[04:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lg-gpio [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.0.0-0ubuntu1] [04:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-control-center [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.0.1-2ubuntu3] [05:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop [source] (jammy-proposed) [10.6.1-1ubuntu2] [05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [source] (kinetic-proposed) [43.1-0ubuntu1] [05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] [05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1.1] [05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1.1] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.57.5+22.10] [08:00] sru-team: could it be possible to promote the tzdata SRUs out of their respective -proposed? That's LP: #1992692 and LP: #1969671 [08:00] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1992692 in tzdata (Ubuntu Jammy) "tzdata 2022e release" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1992692 [08:00] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1969671 in tzdata (Ubuntu Jammy) "Misspelled Ukrainian cities in tzdata" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1969671 [08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.3-7ubuntu5.1 => 2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0.4-2ubuntu2.1 => 3.0.4-2ubuntu2.2] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:16] schopin: I've released tzdata but it would be good to chase an AA to fully phase the updates [10:14] ubuntu-archive: could you please fully phase tzdata in bionic, focal and jammy, and copy it to the -security pockets? TIA :) [10:15] schopin: I didn't see security team member sign off on the copy but I didn't look closely [10:17] bdmurray: you're right, I forgot to check! (didn't handle the update, just trying to move things along) [10:19] sbeattie: I see you handled the ESM updates. Could you sign off on the rest of the updates? [11:12] hello sru team, we have new versions of python-oslo.messaging in the jammy/kinetic queues that revert a patch that is breaking active/active rabbitmq failover. I'm wondering if they can get reviewed, unless they are blocked until L is open. [11:42] here's the bug for the SRU above https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-rabbitmq-server/+bug/1993149 [11:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1993149 in python-oslo.messaging (Ubuntu Kinetic) "VMs stay stuck in scheduling when rabbitmq leader unit is down" [Critical, Triaged] [12:06] coreycb: looking [12:08] thanks bdmurray [12:12] coreycb: its not a blocker but I'd have expected ubuntu1.1 not ubuntu2 [12:13] bdmurray: oh I thought I did do that. or do you mean for jammy? [12:13] coreycb: I was looking at jammy yes [12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.messaging [source] (kinetic-proposed) [14.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] [12:16] coreycb: if you could fix the jammy version that would be nice [12:17] bdmurray: ok I'll re-upload that to jammy with 1.1. I tend to only use 1.x for dev-1 releases that still have the same upstream version as the dev release. but maybe I should use it for older releases as well when it's just a patch change. [12:18] rbasak: hello! amurray sponsored apparmor SRUs for both focal and jammy and they're sitting in the unapproved queue. could you please review and promote them to -proposed when you're available? thank you! [12:21] bdmurray: 1.1 uploaded. thanks again. [12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (jammy-proposed/main) [12.13.0-0ubuntu1 => 12.13.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack) [12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-oslo.messaging [source] (jammy-proposed) [12.13.0-0ubuntu2] [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.messaging [source] (jammy-proposed) [12.13.0-0ubuntu1.1] [14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [27.11.3~20.04.1] [14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [27.11.3~22.04.1] [14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [27.11.3~18.04.1] [14:44] bdmurray: ^ is Kinetic open for SRUs yet? I'm accepting ubuntu-advantage-tools everywhere else, and it'll need a copy forward to L. [14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.11.3~16.04.1] [14:45] (and I've reviewed K; it's fine to accept when ready) [14:52] I did accept a Kinetic SRU but that could have been possible because I'm in ubuntu-release [15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/main) [5.15.0-52.58 => 5.15.0-53.59] (kernel) (sync) [15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/restricted) [5.15.0-52.58+1 => 5.15.0-53.59] (no packageset) (sync) [15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/main) [5.15.0.52.47 => 5.15.0.53.48] (kernel) (sync) [15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-restricted-signatures-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/restricted) [5.15.0-52.58+1 => 5.15.0-53.59] (no packageset) (sync) [15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-lowlatency (jammy-proposed/main) [5.15.0-52.58 => 5.15.0-53.59] (no packageset) (sync) [15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0-53.59] [15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0-53.59] [15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0-53.59] [15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0.53.48] [15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-signatures-lowlatency [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5.15.0-53.59]