| blahdeblah | ^ | 00:20 |
|---|---|---|
| ahasenack | hi #security, when a package in a stable release is, say, 1.0-1, and you need to issue a security update, but that security update is just a rebuild | 13:41 |
| ahasenack | do you call the rebuild 1.0-1build1, or something else? | 13:41 |
| ahasenack | there is no added patch, so in principle it shouldn't warrant an ubuntu suffix | 13:41 |
| mdeslaur | ahasenack: we could, but we usually don't | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | usually don't what? | 14:08 |
| mdeslaur | ahasenack: our automated tooling just uses our usual security update "ubuntu" version string | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | oh, so you would call it 1.0-1ubuntu0.1? | 14:08 |
| mdeslaur | yes, even if we could use "build" | 14:09 |
| ahasenack | ok, but you wouldn't mind if we used 1.0-1build1? | 14:09 |
| mdeslaur | nope, wouldn't mind at all, though you probably want 1build0.1 just to be sure | 14:09 |
| ahasenack | (bar other upgrade issues that might arise, but let's assume I checked) | 14:09 |
| ahasenack | is there precedence for using 1build0.1? | 14:10 |
| sdeziel | isn't using "build" risking to conflict with a fresher import from debian? | 14:10 |
| mdeslaur | we do that so we don't collide with later releases that may have gotten a build1 during the dev cycle | 14:10 |
| ahasenack | but it's a stable release, not devel | 14:11 |
| ahasenack | and later stable releases have a new upstream version | 14:11 |
| mdeslaur | so, in what I'm describing is for stable releases, not the dev release | 14:11 |
| ahasenack | (in this particular case) | 14:11 |
| ahasenack | ok, let me layout the actual package | 14:11 |
| mdeslaur | ahasenack: if you look at the publishing history, and there was never a build1, sure, you can use build1 | 14:11 |
| ahasenack | https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/69vJC7Bvdy/ | 14:12 |
| ahasenack | would you still prefer 1build0.1? | 14:12 |
| mdeslaur | ok, looks like there was never a 1.0.5-1build1 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/go-md2man/+publishinghistory | 14:12 |
| mdeslaur | you can use build1 if you like | 14:13 |
| mdeslaur | using 0.1 vs 1 is just to minimize the chance of colliding with the package history | 14:13 |
| ahasenack | k | 14:13 |
| ahasenack | it's even gone from devel | 14:14 |
| ahasenack | jammy even | 14:14 |
| ahasenack | k | 14:14 |
| JanC | sdeziel: imports from Debian are always rebuilds, so theoretically... shouldn't all buildN suffixes from Debian be dropped? :) | 17:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!