=== muktupavels_ is now known as muktupavels
[06:05] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers, happy release day!
[06:05] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN 
[06:05] <oSoMoN> hey duflu 
[06:05] <duflu> 🚧
[06:07] <oSoMoN> duflu, any urgent problem with the release?
[06:07] <duflu> oSoMoN, not that I know of so my emoji might have been misleading
[06:08] <oSoMoN> slightly, yes :)
[06:09] <oSoMoN> it turns out emoji is not the universal language we were promised, after all
[06:18] <ricotz> good morning everyone
[06:20] <seb128> goood morning desktopers
[06:24] <oSoMoN> good morning ricotz, seb128 
[06:28] <seb128> lut oSoMoN, comment ça va ?
[06:38] <duflu> Morning ricotz and seb128 
[06:50] <didrocks> good morning
[06:52] <seb128> hey duflu, lut didrocks, how are you?
[06:53] <duflu> Hi didrocks 
[06:53] <duflu> seb128, not bad, you?
[06:53] <seb128> I'm alright thanks!
[06:54] <didrocks> hey seb128, duflu. Rain is finally here :) Still warm, but rain at last!
[06:54] <seb128> \o/
[07:32] <oSoMoN> seb128, bien, et toi?
[07:32] <seb128> oSoMoN, nickel!
[07:33] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks 
[07:34] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN!
[07:46] <seb128> there is a new ISO candidate, we had a respin to fix the initial setup metrics option showing with no selection and the wrong default and an nvidia driver issue
[07:47] <seb128> please help testing the new images, changes were minimal so it should be fine but we still want to ensure they work as expected
[12:03] <seb128> didrocks, hey, is ubuntu-report logging 'send to server' events somehow? or if not what's the best way to check a report has been correctly sent? (I'm writting a testcase for the post installation wizard)
[12:04] <seb128> if I do 'ubuntu-report send yes' it tells me that a report for that machine was already sent but I'm unsure that's the best way?
[12:11] <didrocks> seb128: you can try "ubuntu-report send yes"
[12:12] <didrocks> ah, that’s your second line :)
[12:12] <didrocks> yeah, it’s exactly what you need, it will print if it’s already sent or not
[12:12] <didrocks> (basically, it’s checking the existence of ~/.cache/ubuntu-report/ubuntu.[release])
[12:19] <seb128> didrocks, thanks
[14:36] <bittin> 22.10 building going on?
[15:01] <bittin> https://ubuntu.com/blog/canonical-releases-ubuntu-22-10-kinetic-kudu 
[15:22] <sil2100> seb128, kenvandine: hey! Is desktop good to go? Can I get a green light on it?
[15:55] <seb128> sil2100, it is from my perspective if you decide to not respin for the non working dmks signing, which I understand
[15:56] <sil2100> seb128: thanks. Yeah, we had a lot back-and-forth about that even between us, here on IRC and with Oliver
[15:56] <sil2100> But the end decision is to just go for it
[15:56] <sil2100> Thanks!
[15:59] <seb128> np!
[17:25] <LuckyMan> Hi, will the 22.10 torrent come out as soon as the .iso is launched?
[19:23]  * luna downloading 22.10 from ftp.acc.umu.se now
[20:16] <Eickmeyer[m]> LuckyMan: It's out now.
[20:16] <Eickmeyer[m]> And, yes.