 Hi :) New member here from yesterday!!
[07:17] <guiverc> G'day Thonos, ask a Lubuntu support question if you have one, and people will reply/help as they're able to
 What do you use more ? Native deb packages or the snaps? I mean i want to install Gimp. What do you recommend me ?
 Using Lubuntu LTS 22.04 with LXQT 1.1 with the lubuntu-dev backports
[07:25] <guiverc> I don't use gimp often, but I'd usually go for the deb packaged product, only exploring the snap options if I wanted newer (snap often have newer)
 But the deb is a better option in case you dont mind about the version ?
[07:27] <guiverc> It's what I usually use; and if I was using a system that didn't have `gimp` installed; it's what I'd install/try first.. I can't say it's better; mostly that it's what I'd use.
 Understood!
 😀
[07:29] <guiverc> (everything has pros & cons... I'd likely use `rmadison gimp` to see what's available; or if devscripts wasn't already installed `apt-cache policy gimp` and use `snap search gimp` for info on what snaps were available (`snap info` if I wanted more detail etc)
 Maybe I will use this practice: always checking if the package that I need exists in Ubuntu main repository as a deb and if exists install this and if it's not then search for the snap package
[07:44] <guiverc> you use what works for you, or what you consider best in a particular case.. I tend to look first before leaping/installing..  though I do have a preference for Ubuntu (deb) packaged version unless I have a reason to use something else
 is there any particular reason that you make you choose firstly the deb ?
[07:51] <guiverc> myself, I'm mostly using older/resource-limited hardware and find the snaps can be heavier; slower to start...   but some of it I've used deb packages for >20 years & thus know them better (or its just habit maybe)... I don't always use deb packages (I have a couple of snap packages now that are available in deb format too; but I chose snap) so I'm mostly speak general rules/behaviors
[12:04] <aluno> 1
[12:05] <aluno_> aaaa
[12:05] <aluno_> a
[12:05] <aluno_> a
[12:05] <aluno_> a
[12:05] <aluno_> a
[12:05] <aluno_> a
[12:06] <aluno_> oi
[12:06] <aluno_> desculpa bot
[12:06] <aluno_> nao me bane
[12:06] <aluno_> pls
[12:10] <aluno> vai tomar no cu yuri lixo
[12:10] <aluno_> bane ele
[12:18] <aluno>  * jQuery JavaScript Library v3.6.1
[12:19] <aluno>  * https://jquery.com/
[12:19] <aluno>  *
[12:19] <aluno>  * Includes Sizzle.js
[12:19] <aluno>  * https://sizzlejs.com/
[12:19] <aluno>  *
[12:20] <aluno> / arguments.callee.caller (trac-13335). But as of jQuery 3.0 (2016), strict mode should be common
[12:20] <aluno> / enough that all such attempts are guarded in a try block.
[12:20] <aluno> "use strict";
[12:20] <aluno> var arr = [];
[12:20] <aluno> var getProto = Object.getPrototypeOf;
[12:20] <aluno> var slice = arr.slice;
[12:21] <aluno> 		return obj != null && obj [12:21] <aluno> 	};
[12:21] <aluno> var document = window.document;
[12:21] <aluno> 	var preservedScriptAttributes = {
[12:21] <aluno> 		type: true,
[12:21] <aluno> 		src: true,
[12:21] <aluno> 		nonce: true,
[12:21] <aluno> 		noModule: true
[12:21] <aluno> 	};
 Do you have to propose alternative to geany for LXQT?
 Featherpad comes installed by default. (re @Thanos: Do you have to propose alternative to geany for LXQT?)
 Do you have use it to code?
 You don't have to, no. It can be used for regular text.