[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.22.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[01:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.22.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: patchance (lunar-proposed/primary) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[02:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: munin (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.56-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.56-1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[02:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: munin (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.0.69-1ubuntu1 => 2.0.69-1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[02:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: munin (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.57-1ubuntu2 => 2.0.57-1ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpinyin [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.7.92-2] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpinyin [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.7.92-2] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpinyin [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.7.92-2] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpinyin [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.7.92-2] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpinyin [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.7.92-2] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.22.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpinyin [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.7.92-2] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.22.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
[08:14] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, what? at-spi2-core is something I don't know...
[08:17] <RikMills> LocutusOfBorg: source package for libatk-bridge2.0-0 in lunra
[08:18] <RikMills> or lunar even!
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg> RikMills, and why should I open a defect, where is the defect?
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm lost...
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg> is it related to the dbus uninstallable issue=
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg> ?
[08:22] <RikMills> It is
[08:22] <RikMills> and yes, I think that source is not at fault. it is the debus thing
[08:22] <RikMills> *dbus
[08:24] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, LP: #1997338
[08:24] <RikMills> looking at some of those tests that fail on dbus, the initial testbed-packages list seems to include dbus packages from the dbus in proposed, which can't surely be correct?
[08:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1997338 in at-spi2-core (Ubuntu) "libatk-bridge2.0-0 uninstallable on i386" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1997338
[08:25] <RikMills> the testbed should surely be all release pocket
[08:25] <RikMills> and only things in proposed installed by test deps after if required
[08:28] <LocutusOfBorg> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/i386/p/pulseaudio/20221121_104055_4ef54@/log.gz
[08:30] <cpaelzer> I know there has been a lot of test queue delay recently, but one question on that topic. I've seen things I track to go to "No test result". That part is kind of ok as I'm convinced it will work, but does that mean we let things pass without a test result or would I need to re-run those?
[08:30] <LocutusOfBorg> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/i386/v/vlc/20221111_004121_2f7af@/log.gz
[08:30] <LocutusOfBorg> RikMills, ^^ this one shouldn't have proposed enabled
[08:31] <cpaelzer> Forget what I said 2 minutes ago, some analysis shows that this is special to this particular test which on infratsurture gos into "neutral" state. So it is ok.
[08:34] <RikMills> LocutusOfBorg: and yet the artifacts for that run show that dbus from proposed is installed in the testbed before the actual test deps are resolved
[08:35] <RikMills> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/i386/v/vlc/20221121_104241_89449@/artifacts.tar.gz
[08:35] <RikMills> dbus-bin	1.14.0-2ubuntu3
[08:35] <RikMills> dbus-daemon	1.14.0-2ubuntu3
[08:35] <RikMills> dbus-session-bus-common	1.14.0-2ubuntu3
[08:35] <RikMills> dbus-system-bus-common	1.14.0-2ubuntu3
[08:35] <RikMills> dbus-user-session	1.14.0-2ubuntu3
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> RikMills, what is the problem of dbus-proposed?
[08:41] <RikMills> that log is not very clear on that
[08:42] <RikMills> apt as useful not giving helpful output
[08:42] <RikMills> *usual
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> RikMills, sadly, I cant reproduce on local pbuilder environment
[09:14] <RikMills> LocutusOfBorg: same here the other day. think it is specific to the testbeds in the runners
[09:19] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, for pkgconf delta, I don't know if this still applies or not
[09:20] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, ^^ is this pkgconfig crosswrapper still useful with newer pkgconf?
[10:47] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, kodi-inputstream-adaptive? its blocking kodi, needs a sync or a rebuild, don't know...
[11:49] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, jbicha, from what I can see, pkgconfig delta was about adding this:  PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR="$PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR:/usr/lib/pkgconfig"
[11:50] <LocutusOfBorg> now pkgconf switch to personalities
[11:50] <LocutusOfBorg> +DefaultSearchPaths: /usr/local/lib/@MULTIARCH@/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/share/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/@MULTIARCH@/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgconfig
[11:50] <LocutusOfBorg> so, the search path is already including it.
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqmi (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.31~git20220823-0ubuntu2 => 1.32.0-1ubuntu0.22.10.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpinyin [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.7.92-2]
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpinyin [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.7.92-2]
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpinyin [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [2.7.92-2]
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpinyin [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.7.92-2]
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpinyin [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2.7.92-2]
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpinyin [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2.7.92-2]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmbim (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.27~git20220823-0ubuntu1 => 1.28.0-1~ubuntu22.10.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: modemmanager (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.19~git20220905-0ubuntu2 => 1.20.0-1~ubuntu22.10.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[12:58] <icey[m]> hey - any chance the Ceph update in focal-proposed could be accepted into -updates??
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librest (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.9.1-2 => 0.9.1-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.57.5+22.10 => 2.57.5+22.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[13:14] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  i have no idea, i last touched pkgconfig years ago
[13:15] <xnox> ubuntu-sru / ubuntu-archive team the above snapd binary copy is interesting. riscv64 build in kinetic-proposed failed, but suceeded in lunar-proposed (better builder), and it is abi compatible with kinetic. Thus requesting binary copy from lunar to kinetic-proposed, to bring riscv64 binary back to kinetic-proposed.
[13:15] <xnox> as otherwise retries in kinetic-proposed fail to upload on riscv64 as "this binary already exists in this immutable archive"
[13:17] <xnox> cc: @cjwatson ^^^
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-rnp [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.1.0+git20221014.01b7129-4] (no packageset)
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (jammy-proposed/main) [3.104ubuntu14 => 3.104ubuntu14.1] (core)
[15:07] <bdmurray> Could an AA copy dbus from lunar-proposed to lunar? The version in kinetic-updates is greater than the version in lunar, its a security update, the three autopkgtest failures (so far) seem spurious and its causing other issues in the autopkgtest environment.
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted py-rnp [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.0+git20221014.01b7129-4]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [3.22.13+dfsg-1]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-keybase-go-ps [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.0~git20190827.91aafc9-1]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [3.22.13+dfsg-1]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [3.22.13+dfsg-1]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [3.22.13+dfsg-1]
[15:25] <bdmurray> Additionally a bunch of the tests listed in progress in the update_excuses report are lies
[15:38] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, ^^ yes please this might fix the issues we are facing :)
[15:39] <LocutusOfBorg> sadly also curl needs to migrate to fix some other installability I guess
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: postgresql-15 (lunar-proposed/primary) [15.1-1]
[18:22] <bdmurray> FTR dbus has moved to release pocket for lunar
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: masakari-monitors (focal-proposed/main) [9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset)
[21:29] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: kodi> I also don't know, and I'm off this week for Thanksgiving so have limited time to look
[21:30] <vorlon> xnox: by policy we should not copy it back from lunar to kinetic as this risks ABI skew.  Fresh uploads to each series probably better here
=== tuxifreund_ is now known as tuxifreund
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-iguanesolutions-go-systemd [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [5.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-influxdata-influxdb1-client [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.0~git20220302.a9ab567-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: h5z-zfp [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.1.0+git20221021-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: h5z-zfp [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+git20221021-1] (no packageset)