[04:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lg-gpio [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[04:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-control-center [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.0.1-2ubuntu3]
[05:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop [source] (jammy-proposed) [10.6.1-1ubuntu2]
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [source] (kinetic-proposed) [43.1-0ubuntu1]
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1~20.04.2]
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1.1]
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.57.5+22.10]
[08:00] <schopin> sru-team: could it be possible to promote the tzdata SRUs out of their respective -proposed? That's LP: #1992692 and LP: #1969671
[08:00] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1992692 in tzdata (Ubuntu Jammy) "tzdata 2022e release" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1992692
[08:00] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1969671 in tzdata (Ubuntu Jammy) "Misspelled Ukrainian cities in tzdata" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1969671
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.3-7ubuntu5.1 => 2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0.4-2ubuntu2.1 => 3.0.4-2ubuntu2.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:16] <bdmurray> schopin: I've released tzdata but it would be good to chase an AA to fully phase the updates
[10:14] <schopin> ubuntu-archive: could you please fully phase tzdata in bionic, focal and jammy, and copy it to the -security pockets? TIA :)
[10:15] <bdmurray> schopin: I didn't see security team member sign off on the copy but I didn't look closely
[10:17] <schopin> bdmurray: you're right, I forgot to check! (didn't handle the update, just trying to move things along)
[10:19] <schopin> sbeattie: I see you handled the ESM updates. Could you sign off on the rest of the updates?
[11:12] <coreycb> hello sru team, we have new versions of python-oslo.messaging in the jammy/kinetic queues that revert a patch that is breaking active/active rabbitmq failover. I'm wondering if they can get reviewed, unless they are blocked until L is open.
[11:42] <coreycb> here's the bug for the SRU above https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-rabbitmq-server/+bug/1993149
[11:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1993149 in python-oslo.messaging (Ubuntu Kinetic) "VMs stay stuck in scheduling when rabbitmq leader unit is down" [Critical, Triaged]
[12:06] <bdmurray> coreycb: looking
[12:08] <coreycb> thanks bdmurray
[12:12] <bdmurray> coreycb: its not a blocker but I'd have expected ubuntu1.1 not ubuntu2
[12:13] <coreycb> bdmurray: oh I thought I did do that. or do you mean for jammy?
[12:13] <bdmurray> coreycb: I was looking at jammy yes
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.messaging [source] (kinetic-proposed) [14.0.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[12:16] <bdmurray> coreycb: if you could fix the jammy version that would be nice
[12:17] <coreycb> bdmurray: ok I'll re-upload that to jammy with 1.1. I tend to only use 1.x for dev-1 releases that still have the same upstream version as the dev release. but maybe I should use it for older releases as well when it's just a patch change.
[12:18] <georgiag> rbasak: hello! amurray sponsored apparmor SRUs for both focal and jammy and they're sitting in the unapproved queue. could you please review and promote them to -proposed when you're available? thank you!
[12:21] <coreycb> bdmurray: 1.1 uploaded. thanks again.
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (jammy-proposed/main) [12.13.0-0ubuntu1 => 12.13.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-oslo.messaging [source] (jammy-proposed) [12.13.0-0ubuntu2]
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.messaging [source] (jammy-proposed) [12.13.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [27.11.3~20.04.1]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [27.11.3~22.04.1]
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [27.11.3~18.04.1]
[14:44] <rbasak> bdmurray: ^ is Kinetic open for SRUs yet? I'm accepting ubuntu-advantage-tools everywhere else, and it'll need a copy forward to L.
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.11.3~16.04.1]
[14:45] <rbasak> (and I've reviewed K; it's fine to accept when ready)
[14:52] <bdmurray> I did accept a Kinetic SRU but that could have been possible because I'm in ubuntu-release
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/main) [5.15.0-52.58 => 5.15.0-53.59] (kernel) (sync)
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/restricted) [5.15.0-52.58+1 => 5.15.0-53.59] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/main) [5.15.0.52.47 => 5.15.0.53.48] (kernel) (sync)
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-signatures-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/restricted) [5.15.0-52.58+1 => 5.15.0-53.59] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/main) [5.15.0-52.58 => 5.15.0-53.59] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0-53.59]
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0-53.59]
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0-53.59]
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0.53.48]
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-signatures-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0-53.59]