[01:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-epub-thumbnailer (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7-2 => 1.7-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-epub-thumbnailer [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7-3]
[04:16] <amurray> ginggs: hey I see you approved the FFe for apparmor in LP: #1989309 - I notice this got sponsored by utkarsh2102 but it seems to be stuck in unapproved - can this please be sponsored to -proposed? thanks
[04:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1989309 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "[FFe] new apparmor features for 3.0.7" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989309
[07:29] <doko> vorlon: sorry, didn't check these in
[07:29] <doko> now done
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (kinetic-proposed) [3.0.7-1ubuntu2]
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pipewire [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.58-2ubuntu1]
[09:31] <utkarsh2102> amurray: hey, that's intended.
[09:32] <utkarsh2102> it'll be approved from the queue in sometime and will automatically land in the right place.
[09:51] <utkarsh2102> amurray: it's accepted. :)
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bash (kinetic-proposed/main) [5.2-1ubuntu1 => 5.2-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:44] <amurray> utkarsh2102: excellent - thanks
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-sof (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1 => 2.2.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lg-gpio (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu3 => 0.2.0.0-0ubuntu1] (raspi)
[10:49] <sil2100> Okay, accepting some of the kinetic queue items, like the langpacks and doc translation updates
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-docs [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.2]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bash [source] (kinetic-proposed) [5.2-1ubuntu2]
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-builder [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [43.2-1]
[11:01] <sil2100> jbicha: I see a sync for unicode-cldr-core which is a new upstream version - can I get a bit more context on that?
[11:01] <sil2100> I remember us approving an FFe for the new unicode 15 stuff, but I don't remember this as part of it?
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfm-qt [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.0-3]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected firmware-sof [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-openvpn (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.10.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.10.0-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:50] <jbicha> sil2100: the unicode-cldr updates to Unicode 14 🤷
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected budgie-control-center [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.0.1-2ubuntu3]
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220413.1 => 20221010.1] (no packageset)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddtp-translations [source] (kinetic-proposed) [20221010.1]
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.5]
[15:23] <tsimonq2> mitya57: Your libfm-qt sync broke launching of the Lubuntu installer entry by default on ISOs. Please be more careful, the patch in question was `fix-metadata-for-trusting-executables.patch`.
[15:24] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: I'm going to be uploading a fix for libfm-qt in the next 30 minutes, please fast-track this so we don't have a noticeable user regression on our ISO this close to release.
[15:25] <tsimonq2> (Come find me in Prague, beers are on me.)
[15:34] <mitya57> tsimonq2: Oh, sorry, I thought the only Ubuntu delta was updating symbols, and it's not needed anymore
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfm-qt (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-3 => 1.1.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[15:36] <tsimonq2> mitya57: No worries. I generally have a very high degree of trust in your uploads, and I was able to fix this pretty easily. Just please note it for future reference. I appreciate your quick response.
[15:37] <mitya57> tsimonq2: I'm looking at the diff now (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/628011354/libfm-qt_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_1.1.0-3.diff.gz), and it looks like they moved some files from libfm-qt-common to libfm-qt11 without mentioning it in changelog. Please add Breaks/Replaces for that.
[15:39] <tsimonq2> Looking.
[15:39] <mitya57> jammy->kinetic upgrades are not affected because libfm-qt-common was not in jammy. But kinetic->kinetic upgrades are affected.
[15:39] <mitya57> Sorry for not looking at the diff before syncing.
[15:39] <RikMills> mitya57: they decide not to mention nay of the changes in this commit in the changelog: https://salsa.debian.org/lxqt-team/libfm-qt/-/commit/c35c0a90dd04b765a698daa6606d14794af4f8cb
[15:39] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit c35c0a9 in lxqt-team/libfm-qt "Revert previous improper uploaded changes."
[15:40] <RikMills> which may not have been accidental
[15:40] <tsimonq2> That's partly because I didn't realize there was as much activity in Debian LXQt as there is. That's old news, I've since worked it out with them.
[15:40] <tsimonq2> I've been working with Aaron to do a merge upstream to Debian on changes we can actually agree on, but that's been slow moving and not likely to hit this cycle.
[15:41] <RikMills> :D
[15:41] <tsimonq2> On the current issue at hand, yes I can certainly add some Breaks/Replaces, just give me a moment. :)
[15:41] <mitya57> Thank you.
[15:50] <tsimonq2> Of course. I have a patch, however, due to the fact that it's been a while since I've worked with Breaks/Replaces I'll be testing this before I upload.
[15:53] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: Please reject libfm-qt 1.1.0-3ubuntu1 in Kinetic UNAPPROVED, I'll be uploading another iteration with the same version number as soon as it's tested.
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libfm-qt [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[15:55] <ginggs> tsimonq2: ^
[15:56] <tsimonq2> Thank you. :)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (kinetic-proposed/main) [22.10.6 => 22.10.7] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:04] <sil2100> ginggs, bdmurray: pushed translation updates for ubiquity ^
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-openvpn [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.10.0-1ubuntu2]
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:22.10.3]
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.7]
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (kinetic-proposed/main) [185 => 186] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:33] <sil2100> Also uploaded ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu ^ please note: this does not have Xubuntu translations, I'll have to get in touch with the Xubuntu peeps so they follow up with a translation update upload
[16:33] <sil2100> Because I don't want to break anything by pulling in the translations in a wrong way from github :|
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.17.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.2]
[16:39] <tsimonq2> Tested that the libfm-qt upgrade works smoothly from daily (w/ upgrade to current libfm-qt in -proposed) and from Beta. Shouldn't be any further issues on this one. Let me know if you have any questions.
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfm-qt (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-3 => 1.1.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[16:43] <Eickmeyer[m]> sil2100: I take it that doesn't have my fix for the oem-config issue for KDE? bug 1990887
[16:43] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1990887 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Kinetic) "oem-config-kde: window too small, bad UX" [Low, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990887
[16:44] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: If your request is wrt sponsorship I can volunteer, if your request is Release Team ack then carry on :)
[16:44] <Eickmeyer[m]> Simon Quigley: It's a Foundations Team/Installer Team level thing.
[16:45] <Eickmeyer[m]> https://code.launchpad.net/~eeickmeyer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/431242
[16:48] <Eickmeyer[m]> After that it goes SRU team.
[16:48] <tsimonq2> Okay, so you're looking for A) a review on the change itself, which imo looks sane and uploadable this time of cycle, and B) sponsorship of the change if your ACLs don't already permit. You've talked to Rik, the only other affected party on this right?
[16:49] <Eickmeyer[m]> Yeah, seeing as Kubuntu Focus is sponsoring this fix (at a monetary level by paying me to fix it) and that it only affects the OEMs, yes. This is in OEM territory.
[16:49] <Eickmeyer[m]> And yes, Rik is aware, I'm on that team in that capacity.
[16:50] <tsimonq2> In the capacity that I am able to assist in resolving any friction, I'll help :)
[16:50] <Eickmeyer[m]> There's no friction. :)
[16:53] <sil2100> Eickmeyer[m]: ah, sorry! I just got back and I'm simply doing pre-releasey stuff for 22.10, so this is only translation updates really
[16:53] <Eickmeyer[m]> sil2100: No worries! :)
[21:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (kinetic-proposed/main) [1:7.4.2~rc2-0ubuntu1 => 1:7.4.2~rc3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[21:32] <ricotz> hello release-team, please accept libreoffice 7.4.2 rc3 which includes one hotfix :) ^