| RAOF | Is the matrix bridge still on fire? | 06:13 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF_3 | Oooh, it seems not! Hurray! | 06:13 |
| amurray | hey ubuntu-release team - the security team is keen to get the latest apparmor-3.1.1 into kinetic - could you please take a look at LP: #1989309 ? thanks :) | 07:44 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1989309 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "[FFe] apparmor 3.1.1 upstream release" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989309 | 07:44 |
| sil2100 | amurray: looking o/ | 07:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected adsys [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2~20.04] | 07:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adsys (focal-proposed/main) [0.8~22.04 => 0.9.2~20.04] (no packageset) | 07:58 | |
| sil2100 | amurray: left a quick comment, if you could follow up that would be awesome | 07:59 |
| rs2009 | hey sil2100, would it be possible to run the Ubuntu Unity ISO build? | 08:01 |
| sil2100 | rs2009: how are things looking with the ubuntu-unity images btw.? | 08:08 |
| sil2100 | Suar | 08:08 |
| rs2009 | sil2100: we're almost ready for the beta release (all packages in universe, unity works perfectly fine). there was only one outstanding issue (gnome-shell being present), which should fixed in this build | 08:09 |
| sil2100 | Excellent. Build is running + I added unity to the crontab, should be building daily now | 08:10 |
| rs2009 | sil2100: ah thanks! :) | 08:10 |
| sil2100 | rbasak: hey! I'm still reviewing adsys for focal today, if anything o/ | 08:21 |
| rs2009 | jbicha: gnome-shell still seems to be pulled in (due to network-manager-gnome), even when it's blacklisted | 08:25 |
| rs2009 | sil2100: is the blacklist file still considered? (gnome-shell is getting pulled in because of network-manager, which recommends gnome-shell, policykit-1-gnome or polkit-1-auth-agent, so it shouldn't get pulled in even without a blacklist; however, it gets pulled in even when it's blacklisted) | 08:30 |
| RikMills | sil2100: LP: #1990311 says that the uim armhf binaries have been removed by steve last night, but https://bileto.ubuntu.com/log/4927/publish/1/ fails as it thinks it is still a FTBFS | 08:58 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1990311 in uim (Ubuntu) "Please remove uim binaries on armhf from kinetic" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990311 | 08:58 |
| RikMills | how do we solve that? | 08:58 |
| RikMills | cc mitya57 ^ | 08:59 |
| sil2100 | hmmm, tough pickle, let me think about that after the meetings | 09:00 |
| sil2100 | If not I'll just bin-copy it by hand | 09:00 |
| RikMills | sil2100: no problem. we could remove uim from the ticket and handle it manually I guess, but there must be a neater way | 09:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon (jammy-proposed/main) [1.9~22.04.1 => 1.9~22.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adsys [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2~20.04] | 09:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adsys [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.2~20.04] (no packageset) | 09:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adsys [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.2~20.04] (no packageset) | 10:01 | |
| sil2100 | rbasak: I'll also be looking at flash-kernel, as I had pings about that earlier | 10:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2~20.04] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aerwyna-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caesarea-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2~20.04] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cahya-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aethelberht-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.2~22.04] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.2~22.04] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.104ubuntu13] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cagatay-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-cagatay-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 11:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cagney-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-cagney-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 11:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cai-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-cai-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caia-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 12:32 | |
| sil2100 | rbasak: ...I'll also take a look at the u-a-d-d uploads, as some of those are in NEW | 12:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-caia-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 12:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.9~22.04.2] | 12:34 | |
| kanashiro[m] | release team: I have a FFe bug to sync ruby-tilt from Debian here: #1990389 . Could anyone please take a look ? | 12:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9~20.04.1] | 12:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9~20.04.1] | 12:53 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | sil2100, please NBS-proposed cleanup luajit/luajit2/luakit on ppc64el? | 13:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | that arch is broken. | 13:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | luajit on ppc64el is no-go, no matter if we try the jit or jit2 backend | 13:14 |
