgrade are having problems because their boot partition is too small
[15:26] <jawn-smith> The bug description talks about switching initrd compression methods
[15:26] <jawn-smith> So we need to agree on messaging to help people with this
[15:30] <schopin> There are two approaches possible, changing compression or using MODULES=dep to bundle fewer modules.
[15:31] <schopin> The latter approach could however result in an unbootable system, though.
[15:35] <jawn-smith> Okay we've tagged this foundations-todo
[15:35] <jawn-smith> bug 1981385
[15:35] <jawn-smith> reported by mwhudson
[15:35] <dbungert> yes, we want to SRU that I think
[15:35] <jawn-smith> So this needs an SRU to jammy
[15:36] <jawn-smith> I think we just wanted to discuss this to ensure that mwhudson takes a look at the SRU
[15:36] <bdmurray> Well tag it foundations-todo and open a Jammy task
[15:36] <jawn-smith> And since he reads the scrollback of this meeting I bet he'll look at it
[15:37] <jawn-smith> bug 1980494
[15:37] <jawn-smith> mclemenceau: you tagged this
[15:37] <jawn-smith> What would you like to discuss?
[15:40] <jawn-smith> (we discussed offline and bdmurray is commenting on the bug)
[15:40] <jawn-smith> bug 1842439
[15:41] <bdmurray> bdrung: Is the bug here in apport or gtk+3.0?
[15:42] <bdrung> It must be a bug in gtk+3.0, because it's C code crashing.
[15:42] <bdrung> Otherwise apport could catch it with a try-except clause.
[15:43] <jawn-smith> So do we think this is really a desktop issue?
[15:43] <bdrung> yes
[15:43] <jawn-smith> bdrung: can you poke them about it?
[15:43] <bdmurray> Have you contacted anybody on the desktop team?
[15:43] <bdrung> I poked the desktop team in the past for this bug, but nothing happened.
[15:45] <jawn-smith> bug 916494
[15:46] <bdmurray> Again I think we need to find out what ahasenack wanted
[15:46] <jawn-smith> Who will follow up with ahasenack then?
[15:47] <bdmurray> done
[15:47] <jawn-smith> Thanks
[15:47] <jawn-smith> That's it for those bugs
[15:47] <jawn-smith> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:48] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:48] <jawn-smith> only one!
[15:48] <jawn-smith> node-jquery
[15:48] <jawn-smith> who wants it?
[15:51] <jawn-smith> Since this merge was done post feature-freeze
[15:51] <jawn-smith> should we just remove this version?
[15:51] <bdmurray> +1
[15:52] <jawn-smith> Excellent, that's it for proposed migration
[15:53] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
[15:53] <juliank> I'm out tomorrow
[15:53] <jawn-smith> Any other PTO upcoming?
[15:55] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting
[15:55] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:55:22 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-09-15-15.00.moin.txt