[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-noto-color-emoji (jammy-proposed/main) [2.034-1 => 2.038-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tcpreplay (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.4.1-2 => 4.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tcpreplay [source] (kinetic-proposed) [4.4.1-2ubuntu1]
[02:37] <RAOF> ?? nvidia-driver-515 appears to only install aarch64 libraries ??
[02:37]  * RAOF must be reading the diff wrong.
[02:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [source] (focal-proposed) [515.65.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]
[03:49] <rs2009> bdmurray: can we increase the size limit for the Ubuntu Unity ISOs to 3.1 GBs? (the presence of the Firefox snap has resulted in the ISO size being much greater, going from 2.1 GBs to 2.9 GBs)
[04:22] <sarnold> wow, really?
[04:23] <rs2009> sarnold: yep, wasn't expecting such a big size difference
[04:23] <sarnold> me neither
[04:26] <tsimonq2> I mean, snaps kind of have to take their own environment with them... makes me curious on why Firefox is 700 MBs
[04:50] <rs2009> just tested the new Ubuntu Unity ISO, and the snaps are finally back
[04:51] <rs2009> guess Ubuntu Unity's ready for the beta then
[04:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Kinetic Beta] (20220927.2) has been added
[04:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Kinetic Beta] (20220927.2) has been added
[04:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive [Kinetic Beta] (20220927.2) has been added
[04:58] <rs2009> also, does anyone have any idea why the Ubuntu Unity Plymouth splash screen doesn't appear when booting the live ISO, but appears on the installed system without any issues?
[05:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.2]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (jammy-backports/universe) [272-1~bpo22.04.1 => 275-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[05:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (jammy-backports) [275-1~bpo22.04.1]
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[06:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lame (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.100-4 => 3.100-5] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core amd64 edge [Kinetic Beta] (20220928) has been added
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022c-1ubuntu3 => 2022d-1ubuntu1] (core)
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libigloo (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.1-1 => 0.9.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libigloo [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (kinetic-proposed/main) [1:102.3.0+build1-0ubuntu1 => 1:102.3.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-marshmallow-dataclass (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.5.8-2 => 8.5.8-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-marshmallow-dataclass [source] (kinetic-proposed) [8.5.8-2ubuntu1]
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Kinetic Beta] (3142782370) has been added
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-workspace (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4:5.25.5-0ubuntu3 => 4:5.25.5-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu)
[11:19] <athos> Hi! I am wondering if the generate-freeze-block described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcess is indeed in place ATM. i.e., is there any tooling currently preventing packages from migrating out of -proposed?
[11:26] <RikMills> athos: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/commit/?id=dd85ccc45a68f15577681bbaa44b9702ed3adb2d
[11:26] <RikMills> seeded packages are ending up in the unapproved queue
[11:27] <RikMills> just uploaded one myself
[11:43] <athos> RikMills: so, my looking at the generate-freeze-block script I suppose the packages in that list are all seeded and non-seeded packages that were already pending migration are free to migrate even during the freeze
[11:46] <RikMills> yes
[11:46] <athos> s/my/by/
[11:46] <athos> thanks :)
[11:51] <athos> Could we edit "Release minus 3" in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcess to s/to keep uploads from migrating out of -proposed/to keep seeded package uploades from migrating out of -proposed/ ?
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lame (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.100-4 => 3.100-5] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[11:58] <xnox> vorlon:  i was hoping to have 18.18 kernel unblocked to migrate, and yet somehow https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/tree/release?h=devel&id=41e2404e23e824b76ad8bf158e225d630618d173 still has linux as blocked. I am not sure if there is syntax error in our hints, or if something else needs to be done somewhere else given "block ..." stanzas in the
[11:58] <xnox> autogenerated "freeze" file.
[11:58] <xnox> do we need to unblock linux twice?
