alexghiti | o/ | 15:00 |
---|---|---|
schopin | o/ | 15:00 |
ogayot | o/ | 15:00 |
ginggs | o/ | 15:00 |
dbungert | o/ | 15:00 |
jawn-smith | o/ | 15:00 |
jawn-smith | #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team | 15:00 |
meetingology | Meeting started at 15:00:59 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | 15:00 |
meetingology | Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick | 15:01 |
jawn-smith | The weekly status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-22-september-2022/30783 | 15:01 |
jawn-smith | Let's all take our usual time to read and ask questions | 15:01 |
bdrung | \o | 15:02 |
xypron | o/ | 15:03 |
mclemenceau | o/ | 15:03 |
jawn-smith | Any questions about status? | 15:05 |
* bdmurray is still reading | 15:05 | |
bdmurray | I'm good | 15:06 |
jawn-smith | waveform: I would love to help test the Hyperpixel | 15:07 |
bdmurray | How many people are working on audacity? | 15:07 |
bdrung | currently only me. | 15:07 |
dbungert | mine was last week | 15:07 |
bdrung | I hope that I can do the Debian unstable upload today. | 15:07 |
dbungert | nice! | 15:08 |
vorlon | alexghiti79: you mention filing LP: #1990113 but I don't see sponsors subscribed to it, should they be? | 15:09 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1990113 in json-glib (Ubuntu) "Increase timeout on test doc-check for RISC-V" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990113 | 15:09 |
vorlon | (~ubuntu-sponsors) | 15:09 |
alexghiti79 | Ahah, made a mistake, I subscribed ubuntu-release! | 15:10 |
alexghiti79 | I'll change that, thanks | 15:10 |
jawn-smith | #topic Release incoming bugs | 15:10 |
jawn-smith | #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | 15:10 |
jawn-smith | bug 1842439 | 15:10 |
ubottu | Bug 1842439 in apport (Ubuntu Focal) "apport-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_settings_get_screen(settings=0x0) from gtk_css_value_icon_theme_compute() from gtk_css_static_style_compute_value()" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1842439 | 15:10 |
bdrung | This is for the desktop team | 15:10 |
jawn-smith | Awesome | 15:11 |
jawn-smith | bug 1990202 | 15:11 |
ubottu | Bug 1990202 in swtpm (Ubuntu) "Merge swtpm from Debian unstable" [Wishlist, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990202 | 15:11 |
vorlon | we're in feature freeze, and no rationale is given for this to be done post-FF | 15:12 |
jawn-smith | Should we write a comment asking about a FF exception? | 15:12 |
vorlon | (it doesn't show up on MoM, so a bug report seems still useful as it might otherwise fall through the cracks) | 15:13 |
jawn-smith | bdrung pointed out there is a CVE in the new version | 15:13 |
vorlon | ah, but there's a CVE in the changelog | 15:13 |
jawn-smith | which may justify a FF exception | 15:13 |
jbicha | I wasn't intending for a full merge to be done for Kinetic when I opened the swtpm bug | 15:14 |
schopin | We could just take in the CVE bugfix for now, and merge next cycle? | 15:14 |
jawn-smith | bug 1990429 | 15:14 |
ubottu | Bug 1990429 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "software-properties uses deprecated apt-key" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990429 | 15:14 |
jawn-smith | This seems worth carding and working on to me | 15:15 |
jawn-smith | any objections? | 15:15 |
* bdrung agrees | 15:15 | |
juliank | python-apt has the same code | 15:16 |
jawn-smith | juliank: can you file a bug against python-apt? | 15:16 |
jawn-smith | Or does one already exist? | 15:16 |
juliank | I don't understand why we upstreamed the module to apt.auth and then didn't port software-properties :( | 15:16 |
juliank | <but yeah I can file a bug | 15:17 |
jawn-smith | thanks! | 15:17 |
jawn-smith | bug 1097467 | 15:17 |
ubottu | Bug 1097467 in bash (Ubuntu) "bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1097467 | 15:17 |
jawn-smith | doko: waveform: | 15:17 |
vorlon | juliank: has the same code> python-apt didn't show up in sarnold's codesearch, can you maybe check why? | 15:17 |
juliank | vorlon: What did he search for? ' cmd = [apt_pkg.config.find_file("Dir::Bin::Apt-Key", "/usr/bin/apt-key")]' is in there | 15:18 |
jawn-smith | Let's move on and see if doko has any thoughts on it later | 15:18 |
jawn-smith | that's it for kk | 15:18 |
jawn-smith | #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | 15:18 |
jawn-smith | just one! | 15:18 |
vorlon | juliank: apt-key.*adv and then apt-key.*add, I think | 15:18 |
