[12:42] <seb128> hum, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com let you edit testcases, is that a valid option to use and if so how does it sync up with https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests ?
[13:04] <xnox> sil2100:  1 out of 3 riscv kernels that i want in the release are currently building in PPA. Maybe i will have them in like proposed by friday.
[13:05] <sil2100> xnox: that's... not too good! What's the usual turnaround for riscv kernels to migrate from -proposed to release in the devel series?
[13:07] <xnox> sil2100:  depends on kernel internal testing only, which has not yet ever passed on 2 out of 3 of those kernels; sometimes britney triggers bogus tests on non-riscv arches.
[13:07] <xnox> =)
[13:09] <RikMills> looks like queuebot quit in a netsplit, and never came back
[13:54] <xnox> sil2100:  i mean we also potentially have apparmor/snapd regression hence possibly we'll need to respin all the kernels
[14:13] <holman> @rbasak / Stable Release Updates Team - The cloud-init team has verified the 22.3 SRU. Test logs, rerun results, and bugs found during verification have been attached to the SRU bug. Requesting SRU to Bionic, Focal, and Jammy https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318
[14:49] <seb128> bdmurray, ^ you maybe know about my earlier question re iso tracker?
[14:51] <tsimonq2> seb128: I remember the answer to this, the codebase is simply a public copy of the entries in the tracker. There is no automatic mapping or generation, it's simply a review flow of sorts, since you can't propose any changes directly on the tracker. (If the tracker has been rewritten in the last two years, this information may be outdated.)
[14:52] <tsimonq2> Brian may be able to explain it better, but I hope this at least helps you. :)
[14:52] <seb128> tsimonq2, not really but thanks
[14:53] <seb128> tsimonq2, I'm asking because I added some testcases through the webUI for the desktop canary (I'm admin so I can do edits) and I wonder 1. if that was right 2. if those might get lost because they are not in the vcs 3. if I need to also add them to the Vcs
[14:54] <seb128> 3.b, also how the vcs is kept in sync with edits done through the webUI (though from your description it seems there are not?)
[14:54] <tsimonq2> 3b) Manually
[14:54] <seb128> sounds tedious :(
[14:55] <sil2100> bdmurray, ginggs: hey! I pushed a livecd-rootfs upload for licheerv fixes, can you review?
[14:55] <seb128> so basically the expected workflow would be to edit the vcs
[14:55] <seb128> and then copy the vcs updated version manually as content to a webUI edit?
[14:56] <ginggs> sil2100, bdmurray: looking...
[14:56] <tsimonq2> yeah
[14:57] <seb128> tsimonq2, thanks!
[14:58] <tsimonq2> of course :)
[15:10] <ginggs> stgraber: is queuebot yours?
[15:14] <stgraber> yep
[15:14] <stgraber> ah, looks like it got split
[15:15] <ginggs> stgraber: thanks!
[15:28] <bdmurray> seb128: test cases sync from ubuntu-manual-tests to the isotracker but not the other way
[15:30] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: there actually is a script with which you can update the isotracker with the test information in ubuntu-manual-tests
[15:30] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/tree/tools/qa_tracker_update.pl
[15:42] <tsimonq2> Oh wow, thanks!
[15:44] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: Also you might find the last part of this email interesting https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/2022-September/007373.html
[15:48] <tsimonq2> Thanks again :)
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (kinetic-proposed/main) [43.0-1ubuntu1 => 43.0-1ubuntu2] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pocketsphinx [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.8.0+real5prealpha+1-15ubuntu1]
[17:11] <RikMills> hi, the kconfigwidgets upload in unapproved is a fix for a quite serious UI bug that impacts lubuntu app menus. please let that in :)
[17:19] <bdmurray> ✔
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kconfigwidgets [source] (kinetic-proposed) [5.98.0-0ubuntu2]
[17:29] <tsimonq2> 🎉
[18:00] <tsimonq2> Another glaring Lubuntu bug would be fixed by reviewing libfm-qt in binary NEW :)
[18:10] <xnox> @ sil2100 vorlon ubuntu-release https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1991691 will be re-spinning all kernels to fix that.
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfm-qt [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[18:10] <xnox> failure to run snaps affects cloud kernels, desktop & server live sessions.
[18:11] <bdmurray> xnox: thanks, that was on my radar https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-22-10-release-status-tracking/30945
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-terminal (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.46.1-2ubuntu1 => 3.46.2-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[18:13] <xnox> bdmurray: sorry for failing to check discourse post and highlight you directly.
[18:14] <bdmurray> xnox: ubuntu-release gets my attention
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcamera (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0~git20211108+1b30992b623e-4ubuntu1 => 0~git20211108+1b30992b623e-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcamera [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0~git20211108+1b30992b623e-5]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (jammy-proposed/main) [2.72.1-1 => 2.72.4-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:33] <bdmurray> coreycb: The Kinetic release notes are missing info about OpenStack https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-release-notes/27976
[19:33] <coreycb> bdmurray: thanks for the ping! I've been meaning to get to that.
[19:33] <bdmurray> You have 8 more days! ;-)
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022c-1ubuntu3 => 2022e-0ubuntu1] (core)
[20:50] <xnox> ubuntu-archive please promote linux-starfive and linux-meta-starfive from universe to main
[20:50]  * apw looks at that
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-unicodedata2 (kinetic-proposed/universe) [14.0.0+ds2-1 => 14.0.0+ds2-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpanel (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 1.0.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpanel [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.74.0-2 => 2.74.0-3] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)