/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/09/23/#ubuntu-release.txt

vorlonrs2009: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/kinetic/ubuntu-unity/+build/374463/+files/buildlog_ubuntu_kinetic_amd64_ubuntu-unity_BUILDING.txt.gz snaps included now01:54
=== popey0 is now known as popey
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntustudio-look [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10.2] (ubuntustudio)04:52
LocutusOfBorgthanks vorlon05:34
LocutusOfBorgyes, it was probably never working correctly05:34
LocutusOfBorgsad story, luajit is mostly optional on every package, because not available everywhere. So the testsuite mostly never runs it...05:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (jammy-updates/universe) [276.1-1~bpo22.04.1 => 264-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset)06:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: at-spi2-core [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.46.0-3] (core, i386-whitelist)06:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.11~16.04.1]06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.10~16.04.1]07:26
rs2009would be great if someone could run the Ubuntu Unity ISO build08:48
rs2009sil2100, as I mentioned in the #ubuntu-flavors channel, the Firefox issue should be fixed in this build08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted at-spi2-core [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.46.0-3]08:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [27.10.1~16.04.1 => 27.11~16.04.1] (no packageset)09:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.11~16.04.1]09:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph-deploy (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.1-0ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [22.10.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)12:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]13:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10~18.04.1]13:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)13:38
coreycbhello ubuntu-sru, I'm getting pressure to get neutron fixed in focal. there's a new version in focal unapproved if anyone has cycles to review. thanks!15:02
Eickmeyerubuntu-archive: I need a quick ack on ubuntustudio-look in binary NEW for kinetic, it's just a new wallpaper.15:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [s390x] (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)16:08
bdmurrayI'm looking at neutron16:08
cpaelzerEickmeyer: looking16:10
cpaelzersince we are in UIF I checked and found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-look/+bug/1989359 - reading ...16:11
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1989359 in ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates" [High, In Progress]16:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [i386] (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)16:11
cpaelzerEickmeyer: the new .changes should have been generated with -V22.04.9 - in the current form it won't refer and close the bug as it misses the 22.10.1 content (this is not blocking, just FYI)16:13
Eickmeyercpaelzer: I did generate the .changes with -v22.04.9.16:14
cpaelzerhmm, oh you are right here it is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-look/22.10.2 wondered as it wasn't in the diff that was first shown to me16:15
cpaelzeryou are right Eickmeyer16:15
cpaelzeralso the UIFe is accepted (kind of obviously)16:15
EickmeyerHeh :)16:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.4.2-0ubuntu4]16:15
cpaelzersorry for the delay, just reading through all of 22.10.1 atm16:16
cpaelzerEickmeyer: so yeah, it really is just the expected new -kinetic package on top of the formerly agreed UI upload - accepted now16:18
cpaelzersince I'm on it also looking at ubuntu-wallpapers now which has the same "problem"16:19
Eickmeyercpaelzer: Thanks! :)16:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntustudio-look [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.2]16:19
cpaelzerseb128: you did that upload and you could accept it yourself. I won't as the reffered UIFe bug is the one from impish16:20
cpaelzerseb128: pinged you on bug 1989359 about it16:22
ubottuBug 1989359 in ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Kinetic wallpapers updates" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198935916:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [ppc64el] (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)16:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [i386] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]16:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [s390x] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]16:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [ppc64el] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]16:55
RikMillsvorlon: the bug says you removed the uim armhf binaries, but britney does not think so. Can you help?17:42
RikMillsmitya57: ^17:43
mitya57Reference: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#uim17:44
mitya57> missing build on armhf: uim (from 1:1.8.8-9.1)17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (jammy-proposed/main) [1.182~22.04.1 => 1.182~22.04.1] (core) (sync)18:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (jammy-proposed/main) [2.06-2ubuntu10 => 2.06-2ubuntu10] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)18:18
vorlonmitya57, RikMills: the comment in the bug is accurate, I removed all the armhf binary packages except the 'uim' one ;)18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.182~22.04.1]18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu10]18:33
mitya57Ah.18:33
vorlonfixed now18:33
vorlonEickmeyer: W: Ignoring non-equal Provides for package ubuntustudio-wallpapers-jammy in ubuntustudio-wallpapers-kinetic:all=22.10.218:37
vorlonyou're apt spamming everyone in kinetic18:37
Eickmeyervorlon: I didn't catch that one, but that's not hard to fix.18:38
mitya57vorlon: Thank you18:45
Eickmeyervorlon: Fixed.19:05
vorlonEickmeyer: thanks19:09
tsimonq2ubuntu-release: Hi, bug 1990636 has been filed. I'm rusty (and consulting docs now), if it needs an ack could I get a review please? tl;dr we're asking if we can upload new wallpapers for 22.10. Thanks20:12
ubottuBug 1990636 in lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) "lubuntu kinetic - missing Lubuntu kinetic kudu artwork UIFE" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199063620:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]20:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.1-0ubuntu1]20:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [amd64] (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)20:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)20:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]20:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]20:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]20:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]20:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)20:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]21:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [amd64] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]21:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (focal-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu614.3 => 20101020ubuntu614.4] (core)21:24
