/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/10/30/#lubuntu-devel.txt

arraybolt3[m]Can someone who has the ability to legally install WIndows 10 or 11 try to do a Lubuntu installation alongside Windows? I see someone having problems with that on Discourse and I've noticed that os-prober isn't trying to detect other operating systems on my system, so I'm wondering if maybe the os-prober problem that was fixed early on in the 22.04 cycle has resurfaced.00:05
arraybolt3[m](I'd do it myself but I don't own any Windows 10 licenses or hardware with a Windows 10 license.)00:07
arraybolt3[m](Also things have calmed down in $PERSONAL_LIFE so I should be back.)00:09
kc2bez[m]I could probably do it in a VM tomorrow. I am not wanting Windows on any of my bare metal hardware though.00:11
arraybolt3[m]Yeah me neither.00:11
arraybolt3[m]I should probably buy a license at some point in the future so I can do testing, but I don't ever want any version of Windows to touch my bare-metal hardware again. Blech.00:12
kc2bez[m]Technically you can install it you just can't activate it.00:12
guivercarraybolt3[m], lubuntu kinetic (22.10)?00:12
tsimonq2Here's the thing about that...00:13
tsimonq2That's on purpose00:13
arraybolt3[m]guiverc: Nope, Jammy.00:13
tsimonq2I think juliank sent an email to the ML?00:13
tsimonq2Basically, we need to enable Calamares to run it once in the installer with a disclaimer00:13
tsimonq2They discovered a new attack vector in GRUB which allows sideloading of malicious code onto the partition that contains GRUB00:14
guivercgive me a little; I'll boot jammy (daily at most a few days old; SRU testing) and see if it detects a w10 I think I have on samsung thing00:14
tsimonq2I work around this on my local system by explicitly defining a config variable in GRUB00:14
tsimonq2But unfortunately this one isn't a bug... it's by design, and we know the situation isn't ideal right now00:14
tsimonq2If anyone has the chance to find the mailing list archives associated with this issue I'd appreciate it, probably either ubuntu-release or ubuntu-devel. Otherwise I'll likely look tomorrow00:15
arraybolt3[m]Simon Quigley: I thought that it was purposefully disabled in GRUB and that Ubuntu purposefully enabled it again.00:15
tsimonq2I'd appreciate some context on the latter, if you could 00:15
arraybolt3[m]Simon Quigley: Context about the re-enabling of it?00:16
tsimonq2Correct, pretty please :)00:16
arraybolt3[m]Simon Quigley: I actually don't know, I believe guiverc told me that it was behaving the current, secure but bad way early on in the Jammy cycle and then later on it started auto-detecting things right again. I may have misunderstood.00:17
tsimonq2I know you can re-enable it, and I do simply for my own use00:18
tsimonq2I'm not sure about the decision that was reached 00:18
kc2bez[m]I am subscribed to -devel and I can't find it. It must be -release.00:18
arraybolt3[m]One moment...00:19
arraybolt3[m]I can't find it in -release either.00:19
tsimonq2No rush, I need to get back to $sidejob (in spite of current circumstances) so I'll catch you guys a bit later/here and there00:19
arraybolt3[m]Searched from October 2021 to April 2022.00:19
kc2bez[m]Hmm00:20
tsimonq2But I do remember seeing something about this...00:20
tsimonq2Maybe it was on debian-devel?00:20
tsimonq2If you guys can't find it I can search debian-private too...00:20
tsimonq2I know I saw an email about this though.00:20
guivercarraybolt3[m], booting recent daily of jammy (SRU'd calamares from proposed) detects the windows 10 install (original OEM install though was factory reset prior to be given to me) on `samsung 700t1c-p10aat (i5-3317u, 4gb, 3rd gen.core.intel.graphics.4000)`00:20
kc2bez[m]I believe you my search wasn't too exhaustive 00:20
tsimonq2No worries. Take care :)00:21
arraybolt3[m]guiverc: OK. I meant that when you install alongside W10 it doesn't detect it and put it in the boot menu. Though you probably don't want to risk nuking that system.00:21
kc2bez[m]It would have included debian-develop though too. I can look more tomorrow after some time spent horizontal.00:22
kc2bez[m]s/develop/devel/00:22
arraybolt3[m]December 2021 on ubuntu-devel, found it.00:23
arraybolt3[m]Hey look: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-December/041769.html00:23
guivercnot really; so you mean update-grub isn't detecting it... My system has jammy installed & w10 is detected  (never really select it though; last time was just to prove to someone I did have a windows but not knowing password I couldn't login)00:23
kc2bez[m]Ah, I didn't go far enough back.00:23
guivercupdate-grub on my install detects & offers the w10... My w10 has fastboot off & hibernate disabled00:23
arraybolt3[m]guiverc: Hmm. Any chance you can show the contents of /etc/default/grub?00:24
guivercarraybolt3[m], from installed system?  (I'm on live currently; only looked what calamares offered)... I can reboot & provide what is installed if helpful00:24
arraybolt3[m]Yeah, from the installed system. Just to see if maybe OS-PROBER was manually reenabled or something.00:25
guivercarraybolt3[m], https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/7ZKPKzcsnm/00:28
arraybolt3[m]guiverc: Hmm, thanks, and that's weird. I wonder what makes GRUB decide when to use the prober and when not to.00:30
guivercyeah I recall issues early in the cycle (tracking doc is where I'd look for clues), but they were resolved & I ignored it as I tested all releases with a winXP  (my d755-5 has a copy still) but rarely on that samsung (w10)... I commonly test with other GNU/Linuxes (which suffered same issue with prober when it impacted jammy)00:35
* guiverc rebooted samsung & selected checked grub (if windows didn't show, I'd likely not notice!) & yep 'windows boot manager' is there & when selected got to w10 greeter... rebooted again at that point00:37
Roberalz[m]<arraybolt3[m]> "Yeah, from the installed system...." <- edit /etc/default/grub and add the line GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false00:51
Roberalz[m]You try that? 00:52
Roberalz[m]With a update-grub2 00:53
arraybolt3[m]Roberalz: I know that doing that will fix the problem, but my issue is with whether the problem exists at all by default. Also, my laptop only has one OS installed, I just notice that it tells me that os-prober isn't being used. I don't need it, but others who dual-boot do.00:53
arraybolt3[m](Well, OK, only one host OS installed, I have an entire zoo of VMs but that's different.)00:53
Roberalz[m]<arraybolt3[m]> "Roberalz: I know that doing that..." <- It has been disabled by default00:58
Roberalz[m]https://askubuntu.com/questions/1414245/why-do-i-get-warning-os-prober-will-not-be-executed-to-detect-other-bootable-p01:00
arraybolt3[m]Yeah. I thought they changed their minds but I guess not.01:00
Roberalz[m]A script call has been added as posted on askubuntu.01:02
tsimonq2<arraybolt3[m]> "Hey look: https://lists.ubuntu...." <- YES that's the one01:26
Roberalz[m]<tsimonq2> "YES that's the one" <- Thanks for the info 01:35

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!