[02:49] <vorlon> oh ffs, libavif/i386 now build-depends on a library written in rust
[03:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added rust-rav1e to i386-whitelist in lunar
[03:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed rust-rav1e from i386-whitelist in lunar
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-google-cel-go [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.7.3+ds-4] (no packageset)
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ortp [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64-2] (kubuntu)
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ortp [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64-2] (kubuntu)
[06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ortp [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64-2] (kubuntu)
[06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ortp [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64-2] (kubuntu)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ortp [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64-2] (kubuntu)
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ortp [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64-2] (kubuntu)
[08:00] <mwhudson> oh good britney crashed
[09:22] <RikMills> mwhudson: and again....
[09:28] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon !
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, RikMills I think we should report this to #launchpad, because the error is urllib.error.HTTPError: HTTP Error 503: Service Unavailable
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> when trying to connect to api.launchpad.net
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> (but I'm mostly sure they already know)
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please remove ghc from lunar proposed?
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> switching to armhf unregisterised made ghc not being able to build armhf anymore with itself
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> (something that was working on kinetic, meh)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2:21.1.4-2ubuntu1.2]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.4]
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please also #1023131
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> RM: dleyna-core -- RoQA; unmaintained, needs transition, new upstream uses single repo (dleyna)
[10:21] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, atf-sh on i386 please? pkgconf wants it...
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.57.5+22.10 => 2.57.5+22.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [2.57.5+22.10]
[10:40] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, atf isn't easy, I checked it when I enabled pkgconf on i386, it build-depends on kyua which requires lutok and I didn't check if those require more
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> we can disable tests on i386
[10:43] <seb128> yes, we can, but it's carrying a delta which is annoying
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> yes it is
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, if you can check lutok too?
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2022.01+dfsg-2ubuntu2.1]
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bogl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bogl [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bogl [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bogl [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bogl [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:56] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, k, lutok is built, kyua will build once the binary is published then let's see if that's enough
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> I guess so, they were really trivial libs when I checked them
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> but I admit, I don't have any good way to check if they can be built on i386 or not, other than asking here
[10:57] <seb128> 👍
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> a tool for that would be awesome, right?
[10:57] <seb128> I don't really have either, and yes that would be great
[10:58] <seb128> currently I just go through build-depends in rmadison to see what is missing on i386
[10:58] <LocutusOfBorg> this is what I also do, but meh :)
[10:59] <LocutusOfBorg> we need atf again, right?
[11:05] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, we might have a chicken and egg atf/kyua
[11:06] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, right, we might need a source upload to disable the option anyway
[11:06] <LocutusOfBorg> I can do it if you enable atf on i386
[11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[11:06] <seb128> at least to get it to build once
[11:06] <LocutusOfBorg> yep
[11:06] <LocutusOfBorg> I can do in bileto
[11:06] <LocutusOfBorg> bileto is really sad
[11:07] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, enabled
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[11:08] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bogl [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[11:09] <ricotz> sil2100, hello :), there is a libreoffice SRU ready in the kinetic/queue - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1997333
[11:09] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1997333 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.3 for kinetic" [High, In Progress]
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added kyua to i386-whitelist in lunar
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libcamera to i386-whitelist in lunar
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added lutok to i386-whitelist in lunar
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-ggrastr [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-basilisk [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.10.2+ds-2] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-procfs [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.14.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-zerocopy-derive [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added atf to i386-whitelist in lunar
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 to i386-whitelist in focal
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 to i386-whitelist in jammy
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 to i386-whitelist in lunar
[11:55] <LocutusOfBorg> kyua what is your problem?
