[06:13] <RAOF> Is the matrix bridge still on fire?
[06:13] <RAOF_3> Oooh, it seems not! Hurray!
[07:44] <amurray> hey ubuntu-release team - the security team is keen to get the latest apparmor-3.1.1 into kinetic - could you please take a look at LP: #1989309 ? thanks :)
[07:55] <sil2100> amurray: looking o/
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected adsys [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2~20.04]
[07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adsys (focal-proposed/main) [0.8~22.04 => 0.9.2~20.04] (no packageset)
[07:59] <sil2100> amurray: left a quick comment, if you could follow up that would be awesome
[08:01] <rs2009> hey sil2100, would it be possible to run the Ubuntu Unity ISO build?
[08:08] <sil2100> rs2009: how are things looking with the ubuntu-unity images btw.?
[08:08] <sil2100> Suar
[08:09] <rs2009> sil2100: we're almost ready for the beta release (all packages in universe, unity works perfectly fine). there was only one outstanding issue (gnome-shell being present), which should fixed in this build
[08:10] <sil2100> Excellent. Build is running + I added unity to the crontab, should be building daily now
[08:10] <rs2009> sil2100: ah thanks! :)
[08:21] <sil2100> rbasak: hey! I'm still reviewing adsys for focal today, if anything o/
[08:25] <rs2009> jbicha: gnome-shell still seems to be pulled in (due to network-manager-gnome), even when it's blacklisted
[08:30] <rs2009> sil2100: is the blacklist file still considered? (gnome-shell is getting pulled in because of network-manager, which recommends gnome-shell, policykit-1-gnome or polkit-1-auth-agent, so it shouldn't get pulled in even without a blacklist; however, it gets pulled in even when it's blacklisted)
[08:58] <RikMills> sil2100: LP: #1990311 says that the uim armhf binaries have been removed by steve last night, but https://bileto.ubuntu.com/log/4927/publish/1/ fails as it thinks it is still a FTBFS
[08:58] <RikMills> how do we solve that?
[08:59] <RikMills> cc mitya57 ^
[09:00] <sil2100> hmmm, tough pickle, let me think about that after the meetings
[09:00] <sil2100> If not I'll just bin-copy it by hand
[09:00] <RikMills> sil2100: no problem. we could remove uim from the ticket and handle it manually I guess, but there must be a neater way
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon (jammy-proposed/main) [1.9~22.04.1 => 1.9~22.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adsys [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2~20.04]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adsys [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.2~20.04] (no packageset)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adsys [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.2~20.04] (no packageset)
[10:11] <sil2100> rbasak: I'll also be looking at flash-kernel, as I had pings about that earlier
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2~20.04]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aerwyna-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caesarea-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2~20.04]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cahya-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aethelberht-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.2~22.04]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adsys [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.2~22.04]
[10:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.104ubuntu13]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cagatay-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-cagatay-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cagney-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-cagney-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cai-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-cai-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-caia-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[12:33] <sil2100> rbasak: ...I'll also take a look at the u-a-d-d uploads, as some of those are in NEW
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-caia-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.9~22.04.2]
[12:38] <kanashiro[m]> release team: I have a FFe bug to sync ruby-tilt from Debian here: #1990389 . Could anyone please take a look ?
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9~20.04.1]
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9~20.04.1]
[13:13] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100,  please NBS-proposed cleanup luajit/luajit2/luakit on ppc64el?
[13:13] <LocutusOfBorg> that arch is broken.
[13:14] <LocutusOfBorg> luajit on ppc64el is no-go, no matter if we try the jit or jit2 backend
[13:26] <rbasak> sil2100: thank you for syncing. I'm going to start my SRU shift now, so might touch anything.
[13:26] <sil2100> o/
[13:40] <tjaalton> I filed a FFE for mesa, bug 1990387
[13:41] <jbicha> rbasak: could you take another look at bug 1969901 (for bionic)?
