[00:00] <bdmurray> holman, RAOF: I'm still here so will look at this now
[00:02] <holman> Thanks!
[00:03] <bdmurray> holman: the descripton of bug 1987318 still has "TODO-SRU-VERIFICATION" in it is that normal?
[00:03] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1987318 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.3 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1987318
[00:06] <bdmurray> Also why does this upload reference a bug number without an Ubuntu bug task?
[00:07]  * bdmurray is surprised sru-review commented on the bug
[00:10] <holman> bdmurray: Test artifacts from verification are attached below. I'll remove the TODO text to reflect that (those tasks are done).
[00:15] <holman> bdmurray: Is the bug number without a task you are refering to 1986703?
[00:17] <bdmurray> yes
[00:18] <bdmurray> It shouldn't be formatted as "LP: #..." in the changelog if it doesn't have an Ubuntu bug task and that bug seems redundant with the 1987318.
[00:19] <holman>  That one is the upstream release process bug. That was included to represent that the upstream version made it back to all the series we are release to.
[00:20] <bdmurray> How does it demonstrate that?
[00:21] <bdmurray> Having the bug linked to doesn't *hurt* anything I just don't see how it helps.
[00:25] <holman> That's fair. We tried a different upstream release process this cycle (which probably hurt more than it helped), and I think with that entry were trying to reflect where the bug was fixed. I guess it really doesn't add anything and does look redundant since we just point back to the same LP#.
[00:27] <holman> bdmurray: We'll avoid doing that in future releases.
[00:30] <bdmurray> holman: Okay, thanks!
[00:30] <bdmurray> I did accept the packages although queuebot didn't say anything
[00:31] <holman> bdmurray: Awesome, thanks :)
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: solaar (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.5+dfsg-1 => 1.1.5+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted solaar [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.5+dfsg-2]
[01:05] <bdmurray> kicking off an ubuntu image build with the new livecd-rootfs and snapd
[01:17] <xypron> bdmurray sil2100 If the wrong HSS firmware is installed, booting may fail. We have to describe the dependency in our installation instruction. The situation is not worth them trying to boot with the wrong U-Boot or device tree.
[01:18] <xypron> worse
[02:38] <bdmurray> Good news ubuntu built! https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/daily-live/20221014/
[07:52] <sil2100> Okay, spinning langpacks for the release
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfprint [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.2.1-1ubuntu1]
[08:22] <sil2100> huh, I see some image build failures regarding libevent?
[08:22] <sil2100> libevent-2.1-7a : Conflicts: libevent-2.1-7 but 2.1.12-stable-5 is to be installed
[08:23] <sil2100> Did we rebuild rev-deps for this soname bump?
[08:23] <sil2100> wow, that's a lot of rdeps
[08:23] <sil2100> ginggs: ^
[08:24] <ginggs> sil2100: yes we rebuilt everything
[08:24] <sil2100> hm, might be bad build timing or something?
[08:24] <ginggs> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/libevent-2.1-7a.html
[08:25] <sil2100> Though I see multiple build failures, and it makes me shiver a bit
[08:25] <ginggs> could be, the whole lot migrated about an hour ago
[08:27] <ginggs> sil2100: build failures?  do you mean images or packages?
[08:27] <sil2100> Images
[08:27] <sil2100> raspi arm64 images failed, same for server live s390x
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libminc (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.4.05-2ubuntu1 => 2.4.05-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libminc [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [2.4.05-4]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.789 => 2.790] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:00] <seb128> sil2100, is https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/431418 something targetted at releast and if so could someone from foundations also give a review/input?
[09:03] <sil2100> seb128: I'd have to look a bit later, but at least I wasn't aware of this being targetted!
[09:03] <sil2100> ginggs: heeey, can you spot check and approve my livecd-rootfs change ^ ?
[09:08] <seb128> sil2100, thanks, at least I see that the attached bug has been discussed by foundation has an ubuntu-22.10 milestone set
[09:12] <sil2100> seb128: thanks for the heads up! Might have been discussed when I was away. I'll put that on my short-term TODO list
[09:12] <seb128> sil2100, thx
[09:13] <seb128> installation failure issues are usually things we want to see fixed before the release :)
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.790]
[09:17] <ginggs> sil2100: ^
[09:18] <tjaalton> is there a common target for bugs in the installer image?
[09:41] <seb128> is anyone familiar with ubuntu-manual-tests/tools/qa_tracker_update.pl ?
[09:41] <seb128> I'm trying to use it doing
[09:42] <seb128> $ perl ./tools/qa_tracker_update.pl iso testcases/<sometestcasefile>
[09:42] <seb128> but it prompts me "Enter your 2FA OTP" and whatever I input it returns a
[09:42] <seb128> There is no form named "decideform" at ./tools/qa_tracker_update.pl line 245.
[09:42] <seb128> bdmurray, sounds like you had a similar error on https://lists.snapcraft.io/archives/ubuntu-quality/2017-July/007013.html how did you sort it out?
[09:51] <seb128> bdmurray, also ~ubuntu-testcase should probably probably have a backup admin ... and what's the policy to get added?
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.8.7-1ubuntu6 => 1.8.7-1ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:51] <sil2100> Langpack uploads incoming
[13:07] <arighi> rtl8821ce-dkms is blocking promotion of some kernels, there's a fixed version in proposed, but it's not moving because there's a build failure on arm64, however IMHO this driver only makes sense on amd64 (and even there is questionable, because this driver is now supported upstream in the kernel), do you think we can just hint/ignore the regressions for this dkms?