| rbasak | sil2100: thank you for syncing. I'm going to start my SRU shift now, so might touch anything. | 13:26 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 13:26 |
| tjaalton | I filed a FFE for mesa, bug 1990387 | 13:40 |
| ubottu | Bug 1990387 in mesa (Ubuntu) "FFE: Mesa 22.2.0" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990387 | 13:40 |
| jbicha | rbasak: could you take another look at bug 1969901 (for bionic)? | 13:41 |
| ubottu | Bug 1969901 in network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic) "network-manager fails to renew ipv6 address" [Low, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1969901 | 13:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.10~20.04.1] | 14:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:02 | |
| rs2009 | jbicha: gnome-shell is still getting pulled in because of network-manager-gnome (even with the blacklist) | 14:02 |
| jbicha | rs2009: yes, sorry. It's a hard problem to solve. It might not even be triggered by the line in the log that appears to pull in gnome-shell | 14:03 |
| jbicha | we were told that the blacklist probably wouldn't help much, but it was worth a try | 14:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:04 | |
| jbicha | one way forward is to try to add explicit alternate dependencies to the Ubuntu packages instead of relying on the alternate virtual dependency notification-daemon | 14:06 |
| jbicha | this issue was a headache for Ubuntu GNOME and Ubuntu Budgie years ago | 14:07 |
| sil2100 | kanashiro[m]: hey! Left a comment o/ | 14:18 |
| sil2100 | LocutusOfBorg: might not be able to make to it today | 14:18 |
| sil2100 | rbasak: ok, I'll handle the release of some python3.10 toolchain SRUs to -updates now if you don't mind | 14:20 |
| rbasak | sil2100: sure, thanks | 14:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [riscv64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:22 | |
| rbasak | jbicha: done, but sorry we found an issue on review. I've commented on the bug. | 14:22 |
| rbasak | It's a pretty scary patch :-/ | 14:23 |
| rbasak | (don't want to accidentally break networking for users!) | 14:23 |
| jbicha | thanks | 14:24 |
| Eickmeyer | ginggs: RE bug 1990320, obs-studio doesn't have a changelog in their source code, best I can do is attach their release announcement. As for the rest, since it's a debian sync, aiui, we typically rely on Debian to do the work there since they're the trusted source. | 14:30 |
| ubottu | Bug 1990320 in obs-studio (Ubuntu) "[FFe] [Sync] obs-studio 28.0.1" [High, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990320 | 14:30 |
| Eickmeyer | ginggs: And yes, I'm fully aware of when it's ready for sync, I'm capable of doing the sync. I'm watching this like a hawk. | 14:34 |
| ginggs | Eickmeyer: release announcement might sufficient. We'd like to see build and install logs on Ubuntu because we do have some subtle differences in toolchain, etc | 14:35 |
| Eickmeyer | ginggs: Then I'd have to figure out a way to sync to a PPA, but this has never, ever been a requirement for a sync FFe before. Is this a new requirement? | 14:37 |
| jbicha | Eickmeyer: backportpackage -s unstable -d kinetic -u ppa:jbicha/dev (for instance) | 14:39 |
| Eickmeyer | jbicha: Thanks. | 14:39 |
| ginggs | Eickmeyer: you could upload the debian version to a PPA with an ubuntu changelog entry 28.0.1+dfsg1-1~ppa1, or so | 14:40 |
| ginggs | a build log generated locally would be fine too, but I think PPA is easier (and can cover more architectures) | 14:40 |
| Eickmeyer | For me, local build log is last resort, I always build in PPA anymore. | 14:41 |
| Eickmeyer | Ensures a clean toolchain. | 14:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-backports/main) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.11 => 1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nfs-utils [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:2.6.1-1ubuntu1.1] | 14:48 | |
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: Do you have a spare cycle to look at SRU bug 1989611? It's a multi-step process. | 15:01 |
| ubottu | Bug 1989611 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] plasma-distro-release-notifier for Jammy, Focal" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989611 | 15:01 |
| rbasak | Eickmeyer: I don't see it in the queue. What do you need exactly? | 15:03 |
| Eickmeyer | Uhh... It should be in the queue for Jammy and Focal? | 15:04 |
| rbasak | What's the source package name? | 15:04 |
| Eickmeyer | plasma-distro-release-notifier | 15:05 |
| Eickmeyer | It's definitely in source NEW, and it's in the archive already for kinetic. | 15:05 |
| rbasak | Oh, OK. I can't process NEW, sorry. | 15:05 |
| rbasak | AAs needed | 15:05 |
| Eickmeyer | That's right. | 15:05 |
| * Eickmeyer facepalms | 15:05 | |
| Eickmeyer | Heh, I knew this would be tricky. | 15:06 |
| rbasak | Probably easiest to find a person with both AA and SRU hats | 15:07 |
| rbasak | ubuntu-archive: ^ | 15:07 |
| sil2100 | hm, I'm doing some slow NEW SRU queue reviews today | 15:08 |
| sil2100 | Will try to get it, but there's uh, quite a few things! | 15:08 |
