[02:55] <Unit193> In the xubuntu seed/meta, why is (wireplumber) needed twice in order to actually pick up?  I had to do https://dpaste.com/7SG34HBNX in order for ./update to actually add it to the recommends (sans the pipewire dep → rec change.)
[22:27] <arraybolt3[m]> Just need someone to sanity-check something for me - I have a package I'm working with who's version in Debian is 0.12.0-2. I'm applying updates to it that are currently only in Ubuntu. Should the new version number be 0.12.0-2ubuntu1, or 0.12.0-0ubuntu1? (I think the first one is correct.)
[22:29] <arraybolt3[m]> (Also if the wrong version number was already uploaded to the archive, could I change it and have it sponsored and have the correct one replace the old one?)
[23:00] <ginggs> arraybolt3[m]: 0.12.0-2ubuntu1 sounds correct to me
[23:02] <arraybolt3> ginggs: That's what I figured. I think 0.12.0-0ubuntu1 is already in the archive, can I just change the version number in the changelog and then have the package reuploaded?
[23:02] <arraybolt3> (I don't need sponsoring right now, I already have someone to sponsor package uploads for me.)
[23:06] <ginggs> arraybolt3[m]: what is the name of the mystery package?
[23:56] <arraybolt3> ginggs: lxqt-build-tools
[23:56] <arraybolt3> (sorry, I was afk)