| mup | PR snapd#12248 opened: fakeinstaller: format SystemDetails result with %+v <Created by mwhudson> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12248> | 01:10 |
|---|---|---|
| mup | PR snapd#12249 opened: cmd/libsnap-confine-private: do not panic on chmod failure <Simple 😃> <Needs security review> <Created by mardy> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12249> | 05:56 |
| murmel | what's the status of identifying official snaps? https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/bogus-apps-in-store/4703/26 as it's still not really easy to identify :S | 09:07 |
| ogra | official snaps should be released by the Canonical account | 09:10 |
| ogra | (and have a little green checkmark next to the publisher, but i think that's true for any Canonical snaps anyway) | 09:11 |
| murmel | ogra: talking more about keepassxc and hugo for example, at least keepassxc.org says it's official, but nothing says that on snapcraft.io (i guess that's related to the green checkmark?). with hugo I literally have no idea | 09:11 |
| murmel | with keepassxc, I assume they just never "verified" the account, that's why the checkmark is missing (I assume it's sth like twitter checkmark) | 09:12 |
| ogra | well, it is up to the publisher to apply for validation ... | 09:12 |
| murmel | ahh, great. seems like need to talk to them | 09:12 |
| ogra | for some things it is mandatory to have the verification done in advance ... i.e. for classic snaps from external resources | 09:13 |
| ogra | but strict snaps do not require that | 09:13 |
| murmel | huh, I thought with classic ones, there is also some more vetting, very afair | 09:15 |
| ogra | yep | 09:18 |
| ogra | classic has some quite big hurdles ... vetting is one of them | 09:19 |
| murmel | :) great | 09:19 |
| mup | PR snapd#12250 opened: tests: add minimal-smoke test for UC22 and increase minimal RAM <Run nested> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12250> | 09:57 |
| mup | PR snapd#12244 closed: o/snapstate: fix snaps-hold pruning/reset in the presence of system holding <Created by pedronis> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12244> | 11:27 |
| mup | PR snapd#12251 opened: tests: ensure that fakeinstaller put the seed into the right place <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12251> | 12:12 |
| mup | PR snapd#12239 closed: tests: add libfwupd and libfwupdplugin5 to openSUSE dependencies <Simple 😃> <Test Robustness> <Created by mardy> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12239> | 12:22 |
| mup | PR snapd#11575 closed: many: full ICE changes <â›” Blocked> <Created by anonymouse64> <Closed by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11575> | 12:27 |
| lissyx | I'm wondering about the sandbox on snap | 13:09 |
| lissyx | in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1786533 people are expecting to be able to drag and drop to/from firefox | 13:10 |
| mup | PR snapd#12170 closed: many: add stub services for prompting <Squash-merge> <cherry-picked> <Created by mardy> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12170> | 13:53 |
| mup | PR snapd#12252 opened: snapcraft: update libgcc1->libgcc-s1 <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12252> | 14:28 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3866 closed: fix: confirm provider install when using experiental extension <Created by Guillaumebeuzeboc> <Merged by mr-cal> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3866> | 16:31 |
| mup | PR snapd#12252 closed: snapcraft: update libgcc1->libgcc-s1 <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12252> | 16:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!