| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (lunar-proposed/main) [2022e-0ubuntu2 => 2022f-0ubuntu1] (core) | 01:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (lunar-proposed/main) [2022e-0ubuntu2 => 2022f-0ubuntu0.22.10.0] (core) | 01:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (jammy-proposed/main) [2022e-0ubuntu0.22.04.0 => 2022f-0ubuntu0.22.04.0] (core) | 01:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (focal-proposed/main) [2022e-0ubuntu0.20.04.0 => 2022f-0ubuntu0.20.04.0] (core) | 01:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (bionic-proposed/main) [2022e-0ubuntu0.18.04.0 => 2022f-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] (core) | 01:22 | |
| arraybolt3 | Would it be appropriate for me to modify the description of the DKMS bugfix in Ubuntu 22.10 into a proper SRU description so that it can be migrated to the -updates pocket? Or would that be possibly problematic? | 04:15 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [27.11.3~22.10.1] | 07:34 | |
| RAOF | arraybolt3: I'm not aware of the specific case, but in general you're welcome to add SRU information to the relevant bug(s) if they're useful SRUs. | 09:29 |
| RAOF | Assuming they would be acceptable SRUs, of course :) | 09:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (lunar-proposed) [2022f-0ubuntu0.22.10.0] | 10:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022e-0ubuntu2 => 2022f-0ubuntu0.22.10.0] (core) | 10:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2022f-0ubuntu0.22.10.0] | 10:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (jammy-proposed) [2022f-0ubuntu0.22.04.0] | 10:38 | |
| RikMills | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html | 10:41 |
| RikMills | Forbidden | 10:41 |
| RikMills | You don't have permission to access this resource. | 10:41 |
| vorlon | checking | 10:42 |
| RikMills | hmm. not there any more | 10:43 |
| vorlon | what do you mean by "not there"? | 10:43 |
| vorlon | I see the error locally | 10:44 |
| RikMills | doesn't exist any more in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/ | 10:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (focal-proposed) [2022f-0ubuntu0.20.04.0] | 10:45 | |
| RikMills | or at least not listed | 10:45 |
| vorlon | possibly a detail of how apache handles symlinks to unreadable files | 10:45 |
| vorlon | the symlink exists on the server, the target does not | 10:45 |
| RikMills | right | 10:45 |
| vorlon | because the lunar/ output directory doesn't exist | 10:45 |
| RikMills | I guess that will fix itself then | 10:45 |
| vorlon | so this looks like a natural outcome of the archive opening still being in-flight, and us having adjusted the symlinks (to not incorrectly point at kinetic) but not having started running p-m yet for lunar | 10:45 |
| seb128 | Hey there. What's the status of the Lunar archive opening? | 10:46 |
| RikMills | looks so | 10:46 |
| vorlon | seb128: for uploads? | 10:46 |
| RikMills | anyway, thanks. was just checking all my dev booksmarks | 10:46 |
| seb128 | vorlon, yes, but more general just interested by that status, things which maybe I can help with | 10:46 |
| seb128 | would be nice if we had a public discourse like for the release | 10:47 |
| seb128 | I know there was a googledoc about the archive opening in previous cycles, maybe that still exist but I don't remember the url | 10:47 |
| vorlon | seb128: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-547 is our jira checklist for opening. This is the first full work day since we have the name; some of the checklist items were blocked by having the autopkgtest swift copies done | 10:48 |
| vorlon | and we'll sort out the question of toolchain-copies-before-opening today | 10:48 |
| seb128 | vorlon, thanks | 10:48 |
| vorlon | a public discourse> except discourse's workflow for this is terrible :P | 10:48 |
| seb128 | right :/ | 10:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (bionic-proposed) [2022f-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] | 10:51 | |
| hellsworth | bdmurray: do you know the history of why nvidia-driver-520 is missing from the kinetic repo or can you point me to the right person? | 10:51 |
| hellsworth | this came from the kinetic testing discourse post: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-22-10-testing-week/30894/11 | 10:51 |
| bdmurray | hellsworth: I don't off the top of my head but sil2100 might remember | 10:52 |
| hellsworth | thanks | 10:53 |
| sil2100 | hellsworth: hey! It wasn't ready for release, sadly. I think Alberto mentioned he had it ready, but it wasn't tested and ready to go. I think it's planned to go in as an SRU | 10:54 |
| sil2100 | It popped up when we had issues with -515, but I've been told -520 wasn't 'ready', not for releasing in on release week | 10:54 |
| sil2100 | hellsworth: tseliot will know best about the details, since he's the person working on it | 10:55 |
| hellsworth | ah ok thanks so much! | 10:55 |
| vorlon | so we released a 520 SRU to jammy before there was an upgrade path for it to kinetic? | 10:56 |
| vorlon | it's currently in kinetic-proposed; let's see if we can move this forward today | 10:59 |
| bdmurray | There's one comment about it not working well in Focal https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-515/+bug/1992669 | 11:04 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1992669 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (Ubuntu) "Introduce the NVIDIA 520 UDA driver series" [High, In Progress] | 11:04 | |
| guiverc | garfi$$75p | 11:56 |
| sarnold | guiverc: please to be picking a better password next time kthxbye | 11:56 |
| guiverc | & checking which window is current! | 11:57 |
| sarnold | woah woah lets not go crazy | 11:58 |
| guiverc | LOL | 11:58 |
| * arraybolt3 is glad that I use SASL | 12:50 | |
| arraybolt3 | RAOF: Thanks for your help! Yes, it is an acceptable SRU, I'm sure. Just about got respun into Kinetic, then got delayed as a day-0 SRU and then got just left in -proposed... | 12:50 |
