mup | PR snapd#12158 closed: image,tests: tweak naming and test for classic UC20+ image <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12158> | 08:10 |
---|---|---|
mup | PR snapd#12290 closed: testutil: compare unsorted containers nested in maps <Skip spread> <Created by MiguelPires> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12290> | 10:36 |
mup | PR snapd#12307 opened: aspects: support placeholders in aspect names <Skip spread> <Created by MiguelPires> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12307> | 12:01 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3978 opened: linters: fix classic linter interpreter warning <Created by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3978> | 12:22 |
murmel | ogra: available for a min? | 14:23 |
ogra | sure | 14:23 |
murmel | I get this error, but no idea what actually is wrong with the snapcraft, as I even verified there is no dead whitespaces (I have issues sometimes with deadkeys :S) https://paste.debian.net/1260225/ | 14:24 |
murmel | this is the actual file https://paste.debian.net/1260226/ | 14:25 |
ogra | murmel, line 32 has a wrong indentation | 14:27 |
ogra | (yaml is *very* strinct with that ... also always make use there are no tabs used (vim at time likes to replace spaces with tabs IIRC) | 14:27 |
murmel | now i feel dumb :X | 14:28 |
murmel | ogra: yeah, I had issues with intendation, as my vimrc was a bit buggy | 14:28 |
ogra | not sure why it complains about line 15 though ... there might be something mis-interpreted with the colons in the url of the description line | 14:28 |
ogra | .. which then causes it to complain when moving to the next block | 14:29 |
murmel | i fixed line 32 and it also fixed the other issue :X | 14:29 |
ogra | hah ! | 14:29 |
murmel | can I pm you? | 14:29 |
ogra | sure | 14:30 |
=== ackk is now known as ack | ||
mup | PR snapd#12308 opened: interfaces: allow python3.10+ in the default template <Simple 😃> <Needs security review> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12308> | 15:47 |
x7upLime | do you still build snapd using snapcraft? | 16:09 |
x7upLime | for devel purposes I mean.. | 16:10 |
x7upLime | referring to the hacking.md file in the snapd repo | 16:10 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3979 opened: tests: allow local git submodules <Created by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3979> | 16:18 |
mup | PR snapd#12309 opened: o/state: introduce WaitStatus <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12309> | 16:32 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3980 opened: plugins: Increase kernel plugin build environments comparability <Created by jocado> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3980> | 16:43 |
mup | PR snapd#12310 opened: client: remove classic check for `snap recovery --show-keys` <Simple 😃> <Needs Samuele review> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12310> | 17:27 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3979 closed: tests: allow local git submodules <Created by cmatsuoka> <Merged by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3979> | 18:23 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3981 opened: [draft] wip provide snapcraft try for core22 <Created by tigarmo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3981> | 19:58 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3982 opened: lifecycle: fix double emit.pause() call <Created by mr-cal> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3982> | 21:38 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3983 opened: repo: raise error when populating the apt cache directory fails <Created by mr-cal> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3983> | 22:58 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3982 closed: lifecycle: fix double emit.pause() call <Created by mr-cal> <Merged by mr-cal> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3982> | 23:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!