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-zerocopy-derive [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-procfs [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-zerocopy-derive [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:27] <ahasenack> hi, migration/excuses question
[12:28] <ahasenack> thrift (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#thrift) is saying: "Issues preventing migration:
[12:28] <ahasenack> old binaries left on riscv64: libthrift-0.16.0 (from 0.16.0-5build1)"
[12:28] <ahasenack> 0.,16.0-5build1 is superseeded by now, and for some funny reason that only built on riscv64, not any of the other arches
[12:28] <ahasenack> I don't anything .*thrift.* in update_output.txt
[12:29] <ahasenack> so I'm wondering if that "advice" about why it's not migrating is incorrect
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-procfs [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-zerocopy-derive [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-procfs [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:29] <seb128> ahasenack, it is correct
[12:29] <ahasenack> seb128: how to solve it, or what is going on?
[12:29] <seb128> ahasenack, there is a binary existing which isn't available in the current version
[12:30] <seb128> ahasenack, I solved it now, it needs an archive admin to delete the NBS binary
[12:30] <ahasenack> I tried rebuilding 5build1 for the other arches where it failed, but that's when LP is telling me it's superseeded
[12:30] <ahasenack> seb128: ah, thanks!
[12:30] <seb128> np!
[12:30] <ahasenack> fingers crossed if that was the only thing left for gnuradio (and its fanclube) to migrate
[12:31] <seb128> I cleaned a bunch of those NBS binaries this morning but we don't have a nbs report for proposed, would be nice though
[12:32] <ahasenack> indeed, it only clears up once things migrate
[12:32] <ahasenack> so I was checking apt-cache rdepends in a lunar proposed container to see what was missing
[12:35] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, don't ask me why, but no change rebuilding kyua worked
[12:35] <LocutusOfBorg> I suspect some -dev arch:all/arch:any mismatch between amd64 (built previously) and i386 messed it up
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-procfs [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-zerocopy-derive [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mpv [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mpv [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mpv [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mpv [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kpatch (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-0ubuntu8 => 0.9.7-1ubuntu0.22.10.1] (no packageset)
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-procfs [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-zerocopy-derive [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mpv [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mpv [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[14:40] <samir> Hello all
[14:41] <samir> could anyone on ubuntu-archive sponsor this?
[14:41] <samir> https://code.launchpad.net/~samirakarioh/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/433431
[14:41] <samir> https://code.launchpad.net/~samirakarioh/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/433432
[14:41] <samir> https://code.launchpad.net/~samirakarioh/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/433433
[14:41] <samir> https://code.launchpad.net/~samirakarioh/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/433572
[14:49] <RikMills> britney has crashed on all run attempts today
[14:58] <cjwatson> lots of PS5 networking trouble at the moment, not going to investigate all possible knock-on symptoms but it's quite likely to be related
[14:58] <RikMills> it looks very likely
[14:58] <LocutusOfBorg> libgupnp-1.6-dev/ppc64el in main cannot depend on libsoup-3.0-dev in universe
[14:59] <LocutusOfBorg> libsoup3 is already in main, maybe somebody with powers can just do the magic?
[15:00] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: libsoup-3.0-dev can't be in main unless we want sysprof in main
[15:01] <jbicha> the new -dev binaries for gupnp and gssdp need to be demoted to universe again
[15:01] <LocutusOfBorg> oh... also that one
[15:46] <philroche> ubuntu-archive: Does anyone have cycles to review apt-transport-artifact-registry from the Lunar queue? it's NEW. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1993166  This is blocking support for the new Google Artifact Registry service on Ubuntu on GCP
[15:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1993166 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] apt-transport-artifact-registry" [Wishlist, New]
[15:49] <seb128> jbicha, do you know how those gupnpn gssdp binaries end up in main? is something making them listed on component mismatch to promote?
[15:49] <utkarsh2102> samir: as stated before, you don't need an Archive Admin, any core-dev could do that.
[15:49] <utkarsh2102> and fwiw, you're missing an SRU bug.
