[04:46] <doko> coreycb: yes, it's planned, and a rc already is in -proposed
[06:26] <tumbleweed> cjwatson: FYI: launchpadlib 1.10.17's tarball fails gpg verification
[09:29] <cjwatson> tumbleweed: huh, how did I manage that
[09:30] <cjwatson> tumbleweed: I've reuploaded it with a non-outdated signature - tarball stayed the same, sig should be good now
[11:02] <tumbleweed> cjwatson: thanks :) (I uploaded without it anyway)
[12:34] <Unit193> I'm a little confused about LP 1993456
[12:34] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1993456 in wireguard (Ubuntu) "Merge wireguard from Debian unstable for l-series" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1993456
[12:37] <ahasenack> Unit193: these are just bugs the server team uses to track potential merges for the next cycle
[12:37] <ahasenack> Unit193: we use these bugs in our merges board
[12:37] <ahasenack> Unit193: sometimes there is no action to take, because there is no new upload in debian
[12:38] <ahasenack> Unit193: but we file the bug nonetheless for tracking purposes
[12:39] <ahasenack> Unit193: that wireguard one, for example, is incomplete exactly because there is nothing to merge yet
[14:58] <nteodosio> Once ISO test cases are archived one can longer add his report to it?
[15:01] <coreycb> thanks doko
[15:06] <seb128> nteodosio, I think that's correct indeed
[15:06] <nteodosio> Thanks
[18:17] <bdmurray> nteodosi: can you add some more information to bug 1993313?
[18:17] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1993313 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Crashed twice during installation" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1993313
[18:18] <nteodosi> bdmurray, yes, if I can reproduce it again.
[18:18] <bdmurray> nteodosi: if you still have an installed system there would be logs to gather
[18:20] <nteodosi> bdmurray, I used a same .img to perform the tests, unfortunately
[22:21] <Unit193> ahasenack: Seems weird to file bugs for merges when there are none, OK...
[22:21] <Unit193> ...Maybe I shouldn't be subbed to bug reports after all.