[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-std [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.12.0-10] (no packageset)
[01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-zerocopy [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-1] (no packageset)
[01:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-std [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.12.0-10]
[01:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-zerocopy [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.6.1-1]
[01:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-std [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.12.0-10] (no packageset)
[02:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-zerocopy [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-1] (no packageset)
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[03:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] <utkarsh2102> vorlon: I notice that the binary (ar+https) in the apt-transport-artifact-registry is being shipped to /usr/lib/apt/methods/ (after being moved from /usr/bin), is that OK to do that?
[05:24] <amurray> RAOF: hey, can the snapd update from kinetic-proposed please be promoted to -updates? all the other releases have migrated but this one was stuck due to a missing binary for riscv64 - that is now resolved so it should be good to go
[06:08] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: that's where it should be shipped to be used as an apt transport method, yes
[06:08] <utkarsh2102> okeydoke, thanks!
[06:08] <utkarsh2102> I assume that's why the empty directory was created via d/dirs :)
[06:09] <vorlon> still shouldn't need to be
[06:09] <vorlon> directories get auto-created by dh_install
[06:09] <utkarsh2102> of course, I agree
[06:09] <utkarsh2102> fixing and re-uploading that now
[06:09] <utkarsh2102> yep
[06:10] <utkarsh2102> mirespace:^^
[06:48] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, both!
[06:49] <LocutusOfBorg> but yes if you renmove
[06:50] <LocutusOfBorg> if you remove 9.0.2-4ubuntu1 armhf we are fine to go
[06:50] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, atf -> its fixed already done by seb, for the MIR, its already open
[07:19] <LocutusOfBorg>   From sync-blacklist.txt:
[07:19] <LocutusOfBorg>   # doko, 2022-10-24, add setuptools, start the python3.11 addition
[07:19] <LocutusOfBorg>   without it first
[07:19] <LocutusOfBorg>   setuptools
[07:19] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, ^^ can we unblacklist?
[07:19] <LocutusOfBorg> its making python-mpv fail, and maybe other packages
[07:47] <_doko> LocutusOfBorg: that should be ginggs call, I'll be back next week
[07:48] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, I would like to hear your opinion in any case :)
[07:59] <utkarsh2102> vorlon: re-uploaded!
[07:59] <utkarsh2102> mirespace, philroche^
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: apt-transport-artifact-registry (lunar-proposed/primary) [20220622.00-0ubuntu1]
[10:31] <mirespace> utkarsh2102, philroche,vorlon: thanks
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simbody [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simbody [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[11:43] <amurray> bdmurray: hey, would you be able to migrate snapd in kinetic-proposed to -updates?
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simbody [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simbody [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simbody [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-macho-unwind-info [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-macho-unwind-info [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-futures-timer [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-macho-unwind-info [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-futures-timer [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-macho-unwind-info [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-futures-timer [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-futures-timer [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-macho-unwind-info [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-futures-timer [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tmux (jammy-proposed/main) [3.2a-4build1 => 3.2a-4ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simbody [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[14:18] <philroche> vorlon: utkarsh2102: RE apt-transport-artifact-registry. Thanks for following up
[14:19] <utkarsh2102> \o/
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.23 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.25] (core) (sync)
[15:12] <bdmurray> amurray: The riscv64 build for kinetic is now somehow failed to upload versus failed to build. I'll try to rebuild it.
[15:12] <bdmurray> Or maybe I'll read the log instead https://launchpadlibrarian.net/635161482/upload_24571052_log.txt
[15:17] <bdmurray> I really see the binary debs available at ports.ubuntu.com so I'm inclined to ignore the upload failure.
[15:17] <bdmurray> sil2100: thoughts about ^^ ?
[16:56] <georgiag> hi bdmurray. could you please review https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1994146 ? also, can you please prioritize focal in your review? honeywell expects it to land in core20 by january and we are trying to meet the deadline (considering testing time, etc). thank you!
[16:56] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1994146 in apparmor (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] apparmor - Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]
[17:07] <bdmurray> georgiag: Given the comments I'd prefer to check in with RAOF later today
[17:07] <falcojr> bdmurray: as mentioned by blackboxsw yesterday, subiquity folks discovered a regression during our SRU verification on cloud-init 22.4.0 last week. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1997559. We would like to reject 22.4.0 that is sitting in -proposed and in it's place we have uploaded 22.4.2 which contains the SRU regression fix and a high-priority bug for Azure duplicate mac addresses.