[15:49] <utkarsh2102> cf: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template
[15:50] <utkarsh2102> cf: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
[15:50] <jbicha> seb128: I think new binaries go to main by default. I think we demoted them once earlier but a new autosync pushed them back into main since they haven't made it out of proposed yet
[15:51] <seb128> jbicha, k, let me demote them again
[15:53] <utkarsh2102> once you've followed that (filed the bug, readied the upload that way), subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the bug for community-wide attention (and ping any core-dev).
[15:53] <utkarsh2102> hth.
[16:02] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pkgconf/1.8.0-11/+build/24866003 :)
[16:03] <seb128> jbicha, ^ fyi, you were also interested
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (jammy-proposed/main) [0.99.22.3 => 0.99.22.4] (core)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-buengese-sgzip [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20220517.9bca1b6-4] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-rclone-ftp [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-210902h-2] (no packageset)
[18:01] <LocutusOfBorg> great success seb128 !
[18:01] <LocutusOfBorg> thank you!
[18:03] <tsimonq2> 🎉
[18:14] <georgiag> hello! can someone please help with the review of the apparmor SRU https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1994146 ? it's in the unapproved queue and we have a customer waiting for these patches to land on snap core20 so I'd appreciate if you could prioritize focal for now
[18:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1994146 in apparmor (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] apparmor - Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]
[18:15] <georgiag> sil2100 or anyone that can help ^ :)
[18:55] <utkarsh2102> perhaps racb can take a look tomorrow during his SRU duty^
[18:58] <utkarsh2102> rbasak, I meant^
[19:01] <sil2100> I think tomorrow is bdmurray's shift
[19:02] <sil2100> I might try, but eh, I'm a bit too swamped already for today
[19:25] <ahasenack> is somebody working on the excuses page/migration? Last refresh time is 00:59:07 UTC
[19:32] <bdmurray> I'll have it look, it might have croaked during the LP timeouts
[19:34] <ahasenack> thx!
[19:34] <seb128> ahasenack, bdmurray, it was discussed earlier on this channel and Colin said it could be side effect of PS5 issues
[19:39] <ahasenack> seems to be running atm
[19:39] <ahasenack> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/lunar/2022-11-28/16:12:16.log is updating
[19:44] <mwhudson> i think the problem is that because of the size of proposed it makes like <austin powers>one million</> HTTP requests so it doesn't take much network instability at all for one to fail
[19:52] <RikMills> britney got to the finish line this time
[19:53] <tsimonq2> mwhudson: I'd say "yes and no"... if Launchpad is down it takes a bit to even get to that stage in the first place (the aforementioned autopkgtest queues, and in hindsight I think ahasenack made a correct assessment of SQLite concurrency being a potential issue)
[19:54] <tsimonq2> I'd agree something needs to be smarter/not require manual intervention if Launchpad is "known as down"... the list keeps growing :)
[19:54] <mwhudson> yes that too
[19:55] <ahasenack> (I said nothing about sqlite concurrency, somebody else did, I just asked about it ;)
[19:56] <RikMills> anyway, the run that just finished migrated 458 packages \o/
[19:57] <RikMills> and new excuses is up
[19:58] <tsimonq2> 🎉
[20:06] <vorlon> mwhudson: britney doesn't make a million http requests, it just makes one for the autopkgtest sqlite database
[20:06] <vorlon> well - it makes http requests to trigger *new* tests, but that's not a million
[20:06] <mwhudson> vorlon: doesn't it make a lot to schedule the tests
[20:06] <mwhudson> i guess that's not a million indeed
[20:06] <vorlon> and not a function of the size of -proposed, but a function of the delta since the last run
[20:11] <seb128> could someone review that one? https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/+git/britney/+merge/433594
[20:11] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: do you actually need ghc source removed from lunar-proposed, or do you need the ghc 9.0.2-4ubuntu1 armhf binary removed?
