| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit [source] (jammy-updates) [264-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] | 07:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (jammy-proposed/universe) [276.1-1~bpo22.04.1 => 264-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset) | 07:41 | |
| tjaalton | ping, mesa FFE needs review, bug 1990387 | 07:58 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Bug 1990387 in mesa (Ubuntu) "FFE: Mesa 22.2.0" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990387 | 07:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, question w.r.t. haskell ghc /armhf and your findings | 08:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | looking to https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ghc&arch=armhf | 08:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we have 1d build time w.r.t. 7h on some other machines | 08:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can it be related to arm64 kernel with armhf fs? | 08:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | in case it depends on the kernel host, we might find some wrong configure check on architecture maybe, is this consistent with your lxc tests you did some months ago? | 08:06 |
| ginggs | tjaalton: looking | 08:48 |
| tjaalton | ginggs: thanks, added a comment about the ppa and testing I've done | 08:51 |
| ginggs | tjaalton: I was just about to ask :) | 08:52 |
| tjaalton | yeah, didn't realize that was lacking.. | 08:53 |
| xypron | Packages gsfonts and gsfonts-x11 need to be dropped from the archive to let fonts-urw-base35 migrate from kinetic-proposed. See LP #1990820 #1990823 | 09:00 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1990820 in gsfonts-x11 (Ubuntu) "Drop package gsfonts-x11" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990820 | 09:00 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1990823 in gsfonts (Ubuntu) "Drop package gsfonts" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990823 | 09:00 |
| ginggs | ubuntu-archive ^ | 09:01 |
| laney | let's add a hint to let fonts-urw-base35 migrate and then remove those | 09:27 |
| laney | then we can avoid a gap | 09:27 |
| ginggs | laney: thanks | 09:31 |
| laney | I had to clone the hints branch | 09:32 |
| laney | been a while :-) | 09:32 |
| rs2009 | laney: any solution for the stalling desktop ISO builds? | 10:41 |
| fheimes | Hello sru-team, would you mind having a look at 's390-tools(-signed)', 'zfcp-hbaapi' and 'qemu' in the jammy unapproved queue, where there are stuck for a while, and ideally approve them? | 11:51 |
| cpaelzer | fheimes: IIRC the qemu one waits for another ongoing SRU to complete | 12:17 |
| cpaelzer | yep, still the case | 12:19 |
| cpaelzer | fheimes: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/623178064/qemu_6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.5_source.changes waits for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.4 | 12:19 |
| cpaelzer | and the latter is stuck on SRU verification | 12:20 |
| cpaelzer | fheimes: you might help or nidge the people that own it to finally do so | 12:20 |
| cpaelzer | I hav efixed the autopkgtest of it and I have updated the SRU template notifying people that another one is waiting | 12:20 |
| cpaelzer | but no update AFAICS | 12:20 |
| fheimes | @paelzer: ok, let me have a look at LP#1980896 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.4 then ... | 12:21 |
| fheimes | it was opened by vicamo from Canonical - I think I can do the verification on this one ... | 12:24 |
| tsimonq2 | ubuntu-release: POC for the Lubuntu Kinetic Beta is me. I have quite a list... I'll lay a fresh set of eyes on the current freeze pages but please don't be afraid to let me know if you think I'm too rusty on something. Thanks. | 12:25 |
| rs2009 | tsimonq2: hey | 12:39 |
| rs2009 | "My intent has been to rewrite that part of the code given I have a more concise working version locally" - what change(s) did you need to make to get the Lubuntu ISO building successfully locally? (would be great if you could create an MR too) | 12:40 |
| tsimonq2 | As a temporary "here's what I did" I'll PM you the relevant tasks in my Ansible role, but you'll pretty quickly see once you compare and contrast how it may look once re-implemented | 12:41 |
| tsimonq2 | (Give me a few minutes) | 12:41 |
| rs2009 | tsimonq2: that would be great, thanks! :) | 12:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.192.1.12 => 3.192.1.13] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 12:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (jammy-proposed/main) [3.192.54 => 3.192.54.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 12:44 | |
| tsimonq2 | <rs2009> "Simon Quigley: that would be..." <- Of course :) maybe loop Josh in cause his issue is kind of Germinate related too? | 12:48 |
| rs2009 | tsimonq2: sure, I'll ask ItzSwirlz to check this channel on TG | 12:49 |
| tsimonq2 | 🤙 | 12:49 |
