[15:00] <alexghiti> o/
[15:00] <schopin> o/
[15:00] <ogayot> o/
[15:00] <ginggs> o/
[15:00] <dbungert> o/
[15:00] <jawn-smith> o/
[15:00] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:00] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:00:59 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:01] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:01] <jawn-smith> The weekly status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-22-september-2022/30783
[15:01] <jawn-smith> Let's all take our usual time to read and ask questions
[15:02] <bdrung> \o
[15:03] <xypron> o/
[15:03] <mclemenceau> o/
[15:05] <jawn-smith> Any questions about status?
[15:05]  * bdmurray is still reading
[15:06] <bdmurray> I'm good
[15:07] <jawn-smith> waveform: I would love to help test the Hyperpixel
[15:07] <bdmurray> How many people are working on audacity?
[15:07] <bdrung> currently only me.
[15:07] <dbungert> mine was last week
[15:07] <bdrung> I hope that I can do the Debian unstable upload today.
[15:08] <dbungert> nice!
[15:09] <vorlon> alexghiti79: you mention filing LP: #1990113 but I don't see sponsors subscribed to it, should they be?
[15:09] <vorlon> (~ubuntu-sponsors)
[15:10] <alexghiti79> Ahah, made a mistake, I subscribed ubuntu-release!
[15:10] <alexghiti79> I'll change that, thanks
[15:10] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
[15:10] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:10] <jawn-smith> bug 1842439
[15:10] <bdrung> This is for the desktop team
[15:11] <jawn-smith> Awesome
[15:11] <jawn-smith> bug 1990202
[15:12] <vorlon> we're in feature freeze, and no rationale is given for this to be done post-FF
[15:12] <jawn-smith> Should we write a comment asking about a FF exception?
[15:13] <vorlon> (it doesn't show up on MoM, so a bug report seems still useful as it might otherwise fall through the cracks)
[15:13] <jawn-smith> bdrung pointed out there is a CVE in the new version
[15:13] <vorlon> ah, but there's a CVE in the changelog
[15:13] <jawn-smith> which may justify a FF exception
[15:14] <jbicha> I wasn't intending for a full merge to be done for Kinetic when I opened the swtpm bug
[15:14] <schopin> We could just take in the CVE bugfix for now, and merge next cycle?
[15:14] <jawn-smith> bug 1990429
[15:15] <jawn-smith> This seems worth carding and working on to me
[15:15] <jawn-smith> any objections?
[15:15]  * bdrung agrees
[15:16] <juliank> python-apt has the same code
[15:16] <jawn-smith> juliank: can you file a bug against python-apt?
[15:16] <jawn-smith> Or does one already exist?
[15:16] <juliank> I don't understand why we upstreamed the module to apt.auth and then didn't port software-properties :(
[15:17] <juliank> <but yeah I can file a bug
[15:17] <jawn-smith> thanks!
[15:17] <jawn-smith> bug 1097467
[15:17] <jawn-smith> doko: waveform:
[15:17] <vorlon> juliank: has the same code> python-apt didn't show up in sarnold's codesearch, can you maybe check why?
[15:18] <juliank> vorlon: What did he search for? '    cmd = [apt_pkg.config.find_file("Dir::Bin::Apt-Key", "/usr/bin/apt-key")]' is in there
[15:18] <jawn-smith> Let's move on and see if doko has any thoughts on it later
[15:18] <jawn-smith> that's it for kk
[15:18] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:18] <jawn-smith> just one!
[15:18] <vorlon> juliank: apt-key.*adv and then apt-key.*add, I think
[15:18] <jawn-smith> bug 1964036
[15:18] <bdmurray> I'm setting the importance and status for the software-properties bug
[15:19] <bdmurray> Let's try to do that during this process
[15:19] <juliank> vorlon: he yeah, that's not going to work, it's abstracted as `_call_apt_key_script("adv",...`
[15:20] <jawn-smith> Okay ubuntu-release-upgrader needs to be updated to not remove the deb
[15:22] <jawn-smith> Actually it seems that icon is provided by the snap
[15:22] <xypron> /snap/firefox/1860/usr/lib/firefox/browser/chrome/icons/default/default128.png exists
[15:24] <bdmurray> Let's tag this foundations-todo
[15:24] <jawn-smith> So we're going to card that and investigate if it is actually a foundations task
[15:24] <jawn-smith> That's it for jj
[15:24] <jawn-smith> ff is empty again
[15:24] <jawn-smith> Now let's do the foundations-discuss bugs
[15:24] <jawn-smith> #link
[15:25] <jawn-smith> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INVALID&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=EXPIRED&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=FIXRELEASED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WIT
[15:25] <jawn-smith> HOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&field.tag=foundations-triage-discuss&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints=on&orderby=-id&start=0
[15:25] <schopin> (we really need to shorten this URL)
[15:25] <jawn-smith> bug 1990535
[15:26] <schopin> Didn't we already know about that one?
