[06:39] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/wlcs]** RAOF opened [pull request #255](https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/pull/255): GitHub: Fix actions for master→main rename... (full message at ) === mattaR[m] is now known as mattR[m] [08:05] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/wlcs]** bors[bot] merged [pull request #255](https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/pull/255): GitHub: Fix actions for master→main rename [09:27] It's getting worse! [09:27] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/638126793/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-ppc64el.wlcs_1.4.0+dev58-g5e66967-0ubuntu23.04_BUILDING.txt.gz [09:27] Looks like what you experienced yesterday Alan? The gcc-12 basic_string offset bug without PCH [09:28] Only this is on ppc [09:28] 👀 [09:29] Yeah, that's the thing. But I was on 22.10, not 23.04 [09:29] Yeah, same happened on 22.10 [09:29] https://launchpad.net/~mir-team/+archive/ubuntu/dev/+packages [09:57] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq opened [pull request #2739](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2739): wlcs: enable PrimarySelection tests [11:06] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/wlcs]** AlanGriffiths opened [pull request #256](https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/pull/256): Testing: PR with no changes [11:28] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq edited [pull request #2739](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2739): wlcs: refresh xpass tests [11:28] alan_g 👆️ fixed that [11:29] Why did it start failing? [11:29] Because WLCS now had a test that will only start passing after the shm PR [11:29] *has [11:30] Oh! That's why it sounded familiar [11:30] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/wlcs]** AlanGriffiths closed [pull request #256](https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/pull/256): Testing: PR with no changes [11:31] And before today we were like 30 commits behind wlcs ~~master~~main… [11:31] * wlcs ~~master~~ main… [11:31] s/~~//, s/~~// [11:31] (that's why the PrimarySelection tests failed XPASS) [11:33] A shame that wasn't more noticable [12:32] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** bors[bot] merged [pull request #2739](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2739): wlcs: refresh xpass tests [12:55] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** AlanGriffiths opened [pull request #2740](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2740): Make accidentally closing a mir::Fd a compile error [12:57] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** AlanGriffiths opened [pull request #116](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/116): Avoid double closing an Fd [13:36] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq drafted [pull request #2741](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2741): Move ubuntu latest [13:36] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq edited [pull request #2741](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2741): ci: fix working with jammy in GitHub Actions [13:56] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq marked [pull request #2741](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2741): ci: fix working with jammy in GitHub Actions as ready for review [13:57] Saviq ideas? https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/actions/runs/3639085190/jobs/6143039569 (I tried again after an hour in case it was transient) [13:58] Try again :) [13:59] Just fixed that https://github.com/canonical/actions/commit/0e160881f49eba771675494d4e51663b65d8617b [13:59] Re-running... [14:03] ...and that seems to be working :) [16:07] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq assigned to [pull request #2740](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2740): Make accidentally closing a mir::Fd a compile error [16:07] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq requested a review from graysonguarino for [pull request #2740](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2740): Make accidentally closing a mir::Fd a compile error [16:08] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** Saviq requested a review from graysonguarino for [pull request #116](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/116): Avoid double closing an Fd [16:08] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** Saviq assigned to [pull request #116](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/116): Avoid double closing an Fd [16:11] I was looking at Frame #116 and Mir #2740 when I got on this morning. I'm good to approve those changes but I was curious what issue they were causing? Or did Alan just stumble across them? Either way it looks good to me. [16:17] I was looking at the inotify code (thinking about our "wait for a Wayland compositor" script) and noticed the Frame bug. Then, of course, I knew that C++11 has a fix for that [16:29] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq assigned to [pull request #2741](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2741): ci: fix working with jammy in GitHub Actions [16:42] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** bors[bot] edited [pull request #116](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/116): [Merged by Bors] - Avoid double closing an Fd [16:42] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** bors[bot] closed [pull request #116](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/116): [Merged by Bors] - Avoid double closing an Fd [16:52] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq assigned wmww to [issue #2735](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/issues/2735): Mir over VNC doesn't paint X apps correctly [17:08] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** AlanGriffiths opened [issue #2742](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/issues/2742): [clang] how do we handle unqualified call to std::move and std::forward... (full message at ) [17:14] Good night o/ [22:32] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** graysonguarino edited [pull request #2734](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2734): Begin visual aspects of start_drag implementation [22:33] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** graysonguarino edited [pull request #2734](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2734): Begin visual aspects of start_drag implementation [22:33] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** graysonguarino marked [pull request #2734](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2734): Begin visual aspects of start_drag implementation as ready for review