[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:7.4.2~rc3-0ubuntu1]
[06:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkg-kde-tools (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.15.36ubuntu2 => 0.15.36ubuntu3] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[06:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pocketsphinx (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0+real5prealpha+1-14ubuntu1 => 0.8.0+real5prealpha+1-15ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (kinetic-proposed) [186]
[07:26] <cpaelzer> RAOF: Not sure if you are still around, but if you are an SRU question - libvirt for 1989078 is in unapproved and verified; 1990499 is in -unapproved. I wondered if we should/could accept the latter over the former to save everyone an extra download/upgrade (In that case I'd re-upload with -V set accordingly) WDYT?
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfm-qt [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfm-qt [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-3ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[07:48] <sil2100> ginggs: thanks for the reviews!
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1~ubuntu22.04.1]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unicode-cldr-core [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [41-0.1]
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-rugged (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+ds-1build1 => 1.2.0+ds-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-rugged [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.2.0+ds-1ubuntu1]
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (jammy-proposed/main) [1.7.5-3 => 1.7.9-1~22.04.1] (core)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.7.9-1~22.04.1]
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (jammy-proposed/main) [0.104-0ubuntu2.1 => 0.105-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] (core)
[13:11] <schopin> Hi SRU team. The package s390-tools (and its -signed counterpart) has been stuck in unapproved for a while, and there are new patches that ought to be SRUed as well. Do y'all prefer for us to wait until the first SRU cleared or for us to directly upload a new package incorporating the new patches?
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (kinetic-proposed/main) [186 => 187] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:55] <dbungert> bdmurray: on the release status tracker, you asked about "Are we shipping the netboot images for 22.10?" - no, not this cycle.
[14:57] <sil2100> ginggs, bdmurray: can one of you review the new slideshow upload? ^
[14:57] <sil2100> It's the Xubuntu translations
[15:18] <ginggs> sil2100, bdmurray: i'll look at ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu
[15:21] <sil2100> Thank you!
[15:28] <ginggs> bluesabre: re ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu, some of the POT-Creation-Dates go back in time, e.g. 2021-08-20 05:12-0400 -> 2019-03-13 15:37+0000 is that expected?
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (kinetic-proposed/restricted) [515.65.01-0ubuntu3 => 515.76-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[15:34] <xnox> ubuntu-release synced nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 into kinetic-proposed; it is in proposed in all other suites already, please accept it. we kind of need to build generic kernel's lrm with the above.
[15:55] <laney> .
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [515.76-0ubuntu1]
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkg-kde-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.15.36ubuntu3]
[16:38] <bdmurray> schopin: upload again if it is in the unapproved queue, get it verified if it is in -proposed.
[16:45] <Eickmeyer[m]> Is there any way somebody from the installer team can merge this in and someone can release a new version of ubiquity before Final Freeze? It fixes a bug for Kubuntu in OEM mode: https://code.launchpad.net/~eeickmeyer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/431242
[16:46] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: How did you choose 790?
[16:46] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: Smaller than 800, just in case.
[16:47] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: Does the aspect ratio matter?
[16:47] <Eickmeyer[m]> I couldn't find any code for the default size for Ubiquity under GTK, and nobody else more faamiliar with the code was willing to fix it.
[16:47] <bdmurray> The second half of your statement is unfair - its entirely possible there is nobody familiar with it any more
[16:48] <Eickmeyer[m]> "more familiar" it took me 3 hours to trace where this code even was.
[16:49] <Eickmeyer[m]> I didn't know where to begin, in all honesty.
[16:49] <Eickmeyer[m]> The screenshots in the bug report show what is happening currently.
[16:49] <bdmurray> I'm just asking that you try and use more tact with your word choice.
[16:51] <Eickmeyer[m]> Sure.
[16:56] <bdmurray> I'll get it uploaded
[16:57] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: Thanks a bunch.
[16:57] <bluesabre> ginggs: Yep, Launchpad tries to use newer dates than Transifex. Transifex doesn’t bump creation dates for updates.
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (kinetic-proposed/main) [22.10.7 => 22.10.8] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:11] <xnox> vorlon:  any idea how come riscv64 only kernels trigger tests on all arches? https://bugs.launchpad.net/britney/+bug/1992486
[17:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1992486 in britney "riscv only kernels trigger autopkgtests on all arches" [Undecided, New]
[17:11] <xnox> i sort of expected no tests at all, given that there are no riscv64 autopkgtests
[17:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnote (kinetic-proposed/universe) [42.1-1 => 43.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[18:12] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-archive: libfm-qt binary NEW is a no-op, could I please get a review? Lubuntu Kinetic -> Kinetic upgrades are currently broken
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlb [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1]
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxmlb [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1] (core)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxmlb [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1] (core)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxmlb [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1] (core)
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxmlb [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1] (core)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxmlb [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1] (core)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (kinetic-proposed/main) [1:102.3.2+build2-0ubuntu1 => 1:102.3.3+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-firmware [source] (focal-proposed) [3.34.0-2ubuntu1]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.7.9-1~20.04.1]
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (kinetic-proposed/main) [42.0-1ubuntu4 => 43.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxmlb [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxmlb [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxmlb [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxmlb [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxmlb [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.3.6-2build1~20.04.1]
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: prometheus-tplink-plug-exporter (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0+git20200622.cc4a731-2build1 => 0.2.0+git20200622.cc4a731-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted prometheus-tplink-plug-exporter [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.0+git20200622.cc4a731-2ubuntu1]
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.8]
[19:05] <holman> Hello release team. The cloud-init team has verified the 22.3 release for SRU. Test logs, rerun results, and bugs found during verification have been attached to the SRU bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318
[19:05] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1987318 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.3 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-packagekit (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.32.0-3 => 3.32.0-5] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[19:45] <bdmurray> holman: The correct team for updates in stable releases is the Stable Release Updates team whereas the Ubuntu Release team deals with the development release of Ubuntu.
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calls (kinetic-proposed/universe) [43~beta.0-1ubuntu2 => 43.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calls [source] (kinetic-proposed) [43.0-1ubuntu1]
[19:57] <holman> bdmurray: Sorry about that, thanks for the correction.
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.2.60-0ubuntu0.1 => 3.2.61-0ubuntu0.1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.11]
[20:57] <simpoir> Hi release team. Chiming in to say I've been appointed release shepherd for the kinetic cloud images builds.
[20:58] <tsimonq2> Welcome :)
[20:59] <simpoir> thanks
[21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (kinetic-proposed) [187]
[21:53] <ginggs> bluesabre: thanks
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (kinetic-proposed/main) [8.0.30-0ubuntu3 => 8.0.31-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[23:31] <holman> @RAOF / Stable Release Updates Team - Hello. The cloud-init team has verified the 22.3 SRU. Test logs, rerun results, and bugs found during verification have been attached to the SRU bug. Requesting release to Bionic, Focal, and Jammy https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsoup2.4 (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.74.2-3 => 2.74.3-1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (jammy-proposed/main) [22.04.17 => 22.04.18] (ubuntu-desktop)
[23:52] <tsimonq2> (I know, it's weird to see me even touching Ubiquity, but I'm fulfilling a sponsorship request. :) )