[00:55] <Liver_K> hey the /var/log/apt/history.log file only has a couple weeks of logs in it, how do i change how long they are kept?
[01:36] <blahdeblah> Liver_K: Edit /etc/logrotate.d/apt
[15:39] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: can this be marked as merged? https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+git/libvirt/+merge/428252
[15:43] <ahasenack> oh wow, mysql takes 12h to build on riscv64
[15:43] <ahasenack> "Finished on 2022-10-20 (took 12 hours, 49 minutes, 6.5 seconds)"
[15:45] <ahasenack> athos: is this one good to go? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-defaults/+bug/1990302 I lost track of the php rebases due to security uploads, and block-proposed-* (which this one doesn't have)
[15:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-server- Launchpad bug 1990302 in php8.1 (Ubuntu Jammy) "php://temp bug fixed in 8.1.6 is not backported to 8.1.2 release" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[15:58] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: done
[16:54] <shubjero> If I change the vlan id on a bonded interface in my netplan config and then run 'netplan apply', the vlan id doesnt change in /proc/net/vlan/bond.whatever . I've also tried restarting systemd-networkd but that doesnt apply the change either. Aside from rebooting (which works), what else can I try to apply a vlan id change? Thanks all
[17:05] <tomreyn> shubjero: maybe editing the networkd configuration in /run (and then restarting networkd?), i am just guessing and that's just another attempt at another workaround.
[17:47] <shubjero> tomreyn: i dont see where a vlan id is defined in /run
[18:00] <tomreyn> shubjero: oops, i guess it may not be in the networkd configuration file at all then
[18:18] <znf> shubjero, netplan + bonds = poop
[18:19] <znf> "apply" mostly fails with bonds, I think it even warns you that it doesn't work properly 
[18:19] <shubjero> i never get any errors and dont generally have a problem with netplan other than that it does seem to actually apply the underlying changes lol
[18:19] <shubjero> *doesnt seem
[18:20] <shubjero> thankfully im not changing vlan id's every day and this was more of just an annoyance of having to reboot when testing a new setup which required me to change the vlan id
[18:20] <shubjero> so its more of a "would be nice to know but not a huge deal"
[18:57] <ahasenack> sergiodj: hi, regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isync/+bug/1995690
[18:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-server- Launchpad bug 1995690 in isync (Ubuntu Jammy) "error:0A000126:SSL routines" [Undecided, In Progress]
[18:57] <ahasenack> was jammy not uploaded by the time kinetic was accepted? Or why is just jammy still in unapproved?
[19:01] <sergiodj> ahasenack: not really sure why it wasn't accepted at the same time.  LP barfed when I did the first upload to jammy, but I re-did the upload after a few hours and it worked
[19:02] <sergiodj> btw, I think that's a good candidate for you to exercise your SRU powers
[19:03] <ahasenack> I'm on it, just releases php8.1 from athos even
[19:03] <sergiodj> thanks
[19:03] <ahasenack> so yours wasn't the first
[19:03] <sdeziel> sigh, this unexpected EOL with OpenSSL 3.0 is a recurring problem :/
[19:03] <sergiodj> yes :-/
[19:03] <ahasenack> postfix is another one, right
[19:03] <sdeziel> nginx, dovecot, postfix and now isync
[19:04] <ahasenack> patches accepted :)
[19:06] <sdeziel> I'm happy to provide external testing/validation but getting debdiffs out is hard with my free time budget :/
[20:22] <ahasenack> sergiodj: you sponsored dnsmasq for miriam? 2.80-1.1ubuntu1.6
[20:22] <ahasenack> sergiodj: I'm puzzled whith the diff in lp
[20:23] <ahasenack> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/635576064/dnsmasq_2.80-1.1ubuntu1_2.80-1.1ubuntu1.6.diff.gz
[20:23] <ahasenack> it's like the previous version is ubuntu1, which is the focal release. Did you use -v when building the package?
[20:23] <ahasenack> might be an artifact of this old source format, though, and nothing to worry about
[20:23] <sergiodj> ahasenack: let me take a look
[20:24] <ahasenack> the changes file looks fine, it has just 2.80-1.1ubuntu1.6 in the changelog
[20:24] <sergiodj> ahasenack: the diff looks strange, indeed
[20:25] <ahasenack> but it's lp who decided to diff against 2.80-1.1ubuntu1
[20:25] <sergiodj> I didn't use -v, but I had to use -I.git -i.git because this is a 1.0 source format package
[20:25] <ahasenack> ok
[20:25] <sergiodj> I wonder if that (being a 1.0 source format package) is confusing LP
[20:30] <sergiodj> now I'm puzzled too
[20:33] <sergiodj> I think it's a problem with LP.  if you go to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq and check the diff for 2.80-1.1ubuntu1.5 on Focal, you will see that it also includes the diff for previous versions as well
[20:33] <sergiodj> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/dnsmasq/2.80-1.1ubuntu1.5/dnsmasq_2.80-1.1ubuntu1.5.diff.gz
[20:33] <sergiodj> so, IMHO, nothing to worry about
[20:36] <ahasenack> hm, the debdiff I get in the sru tooling also shows extra stuff
[20:38] <sergiodj> 1.0 source format is a pain...