[20:11] <mwhudson> vorlon: i rescind my take :)
[20:12] <seb128> it's adding a 'force-badtest espeak-ng/1.51+dfsg-9/i386' hint , the tests require clang now which is failing to install on i386 it seems, also there is no point checking the speech service is working on i386
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-google-cel-go [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.11.4+ds-1] (no packageset)
[20:19] <Eickmeyer> Does anybody from the SRU team have a spare cycle to review bug 1989611? We're almost across the finish line. Both Kubuntu meta sources and the one Ubuntu Studio meta source have been uploaded and are in unapproved.
[20:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1989611 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] plasma-distro-release-notifier for Jammy, Focal" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989611
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipewire [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipewire [i386] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.60-3ubuntu1]
[20:32] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: atf-sh> is this a runtime dependency? pkgconf is built on i386 and update-excuses doesn't mention this package.  Also pkgconf is going to need to go through an MIR...
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-buengese-sgzip [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.0~git20220517.9bca1b6-4]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-rclone-ftp [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.0.0-210902h-2]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-procfs [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.14.1-1]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-zerocopy-derive [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-google-cel-go [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.11.4+ds-1]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-zerocopy-derive [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-procfs [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.14.1-1]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-basilisk [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.10.2+ds-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-procfs [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.14.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-procfs [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.14.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-zerocopy-derive [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-zerocopy-derive [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-ggrastr [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.0.1-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-procfs [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.14.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-zerocopy-derive [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-procfs [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.14.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-zerocopy-derive [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-google-cel-go [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.7.3+ds-4]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ortp [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ortp [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ortp [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-ggrastr [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ortp [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ortp [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ortp [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-basilisk [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.10.2+ds-1]
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-buengese-sgzip [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.0~git20220517.9bca1b6-3]
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minetest-mod-meshport [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-rclone-ftp [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.0.0-210902h-1]
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted neon-2-sse [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.0.0~git20220912.a15b489-1]
[20:41] <vorlon> jbicha, seb128: "new binaries go to main by default" - they go to the same component as the source package by default.  But if there were already binaries in proposed, a new autosync would not move them back to main.  And https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lunar/amd64/libgupnp-1.6-dev shows this binary was not in universe before now
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mathcomp-abel [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mathcomp-abel [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mathcomp-abel [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mathcomp-abel [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mathcomp-abel [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mathcomp-abel [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1]
[20:46] <vorlon> philroche, mirespace: I'm not keen on 'apt-transport-ar' as a binary package name for this; I wouldn't consider 'ar' a widely-recognized abbreviation for artifact registry, so this looks like namespace squatting to me.  Also I see no point in making the source and binary package names different here.  Could you please reupload with the binary package name as apt-transport-artifact-registry?
[20:48] <sarnold> is that 'artifactory' or is this something else?
[20:49] <vorlon> sarnold: it's labeled 'Artifact Registry' in the package, not 'artifactory', so I'm assuming it's different
[20:49] <vorlon> philroche, mirespace: also uh - 'Upstream-Name: google-compute-engine'?
[20:49] <sarnold> aha cool, thanks
[20:50] <vorlon> philroche, mirespace: debian/dirs is harmless but is also useless cruft; you only need to declare debian/dirs when your intent is to ship an empty directory in the package
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected apt-transport-artifact-registry [source] (lunar-proposed) [20220622.00-0ubuntu1]
[20:55] <mwhudson> apt-transport-ar sounds like it would get debs from .a archives
[20:57] <ahasenack> or an apt transport for Pirate Day
[20:57] <sarnold> that was my first thought, yes :)
[20:57] <sarnold> arr
[20:57] <ahasenack> you guys have no imagination
[21:00] <sarnold> so true
[21:02] <utkarsh2102> lmao
[21:02] <juliank> yes, .a is why I wanted better name
[21:02] <utkarsh2102> vorlon: I'll have it fixed and take care of the re-upload. Thanks!
