mup | PR snapd#12405 opened: ci: update golangci-lint to v1.50.1 <Created by jhenstridge> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12405> | 03:19 |
---|---|---|
mup | PR snapd#12406 opened: ci: update various Github actions to Node 16.x versions <Created by jhenstridge> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12406> | 04:24 |
jamesh | fyi: CI is currently broken due to the Go snap updating its stable channel. https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12405 should fix that. | 06:55 |
mup | PR #12405: ci: update golangci-lint to v1.50.1 in order to support Go 1.19 <Simple 😃> <Skip spread> <Created by jhenstridge> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12405> | 06:55 |
mup | PR snapd#12405 closed: ci: update golangci-lint to v1.50.1 in order to support Go 1.19 <Simple 😃> <Skip spread> <Created by jhenstridge> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12405> | 08:25 |
jamesh | mvo: I didn't add the "skip spread" tag to https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12406 because I was making changes to workflows that ran the spread tests. I don't think any of the spread failures were related to the changes though. | 09:57 |
mup | PR #12406: ci: update various Github actions to Node 16.x versions <Skip spread> <Created by jhenstridge> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12406> | 09:57 |
mvo | jamesh: I added the skip spread as this was purely workflow so no need to run spread or am I missing something? | 09:58 |
jamesh | mvo: there were changes to the workflow jobs that run the spread tests | 09:58 |
mvo | jamesh: oh, I can remove the label again, sorry for that | 09:59 |
jamesh | mvo: the last run including the spread tests didn't show anything that looked like anything related to my changes. It's up to you. | 10:00 |
* mvo nods | 10:01 | |
mup | PR snapd#12406 closed: ci: update various Github actions to Node 16.x versions <Skip spread> <Created by jhenstridge> <Merged by MiguelPires> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12406> | 10:01 |
jamesh | It's merged now, so I guess that settles it :-) | 10:01 |
mvo | jamesh: lol - indeed | 10:03 |
jamesh | I'm not entirely sure why they increased the major version for all these actions. They all behave identically, and the node version is an implementation detail. | 10:05 |
mup | PR snapd#12388 closed: data: install snapcraft logo in /usr/share/snapd <Squash-merge> <Created by sergio-costas> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12388> | 10:06 |
juliank | sigh | 10:52 |
juliank | **This snap is deprecated. We recommend using the official Debian/Ubuntu packages | 10:52 |
juliank | (https://apt.syncthing.net/) instead.** | 10:52 |
juliank | it's on 1.4.2 and they are at 1.22.1 | 10:53 |
juliank | I just noticed this now that they haven't updated the snap in 2.5 years | 10:54 |
juliank | Don't they want to work on core? sigh. | 10:58 |
ogra | juliank, probably because we're doing a really bad job at promoting core outside of the commercial world ... community is often not really aware of ubuntu core | 11:46 |
juliank | I mean that's a brilliant use case for core, a syncthing NAS thingy | 11:46 |
ogra | yes | 11:46 |
juliank | I'm just very angry now because I'm running 2 year old software listening on open ports | 11:47 |
juliank | they changed the store description to say deprecated but who looks at that | 11:47 |
ogra | yeah ... try filing an upstream issue ? | 11:48 |
juliank | perhaps | 11:49 |
juliank | at the very least hand the snap over to someone who maintains it | 11:49 |
juliank | * they could | 11:50 |
ogra | yeah | 11:52 |
ogra | there is always "the MOTU of snaps" (called "snapcrafters") they could ask via forum.snapcraft.io ... | 11:52 |
mup | PR snapd#12407 opened: secboot: detect lockout mode in CheckTPMKeySealingSupported <Run nested> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12407> | 11:56 |
mup | PR snapcraft#3998 closed: Kernel plugin: multiple fixes <Created by kubiko> <Merged by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3998> | 12:01 |
mup | PR snapd#12400 closed: o/servicestate,snap/quota: check against adding the same service twice in quota groups <Squash-merge> <quota> <Pulse> <Created by Meulengracht> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12400> | 12:41 |
mup | PR snapd#12408 opened: DT-878: Original patch re-applied with conditionals <Created by sergio-costas> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12408> | 12:41 |
mup | PR snapd#12409 opened: image: generate seed.manifest <need-architecture-review> <Created by Meulengracht> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12409> | 13:52 |
mup | PR snapd#12410 opened: many: make VolumeStructure a normal member of LaidOutStructure <Created by alfonsosanchezbeato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12410> | 13:52 |
mup | PR snapd#12411 opened: cmd/snap-bootstrap: add support for snapd_system_disk <Created by valentindavid> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12411> | 15:47 |
mup | PR snapd#12412 opened: interfaces: allow use of mksquashfs and unsquashfs from snap contexts <Created by bugraaydogar> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12412> | 16:37 |
mup | PR snapd#12413 opened: interfaces: expand block-devices and raw-volume to support mkfs tools <Created by bugraaydogar> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12413> | 16:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!