[01:54] <vorlon> rs2009: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/kinetic/ubuntu-unity/+build/374463/+files/buildlog_ubuntu_kinetic_amd64_ubuntu-unity_BUILDING.txt.gz snaps included now
[04:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntustudio-look [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10.2] (ubuntustudio)
[05:34] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon
[05:34] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, it was probably never working correctly
[05:34] <LocutusOfBorg> sad story, luajit is mostly optional on every package, because not available everywhere. So the testsuite mostly never runs it...
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (jammy-updates/universe) [276.1-1~bpo22.04.1 => 264-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: at-spi2-core [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.46.0-3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.11~16.04.1]
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.10~16.04.1]
[08:48] <rs2009> would be great if someone could run the Ubuntu Unity ISO build
[08:48] <rs2009> sil2100, as I mentioned in the #ubuntu-flavors channel, the Firefox issue should be fixed in this build
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted at-spi2-core [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.46.0-3]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [27.10.1~16.04.1 => 27.11~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.11~16.04.1]
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph-deploy (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.1-0ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [22.10.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10~18.04.1]
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.10~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:02] <coreycb> hello ubuntu-sru, I'm getting pressure to get neutron fixed in focal. there's a new version in focal unapproved if anyone has cycles to review. thanks!
[15:09] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: I need a quick ack on ubuntustudio-look in binary NEW for kinetic, it's just a new wallpaper.
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [s390x] (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:08] <bdmurray> I'm looking at neutron
[16:10] <cpaelzer> Eickmeyer: looking
[16:11] <cpaelzer> since we are in UIF I checked and found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-look/+bug/1989359 - reading ...
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [i386] (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:13] <cpaelzer> Eickmeyer: the new .changes should have been generated with -V22.04.9 - in the current form it won't refer and close the bug as it misses the 22.10.1 content (this is not blocking, just FYI)
[16:14] <Eickmeyer> cpaelzer: I did generate the .changes with -v22.04.9.
[16:15] <cpaelzer> hmm, oh you are right here it is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-look/22.10.2 wondered as it wasn't in the diff that was first shown to me
[16:15] <cpaelzer> you are right Eickmeyer
[16:15] <cpaelzer> also the UIFe is accepted (kind of obviously)
[16:15] <Eickmeyer> Heh :)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.4.2-0ubuntu4]
[16:16] <cpaelzer> sorry for the delay, just reading through all of 22.10.1 atm
[16:18] <cpaelzer> Eickmeyer: so yeah, it really is just the expected new -kinetic package on top of the formerly agreed UI upload - accepted now
[16:19] <cpaelzer> since I'm on it also looking at ubuntu-wallpapers now which has the same "problem"
[16:19] <Eickmeyer> cpaelzer: Thanks! :)
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntustudio-look [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.2]
[16:20] <cpaelzer> seb128: you did that upload and you could accept it yourself. I won't as the reffered UIFe bug is the one from impish
[16:22] <cpaelzer> seb128: pinged you on bug 1989359 about it
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [ppc64el] (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [i386] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [s390x] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [ppc64el] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]
[17:42] <RikMills> vorlon: the bug says you removed the uim armhf binaries, but britney does not think so. Can you help?
[17:43] <RikMills> mitya57: ^
[17:44] <mitya57> Reference: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#uim
[17:44] <mitya57> > missing build on armhf: uim (from 1:1.8.8-9.1)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (jammy-proposed/main) [1.182~22.04.1 => 1.182~22.04.1] (core) (sync)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (jammy-proposed/main) [2.06-2ubuntu10 => 2.06-2ubuntu10] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[18:33] <vorlon> mitya57, RikMills: the comment in the bug is accurate, I removed all the armhf binary packages except the 'uim' one ;)
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.182~22.04.1]
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu10]
[18:33] <mitya57> Ah.
[18:33] <vorlon> fixed now
[18:37] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: W: Ignoring non-equal Provides for package ubuntustudio-wallpapers-jammy in ubuntustudio-wallpapers-kinetic:all=22.10.2
[18:37] <vorlon> you're apt spamming everyone in kinetic
[18:38] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I didn't catch that one, but that's not hard to fix.
[18:45] <mitya57> vorlon: Thank you
[19:05] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Fixed.
[19:09] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: thanks
[20:12] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: Hi, bug 1990636 has been filed. I'm rusty (and consulting docs now), if it needs an ack could I get a review please? tl;dr we're asking if we can upload new wallpapers for 22.10. Thanks
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [amd64] (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)
[20:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rav1e [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-4] (no packageset)
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rav1e [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1-4]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [amd64] (bionic-backports) [1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1]
[21:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (focal-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu614.3 => 20101020ubuntu614.4] (core)
[21:25] <vorlon> bdmurray: ^^ our prereq for 20.04.6...
[21:25] <vorlon> if you happen to want to review
[21:28] <vorlon> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/kinetic_uninst.txt oh hey look, apt spam
[21:28] <rbasak> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases#Future is out of date, if somebody feels like fixing it.
[21:29] <bdmurray> I'm trying to figure out why /snap/bin is in /etc/environment ... cloud-init?
[21:29] <bdmurray> s/is/isn't/
[21:29] <vorlon> in whose /etc/environment
[21:30] <bdmurray> some lxd armhf remote unit
[21:31] <blackboxsw> vorlon: I think sil2100 accidentally overlooked the unapproved upload to bionic-proposed yesterday morning https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-init   jammy and focal were approved, yet I think this was overlooked for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318.
