[03:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5pimcommon [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[04:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5pimcommon [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5pimcommon [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5pimcommon [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5pimcommon [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[04:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5pimcommon [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[04:39] <RikMills> ubuntu-archive: please accept the libkf5pimcommon new binaries. needed so that the rest of the KDE PIM stack can build
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5pimcommon [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5pimcommon [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5pimcommon [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5pimcommon [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5pimcommon [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5pimcommon [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[05:08] <RikMills> ^ thanks!
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pastedeploy [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [3.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tepl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tepl [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tepl [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tepl [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tepl [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tepl [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [6.2.0-2]
[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tepl [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [6.2.0-2]
[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tepl [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [6.2.0-2]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nut [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.8.0-5]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tepl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [6.2.0-2]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pastedeploy [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [3.0.1-1]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tepl [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [6.2.0-2]
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[10:47] <sil2100> Okay, since I finally have some time, let me clear out that kinetic-proposed situation. Have no idea why so many packages were left lying around
[11:42] <xnox> rbasak:  we actually need kpatch backports, but the one in kinetic unapproved lacks SRU paperwork, now that kinetic is stable. I guess yes, please reject, and i will reupload them.
[11:45] <rbasak> Done, thanks
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kpatch [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.7-0ubuntu1]
[12:25] <laney> anyone looked into the oem packageset sync failures that are spamming devel-permissions?
[12:27] <rbasak> I don't see much spam.
[12:27] <rbasak> There's the occasional failure
[12:27] <rbasak> Am I missing more?
[12:28] <rbasak> I mean it'd be nice if spurious failures didn't result in emails
[12:28] <rbasak> But I don't think there are failures happening right now?
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet6 (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.0.110-0ubuntu1 => 6.0.111-0ubuntu1~22.10.1] (no packageset)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet6 (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.0.110-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 6.0.111-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:14] <laney> Looks like a couple of instances of network trouble this week, hopefully will (or has) self resolve.
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: licheerv-rtl8723ds-dkms (jammy-proposed/primary) [1.0-0ubuntu0.1]
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.07+dfsg-1ubuntu4 => 2022.07+dfsg-1ubuntu4.1] (core)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open3d [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.16.0+ds-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open3d [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.16.0+ds-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open3d [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.16.0+ds-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open3d [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.16.0+ds-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open3d [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.16.0+ds-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open3d [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.16.0+ds-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rygel [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.42.0-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rygel [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.42.0-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rygel [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.42.0-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rygel [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.42.0-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [4:22.11.80-0ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rygel [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.42.0-2ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rygel [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.42.0-2ubuntu1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dotnet6 [source] (kinetic-proposed) [6.0.111-0ubuntu1~22.10.1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected mint-y-icons [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.1-1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected passes-gtk [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [0.6-1]
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted licheerv-rtl8723ds-dkms [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.0-0ubuntu0.1]
[18:06] <vorlon> doko: any plans to do something with Debian bug #1017666? seeing that it's now two llvm releases behind and uninstallable in sid
[18:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1017666 in src:amdgcn-tools "amdgcn-tools: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-14" [Important, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1017666
[18:07] <vorlon> doko: oh, perhaps it's not uninstallable in sid; llvm-toolchain-13 is still present in Debian, though perhaps unbuildable due to spirv-llvm-translator removal
[18:07] <vorlon> llvm-spirv [amd64 arm64 armel armhf mips64el mipsel ppc64el s390x] <!stage1> | hello [!i386]
[18:07] <vorlon> what kind of build-dep is that
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: licheerv-rtl8723ds-dkms [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.0-0ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted licheerv-rtl8723ds-dkms [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0-0ubuntu0.1]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isync (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.4.4-3 => 1.4.4-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu13]
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (kinetic-proposed) [3.46.1-0ubuntu1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [source] (kinetic-proposed) [3.46.1-0ubuntu1]
[19:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (kinetic-proposed) [3.0.1-0ubuntu0.22.10.1]
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.06-2ubuntu13 => 2.06-2ubuntu13] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.06-2ubuntu13 => 2.06-2ubuntu13] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-qpageview (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.6.2-3~ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: frescobaldi (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.1.3+ds1-1 => 3.2+ds1-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot-nezha [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2022.04+git20220405.7446a472-0ubuntu2.22.10.0]
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot-nezha [source] (jammy-proposed) [2022.04+git20220405.7446a472-0ubuntu0.2]
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpfm4 [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.11.1+git32-gd0b85fb-1ubuntu0.1]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu13]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu13]
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.186]
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wike [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.8.1+ds-1ubuntu1]
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isync [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.4.4-3ubuntu0.22.10.1]
[23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.11 => 2.765.12] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected plymouth [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.5+git20211018-1ubuntu3.1]
[23:13] <tsimonq2> Given Bileto's current issues with copying, what would be the most acceptable way to land the LXQt 1.2 stack currently sitting in that PPA, once it's fully ready?
[23:13] <tsimonq2> I can certainly upload all the source.changes files at once, but that strikes me as wasting builder resources... thoughts?
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openconnect [source] (jammy-proposed) [8.20-1ubuntu0.1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librm [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.2+really2.2.2-0ubuntu0.1]
[23:44] <vorlon> tsimonq2: I'm indifferent to the waste of builder resources; and a major reason I'm broadly down on use of bileto is that test results don't get copied over so it wastes autopkgtest resources, which is certainly a larger concern right now given queue sizes
[23:44] <vorlon> (and there's no way around that today, and autopkgtest costs swamp any builder costs right now)
[23:45] <tsimonq2> Thank you, that exactly answers my question :)