jawn-smith | bug 1964036 | 15:18 |
ubottu | Bug 1964036 in firefox (Ubuntu) "Firefox icon missing from panel following Kubuntu upgrade 20.04->22.04" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1964036 | 15:18 |
bdmurray | I'm setting the importance and status for the software-properties bug | 15:18 |
bdmurray | Let's try to do that during this process | 15:19 |
juliank | vorlon: he yeah, that's not going to work, it's abstracted as `_call_apt_key_script("adv",...` | 15:19 |
jawn-smith | Okay ubuntu-release-upgrader needs to be updated to not remove the deb | 15:20 |
jawn-smith | Actually it seems that icon is provided by the snap | 15:22 |
xypron | /snap/firefox/1860/usr/lib/firefox/browser/chrome/icons/default/default128.png exists | 15:22 |
bdmurray | Let's tag this foundations-todo | 15:24 |
jawn-smith | So we're going to card that and investigate if it is actually a foundations task | 15:24 |
jawn-smith | That's it for jj | 15:24 |
jawn-smith | ff is empty again | 15:24 |
jawn-smith | Now let's do the foundations-discuss bugs | 15:24 |
jawn-smith | #link | 15:24 |
jawn-smith | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INVALID&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=EXPIRED&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=FIXRELEASED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WIT | 15:25 |
jawn-smith | HOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&field.tag=foundations-triage-discuss&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints=on&orderby=-id&start=0 | 15:25 |
schopin | (we really need to shorten this URL) | 15:25 |
jawn-smith | bug 1990535 | 15:25 |
ubottu | Bug 1990535 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "nvidia-settings not installed after off-line install of kinetic" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990535 | 15:25 |
schopin | Didn't we already know about that one? | 15:26 |
vorlon | which iteration of it | 15:26 |
jawn-smith | bdmurray: Is this the same issue we've seen before? | 15:26 |
bdmurray | bug 1985054? | 15:27 |
ubottu | Bug 1985054 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Jammy) "nvidia-settings no longer preinstalled with NVidia drivers in offline mode" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1985054 | 15:27 |
jawn-smith | #link https://tinyurl.com/4ay3jbuw for the list | 15:27 |
schopin | bdmurray: yes, that's the one I was thinking about. | 15:27 |
bdmurray | I'd rather have the one with the logs be the primary bug | 15:27 |
schopin | Fair enough. I should have thought about adding them when confirming the previous one, my bad. | 15:28 |
jawn-smith | Okay so shall we card this? | 15:28 |
bdmurray | s/card/tag foundations-todo/ | 15:29 |
bdmurray | I'll do that | 15:30 |
jawn-smith | yes, thanks! | 15:30 |
jawn-smith | bug 1990247 | 15:30 |
ubottu | Bug 1990247 in popularity-contest (Ubuntu) "Popcon Ubuntu backend to be decomissioned" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990247 | 15:30 |
jawn-smith | Steve votes -1 on this and letting the errors happen | 15:31 |
vorlon | I'm -1 on doing an SRU for this, the packaging changes to land this in devel were extensive | 15:31 |
vorlon | shall I wontfix the bug? | 15:32 |
bdmurray | I'm okay with that | 15:32 |
jawn-smith | Sounds like a plan to me | 15:32 |
jawn-smith | bug 1989623 | 15:32 |
ubottu | Bug 1989623 in dpkg (Ubuntu) "package zlib1g:amd64 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 failed to install/upgrade: package zlib1g:amd64 is already installed and configured" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989623 | 15:32 |
jawn-smith | juliank: thoughts on this? | 15:33 |
juliank | funny | 15:33 |
juliank | Gotta mark this as Incomplete and ask for a /var/lib/dpkg/status copy I guess | 15:34 |
jawn-smith | Okay, thanks! | 15:34 |
bdmurray | Should that be collected regularly? | 15:34 |
jawn-smith | Should we also change the tag? | 15:34 |
bdmurray | The /var/lib/dpkg/status file | 15:34 |
jawn-smith | Okay so let's remove the tag, and juliank will follow up on the bug reports asking for more information | 15:36 |
jawn-smith | bug 1989604 | 15:36 |
ubottu | Bug 1989604 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu 22.04 failed to install" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989604 | 15:36 |
jawn-smith | A quick reading of the logs shows an odd file I/O error | 15:37 |
juliank | see : AssertionError: Failed to mount the target: /target | 15:39 |