| rbasak | Eickmeyer: sorry I couldn't help, but thanks again for continuing to drive this! It seems important for the flavours. | 15:09 |
| Eickmeyer | sil2100: No worries, just wanted to get some eyes on it. It's a pretty serious UX issue that was neglected for several years. | 15:09 |
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: Yep! It's very important. In fact, got a bug report against ubuntu-release-upgrader that got marked as a dupe of this bug just yesterday. It's affecting users in a major way. | 15:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (focal-proposed/universe) [2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.3 => 2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.4] (kernel-dkms) | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.2] (kernel-dkms) | 15:44 | |
| rs2009 | sil2100: would it be possible to add 'remove_package minimal.standard.live gnome-shell' for Ubuntu Unity? wasn't able to think of any other workaround to fix this issue, as germinate seems to be picking gnome-shell for a completely unknown reason (despite the ubuntu-unity-desktop metapackage not having any sort of recursive depends/recommends on | 15:50 |
| rs2009 | it) | 15:50 |
| rs2009 | also vorlon ^ | 16:54 |
| vorlon | rs2009, jbicha: blacklist in seeds is only ever useful for causing image builds to fail in the case of a blacklisted package being pulled in. it will never tell germinate which alternative to pull in instead; for that the only solution is to make sure your correct alternative is seen by germinate first | 17:47 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: the correct alternative is present in the seed, but is still not recognized by germinate (and we couldn't find anything else causing gnome-shell to be pulled in), which is why we attempted to blacklist the package despite being warned | 17:50 |
| rs2009 | is it possible to prioritize a package in the seed (to be seen before network-manager), as packages seem to be seen in alphabetical order? | 17:52 |
| vorlon | rs2009: that is the question. This part of germinate is a dark art to me. I'm going to have a look here | 17:55 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: yep, I couldn't find anything related to this anywhere, which is also one of the reasons why I reverted to 'remove_package minimal.standard.live gnome-shell' | 17:56 |
| vorlon | rs2009: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu-unity.kinetic/ onlly shows gnome-shell in the 'extra' seed which shouldn't affect tasks or image builds. Can you point me to what exactly you're seeing? | 17:57 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: it's in the ISO build logs: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/kinetic/ubuntu-unity/+build/374134/+files/buildlog_ubuntu_kinetic_amd64_ubuntu-unity_BUILDING.txt.gz | 17:58 |
| vorlon | ? Unknown package policykit-1-gnome for seed desktop on arch amd64 | 17:59 |
| vorlon | well that doesn't look right | 17:59 |
| vorlon | is something causing germinate here to ignore universe? | 17:59 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: yep, that's kinda confusing | 18:00 |
| vorlon | live-build/auto/config calls germinate before the per-flavor definition of COMPONENTS lol? | 18:01 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: oh lmao | 18:01 |
| vorlon | may or may not fix this issue but let me dig | 18:02 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: also, would be great if you could sync ubuntu-unity-desktop with the seeds | 18:07 |
| vorlon | I'm going to be afk here shortly for food, but I'll see if I can get to that today | 18:07 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: ah, that would be great. thanks :) | 18:08 |
| vorlon | so it was 07873ec5285348165fd9f494cd7e09d7b12f4481 that regressed us running germinate before COMPONENTS is defined. I'm not sure if that will fix this issue but I'm going to take a stab at it | 18:08 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: ack | 18:11 |
| rs2009 | thanks | 18:11 |
| kanashiro[m] | vorlon: could you take a quick look at #1990389 ? | 19:22 |
| vorlon | back again | 23:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.15] | 23:16 | |
| vorlon | jbicha: there are reverse-build-dependencies of node-unicode-14.0.0 | 23:16 |
| vorlon | (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html) | 23:17 |
| vorlon | jbicha: why is ubuntu-archive subscribed to LP: #1990202? | 23:21 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1990202 in swtpm (Ubuntu) "Merge swtpm from Debian unstable" [Wishlist, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990202 | 23:21 |
| vorlon | rs2009: uploaded ubuntu-unity-meta and launchpad rejected it with no explanation. Will try again | 23:30 |
| jbicha | the reverse build-depends are cleared now. I don't know why I subscribed that team. Removed. | 23:30 |
| jbicha | oh it's because I used requestsync to start the bug | 23:33 |
| vorlon | thanks | 23:33 |
| vorlon | Downloading http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/dists/kinetic/main restricted universe multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages.xz file ... | 23:36 |
| vorlon | no | 23:36 |
| vorlon | um germinate takes a comma separated list of components how did this ever work | 23:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!