[11:58] <xnox> cc: bdmurray ^^^^
[12:01] <xnox> ah,
[12:02] <xnox> apw:  i think the freeze block is blocking not just linux, but all other packages too, ie. linux-signed linux-meta linux-restricted-modules etc. so we need to request to unblock them all. or you unblock them all in your apw file, in the ubuntu-release hints file.
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [source] (jammy-proposed) [515.65.01-0ubuntu0.22.04.3]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (jammy-proposed/restricted) [515.65.01-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 515.65.01-0ubuntu0.22.04.3] (i386-whitelist)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (focal-proposed/restricted) [515.65.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 515.65.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] (i386-whitelist)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (kinetic-proposed/main) [8.6.0-0ubuntu1 => 8.6.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[12:42] <cpaelzer> Hi release team, this libvirt upload fixes a bug that causes the default network to not be enabled.
[12:42] <cpaelzer> If you think having that unfixed affects the beta testing, feel free to consider accepting it from -unapproved
[12:52] <xnox> @ubuntu-release team bdmurray / vorlon - could you please consider unblocking linux 18.18 abi to migrate https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1990366/comments/1
[12:59] <bdmurray> xnox: unblocking so what would happen?
[13:00]  * bdmurray reads the comment
[13:00] <bdmurray> xnox: You want me to respin everything?
[13:10] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: How could libvirt break some beta testers?
[13:12] <Trevinho> bdmurray: hey, have you seen  my ping last night about gdm3?
[13:13] <xnox> bdmurray: unblock, such that it migrates, such that we do respin everything but riscv & raspi =)
[13:13] <bdmurray> xnox: Could you rationalize that a bit more for me?
[13:13] <xnox> because people will not like broken shnaps and apparmor bugs
[13:14] <ahasenack> shnaps :)
[13:14] <xnox> bdmurray:  see top of changelog of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/5.19.0-18.18
[13:14] <xnox> * 5.19.0-17.17: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000084
[13:14] <xnox>     (LP: #1990236)
[13:14] <xnox> the rest is boring
[13:15] <bdmurray> schnapps ?
[13:15] <ahasenack> funny either way :)
[13:16] <bdmurray> Trevinho: gdm looks like a major version bump w/ no Launchpad bug reference and freeze exception information
[13:17] <bdmurray> xnox: Out of curiousity does this also happen to fix the virtio_rng issue?
[13:18] <Trevinho> bdmurray: it's mostly a bugfix version as gdm skipped all the 43~alpha, ~beta and rc phases so we couldn't proceed earlier, but version number actually don't say much about the actual changes that were minor but still worth to test: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/NEWS
[13:20] <Trevinho> actually better at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/compare/42.0...43.0?from_project_id=1856 it's all minor changes
[13:23] <xnox> bdmurray:  it does contain a bunch of virtio rng reverts too, i don't know if that "fixes everything" or not.
[13:25] <bdmurray> xnox: it won't affect my decsision I was just curious
[13:25] <xnox> bdmurray:  or like if you want to release current beta images, that's fine, we but we do want to release 18.18 as soon as we lift freeze block; or like just before lifting freeze block.
[13:25] <xnox> unless you are not going to lift freeze block at all, going forward until release date.
[13:25] <xnox> (i can't remember what you lot in ubuntu-release team do normally between beta and release)
[13:26] <arighi> bdmurray, xnox hello, sorry, I just jumped here now, I know you're talking about kernel stuff for the beta :)
[13:27] <bdmurray> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/ubuntu-release-tools/+git/templates/tree/jira-milestones/devel-release/beta-release.yaml#n140
[13:28] <arighi> bdmurray, just a note (I missed the previous messages, so I apologize if it has been mentioned already) the latest 5.19.0-18.18 kernel has the fix for virtio-rng, so if there's still a chance to put that in the beta, we don't need to blacklist the module anymore
[13:31] <bdmurray> xnox: so we currently have 5.19.0-15.15 but bug 1990236 refers to 5.19.0-17.17 is the kernel currently on the images affected?
[13:31] <bdmurray> s/currently have/currently have on the images/
[13:39] <bdmurray> xnox: ?
