[08:59] <mwhudson> jdstrand: thank you!
[09:24] <mwhudson> so is dput-ng just completely broken in ubuntu?
[09:29] <schopin> Not *completely*, just for you :)
[09:50] <mwhudson> i think you need to purge dput rather than just remove it first? but i actually want to keep my configuration...
[09:51] <mwhudson> anyway i've come up with an absurd workflow that may have let me do what i needed...
[10:11] <tumbleweed> dput-ng being broken by old dput config files is something I've heard of before
[10:17] <enr0n> Can a core dev please retry these autopkgtests? retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks openssh -s kinetic | grep -v piuparts
[11:02] <Unit193> Yay!  Not the only dput user. \o/
[11:11] <ahasenack_> cjwatson: hi, just got this bug filed against debian-archive-keyring (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-archive-keyring/+bug/1994013), and found a comment you made on a similar bug from 2018, asking a similar thing
[11:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1994013 in debian-archive-keyring (Ubuntu Bionic) "Old keyring makes deboostrap Debian stable not possible in Bionic" [Undecided, New]
[11:11] <ahasenack_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-archive-keyring/+bug/1752656 being that other one
[11:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1752656 in ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu) "Please SRU archive keyrings to older releases" [Undecided, New]
[11:11] <ahasenack_> does your comment about xenial also apply to bionic?
[11:16] <ginggs> enr0n: looking...
[11:20] <enr0n> ginggs: thanks!
[11:20] <ginggs> .
[11:46] <cjwatson> ahasenack_: I'm not sure, sorry - gpg is confusing and apparently I didn't specify (probably because I only cared about xenial at the time).  I suspect the only way to find out is to experiment.
[11:46] <ahasenack_> ok
[11:46] <cjwatson> ahasenack_: I vaguely remember a problem with bionic's Ed25519 support in gpg but not sure.
[11:47] <ahasenack_> my other concern was if a newer version of the keyring would expire very old keys, and would make bootstrapping something like oldoldstable problematic
[11:47] <ahasenack_> but I guess not