jawn-smith | We seem to have enough logs to investigate. Let's change the tag to todo | 15:39 |
jawn-smith | bug 1989598 | 15:40 |
ubottu | Bug 1989598 in swtpm (Ubuntu Jammy) "swtpm-create-user-config-files script contains unevaluated @DATAROOTDIR@ variable" [Low, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989598 | 15:40 |
bdmurray | That might actually be on we want to subscribed the team to, rather than overloading the todo list | 15:40 |
jawn-smith | Okay, thanks bdmurray | 15:40 |
jawn-smith | bug 1989585 | 15:43 |
ubottu | Bug 1989585 in grub-installer (Ubuntu) "while i was installing ubuntu 20.04 at last step it seems like grub installation failed caused a fatal error forcing me to restart whole process." [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989585 | 15:43 |
jawn-smith | Someone want to comment suggesting 22.04 and remove the tag? | 15:45 |
jawn-smith | enr0n thanks for volunteering | 15:45 |
jawn-smith | bug 1988819 | 15:45 |
ubottu | Bug 1988819 in apt (Ubuntu) "When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should say so" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988819 | 15:45 |
jawn-smith | juliank: lots of discussion on this | 15:46 |
juliank | yeah | 15:46 |
jawn-smith | Sounds like something that will be worked on | 15:46 |
jawn-smith | So let's set the tag to foundations-todo | 15:46 |
mclemenceau | done | 15:47 |
jawn-smith | bug 1987924 | 15:47 |
ubottu | Bug 1987924 in grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Jammy) "GRUB may execute the kernel w/ dirty instruction cache on arm64" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1987924 | 15:47 |
jawn-smith | Leaving this here for now to discuss in a future meeting | 15:48 |
jawn-smith | bug 1982511 | 15:49 |
ubottu | Bug 1982511 in grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Focal) "Intermittent 'Synchronous Exception' on arm64" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1982511 | 15:49 |
jawn-smith | Skipping for future meeting | 15:49 |
jawn-smith | bug 1980494 | 15:49 |
ubottu | Bug 1980494 in krb5 (Ubuntu) "krb5-multidev is not multi-arch installable due to differences in /usr/bin/krb5-config.mit" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980494 | 15:49 |
jawn-smith | vorlon votes we filter the LDFLAGS from the scripts | 15:51 |
vorlon | yes, I don't think a configure script should replicate the dpkg-buildflags output from a single point in time | 15:52 |
bdrung | vorlon, can you comment the bug with that information? | 15:53 |
vorlon | yes | 15:53 |
jawn-smith | The tag has been removed and importance set | 15:53 |
jawn-smith | bug 1902855 | 15:53 |
ubottu | Bug 1902855 in subiquity (Ubuntu) "two identical disks are only offered as a multipath device" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1902855 | 15:53 |
jawn-smith | Apparently we have a branch started on this but tests are broken | 15:54 |
jawn-smith | so let's call it todo | 15:54 |
jawn-smith | Skipping the firefox bug because we've already discussed it | 15:54 |
jawn-smith | bug 916494 | 15:55 |
ubottu | Bug 916494 in ipxe (Ubuntu) "Please put ipxe.krn to the desktop CD" [Wishlist, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/916494 | 15:55 |
jawn-smith | Waiting on a response from ahasenack | 15:55 |
jawn-smith | So let's remove the tag and whoever is on triage duty when we get a response can add it back | 15:56 |
jawn-smith | That's it for the foundations-triage-discuss | 15:57 |
jawn-smith | #topic Team proposed-migration report | 15:57 |
jawn-smith | #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs | 15:57 |
jawn-smith | vorlon: | 15:57 |
vorlon | unicode-data is driven by jbicha | 15:58 |
vorlon | I don't think there's anything for us here currently | 15:58 |
vorlon | and the other two are existing (passing) autopkgtests for glibc and systemd blocking linux-meta; I'd leave this for the kernel team to sort out | 15:59 |
vorlon | so, nothing to assign here today! | 15:59 |
vorlon | jawn-smith: | 15:59 |
jawn-smith | \o/ | 15:59 |
jawn-smith | #topic AOB | 15:59 |
jawn-smith | Any extended absences coming up? | 15:59 |
jawn-smith | sil2100: you have some time off soon right? | 16:00 |
jawn-smith | That's the only one I see on the calendar | 16:00 |
jawn-smith | #endmeeting | 16:01 |
meetingology | Meeting ended at 16:01:34 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-09-22-15.00.moin.txt | 16:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!