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.10~20.04.1]
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:02] <rs2009> jbicha: gnome-shell is still getting pulled in because of network-manager-gnome (even with the blacklist)
[14:03] <jbicha> rs2009: yes, sorry. It's a hard problem to solve. It might not even be triggered by the line in the log that appears to pull in gnome-shell
[14:03] <jbicha> we were told that the blacklist probably wouldn't help much, but it was worth a try
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:06] <jbicha> one way forward is to try to add explicit alternate dependencies to the Ubuntu packages instead of relying on the alternate virtual dependency notification-daemon
[14:07] <jbicha> this issue was a headache for Ubuntu GNOME and Ubuntu Budgie years ago
[14:18] <sil2100> kanashiro[m]: hey! Left a comment o/
[14:18] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: might not be able to make to it today
[14:20] <sil2100> rbasak: ok, I'll handle the release of some python3.10 toolchain SRUs to -updates now if you don't mind
[14:22] <rbasak> sil2100: sure, thanks
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [riscv64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.10~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:22] <rbasak> jbicha: done, but sorry we found an issue on review. I've commented on the bug.
[14:23] <rbasak> It's a pretty scary patch :-/
[14:23] <rbasak> (don't want to accidentally break networking for users!)
[14:24] <jbicha> thanks
[14:30] <Eickmeyer> ginggs: RE bug 1990320, obs-studio doesn't have a changelog in their source code, best I can do is attach their release announcement. As for the rest, since it's a debian sync, aiui, we typically rely on Debian to do the work there since they're the trusted source.
[14:34] <Eickmeyer> ginggs: And yes, I'm fully aware of when it's ready for sync, I'm capable of doing the sync. I'm watching this like a hawk.
[14:35] <ginggs> Eickmeyer: release announcement might sufficient.  We'd like to see build and install logs on Ubuntu because we do have some subtle differences in toolchain, etc
[14:37] <Eickmeyer> ginggs: Then I'd have to figure out a way to sync to a PPA, but this has never, ever been a requirement for a sync FFe before. Is this a new requirement?
[14:39] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: backportpackage -s unstable -d kinetic -u ppa:jbicha/dev (for instance)
[14:39] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: Thanks.
[14:40] <ginggs> Eickmeyer: you could upload the debian version to a PPA with an ubuntu changelog entry 28.0.1+dfsg1-1~ppa1, or so
[14:40] <ginggs> a build log generated locally would be fine too, but I think PPA is easier (and can cover more architectures)
[14:41] <Eickmeyer> For me, local build log is last resort, I always build in PPA anymore.
[14:42] <Eickmeyer> Ensures a clean toolchain.
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-backports/main) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.11 => 1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nfs-utils [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:2.6.1-1ubuntu1.1]
[15:01] <Eickmeyer> rbasak: Do you have a spare cycle to look at SRU bug 1989611? It's a multi-step process.
[15:03] <rbasak> Eickmeyer: I don't see it in the queue. What do you need exactly?
[15:04] <Eickmeyer> Uhh... It should be in the queue for Jammy and Focal?
[15:04] <rbasak> What's the source package name?
[15:05] <Eickmeyer> plasma-distro-release-notifier
[15:05] <Eickmeyer> It's definitely in source NEW, and it's in the archive already for kinetic.
[15:05] <rbasak> Oh, OK. I can't process NEW, sorry.
[15:05] <rbasak> AAs needed
[15:05] <Eickmeyer> That's right.
[15:05]  * Eickmeyer facepalms
[15:06] <Eickmeyer> Heh, I knew this would be tricky.
[15:07] <rbasak> Probably easiest to find a person with both AA and SRU hats
[15:07] <rbasak> ubuntu-archive: ^
[15:08] <sil2100> hm, I'm doing some slow NEW SRU queue reviews today
[15:08] <sil2100> Will try to get it, but there's uh, quite a few things!
[15:09] <rbasak> Eickmeyer: sorry I couldn't help, but thanks again for continuing to drive this! It seems important for the flavours.
[15:09] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: No worries, just wanted to get some eyes on it. It's a pretty serious UX issue that was neglected for several years.
[15:11] <Eickmeyer> rbasak: Yep! It's very important. In fact, got a bug report against ubuntu-release-upgrader that got marked as a dupe of this bug just yesterday. It's affecting users in a major way.