[13:48] <xnox> bdmurray:  i don't think it is, so we don't care i guess =)
[13:48] <xnox> arighi:  beta was built with -15.15 as 17.17 never made it out of proposed (or has been removed?) so we are fine to ship beta with -15.15, no?
[13:50] <arighi> xnox, yes 17.17 made to proposed, but not release (and it was affected by multiple bugs, due to the new AA changes - that are reverted in 18.18) and the one that is waiting to get in release right now is 18.18
[13:52] <bdmurray> arighi: But 15.15 doesn't have the bugs that 17.17 has correct?
[13:52] <arighi> bdmurray, correct, same with 18.18 because the new apparmor / lsm stacking patch sets have been reverted
[13:53] <xnox> bdmurray:  however we can't release ppc64el with 15.15 i don't think.
[13:53] <xnox> bdmurray:  so maybe hold ppc64el images (server ppc64el only i guess) and then can release the rest.
[13:53] <arighi> bdmurray, basically -18.18 would be the best kernel that we have at the moment, because of the virtio-rng fix and because it doesn't have the issues that 17.17 has...
[13:53] <bdmurray> Alright given that 15.15 is okay and we have a fair bit of testing with that kernel already I'm inclined not to switch
[13:54] <bdmurray> xnox: bringing more rain to my parade?
[13:54] <bdmurray> what's wrong with ppc64el?
[13:54] <xnox> see backchannel
[13:54] <arighi> bdmurray, ... and 18.18 doesn't have the ppc64 issue as well (as mentioned by xnox), but for that we can maybe hold ppc64 images...
[13:55] <xnox> bdmurray:  i shall mark ppc64el images a failed testing on iso tracker i guess.
[13:55] <xnox> because it is currently broken.
[13:57] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: I testers have a process like 1. sping up 22.10 2. install libvirt 3. do KVM based tests => #3 will fail everything by "default network is not active"
[13:57] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: the kernel teams tests were the ones seeing it in the first place
[14:00] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: noted, thanks
[14:01] <cpaelzer> but I'm not pressing anyone to accept it, really just wanted to FYI so it can be considered
[14:02] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: I appreciate the ping and the details
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10.5 => 22.10.6] (ubuntustudio)
[14:34] <dbungert> ubuntu-archive: please consider approving klibc.  This upload addresses the FTBFS found in the recent test rebuild.
[14:35] <bdmurray> dbungert: we are frozen for the beta right now, this can wait until Friday right?
[14:35] <dbungert> bdmurray: there is no particular rush
[14:35] <dbungert> I will wait
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nbconvert (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.5.3-1 => 6.5.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nbconvert [source] (kinetic-proposed) [6.5.3-1ubuntu1]
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [source] (jammy-proposed) [515.65.01-0ubuntu0.22.04.3]
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [source] (focal-proposed) [515.65.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.3]
[15:08] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: I'm going to need an approval on ubuntustudio-default-settings due to bug 1991063, and probably a respin for Ubuntu Studio. Pretty nasty bug that I didn't have a fix for until an hour ago.
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core amd64 edge [Kinetic Beta] has been disabled
[15:09] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: Could you elaborate on how "nasty" it is? The bug wasn't very informative iirc
[15:10] <Eickmeyer> No xdg-user-dirs. for new users or fresh installs.
[15:10] <Eickmeyer> So, no Documents, Music, Pictures, etc. directories.
[15:14] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I hope that's informative enough. To me the bug made perfect sense.
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Kinetic Beta] has been disabled
[15:23] <Eickmeyer> Disabled?
[15:24] <bdmurray> So that tests aren't reported on the old image
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-default-settings [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.6]
[15:24] <Eickmeyer> Ah.
