[13:30] <lissyx> oSoMoN, seb128, hello
[13:30] <seb128> lissyx, hey
[13:30] <lissyx> oSoMoN, seb128, shouldn't this be filed against ubuntu rather than us? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1798512
[13:30] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Mozilla bug 1798512 in Firefox Build System "Update Snap ffmpeg to support VAAPI AV1 hardware decoding" [--, Unconfirmed]
[13:34] <seb128> lissyx, it's an issue with the firefox snap not with ubuntu though?
[13:34] <lissyx> yeah but it's not a bug on firefox itself
[13:35] <lissyx> and given https://github.com/canonical/firefox-snap/blob/767875a21a6bd2c543fdee4119e67fbe5b7d2f53/snapcraft.yaml#L438-L439  I dont see if it can be fixed
[13:35] <seb128> I mean it's fine to report firefox snap issues on launchpad but that's not different from other snaps issues
[13:35] <seb128> lissyx, I'm unsure to understand
[13:35] <seb128> firefox seems to stage libavcodec58 from the archive
[13:36] <seb128> is the issue that the focal version is too old and doesn't has the needed codec?
[13:36] <seb128> if so we could build ffmpeg from source instead of staging the deb
[13:37] <seb128> also I'm unclear what's currently included in the snap today but some of the codecs distribution is restricted due to patents
[13:38] <lissyx> yes, I think it is staging libavcodec58 from 20.04 and not 22.04
[13:38] <seb128> right, it's a core20 snap atm
[13:39] <seb128> let me talk to Ken/Olivier later here, we are together at a sprint
[13:44] <oSoMoN> lissyx, seb128: I discussed this already with the bug reporter
[13:45] <oSoMoN> the snap ships ffmpeg from the archive, and it's too old to support av1 hw decoding 
[13:45] <oSoMoN> event bumping to core22 doesn't solve the problem, because the version of ffmpeg in jammy is too old. We need ffmpeg 5 to address that.
[13:46] <oSoMoN> The only option I see is to build ffmpeg from source as part of the snap
[13:46] <oSoMoN> hence the bug report
[13:46] <lissyx> well the new bug report is not crystal clear sorry
[13:46] <oSoMoN> let me see if I can clarify it
[13:46] <lissyx> but how does this fits with the requirement of ffmpeg mentionned in the snapcraft comment?
[13:47] <lissyx> does building from source makes the requirement not valid anymore maybe?
[13:47] <lissyx> (and we already have some  in-tree ffmpeg, can't we just use that?)
[13:49] <seb128> lissyx, might be easier to discuss that in person next week
[13:50] <lissyx> sure
[13:51] <RAOF> Hey, seb128. How do you feel about sponsoring a colord upload from salsa? 😉
[13:53] <seb128> RAOF, I'm in!
[14:13] <seb128> RAOF, uploaded
[14:13] <RAOF> 🎉