[21:31] <blackboxsw>   If there is SRU review time today to supplement this bugfix release for pre-release bugs found in -proposed, it'd be great. If not, we can circle back w/ sil2100 on Monday
[21:31] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: oh hey does cloud-init set PATH in /etc/environment?
[21:33] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: cloud-init doesn't write to /etc/environment from what I recall.... we can quick check any written files on a system w/ grep Writing /var/log/cloud-init.log
[21:33] <bdmurray> 2022-09-23 18:43:46,706 - util.py[DEBUG]: Writing to /etc/environment - wb: [644] 310 bytes
[21:33] <blackboxsw> ahh interesting. hah. it didn't on my LXC instances
[21:33] <blackboxsw> glad grep tells the truth. reading back context in this channel
[21:35] <bdmurray> basically "/snap/bin" isn't in $PATH when connected via ssh and I'd thought this was fixed with bug 1659719
[21:37] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: this is within a live install via subiquity? I know there are some funky $PATH gymnastics there
[21:37] <falcojr> bdmurray: got more of that log? I was also under the impression that we never touched /etc/environment and finding where isn't obvious
[21:38] <blackboxsw> I'd expect maybe at some stage we see a write_files declaration in cloud-config that's trying to manipulate /etc/environment if you see those logs in cloud-init.log  `sudo cloud-init query userdata` would check that on the failed environment or `sudo cloud-init collect-logs`
[21:39] <bdmurray> The problem is the userdata file, I do not accept responsibility for this line
[21:39] <dbungert> subiquity does mess with environment more than I would like, but it does so by appending instead of resetting.  It sounds to me though that in this lxd armhf unit subiquity isn't involved.
[21:40] <bdmurray> Anyway, thanks for responding
[21:40] <vorlon> dbungert: you've piqued my interest.  where/why?
[21:42] <dbungert> vorlon: the big problem is that subiquity has both archive python packages and pip packages and we need to fix that.
[21:42] <vorlon> dbungert: why does that require modifying /etc/environment?
[21:42] <dbungert> oh no, it doesn't
[21:42] <vorlon> ah ok
[21:42] <dbungert> this is strictly the environment of two processes or so
[21:43] <blackboxsw> ok, then shouldn't manifest in cloud-config user-data in that case
[21:43] <blackboxsw> so if you're seeing funky user-data with write_files manipulation of /etc/environment bdmurray that's likely our cause, and we'd need to find out the who/why there
[21:44] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: this was my issue https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/430401
[21:44] <blackboxsw> heh. ahh roger got it . sorry for the noise otherwise
[21:44] <bdmurray> No, I'm sorry! ;-)
[21:45] <blackboxsw> sooo. <nice pause> ... SRU review possibility anyone. for bionic ;)
[21:45] <blackboxsw> ... just trying to make busy people feel guilty
[21:46]  * bdmurray already left for afternoon coffee
[21:46] <vorlon> blackboxsw: sorry for not acking - I'm currently looking at some grub2 security SRUs that I'm behind on, then I'll take a lok
[21:46] <vorlon> and also a look
[21:47] <blackboxsw> awesome. mom always said "squeaky wheel gets the SRU review"
[21:47] <falcojr> if that doesn't work we can just flip the table
[21:47] <blackboxsw> heh
[21:54] <vorlon> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gvfs/kinetic/ppc64el gvfs I swear
[22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu47.4]
[22:06] <vorlon> autopkgtest [21:12:58]: test build-procenv:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - -
[22:06] <vorlon> build-procenv        FAIL stderr: W: Ignoring non-equal Provides for package ubuntustudio-wallpapers-jammy in ubuntustudio-wallpapers-kinetic:all=22.10.2
[22:06] <vorlon> autopkgtest [21:12:59]: test build-procenv:  - - - - - - - - - - stderr - - - - - - - - - -
[22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu47.4]
[22:32] <vorlon> blackboxsw: the cloud-init in jammy-proposed is newer than the version in kinetic, please fix
[22:33] <blackboxsw> vorlon: dpkg --compare-versions 22.3.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 lt 22.3.3-0ubuntu1~22.10.1 && echo "All clear"
[22:33] <blackboxsw> All clear
[22:33] <blackboxsw> I'm missing something
[22:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[22:34] <vorlon> blackboxsw: oops, my brain ignored that line because of the ~22.10.1 which I associate exclusively with SRUs
[22:34] <blackboxsw> whew. gave me the sweats for a second
[22:34] <blackboxsw> :)
[22:38] <vorlon> blackboxsw: in which case, I amend my request to "please use expected version numbers for devel series uploads" ;)
[22:50] <blackboxsw> heh thanks.... vorlon to check to see if that was a serious comment or joke. cloud-init used to avoid the version diminish suffix `~22.10.1` for a devel series until it actually released. Is the defined best-practice for packaged delivered to devel releases to avoid specifying release ~MM.NN.1 versions until after a release becomes stable?
[22:50] <vorlon> blackboxsw: yes
[22:50]  * blackboxsw looks up the wikis again.
[22:50] <blackboxsw> ok will revert to our previous behavior.
[22:51] <blackboxsw> so next uploads for L-series will correct that
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (focal-backports/universe) [1.23.0-1~bpo20.04.1 => 1.23.1-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.23.0-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.23.1-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)