[17:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1997559 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Kinetic) "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'partition'" [Undecided, New]
[17:08] <falcojr> Our SRU exception process bug is here for cloud-init. If you have time today for review, it would be excellent. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1996645
[17:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1996645 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.3.4 to 22.4) Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Kinetic" [Undecided, New]
[17:11] <georgiag> bdmurray: okay, thank you
[17:12] <bdmurray> falcojr: If you are fixing bug 1997559 why isn't it in the changelog and Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed ?
[17:12] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1997559 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Kinetic) "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'partition'" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1997559
[17:14] <falcojr> bdmurray: Wouldn't that fall under our top-level SRU bug?
[17:15] <bdmurray> If your previous SRU caused a regression and your upload is purported to fix it the SRU team would want to be able to verify the status of the fix by seeing the bug in the pending SRU report.
[17:16] <falcojr> and to do that we need to add it to the changelog?
[17:16] <bdmurray> bdrung: The phasing of your apport SRU for Focal has stopped and the email to you about it bounced.
[17:17] <bdmurray> falcojr: Correct the report uses Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed which is generated by Launchpad based of LP: # in the debian/changelog
[17:17] <falcojr> would 1844191 need to be included as well?
[17:17] <falcojr> it's not an SRU regression, but it is new to this uplod
[17:17] <falcojr> *upload
[17:19] <bdmurray> Well given that you've added bug tasks for the cloud-init package for a bunch of releases I'd add it so the Launchpad Janitor will close the bugs thereby avoiding manual labor on somebody's part.
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:26] <laney> 29/11 17:19:19 <bdmurray> Well given that you've added bug tasks for the cloud-init package for a bunch of releases I'd add it so the Launchpad Janitor will close the bugs thereby avoiding manual labor on somebody's part.
[17:26] <laney> lol
[17:26] <laney> sorry
[17:26] <laney> it was just a REALLY good point
[17:33] <tsimonq2> 🎉
[17:33] <bdmurray> ;-)
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[18:41] <ricotz> bdmurray, hello :), would you have time to accept libreoffice from kinetic/unapproved queue? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1997333
[18:41] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1997333 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.3 for kinetic" [High, In Progress]
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: golang-1.18 (focal-proposed/primary) [1.18.1-1ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: golang-1.18 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.18.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[18:51] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Good morning! If you've got a spare cycle, can we get SRU bug 1989611 closer to the finish line? Just metas at this point.
[18:51] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1989611 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] plasma-distro-release-notifier for Jammy, Focal" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1989611
[19:01] <bdmurray> ricotz: Is this an SRU of a release candidate?
[19:02] <ricotz> bdmurray, no, the tests were made with RC2 which is identical to 7.4.3 Final
[19:03] <ricotz> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/635718894/libreoffice_7.4.3-0ubuntu0.22.10.1_source.changes
[19:04] <ricotz> ah I see, the debian changlog can be confusing here
[19:05] <bdmurray> And lunar has 7.4.3~rc2 which isn't in the debian changelog file
[19:06] <ricotz> bdmurray, the kinetic packages isn't based on the lunar packages
[19:06] <ricotz> packages/packaging
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dss [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.46.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[19:08] <ricotz> bdmurray, see https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/log/?h=wip/kinetic-7.4
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.4-0ubuntu0~18.04.1 => 22.4.2-0ubuntu0~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.4-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 => 22.4.2-0ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [22.4-0ubuntu0~22.04.1 => 22.4.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (kinetic-proposed/main) [22.4-0ubuntu0~22.10.1 => 22.4.2-0ubuntu0~22.10.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:7.4.3-0ubuntu0.22.10.1]
[19:11] <ricotz> bdmurray, thank you
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.266.3]
[19:20] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: falcojr d/changelogs updated with James' new 22.4.2 upload for cloud-init SRU each d/changelog now adds: +    - Includes (LP: #1997559, #1844191) not present in 22.4.0.
[19:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1997559 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Kinetic) "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'partition'" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1997559
[19:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1844191 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Kinetic) "azure advanced networking sometimes triggers duplicate mac detection" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1844191
[19:21] <blackboxsw> Looks like from the conversation above that we are looking to reject those unapproved uploads of cloud-init 22.4.2 from 20 hours ago and review the 22.4.2 uploads from a few mins ago instead. Thank you both.
