[14:59] <juliank> o/
[14:59] <ogayot> o/
[15:00] <juliank> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:00] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:00:18 UTC.  The chair is juliank.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:00] <xypron> \o
[15:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:00] <bdrung> \o
[15:01] <juliank> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-29-september-2022/30898
[15:01] <jawn-smith> o/
[15:01] <juliank> weekly status is there
[15:01] <bdmurray> o/
[15:01] <juliank> I forgot mine :(
[15:01] <juliank> Let's all take our usual time to read and ask questions
[15:02] <ginggs> o/
[15:05] <bdmurray> enr0n: can you elaborate on bug 1964036?
[15:07] <enr0n> bdmurray: I did an upgrade attempt where I removed the firefox entry in deb2snap.json, so that u-r-u would not mess with the firefox snap or deb
[15:07] <bdrung> xypron, regarding the gemmi failure: Why did you disable the tests on non-amd64 instead of fixing the test case?
[15:07] <enr0n> When I did that, the icon was still missing on upgrade, suggesting that u-r-u is not the cause of that bug
[15:09] <bdmurray> Still shouldn't we not be removing the deb?
[15:09] <bdmurray> waveform: no it can't be added to your PPU but if you were a core dev! ;-)
[15:10] <enr0n> Correct, we should let the deb handle the transition. I was just pointing out that the original issue raised in the bug is not fixed by us leaving the deb alone
[15:10] <waveform> bdmurray, I'm sure if someone checks the coverage of that PPU ... ;)
[15:12] <juliank> #topic Release incoming bugs
[15:12] <juliank> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:13] <juliank> bug 1990429
[15:13] <xypron> bdrung: it is about mathematical accuracy. The same two tests are disabled on Windows for the same reason.
[15:13] <xypron> bdrung: we don't expect the exact same numbers on other architectures.
[15:14] <juliank> We had that last week already huh
[15:14] <juliank> tag it  foundations-todo?
[15:15] <juliank> bug 1990202
[15:15] <juliank> we also looked at this last week
[15:16] <juliank> did we mean to untag this?
[15:16] <bdmurray> I'll do it
[15:16] <juliank> bug 1990856
[15:16] <juliank> that sounds like not a bug
[15:17] <juliank> ah
[15:17] <mclemenceau> o/
[15:18] <juliank> seems valid
[15:18] <juliank> subscribing
[15:18] <juliank> bug 1097467
[15:19] <juliank> going through the same bugs every week not super helpful :D
[15:20] <juliank> this discussion needs to go upstream
[15:21] <juliank> Removing the tag, there isn't anything we can do here really
[15:21] <juliank> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:21] <juliank> bug 1990586
[15:22] <bdmurray> I think there is a needs-forwarding response in the ubuntu-qa-tools scripts
[15:22] <juliank> this in progress, going to fix up tags
[15:22] <juliank> end of list :D
[15:22] <juliank> let's look at foundations-triage-discuss bugs
[15:22] <juliank> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/foundations-triage-discuss-bug-tasks.html
[15:23] <juliank> bug 1991139
[15:23] <juliank> this is bug resulting from phasing implementation in update-manager and apt
[15:23] <juliank> so we solved dist-upgrade then keep back phased packages, but any dependencies they marked for install are still being marked for install
[15:24] <juliank> not super high priority, more of an annoyance
[15:24] <juliank> but needs to be fixed
[15:24] <juliank> subscribing the team
[15:24] <juliank> bug 1991083
[15:25] <juliank> bdmurray: what do you want to discuss?
[15:25] <juliank> fancy bug
[15:25] <bdmurray> I think it is important for the release and didn't want to just add it to todo w/o it also being added to the pulse
[15:28] <juliank> imported as FR-2732
[15:29] <juliank> (and tagged todo)
[15:29] <juliank> bug 1990520
[15:30] <schopin> IMO we should tag it, it's on my personal todo anyway :)
[15:30] <juliank> not sure what KMIP is but this sounds important to get done and is just sponsoring, tag it todo
[15:32] <juliank> bug 1987924
[15:32] <juliank> This will happen in a couple of weeks
[15:32] <juliank> I'm gonna subscribe foundations-bugs to it but not tag it todo?
[15:33] <juliank> bug 1987541 even less priority
[15:34] <juliank> > I'm gonna subscribe foundations-bugs to it but not tag it todo?
[15:34] <juliank> bug 1982511
[15:34] <juliank> > I'm gonna subscribe foundations-bugs to it but not tag it todo?
[15:36] <juliank> bug 1920753
[15:39] <juliank> so this machine had updates pocket disabled but image was built with that
[15:39] <juliank> so he had libc6 ubuntu9.9 installed, but only ubuntu9.7 in the sources.list
[15:39] <juliank> which doesn't work
[15:39] <juliank> This is Invalid
[15:40] <bdmurray> It feels to me like we should be capturing sources.list in bug reports more regularly
[15:41] <bdrung> bdmurray, feel free to open a bug report against apport to collect the sources.list by default
[15:45] <juliank> that's this list
[15:45] <juliank> let's investigate all our todo bugs
[15:45] <juliank> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/foundations-todo-bug-tasks.html
[15:45] <juliank> well, let's get an overview at least
[15:46] <juliank> looking at Importance Undecided, Status New
[15:47] <juliank> bug 1981109
[15:48] <juliank> is  actualyl this todo?, ubuntu-meta is assigned to server?
[15:48] <bdmurray> ubuntu-meta is a shared package
[15:51] <juliank> let's ask steve about this, and  continue with bug 1988710
[15:51] <juliank> false positive compiler warning
[15:52] <juliank> medium I'd say, easy to workaround anyway
[15:52] <juliank> doko: ^
[15:52] <bdmurray> juliank: are you reading the description or comment #3?
[15:52] <doko> it's upstreamed, do we care about alpha?
[15:53] <juliank> I just want to know which Importance to set :D
[15:53] <doko> minor. there's a work-around, and we also could stop building the alpha qemu
[15:54] <juliank> that's it for Undecided New ones
[15:55] <juliank> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:55] <juliank> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:55] <juliank> it's empty
[15:55] <bdrung> \o/
[15:55] <juliank> #topic AOB
[15:55] <bdrung> The apport SRUs are waiting to being accepted in -proposed.
[15:56] <bdmurray> I'm out next week
[15:57] <jawn-smith> I'm out the week after next
[15:57] <juliank> Germany is out Monday :D
[15:57] <juliank> I
[15:57] <juliank> so I'm at an event next week, and travelling only, I won't be attending meets most likely
[16:00] <juliank> #endmeeting
[16:00] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 16:00:09 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-09-29-15.00.moin.txt