vorlonbdmurray: ^^ our prereq for 20.04.6...21:25
vorlonif you happen to want to review21:25
vorlonhttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/kinetic_uninst.txt oh hey look, apt spam21:28
rbasakhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases#Future is out of date, if somebody feels like fixing it.21:28
bdmurrayI'm trying to figure out why /snap/bin is in /etc/environment ... cloud-init?21:29
bdmurrays/is/isn't/21:29
vorlonin whose /etc/environment21:29
bdmurraysome lxd armhf remote unit21:30
blackboxswvorlon: I think sil2100 accidentally overlooked the unapproved upload to bionic-proposed yesterday morning https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-init   jammy and focal were approved, yet I think this was overlooked for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318.21:31
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1987318 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.3 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]21:31
blackboxsw  If there is SRU review time today to supplement this bugfix release for pre-release bugs found in -proposed, it'd be great. If not, we can circle back w/ sil2100 on Monday21:31
bdmurrayblackboxsw: oh hey does cloud-init set PATH in /etc/environment?21:31
blackboxswbdmurray: cloud-init doesn't write to /etc/environment from what I recall.... we can quick check any written files on a system w/ grep Writing /var/log/cloud-init.log21:33
bdmurray2022-09-23 18:43:46,706 - util.py[DEBUG]: Writing to /etc/environment - wb: [644] 310 bytes21:33
blackboxswahh interesting. hah. it didn't on my LXC instances21:33
blackboxswglad grep tells the truth. reading back context in this channel21:33
bdmurraybasically "/snap/bin" isn't in $PATH when connected via ssh and I'd thought this was fixed with bug 165971921:35
ubottuBug 1659719 in openssh (Ubuntu) "ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165971921:36
blackboxswbdmurray: this is within a live install via subiquity? I know there are some funky $PATH gymnastics there21:37
falcojrbdmurray: got more of that log? I was also under the impression that we never touched /etc/environment and finding where isn't obvious21:37
blackboxswI'd expect maybe at some stage we see a write_files declaration in cloud-config that's trying to manipulate /etc/environment if you see those logs in cloud-init.log  `sudo cloud-init query userdata` would check that on the failed environment or `sudo cloud-init collect-logs`21:38
bdmurrayThe problem is the userdata file, I do not accept responsibility for this line21:39
dbungertsubiquity does mess with environment more than I would like, but it does so by appending instead of resetting.  It sounds to me though that in this lxd armhf unit subiquity isn't involved.21:39
bdmurrayAnyway, thanks for responding21:40
vorlondbungert: you've piqued my interest.  where/why?21:40
dbungertvorlon: the big problem is that subiquity has both archive python packages and pip packages and we need to fix that.21:42
vorlondbungert: why does that require modifying /etc/environment?21:42
dbungertoh no, it doesn't21:42
vorlonah ok21:42
dbungertthis is strictly the environment of two processes or so21:42
blackboxswok, then shouldn't manifest in cloud-config user-data in that case21:43
blackboxswso if you're seeing funky user-data with write_files manipulation of /etc/environment bdmurray that's likely our cause, and we'd need to find out the who/why there21:43
bdmurrayblackboxsw: this was my issue https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/43040121:44
blackboxswheh. ahh roger got it . sorry for the noise otherwise21:44
bdmurrayNo, I'm sorry! ;-)21:44
blackboxswsooo. <nice pause> ... SRU review possibility anyone. for bionic ;)21:45
blackboxsw... just trying to make busy people feel guilty21:45
* bdmurray already left for afternoon coffee21:46
vorlonblackboxsw: sorry for not acking - I'm currently looking at some grub2 security SRUs that I'm behind on, then I'll take a lok21:46
vorlonand also a look21:46
blackboxswawesome. mom always said "squeaky wheel gets the SRU review"21:47
falcojrif that doesn't work we can just flip the table21:47
blackboxswheh21:47
vorlonhttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gvfs/kinetic/ppc64el gvfs I swear21:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu47.4]22:05
vorlonautopkgtest [21:12:58]: test build-procenv:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - -22:06
vorlonbuild-procenv        FAIL stderr: W: Ignoring non-equal Provides for package ubuntustudio-wallpapers-jammy in ubuntustudio-wallpapers-kinetic:all=22.10.222:06
vorlonautopkgtest [21:12:59]: test build-procenv:  - - - - - - - - - - stderr - - - - - - - - - -22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu47.4]22:13
vorlonblackboxsw: the cloud-init in jammy-proposed is newer than the version in kinetic, please fix22:32
blackboxswvorlon: dpkg --compare-versions 22.3.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 lt 22.3.3-0ubuntu1~22.10.1 && echo "All clear"22:33
blackboxswAll clear22:33
blackboxswI'm missing something22:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]22:33
vorlonblackboxsw: oops, my brain ignored that line because of the ~22.10.1 which I associate exclusively with SRUs22:34
blackboxswwhew. gave me the sweats for a second22:34
blackboxsw:)22:34
vorlonblackboxsw: in which case, I amend my request to "please use expected version numbers for devel series uploads" ;)22:38
blackboxswheh thanks.... vorlon to check to see if that was a serious comment or joke. cloud-init used to avoid the version diminish suffix `~22.10.1` for a devel series until it actually released. Is the defined best-practice for packaged delivered to devel releases to avoid specifying release ~MM.NN.1 versions until after a release becomes stable?22:50
vorlonblackboxsw: yes22:50
* blackboxsw looks up the wikis again.22:50
blackboxswok will revert to our previous behavior.22:50
blackboxswso next uploads for L-series will correct that22:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (focal-backports/universe) [1.23.0-1~bpo20.04.1 => 1.23.1-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.23.0-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.23.1-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)23:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!