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-faraday (focal-proposed/universe) [0.15.4-3 => 0.15.4-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[15:26] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Thanks. :)
[15:34] <ginggs> ubuntustudio is getting a respin and will be available in a couple of hours
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.7 => 2.4.8] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:44] <juliank> rbasak: do you want to have a go at this apt SRU? the kinetic one we'll sync from Debian after the beta I suppose. Critical bug fixes, need to go to proposed today, and we should push it out to updates on monday, as it's blocking any SRUs with interdependencies
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gemmi (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.5.6+ds-2 => 0.5.6+ds-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gemmi [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.6+ds-2ubuntu1]
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (focal-backports) [1.23.1-1~bpo20.04.1]
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.23.1-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:52] <juliank> rbasak: or I guess bdmurray can have a look at the apt sru, I don't mind, I just know today is your shift, and sil2100 is out tomorrow on his shift, so meh
[16:07] <bdmurray> I'm not sure when I'd get to it w/ the beta
[16:19] <paride> bdmurray, utkarsh2102, any ubuntu member can change the topic here, or be channel operator
[16:19] <paride> see /msg chanserv flags #ubuntu-release
[16:21] <rs2009> paride: I don't seem to be an OP in #ubuntu-unity. Would it be possible for you to give me OP rights there? (wanted to update the channel topic there)
[16:23] <paride> moving discussion there
[16:26] <bdmurray> paride: ah, that explains how the patch pilot thing worked in #ubuntu-devel
[16:27] <bdmurray> paride: thanks!
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (jammy-proposed/main) [2.17.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 2.17.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (core)
[16:54] <rbasak> juliank: looking. Do you have an upload lined up for Kinetic somewhere?
[17:01] <bdmurray> rbasak: As I understand it the plan is to sync it from debian
[17:04] <rbasak> OK
[17:07] <juliank> Indeed
[17:11] <rbasak> Accepted, thanks
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.8]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keystone (kinetic-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0+git2022091213.1ea9f7557-0ubuntu2 => 2:21.0.0+git2022091213.1ea9f7557-0ubuntu3] (openstack)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icu (kinetic-proposed/main) [71.1-3 => 71.1-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:01] <arraybolt3> Critical bug, the GUI do-release-upgrader for Kubuntu and Lubuntu is reliably failing with "The upgrade has been aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a)." So far I have reproduced this partially (some extreme graphical glitchiness with the Lubuntu upgrader, though I didn't let it go all the way through to the point of failure), and I'm reproducing it in Kubuntu now.
[18:03] <bdmurray> rs2009: we've bumped the size limit for ubuntu-unity
[18:03] <utkarsh2102> paride, bdmurray: indeed. I found that #ubuntu-devel has -t already set. So anyone can change the topic via /topic <topic>
[18:03] <utkarsh2102> however, there's a caveat here
[18:04] <utkarsh2102> it doesn't work with IRC clients, like Matrix
[18:04] <utkarsh2102> but using irssi or IRC, it should just work
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Kinetic Beta] has been updated (20220928)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (jammy-proposed/main) [3.192.54.1 => 3.192.54.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [3.192.30.12 => 3.192.30.13] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.192.1.13 => 3.192.1.14] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:41] <bdmurray> arraybolt3: thanks for the heads up
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (xenial-proposed/main) [3.168.16 => 3.168.17] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-notifier [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.192.54.2]
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (jammy-proposed/main) [3.192.54.1 => 3.192.54.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-menu (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.60 => 0.61] (ubuntustudio)
[20:15] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Found another one and fixed it, this time with the custom menus in Ubuntu Studio not being correct in the live session. That's the ubuntustudio-menu upload. bug 1991150.
[20:17] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: Are you asking for a respin for this fix?
[20:18] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I hate to do so, but yes. :(
[20:18] <Eickmeyer> I'll buy you a beer in Prague or something.
[20:21] <bdmurray> I know how large the beers in Prague are!
[20:25] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: HAHAHAHA
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-menu [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.61]
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Kinetic Beta] has been disabled
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (kinetic-proposed/main) [1:102.3.0+build1-0ubuntu1 => 1:102.3.1+build2-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[22:28] <bdmurray> rebuilding ubuntustudio
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Kinetic Beta] has been updated (20220928.1)