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-meta [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.418.1]
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.15]
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ruby-sdbm (jammy-proposed/primary) [1.0.0-2~ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[19:41] <seb129> hey there, could someone review https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/+git/britney/+merge/433594 ?
[19:42] <seb129> it's an hint for the i386 tests since the package added extra tests and depends including clang which isn't installable on i386
[19:47] <bdmurray> jbicha: Could you submit an MP for your NewReleaseCycleProcess change? https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/ubuntu-release-tools/+git/templates/+ref/main
[19:47] <bdmurray> Lukasz has plans to update the wiki or maybe discourse from the template
[19:50] <jbicha> thanks, I was wondering how to update the jira tasks 🥳
[19:50] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Thanks for kubuntu-meta and ubuntustudio-meta acceptance for jammy! Did you miss the kubuntu-meta for focal or was that intentionally not accepted? Focal is where the notification would be active right now.
[19:53] <RikMills> Eickmeyer: it would be active for Jammy if people have been doing previous non LTS upgrades
[19:53] <Eickmeyer> RikMills: True, but that requires manual intervention on the user's part.
[19:53] <RikMills> a lot of people do
[19:54] <Eickmeyer> And I'm not discounting that at all.
[19:54] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, you requested dleyna-core to be removed the other day, is that blocking anything until a merged dleyna is uploaded?
[20:06] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: Ah, I got distracted
[20:07] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: No worries, I'm bouncing all over the place today too. :)
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [1.398.1]
[20:09] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Thanks for everything!
[20:11] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128,
[20:11] <LocutusOfBorg>  [2022-11-01] dleyna-core REMOVED from testing (Debian testing watch)
[20:11] <LocutusOfBorg> [2022-11-01] Removed 0.7.0-1 from unstable (Debian FTP Masters)
[20:18] <LocutusOfBorg> well, yesterday it was blocking something
[20:18] <LocutusOfBorg> but meh
[20:19] <LocutusOfBorg> oh the removal was done by v_orlon!
[20:20] <LocutusOfBorg> and yes, it was blocking upnp and so on
[20:21] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, some mathcomp removal were missing libcoq-mathcomp-algebra-tactics (armhf, riscv64)
[20:21] <LocutusOfBorg> same for libcoq-mathcomp-analysis
[20:21] <LocutusOfBorg> also hint mathcomp-algebra-tactics/armhf mathcomp-analysis/armhf
[20:23] <LocutusOfBorg> also missing build on armhf/riscv64: coq-hierarchy-builder, libcoq-hierarchy-builder (from 1.3.0-1)
[20:31] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, ack,
[20:34] <amurray> bdmurray: wgrant binary copied back the corresponding riscv build from lunar (since it failed to upload as the lunar one got built and published first with the same version) - so all the binaries are now published to hirsute-proposed
[21:19] <bdmurray> retrying kinetic autopkgtest failures trigged by vim as seen in the pending SRU report
[21:19] <bdmurray> apt too
[21:24] <tsimonq2> Thank you :)
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.4.2-0ubuntu0~22.10.1]
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.4.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1]
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.4.2-0ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.4.2-0ubuntu0~20.04.1]
[22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (kinetic-proposed) [22.4.2-0ubuntu0~22.10.1]
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.4.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1]
[22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.4.2-0ubuntu0~20.04.1]
[22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.4.2-0ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[23:23] <amurray> RAOF: hey, any chance you could take a look at the pending apparmor SRU https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1994146 - this is required for a particular customer feature in core20 so the priority is getting this in for focal at this time (but hopefully we can land the other releases as well)
[23:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1994146 in apparmor (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] apparmor - Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgraphics-toolkit-color-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.04-1] (no packageset)
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnet-dns-resolver-unbound-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.20-1] (no packageset)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnet-dns-resolver-unbound-perl [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.20-1] (no packageset)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnet-dns-resolver-unbound-perl [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.20-1] (no packageset)
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnet-dns-resolver-unbound-perl [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.20-1] (no packageset)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [7.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnet-dns-resolver-unbound-perl [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.20-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnet-dns-resolver-unbound-perl [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.20-1] (no packageset)