=== athos_ is now known as athos
=== chiluk_ is now known as chiluk
=== genii_ is now known as genii
[16:00] <jawn-smith> o/
[16:00] <bdrung> \o
[16:00] <bdmurray> o/
[16:00] <schopin> o/
[16:01] <ogayot> \o
[16:01] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[16:01] <bG9s> o/
[16:01] <meetingology> Meeting started at 16:01:16 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[16:01] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[16:01] <jawn-smith> The weekly status is here:
[16:01] <jawn-smith> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-1-december/32562/
[16:01] <jawn-smith> let's take our usual time to read and ask questions
[16:02] <slyon> o/
[16:02] <jawn-smith> waveform_: was the Pi desktop LUKS change in livecd-rootfs or the gadget?
[16:03] <waveform_> neither -- manually patched into the image, hence "hacky". Ultimately it ought to go in ubuntu-raspi-settings-desktop most likely
=== waveform_ is now known as waveform
[16:05] <bdmurray> enr0n: the reboot required notification does that need SRU'ing or ... ?
[16:05] <schopin> bdrung: thanks for the quick turnaround on tzdata :)
[16:05] <enr0n> bdmurray: eventually. It's not even in lunar yet. This was just a PPA for the time being
[16:05] <bdrung> schopin, you're welcome
[16:05] <bdmurray> ack
[16:06] <bG9s> please tell me something big could be done for "lunar year" and "lunar calendar"
[16:06] <bG9s> ok I'm quiet again
[16:06] <bdmurray> Is tzdata verified so we can release it early?
[16:07] <bdrung> the first uploads are verified, but the second uploads (for updating ICU data) are pending being accepted
[16:08] <bdmurray> bleah xnox
[16:08] <bdrung> wait, sil2100 accepted them. I need to do the tests again.
[16:09] <bdmurray> let me know when the testing is done
[16:09] <sil2100> They're in flight
[16:09] <bdmurray> I want them to land
[16:09] <sil2100> Still need to accept focal
[16:09] <bdmurray> Not be up in the air
[16:10] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
[16:10] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[16:10] <jawn-smith> bug 1396379
[16:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1396379 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1396379
[16:12] <jawn-smith> This appears to be in progress thanks to juliank
[16:12] <jawn-smith> So let's remove the tag
[16:12] <jawn-smith> bug 1998095
[16:12] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1998095 in pkgconf (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pkgconf, replacement for pkg-config" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1998095
[16:14] <slyon> the question here is foundations will be maintaining pkgconf
[16:14] <jawn-smith> Since we currently maintain pkg-config the answer is probably yes
[16:14] <jawn-smith> But we need to have a more in depth discussion with v_orlon
[16:15] <jawn-smith> So let's leave it tagged and discuss it when v_orlon is back around
[16:15] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[16:15] <jawn-smith> just bug 1842439
[16:15] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1842439 in apport (Ubuntu Focal) "apport-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_settings_get_screen(settings=0x0) from gtk_css_value_icon_theme_compute() from gtk_css_static_style_compute_value()" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1842439
[16:15] <jawn-smith> which is currently with the desktop team, so nothing to do
[16:16] <jawn-smith> No updates to the bug since Nov 5 so moving on
[16:16] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[16:16] <jawn-smith> bug 1965094 is still with the desktop team
[16:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1965094 in ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu) "'Additional Drivers' application crashes on startup" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1965094
[16:16] <jawn-smith> No updates since October
[16:16] <bdmurray> we should follow up with the desktop team about bug 1842439 right?
[16:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1842439 in apport (Ubuntu Focal) "apport-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_settings_get_screen(settings=0x0) from gtk_css_value_icon_theme_compute() from gtk_css_static_style_compute_value()" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1842439
[16:17] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: would you like to follow up on that?
[16:17] <bdmurray> yes
[16:18] <jawn-smith> thanks
[16:18] <jawn-smith> bug 1997467
[16:18] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1997467 in netplan "Update 0.105-0ubuntu2~22.04.1 seems to cause regressions with snapd integration" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1997467
[16:18] <jawn-smith> slyon: it's netplan and you tagged it
[16:18] <jawn-smith> looks like there's a PR?
[16:18] <slyon> Indeed
[16:18] <jawn-smith> but the SRU still needs to be done, correct?
[16:18] <slyon> I got my initial fix reviewed by schopin, but it looks like the solution will be much more complex
[16:18] <slyon> I hope to allocate some time to work on this next week
[16:18] <jawn-smith> Okay so if you're actively working on it next week should we remove the tag?
[16:18] <slyon> I think we can remove the rls-incoming tag, as I've also tagged it foundations-todo
[16:19] <slyon> Still needs an proper upstream fix and SRUs
[16:19] <slyon> yes, I'll remove the tag
[16:19] <jawn-smith> Thanks
[16:19] <jawn-smith> bug 1992369
[16:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1992369 in gnome-font-viewer (Ubuntu) "DejaVu Serif Italic capital letters and digits broken" [Low, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1992369
[16:20] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: you tagged this in a comment where you stated that you were unable to recreate?
[16:21] <bdmurray> yeah, that's weird hunh
[16:23] <bdmurray> somebody should have a look at comment #8 and if there isn't anything obvious pass on it
[16:23] <bdmurray> i.e. fontforge etc...