[13:08] <arighi> sil2100, bdmurray ^
[13:18] <sil2100> arighi: hm, you mean build failure as part of autopkgtests?
[13:20] <sil2100> arighi: hm, I see rtl8821ce autopkgtest failures on amd64 as well
[13:20] <arighi> sil2100, correct, but also if you try to install the dkms
[13:20] <arighi> sil2100, on amd64 only the old dkms should fail, the one in proposed should be fine
[13:21] <sil2100> apw: I'd leave this to you, as I think you'd have the best insight re: this ^
[13:31] <ginggs> I retried the rtl8821ce autopkgtests along with dkms, they should be able to migrate soon
[13:33] <arighi> ginggs: perfect, thanks!
[15:00] <bdmurray> seb128: what branch of ubuntu-manual-tests are you using? I've used the update perl script successfully this week
[15:06] <seb128> bdmurray, git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests main
[15:06] <seb128> but could be a depends missing on my system, like I had to install libwww-mechanize-perl
[15:06] <seb128> or could be an acl issue, is ther a config or token stored?
[15:24] <bdmurray> seb128: you just need to set email and password but I wouldn't expect you to make it to the 2FA without that
[15:37] <seb128> k, I need to drop but let's continue that conversation later
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-artwork (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10 => 22.10.1] (xubuntu)
[17:37] <bluesabre> ^ Xubuntu's 22.10 wallpaper, landing very late. Release team, do you mind approving this upload?
[17:43] <sil2100> bluesabre: on it
[17:45] <bluesabre> sil2100: thank you!
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-artwork [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.1]
[17:50] <bluesabre> <3
[18:07] <tjaalton> I filed lp1992996 to remove some obsolete libs on the intel opencl stack
[18:07] <tjaalton> lp:1992996
[18:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1992996 in spirv-llvm-translator-11 (Ubuntu) "RM: obsolete intel opencl libraries (for llvm-11, -13)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1992996
[19:14] <sil2100> klebers, apw: hey! How are the kernels looking for 22.10?
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (kinetic-proposed/main) [22.10.8 => 22.10.9] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:31] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! Can you review and accept the ubiquity upload here ^ ?
[19:31] <sil2100> Other than that, I think we're just waiting for the kernels
[19:33] <sil2100> bdmurray: can you try reaching out to the kernel team to check up if there's anyone working on getting all the kernels migrated?
[19:34] <sil2100> bdmurray: another thing that might be good to go is to go through the list of blockers on the tracking bug and checking if those are all fixed or not
[19:35] <bdmurray> I see some linux-meta-raspi autopkgtest failures in excuses
[19:35] <bdmurray> I'll retry the ones which errored out
[19:35] <sil2100> Thanks
[19:35] <sil2100> Would be nice if I knew that there was someone in the US from the kernel team delegated to get those out
[19:36] <sil2100> I go AFK a bit, but "I'll be back"
[19:36] <bdmurray> Okay, Arnold
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.10.9]
[19:51] <apw> sil2100, i think they are getting there; i think other than riscv they have promoted now -- though xnox has had his hand firmly on the scroff of their neck
[19:52] <bdmurray> apw: the failure here looked interesting https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/kinetic/armhf
[19:53] <bdmurray> its failed the same way in the past with that combination of triggers
[19:54] <apw> bdmurray, do we even support that combination; raspi and n-g-d-390 seems like a supprising old combo
[19:54] <bdmurray> that might explain why it has never been blocked
[19:55] <apw> the n-g-d-390 is for legacy cards so not the one i'd expect to be in use, well anywhere most of the time.
[19:57] <apw> bdmurray, it cirtainly has never passed in kinetic ... or indeed jammy
[19:58] <apw> bdmurray, all of the non-legacy streams work, though i am not sure i know if you can plug those into a raspi anyhow.
[19:59] <apw> bdmurray, we are missing three results, not sure why those three mind ... hrm
[20:00] <bdmurray> apw: I restarted the missing results
[20:01] <apw> everything else looks good including on other arches for the missing items, so fingers crossed.
[20:01] <bdmurray> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-raspi if the version number is unknown that indicates a test environment failure
[20:01] <bdmurray> apw: Is there anybody on the kernel team who will around for the rest of my day (4 hours) if crossing fingers isn't enough?
[20:02] <apw> bdmurray, there should be people on the team about for some hours yet
[20:03] <bdmurray> maybe I should have clarified by saying who can help with making the kernel migrate ;-)
[20:03] <apw> bdmurray, i am about for likely 2 hours, and i cirtainly can hit hammers.
[20:04] <apw> bdmurray, i am inclined to say that the remaining misses even as failures for that package are unlikely to be blockers; so we could consider overriding them if necessary.
[20:05] <bdmurray> apw: ack thanks
[20:05]  * bdmurray goes for lunch
[20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (kinetic-proposed/main) [43.0-1ubuntu1 => 43.0-1ubuntu2] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[21:31] <bdmurray> retrying the riscv64 build of ubiquity
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: extrepo-data (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1 => 1.0.3] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted extrepo-data [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.3]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: extrepo (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10 => 0.11] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted extrepo [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0.11]
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pubpaste (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.6 => 0.7.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pubpaste [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0.7.1]