[21:03] <juliank> I've been saying that a year ago or so :D
[21:04] <Odd_Bloke> sudo apt-get install apt-transport-ar^ apt-transport-en
[21:05] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: ack, thank you
[21:32] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: hi, why have you said in patchance debian/copyright that the general license is GPL-2 rather than GPL-2+?  I can't find this anywhere in the source; and without another declaration, the GPL itself says that "or any later version" applies
[21:33] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Because I wasn't clear on it. I can reupload as GPL-2+ without issue.
[21:34] <Eickmeyer> I was being a little too cautious, I guess.
[21:36] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: also, I wonder about the hard-coding of python3 dependencies here in debian/control, and not using ${python3:Depends} which I think is supposed to be used here?
[21:36] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ok.  It's not wrong to distribute this under GPL-2, but it's unnecessarily strict; feel free to upload a correction afterwards
[21:36] <Eickmeyer> I can try that! :)
[21:37] <Eickmeyer> IIRC RE: Python, I think Lintian was throwing warnings, so I was being overly-cautious.
[21:38] <Eickmeyer> That, or I was spelling it out per the Readme.
[21:38] <Eickmeyer> Honestly, it was a few weeks ago and my memory has been through a lot. ;)
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted patchance [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: patchance [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: patchance [arm64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: patchance [armhf] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: patchance [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:47] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: please have a look at lintian output for the patchance binary package; there are quite a few errors/warnings
[21:47] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: technically nothing that's an archive issue so I'm accepting, but it's definitely buggy
[21:47] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Looking...
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted patchance [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted patchance [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted patchance [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted patchance [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bogl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bogl [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bogl [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bogl [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bogl [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bogl [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.18-20ubuntu1]
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpv [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1]
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpv [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1]
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpv [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1]
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpv [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1]
[21:50] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Ok, yeah, I see it. The manpage issue is something this dev is notorious for forgetting, so that's upstream. Everything else I can fix.
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpv [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1]
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpv [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.35.0-3ubuntu1]
[22:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.4-0ubuntu0~18.04.1 => 22.4.2-0ubuntu0~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[22:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.4-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 => 22.4.2-0ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[22:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [22.4-0ubuntu0~22.04.1 => 22.4.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[22:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (kinetic-proposed/main) [22.4-0ubuntu0~22.10.1 => 22.4.2-0ubuntu0~22.10.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[22:55] <blackboxsw> RAOF: subiquity folks discovered a regression during our SRU verification on cloud-init 22.4.0 last week. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1997559.   We would like to reject 22.4.0 that is sitting in -proposed and in it's place we have uploaded 22.4.2 which contains the SRU regression fix and a high-priority bug for Azure duplicate mac addresses.
[22:55] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1997559 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'partition'" [High, Fix Released]
[22:56] <blackboxsw> Our SRU exception process bug is here for cloud-init. If you have time today or tomorrow for review, it would be excellent. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1996645
[22:56] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1996645 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.3.4 to 22.4) Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Kinetic" [Undecided, New]
[22:58] <blackboxsw> we have supplemented cloud-init's SRU process bug description with references to these two bugs fixed beyond our original 22.4.2 and expect to perform some manual testing of both of those bugs above what has already been verified by the 22.4.0 SRU verification process.
[22:58] <blackboxsw> * beyond our original 22.4.0*
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mediastreamer2 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mediastreamer2 [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mediastreamer2 [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.64+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mediastreamer2 [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64+dfsg-3]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mediastreamer2 [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64+dfsg-3]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mediastreamer2 [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1:5.1.64+dfsg-3]
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-biocbaseutils [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-bsseq [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.34.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-biocbaseutils [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.0.0+dfsg-1]
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-bsseq [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.34.0+dfsg-1]
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdump-tools (jammy-proposed/main) [1:1.6.10ubuntu2 => 1:1.6.10ubuntu2.1] (core)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdump-tools (kinetic-proposed/main) [1:1.8ubuntu1 => 1:1.8ubuntu1.1] (core)