| kisak | good day, is this an appropreate medium to request an adjustment to the per-release i386 whitelist? I'm a mesa PPA maintainer and every 6 months llvm changes their name which puts it out of alignment with the whitelist. | 13:33 |
| kisak | I'm specifically requesting for i386 builds of llvm-toolchain-15 to be allowed on Focal and Jammy for https://launchpad.net/~kisak/+archive/ubuntu/kisak-mesa . | 13:34 |
| xnox | apw: reviewed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=debian-installer such a rebuild will result in a correct upgrade of grub being singning key upgrading from 2017 to 2021v1; and shim-signed upgrade from 1.40.4 -> 1.40.7 (aka upgrade from snapshot, to v15.4 upstream release with many bugfixes on top). Changelog is correct, the test case on the bug report is | 13:46 |
| xnox | incomplete, but easy to test "enroll latest dbx updates, and try booting daily iso". | 13:46 |
| xnox | please accept above debian-installer SRU | 13:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [3.192.30.11 => 3.192.30.12] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 14:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (xenial-proposed/main) [3.168.15 => 3.168.16] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 14:07 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello, why is this channel not mentioned here? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/ChannelList | 14:41 |
| krytarik | LocutusOfBorg: I'm not entirely sure I remember right, but I think the channel was hidden (+s) originally on old freenode, which would be a valid reason for that - now though I'd see no reason not to include it there. | 14:58 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: all of my armhf ghc tests were certainly with an arm64 kernel | 15:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok so vorlon you say that kernel is not the culprit | 15:06 |
| vorlon | sounds like it is not, no | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | just FYI ghc is fixed (abi issues) | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm *trying* to do the rebuilds on bileto | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | for all haskell | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | is it ok to publish in one week if I can sort it out? | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (I'm also removing some other armhf parallel=2 slowness in rules file) | 15:08 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: is the fixed ghc going to require one more rebuild of the whole stack? | 15:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, this is why I do all the rebuilds directly in bileto | 15:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4933 | 15:09 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: then yes, we should be able to do that next week | 15:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 15:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw only armhf and s390x changed ABI, so maybe I can speedup a little bit | 15:22 |
| tjaalton | libllvm15 wants to move to main due to mesa | 15:25 |
| vorlon | I just promoted llvm-toolchain-15 per https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html | 15:28 |
| xnox | vorlon: or maybe you can self-accept d-i SRU, i have reviewed it, and it looks correct from a local rebuild an inspection. | 15:31 |
| xnox | vorlon: hopefully d-i-requirements seed removal is not causing any errors in seeds generators. | 15:32 |
| rs2009 | vorlon: looks like snap-preseed might be broken, which is resulting in the stalling ISO builds (the firefox issue is fixed, and the build gets stuck when 'snap-preseed' is called, after 'snap debug validate-seed' is run) | 15:51 |
| bdmurray | rs2009: How did you get that level of detail? | 15:55 |
| rs2009 | bdmurray: I added a number of echo lines in snap_preseed and snap_validate_seed (in functions), and found that the build would stall at snap_validate_seed when 'snap preseed' is called (the echo line before it would run, but the one after wouldn't) | 15:57 |
| rs2009 | The 'snap-preseed' call could be temporarily removed until the snapd issue's fixed (as it would lengthen the first boot process, but would fix the build issue) | 16:01 |
| vorlon | xnox: no hurry to self-accept that, we don't have the 20.04 point release scheduled yet | 16:01 |
| tjaalton | vorlon: thanks! | 16:02 |
| xnox | vorlon: having a working focal daily would be nice though | 16:09 |
| rs2009 | here's a merge request to make that change: https://code.launchpad.net/~rs2009/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/430492 | 16:09 |
| rs2009 | also, would be great if someone could (perhaps) ask the Snap team to take a look at the issues with snap-preseed | 16:35 |
| ginggs | vorlon: would you take a look at python-redis on component mismatches please? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-redis 3.5.3-2 is correctly in universe, but 4.3.4-3 is in main | 16:40 |
