[01:10] <mup> PR snapd#12248 opened: fakeinstaller: format SystemDetails result with %+v <Created by mwhudson> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12248>
[05:56] <mup> PR snapd#12249 opened: cmd/libsnap-confine-private: do not panic on chmod failure <Simple 😃> <Needs security review> <Created by mardy> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12249>
[09:07] <murmel> what's the status of identifying official snaps? https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/bogus-apps-in-store/4703/26 as it's still not really easy to identify :S
[09:10] <ogra> official snaps should be released by the Canonical account 
[09:11] <ogra> (and have a little green checkmark next to the publisher, but i think that's true for any Canonical snaps anyway)
[09:11] <murmel> ogra: talking more about keepassxc and hugo for example, at least keepassxc.org says it's official, but nothing says that on snapcraft.io (i guess that's related to the green checkmark?). with hugo I literally have no idea
[09:12] <murmel> with keepassxc, I assume they just never "verified" the account, that's why the checkmark is missing (I assume it's sth like twitter checkmark)
[09:12] <ogra> well, it is up to the publisher to apply for validation ... 
[09:12] <murmel> ahh, great. seems like need to talk to them
[09:13] <ogra> for some things it is mandatory to have the verification done in advance ... i.e. for classic snaps from external resources
[09:13] <ogra> but strict snaps do not require that
[09:15] <murmel> huh, I thought with classic ones, there is also some more vetting, very afair
[09:18] <ogra> yep
[09:19] <ogra> classic has some quite big hurdles ... vetting is one of them 
[09:19] <murmel> :) great
[09:57] <mup> PR snapd#12250 opened: tests: add minimal-smoke test for UC22 and increase minimal RAM <Run nested> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12250>
[11:27] <mup> PR snapd#12244 closed: o/snapstate: fix snaps-hold pruning/reset in the presence of system holding <Created by pedronis> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12244>
[12:12] <mup> PR snapd#12251 opened: tests: ensure that fakeinstaller put the seed into the right place <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12251>
[12:22] <mup> PR snapd#12239 closed: tests: add libfwupd and libfwupdplugin5 to openSUSE dependencies <Simple 😃> <Test Robustness> <Created by mardy> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12239>
[12:27] <mup> PR snapd#11575 closed: many: full ICE changes <⛔ Blocked> <Created by anonymouse64> <Closed by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11575>
[13:09] <lissyx> I'm wondering about the sandbox on snap
[13:10] <lissyx> in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1786533 people are expecting to be able to drag and drop to/from firefox
[13:53] <mup> PR snapd#12170 closed: many: add stub services for prompting <Squash-merge> <cherry-picked> <Created by mardy> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12170>
[14:28] <mup> PR snapd#12252 opened: snapcraft: update libgcc1->libgcc-s1 <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12252>
[16:31] <mup> PR snapcraft#3866 closed: fix: confirm provider install when using experiental extension <Created by Guillaumebeuzeboc> <Merged by mr-cal> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3866>
[16:38] <mup> PR snapd#12252 closed: snapcraft: update libgcc1->libgcc-s1 <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12252>