| arraybolt3 | Bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/1991725 | 12:50 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1991725 in dkms (Ubuntu) "fails to sign kernel modules" [High, Fix Committed] | 12:50 | |
| arraybolt3 | Anyway I'll turn this into a good SRU and then re-ping whomever needs it soon. | 12:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.54ubuntu0.1] | 12:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.52ubuntu0.2] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.37ubuntu0.15] | 13:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (focal-proposed) [0.43ubuntu1.11] | 13:03 | |
| arraybolt3 | sil2100: Hey, remember that DKMS bug fix in Kinetic? It is *still* sitting in -proposed. I've turned it into a real SRU, if it can be shoved through at the earliest possible convenience that would be awesome. Thank you! | 13:28 |
| arraybolt3 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/1991725 | 13:28 |
| sil2100 | eeek | 13:28 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1991725 in dkms (Ubuntu) "fails to sign kernel modules" [High, Fix Committed] | 13:28 | |
| sil2100 | hm, I suppose it would be good to get a no-change rebuild of the bcmwl driver along with it I suppose? | 13:29 |
| arraybolt3 | It wasn't necessary in my testing, but if you think so, sure. | 13:30 |
| arraybolt3 | (For me just installing the updated DKMS make everything work right.) | 13:30 |
| sil2100 | Oh, it did? I thought we had to trigger a rebuild of the actual dkms driver? | 13:30 |
| sil2100 | That's good news | 13:30 |
| arraybolt3 | Well... | 13:30 |
| arraybolt3 | We do have to trigger a rebuild of the actual DKMS driver, but the user *should* install DKMS first. | 13:31 |
| arraybolt3 | I mean, that's at least what we have in the Lubuntu release notes. Do a full-upgrade first, then install your drivers. Then again with Ubiquity-based flavors, having a no-change rebuild would be handy. | 13:31 |
| arraybolt3 | Though if we're going to do that, should we trigger NCRs on all packages that contain DKMS modules (VirtualBox and v4l2loopback for instance)? | 13:32 |
| toabctl | bdmurray, (cc bdrung ) what's the exact eol date for lunar? cpc needs distro-info-data updated to start doing lunar builds. | 13:32 |
| vorlon | I would suggest the latter should be limited to those packages that might be installed by the install media | 13:32 |
| arraybolt3 | vorlon: Makes sense. | 13:33 |
| vorlon | toabctl: exactly 9 months later unless otherwise indicated and such an indication should come from the Security Team who actually provides that support | 13:33 |
| * arraybolt3 has to go afk, will read backlog and pings when I get back in about an hour | 13:37 | |
| toabctl | vorlon, thx. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/distro-info-data/-/merge_requests/5 does fix the dates (cc bdrung ) | 13:43 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Merge 5 in debian/distro-info-data "Fix Ubuntu Lunar Lobster dates" [Opened] | 13:43 | |
| toabctl | already solved by bdmurray.thx | 13:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12 (lunar-proposed/main) [12.2.0-3ubuntu1 => 12.2.0-8ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 13:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (lunar-proposed) [12.2ubuntu4] | 13:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (lunar-proposed) [12.3ubuntu1] | 13:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.10 (lunar-proposed/main) [3.10.7-1 => 3.10.8-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync) | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.11 (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.11.0~rc2-1 => 3.11.0-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.54 => 0.54ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 14:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (jammy-proposed/main) [0.52ubuntu0.1 => 0.52ubuntu0.2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 14:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1.10 => 0.43ubuntu1.11] (core, i386-whitelist) | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.37ubuntu0.14 => 0.37ubuntu0.15] (core) | 14:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.5.3 => 2.5.3ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.8 => 2.4.9] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12 [source] (lunar-proposed) [12.2.0-8ubuntu1] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (lunar-proposed/main) [2.39-3ubuntu1 => 2.39-8ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.39-8ubuntu1] | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (jammy-proposed/main) [2.17.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 2.17.3-0ubuntu1] (core) | 15:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu0.22.10.1] (core) | 15:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (lunar-proposed/main) [2.39-8ubuntu1 => 2.39-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:15 | |
| tsimonq2 | Ooh, I see progress on the Lunar queue :D | 17:17 |
| ogra | don't look too close, you know lobsters are shy animals ... | 17:19 |
| tsimonq2 | 😆 come on little lobster, I believe in you! | 17:20 |
| mdeslaur | o_O | 17:21 |
| tsimonq2 | (all in good spirits, take your time :) ) | 17:23 |
| === ghvail|wtf is now known as ghavil | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.39-8ubuntu2] | 17:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.39-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 20:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.39-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 20:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (lunar-proposed/main) [13.9.1ubuntu1 => 13.10.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 22:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.39-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 22:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.39-8ubuntu2] | 22:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [i386] (lunar-proposed) [2.39-8ubuntu2] | 22:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.39-8ubuntu2] | 22:35 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!