[15:26] <vorlon> which iteration of it
[15:26] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: Is this the same issue we've seen before?
[15:27] <bdmurray> bug 1985054?
[15:27] <jawn-smith> #link https://tinyurl.com/4ay3jbuw for the list
[15:27] <schopin> bdmurray: yes, that's the one I was thinking about.
[15:27] <bdmurray> I'd rather have the one with the logs be the primary bug
[15:28] <schopin> Fair enough. I should have thought about adding them when confirming the previous one, my bad.
[15:28] <jawn-smith> Okay so shall we card this?
[15:29] <bdmurray> s/card/tag foundations-todo/
[15:30] <bdmurray> I'll do that
[15:30] <jawn-smith> yes, thanks!
[15:30] <jawn-smith> bug 1990247
[15:31] <jawn-smith> Steve votes -1 on this and letting the errors happen
[15:31] <vorlon> I'm -1 on doing an SRU for this, the packaging changes to land this in devel were extensive
[15:32] <vorlon> shall I wontfix the bug?
[15:32] <bdmurray> I'm okay with that
[15:32] <jawn-smith> Sounds like a plan to me
[15:32] <jawn-smith> bug 1989623
[15:33] <jawn-smith> juliank: thoughts on this?
[15:33] <juliank> funny
[15:34] <juliank> Gotta mark this as Incomplete and ask for a /var/lib/dpkg/status copy I guess
[15:34] <jawn-smith> Okay, thanks!
[15:34] <bdmurray> Should that be collected regularly?
[15:34] <jawn-smith> Should we also change the tag?
[15:34] <bdmurray> The /var/lib/dpkg/status file
[15:36] <jawn-smith> Okay so let's remove the tag, and juliank will follow up on the bug reports asking for more information
[15:36] <jawn-smith> bug 1989604
[15:37] <jawn-smith> A quick reading of the logs shows an odd file I/O error
[15:39] <juliank> see : AssertionError: Failed to mount the target: /target
[15:39] <jawn-smith> We seem to have enough logs to investigate. Let's change the tag to todo
[15:40] <jawn-smith> bug 1989598
[15:40] <bdmurray> That might actually be on we want to subscribed the team to, rather than overloading the todo list
[15:40] <jawn-smith> Okay, thanks bdmurray
[15:43] <jawn-smith> bug 1989585
[15:45] <jawn-smith> Someone want to comment suggesting 22.04 and remove the tag?
[15:45] <jawn-smith> enr0n thanks for volunteering
[15:45] <jawn-smith> bug 1988819
[15:46] <jawn-smith> juliank: lots of discussion on this
[15:46] <juliank>  yeah
[15:46] <jawn-smith> Sounds like something that will be worked on
[15:46] <jawn-smith> So let's set the tag to foundations-todo
[15:47] <mclemenceau> done
[15:47] <jawn-smith> bug 1987924
[15:48] <jawn-smith> Leaving this here for now to discuss in a future meeting
[15:49] <jawn-smith> bug 1982511
[15:49] <jawn-smith> Skipping for future meeting
[15:49] <jawn-smith> bug 1980494
[15:51] <jawn-smith> vorlon votes we filter the LDFLAGS from the scripts
[15:52] <vorlon> yes, I don't think a configure script should replicate the dpkg-buildflags output from a single point in time
[15:53] <bdrung> vorlon, can you comment the bug with that information?
[15:53] <vorlon> yes
[15:53] <jawn-smith> The tag has been removed and importance set
[15:53] <jawn-smith> bug 1902855
[15:54] <jawn-smith> Apparently we have a branch started on this but tests are broken
[15:54] <jawn-smith> so let's call it todo
[15:54] <jawn-smith> Skipping the firefox bug because we've already discussed it
[15:55] <jawn-smith> bug 916494
[15:55] <jawn-smith> Waiting on a response from ahasenack
[15:56] <jawn-smith> So let's remove the tag and whoever is on triage duty when we get a response can add it back
[15:57] <jawn-smith> That's it for the foundations-triage-discuss
[15:57] <jawn-smith> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:57] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:57] <jawn-smith> vorlon:
[15:58] <vorlon> unicode-data is driven by jbicha
[15:58] <vorlon> I don't think there's anything for us here currently
[15:59] <vorlon> and the other two are existing (passing) autopkgtests for glibc and systemd blocking linux-meta; I'd leave this for the kernel team to sort out
[15:59] <vorlon> so, nothing to assign here today!
[15:59] <vorlon> jawn-smith:
[15:59] <jawn-smith> \o/
[15:59] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
[15:59] <jawn-smith> Any extended absences coming up?
[16:00] <jawn-smith> sil2100: you have some time off soon right?
[16:00] <jawn-smith> That's the only one I see on the calendar
[16:01] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting
[16:01] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 16:01:34 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-09-22-15.00.moin.txt