| ginggs | python-tooz demoted the Depends on python3-redis to a Suggests https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-tooz/3.0.0-0ubuntu2 | 16:41 |
| ItzSwirlz | tsimonq2, rs2009: hi, I'm not sure what idea your suggesting here | 16:55 |
| ItzSwirlz | I noticed that the ubuntu-seeds project was incorrectly branched, so i'm getting that fixed but I'm not sure how it would help germinate | 16:55 |
| vorlon | ginggs: oh, is that's what's up; demoted, thanks | 17:30 |
| ginggs | vorlon: ta! | 17:33 |
| vorlon | evidently I was the one who did the demotion in the release pocket but didn't notice the version in -proposed, hah | 17:34 |
| vorlon | bdmurray, teward[m], there should be an invitation for ~motu to join ~ubuntucinnamon-dev, could one of you please accept it so we can have proper seed management? (or if it's not there please let ItzSwirlz and I know) | 17:35 |
| ItzSwirlz | I just sent an invitation | 17:36 |
| teward[m] | *yawns and looks* | 17:36 |
| teward[m] | vorlon: itzswirlz: E:NOACCESS | 17:37 |
| teward[m] | with ItzSwirlz being owner of the subteam I can't add them it seems | 17:37 |
| teward[m] | ah there it is | 17:37 |
| teward[m] | loopholes are FUN! | 17:37 |
| teward[m] | added my own team (MOTU) to the cinnamon developers team | 17:38 |
| teward[m] | and because of the invite it worked. | 17:38 |
| teward[m] | vorlon: as such, done. *goes and hunts down coffee* | 17:38 |
| vorlon | teward[m]: right, needed a member of the DMB to accept the invite on behalf of ~motu - thanks :) | 17:38 |
| teward[m] | @vorlon problem is it never sent me the invitation so i had to loophole the thing | 17:39 |
| teward[m] | E:NOINVITATION so :P | 17:39 |
| teward[m] | and i know LP and email are delayed a little | 17:39 |
| vorlon | ah | 17:39 |
| vorlon | delayed a little> should not be? | 17:39 |
| teward[m] | also this poses a question: shouldn't that dev team be under the ownership./control of DMB not the specific flavor? | 17:39 |
| teward[m] | I ask this because if it grants any kind of dev privs that might need DMB involvement | 17:39 |
| teward[m] | should not be> MS365 is where my email sits, it's always ~45s behind | 17:40 |
| vorlon | teward[m]: I don't believe that's ever been the case for other flavor teams? | 17:40 |
| teward[m] | greylisting and swtuff | 17:40 |
| teward[m] | stuff* | 17:40 |
| vorlon | teward[m]: yeah the invite was sent ~1h ago | 17:40 |
| teward[m] | vorlon: i forget did a specific cinnamon packageset get made yet? | 17:40 |
| teward[m] | > sent 1h ago might've gotten lost in my email i have like 500 | 17:40 |
| ItzSwirlz | ty teward | 17:41 |
| teward[m] | though when y'all pinged me Swirlz just said "I just sent an invitation" so i see a discrepancy at play | 17:41 |
| teward[m] | i still want to know if the cinnamon flavor has a packageset or not made yet :P | 17:41 |
| ItzSwirlz | well i sent it about 10 mins ago | 17:41 |
| teward[m] | for obvious permissions reasons | 17:41 |
| teward[m] | which is why it hasn't arrived yet, that sometimes takes time to sift through greylisting | 17:41 |
| ItzSwirlz | teward[m]: we can't even get germinate working and for the life of me nobody can figure out why | 17:41 |
| teward[m] | greylisting delays up to 30min | 17:41 |
| teward[m] | don't ask me :) | 17:41 |
| vorlon | teward[m]: this isn't for packagesets at this point, no | 17:42 |
| ItzSwirlz | Okay; so now I need a proper fork of ubuntu-seeds under ubuntucinnamon-dev for lp:~ubuntucinnamon-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntucinnamon.kinetic | 17:42 |
| teward[m] | ack | 17:42 |
| ItzSwirlz | I don't think I forked the branch properly and that may be why germinate is failing, if you could do that, big 'preesh | 17:43 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: lp:~ubuntucinnamon-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntucinnamon.kinetic is the bzr format, is that what you intend? | 17:43 |
| teward[m] | *goes back to prodding Simon Quigley with the intention of fixing crap in Debian and Github for pastebinit because there's some force-push process breaking crap in terms of pull reqs and fixes* | 17:43 |
| ItzSwirlz | vorlon: I guess. Unity got their thing working with it, and I know bazaar is outdated but i think its our last hope | 17:44 |
| ItzSwirlz | i ran through EVERYTHING in the seed. | 17:44 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: unity is not using bzr | 17:44 |
| ItzSwirlz | vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity7maintainers/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-unity.kinetic | 17:44 |
| ItzSwirlz | its a bzr branch ._. | 17:44 |
| vorlon | that's not the live branch | 17:44 |
| vorlon | and I've said that I will not stand up any new flavors using bzr for seeds | 17:45 |
| vorlon | let me have a look | 17:45 |
| ItzSwirlz | Okay... so are you willing to give a shot and try to help me figure out what is happening? | 17:45 |
| ItzSwirlz | When germinate tries to clone platform in every flavor/remix but Cinnamon's its fine. For cinnamon it errors out and I can't figure out why other than it's magic. | 17:45 |