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (focal-proposed/universe) [2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.3 => 2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.4] (kernel-dkms)
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.2] (kernel-dkms)
[15:50] <rs2009> sil2100: would it be possible to add 'remove_package minimal.standard.live gnome-shell' for Ubuntu Unity? wasn't able to think of any other workaround to fix this issue, as germinate seems to be picking gnome-shell for a completely unknown reason (despite the ubuntu-unity-desktop metapackage not having any sort of recursive depends/recommends on
[15:50] <rs2009> it)
[16:54] <rs2009> also vorlon ^
[17:47] <vorlon> rs2009, jbicha: blacklist in seeds is only ever useful for causing image builds to fail in the case of a blacklisted package being pulled in.  it will never tell germinate which alternative to pull in instead; for that the only solution is to make sure your correct alternative is seen by germinate first
[17:50] <rs2009> vorlon: the correct alternative is present in the seed, but is still not recognized by germinate (and we couldn't find anything else causing gnome-shell to be pulled in), which is why we attempted to blacklist the package despite being warned
[17:52] <rs2009> is it possible to prioritize a package in the seed (to be seen before network-manager), as packages seem to be seen in alphabetical order?
[17:55] <vorlon> rs2009: that is the question.  This part of germinate is a dark art to me.  I'm going to have a look here
[17:56] <rs2009> vorlon: yep, I couldn't find anything related to this anywhere, which is also one of the reasons why I reverted to 'remove_package minimal.standard.live gnome-shell'
[17:57] <vorlon> rs2009: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu-unity.kinetic/ onlly shows gnome-shell in the 'extra' seed which shouldn't affect tasks or image builds.  Can you point me to what exactly you're seeing?
[17:58] <rs2009> vorlon: it's in the ISO build logs: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/kinetic/ubuntu-unity/+build/374134/+files/buildlog_ubuntu_kinetic_amd64_ubuntu-unity_BUILDING.txt.gz
[17:59] <vorlon> ? Unknown package policykit-1-gnome for seed desktop on arch amd64
[17:59] <vorlon> well that doesn't look right
[17:59] <vorlon> is something causing germinate here to ignore universe?
[18:00] <rs2009> vorlon: yep, that's kinda confusing
[18:01] <vorlon> live-build/auto/config calls germinate before the per-flavor definition of COMPONENTS lol?
[18:01] <rs2009> vorlon: oh lmao
[18:02] <vorlon> may or may not fix this issue but let me dig
[18:07] <rs2009> vorlon: also, would be great if you could sync ubuntu-unity-desktop with the seeds
[18:07] <vorlon> I'm going to be afk here shortly for food, but I'll see if I can get to that today
[18:08] <rs2009> vorlon: ah, that would be great. thanks :)
[18:08] <vorlon> so it was 07873ec5285348165fd9f494cd7e09d7b12f4481 that regressed us running germinate before COMPONENTS is defined.  I'm not sure if that will fix this issue but I'm going to take a stab at it
[18:11] <rs2009> vorlon: ack
[18:11] <rs2009> thanks
[19:22] <kanashiro[m]> vorlon: could you take a quick look at #1990389 ?
[23:08] <vorlon> back again
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.15]
[23:16] <vorlon> jbicha: there are reverse-build-dependencies of node-unicode-14.0.0
[23:17] <vorlon> (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html)
[23:21] <vorlon> jbicha: why is ubuntu-archive subscribed to LP: #1990202?
[23:30] <vorlon> rs2009: uploaded ubuntu-unity-meta and launchpad rejected it with no explanation.  Will try again
[23:30] <jbicha> the reverse build-depends are cleared now. I don't know why I subscribed that team. Removed.
[23:33] <jbicha> oh it's because I used requestsync to start the bug
[23:33] <vorlon> thanks
[23:36] <vorlon> Downloading http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/dists/kinetic/main restricted universe multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages.xz file ...
[23:36] <vorlon> no
[23:38] <vorlon> um germinate takes a comma separated list of components how did this ever work