[16:23] <jawn-smith> Okay, who would like to do that?
[16:24] <jawn-smith> sounds like danilogondolfo will do so
[16:24] <jawn-smith> bug 1991533
[16:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1991533 in update-manager (Ubuntu Jammy) "ubuntu-security-status should call pro-security-status as soon as it is available" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1991533
[16:24] <jawn-smith> Looks like it's fix committed. But I'm assuming the tag is here for the SRUs?
[16:26] <bdmurray> It looks like something I should "carry over the finish line"
[16:26] <jawn-smith> Great thanks bdmurray
[16:26] <jawn-smith> That's all of the bugs
[16:30] <jawn-smith> #topic proposed-migration
[16:30] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[16:30] <bdmurray> I retried glibc and linux-meta-raspi
[16:31] <jawn-smith> ginggs: is retrying binutils
[16:31] <jawn-smith> schopin is investigating cargo
[16:31] <bdmurray> and systemd with linux-meta-raspi
[16:32] <jawn-smith> looks like postgresql-common just needs a migration-reference/0 test
[16:32] <jawn-smith> I'll start that
[16:32] <jawn-smith> pkg-js-tools looks a bit flakey
[16:33] <bdmurray> debhelper's waiting on seem a bit unbelievable
[16:33] <jawn-smith> why do you say that?
[16:34] <bdmurray> because the ppc64el queue is close to 0
[16:34] <bdmurray> and its been waiting 29 days
[16:34] <ginggs> i retried debhelper
[16:34] <jawn-smith> Thanks ginggs
[16:34] <bdmurray> cheers
[16:34] <ginggs> it was one of the ones where the tests were not in the queue
[16:34] <jawn-smith> I did a migration-reference/0 test for one of them because the history showed a long list of failures
[16:35] <jawn-smith> so is the solution to that to manually queue them?
[16:35] <jawn-smith> Or should we leave them in that state so QA or IS can look into how we got in this state?
[16:36] <jawn-smith> Sounds like we should just retrigger them
[16:36] <bdmurray> Its unlikely the QA team will have time to investigate waiting ones
[16:36] <jawn-smith> Any volunteers to retrigger those?
[16:37] <bdmurray> which ones specifically?
[16:37] <ginggs> jawn-smith: which are those?
[16:37] <jawn-smith> the debhelper waiting ones
[16:37] <ginggs> jawn-smith: i already did them
[16:37] <jawn-smith> Oh great, thanks
[16:37] <bdmurray> ginggs: already did
[16:37] <jawn-smith> dbus
[16:37] <jawn-smith> sounds like a waveform thing
[16:38] <jawn-smith> I'll look at fwupd vs python3-defaults
[16:38] <waveform> ack, I'll take dbus
[16:38] <jawn-smith> Any volunteers to look at nemo vs libselinux and network-manager vs libselinux?
[16:39] <jawn-smith> Ah this appears to be a dbus thing
[16:41] <jawn-smith> any volunteers for cross-toolchain-base?
[16:42] <jawn-smith> mwhudson: I heard you say yes to cross-toolchain-base
[16:42] <jawn-smith> sil2100: livecd-rootfs?
[16:42] <jawn-smith> at least the ppc64el one
[16:43] <sil2100> ...ok!
[16:43] <jawn-smith> distro-info missing builds
[16:43] <bdrung> distro-info is on my radar.
[16:43] <jawn-smith> ack, thanks
[16:43] <jawn-smith> cmake
[16:43] <jawn-smith> who wants it?
[16:43] <bdrung> distro-info fails to build due to pylint behaving weird.
[16:44] <jawn-smith> ogayot: cmake
[16:44] <jawn-smith> samirkamerkar: can you look into the java-common regressions that aren't arm{64,hf} ?
[16:45] <bdmurray> why not armhf?
[16:45] <jawn-smith> oh didn't realize those queues were reasonable
[16:45] <jawn-smith> so just the not-arm64 ones
[16:45] <samirkamerkar> I may need help, but I will give it a try
[16:46] <jawn-smith> openssh needs retries
[16:46] <jawn-smith> juliank: apt ?
[16:47] <jawn-smith> adrien: libb-hooks-op-check-entersubforcv-perl
[16:47] <jawn-smith> dbungert: libb-hooks-parser-perl
[16:47] <dbungert> ack
[16:48] <jawn-smith> danilogondolfo: libbencode-perl
[16:48] <jawn-smith> schopin: libdevel-declare-perl
[16:48] <schopin> ack
[16:48] <adrien> that name
[16:49] <jawn-smith> Someone should ping vpa later about libsignatures-perl
[16:49] <jawn-smith> cyrus-imapd may just need migration-reference tests
[16:49] <slyon> I can do that
[16:50] <xypron> libical3 causes regression in gvmd -> xypron
[16:50] <jawn-smith> xypron: ciderwebmail vs libemail-address-xs-perl ?
[16:50] <jawn-smith> sure let's give ciderwebmail to enr0n then
[16:50] <enr0n> ack
[16:51] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
[16:54] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting
[16:54] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 16:54:39 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-12-01-16.01.moin.txt
[20:17] <mwhudson> jawn-smith: so long as it doesn't involve fixing perl this time