| vorlon | where / in what context are you running germinate? | 17:46 |
| ItzSwirlz | You'll also see on the UCR seed (https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntucinnamon-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntucinnamon) that it is not listed as a project of Ubuntu Seeds | 17:46 |
| ItzSwirlz | vorlon: https://github.com/Ubuntu-Cinnamon-Remix/ubuntucinnamon-meta | 17:46 |
| ItzSwirlz | the ubuntucinnamon-meta package, you can pull-lp-source it | 17:46 |
| ItzSwirlz | So even on unity's meta it will say fatal: remote error, repository '../platform' not found. But it finds the correct platform.kinetic, and for Unity it continues but UCR just stops. | 17:49 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: your update.cfg needs to reference both the ~ubuntucinnamon-dev namespace and the ~ubuntu-core-dev namespace, the latter provides platform | 17:50 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: quite a strange list of architectures in update.cfg, Ubuntu has never supported mips64el | 17:51 |
| ItzSwirlz | vorlon: whoops, forgot to push that. I removed it on my local system | 17:51 |
| ItzSwirlz | https://github.com/lubuntu-team/lubuntu-meta-packaging/blob/ubuntu/jammy/update.cfg - lubuntu has practically the same exact thing | 17:52 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: this is the error I get currently: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/CYQd8GJgcs/ | 17:54 |
| ItzSwirlz | That's the same error I have. | 17:55 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: your STRUCTURE lists 'supported' but there is no 'supported' file in the seed repo | 17:55 |
| ItzSwirlz | I'll try yoinking it ig | 17:55 |
| ItzSwirlz | hold up i think it might actually have worked | 17:58 |
| ItzSwirlz | if this was it the whole time i'm going to throw my headset out the window | 17:59 |
| ItzSwirlz | it worked, what the actual- | 18:00 |
| ItzSwirlz | Eickmeyer, mystery solved. I recommend you take a shot while you're old enough to | 18:00 |
| ItzSwirlz | So, what do I need to put in the supported file, is it necessary? | 18:03 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: if you look at ubuntu-unity, it's completely empty. I'm not sure if anything cares about the supported seed existing at all, the failure was simply the mismatch that STRUCTURE referenced a seed that didn't exist | 18:13 |
| ItzSwirlz | vorlon: Alright, cool. Thank you SO much | 18:13 |
| vorlon | (we care about 'supported' for Ubuntu itself because it defines main, but otherwise...) | 18:13 |
| Eickmeyer | ItzSwirlz: I'll do it when I have a chance. | 18:27 |
| Eickmeyer | Probably should soon, now that I think about it. | 18:27 |
| vorlon | ItzSwirlz: so removing mips64el from update.cfg is necessary to let ./update run; but what about ppc64el and s390x? do you really want this metapackage built for those architectures? | 18:34 |
| vorlon | these are not desktop hardware; s390x doesn't even have physical dispalys | 18:35 |
| ItzSwirlz | oh, i guess ill remove them | 18:35 |
| sarnold | hmm, I thought when I visited the mainframe in suse's basement that it had a thinkpad taped to the side :0 | 18:37 |
| vorlon | >:| | 18:38 |
| bdmurray | The ubuntu-server-live livefs is buidling and that image includes snaps so I'm not convinced its livecd-rootfs | 18:43 |
| Eickmeyer | I take it that means we haven't gotten to the bottom of the stalled images yet. | 18:48 |
| bdmurray | That is correct | 18:53 |
| bdmurray | rs2009: Do you have a minimal test case for your change regarding removal snap-preseed? | 19:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntucinnamon-wallpapers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10.1] (no packageset) | 19:31 | |
| mwhudson | vorlon: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/2.784 <- don't we still build ubuntu-server preinstalled images for pis? | 20:10 |
| mwhudson | hmm maybe not | 20:10 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: oh possibly - but previously the autopkgtest was build-testing d-i server images which is not useful | 20:11 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: yes that doesn't sound useful | 20:12 |
| mwhudson | so much dead code but i guess the plan is to set it all on fire so not really worth pruning it | 20:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.2-0ubuntu4 => 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu5] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 21:01 | |
| Ukikie | libigloo uploaded to kinetic, it's a bit late but fixes use-after-free and seems small enough, https://dpaste.com/3XCRPXDAW | 22:52 |
| === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 22.04.1 Jammy Jellyfish, 20.04.5 Focal Fossa | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Kinetic Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or whiskey | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!