| blahdeblah_ | teward: #ubuntu-kernel? | 00:33 |
|---|---|---|
| teward | blahdeblah_: never had luck getting them there. I see they have a discourse thread so I'll just stab there | 00:33 |
| teward | pretty sure xnox or someone'll reply to me xD | 00:33 |
| blahdeblah_ | They eventually got to my questions there. FWIW> | 00:34 |
| blahdeblah_ | s/>/./ | 00:34 |
| vorlon | teward: uh making an authoritative statement on behalf of the kernel team sounds like a tall order; what's the actual question? | 01:19 |
| teward | vorlon: the question is whether the mainline PPA is monitored or not | 01:19 |
| teward | stdby for incoming askubuntu link | 01:19 |
| teward | ... if i can find the tab again | 01:19 |
| teward | *has 10000 tabs open for Lubuntu stuff* | 01:19 |
| vorlon | teward: what does "monitored" mean? it's an archive | 01:19 |
| teward | vorlon: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1444284/how-are-the-kernel-builds-at-https-kernel-ubuntu-com-kernel-ppa-mainline-moni/ <-- exactly as written and asked | 01:20 |
| teward | however | 01:20 |
| vorlon | "can we be sure that the kernel builds staged there are successful" uh no and why do you care | 01:20 |
| teward | given that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds is stating they're not supported, I already made a presumptive answer on the basis of "not supported" being "not monitored, tested, validated to work, etc." | 01:20 |
| teward | vorlon: welcome to the usual [CENSORED] we get from average people on Ask Ubuntu | 01:21 |
| vorlon | "what should I do if I find a failed build" again why are you making work for yourself | 01:21 |
| vorlon | teward: I mean, I subscribe to the netplan tag on Ask Ubuntu and it's a wonder there aren't more questions from people trying to plug their ethernet into 220V (although maybe that's a self-solving problem) | 01:21 |
| vorlon | I exaggerate - but I often despair of people failing to understand CIDR :) | 01:22 |
| teward | vorlon: what you don't see that I do is when people flag questions as "uhhh... offtopic?" with mod flags ;) | 01:22 |
| teward | very few people notice from here i'm a moderator over there :P | 01:23 |
| teward | so unfortunately I see a ton of extra crap you don't there :) | 01:23 |
| vorlon | (uhhuh, yes, ok, you've configured two network interfaces on your machine, using the same network address, and you want to access what? how exactly are you expecting this to work) | 01:23 |
| teward | unrelated: my current hated thing: CORS. *hisses in chaos and beats the crap out of his webserver* | 01:23 |
| vorlon | teward: right so anyway, I can't speak authoritatively for the kernel team, and they may not want to go on the record, hth :) | 01:24 |
| teward | :P | 01:24 |
| teward | well if the answer is "we won't go on the record" then my answer which is nbased on the wiki's "not supported' statement is all that exists :) | 01:25 |
| teward | *yawns and returns to fighting CORS* | 01:25 |
| sarnold | from my end of things, it seems like the linux-mainline stuff has been broken for so long that we'd be doing everyone a service if we deleted the ppa, deleted the wiki pages that mention it, and reclaim all that disk space for use for other things | 01:38 |
| sarnold | I don't think those have been installable for months, maybe years, even when they *did* build | 01:38 |
| rbasak | RikMills: FYI, https://code.launchpad.net/~kbar/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-wallpapers/+git/kubuntu-wallpapers/+merge/431449 exists. I wouldn't want to sponsor without checking with a Kubuntu person first, so maybe you could take a look instead? | 01:51 |
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: I'm going to put my seldom-used outside of work hours Kubuntu hat on and +1 that, LGTM. I highly doubt Rik would -1 that. | 01:59 |
| rbasak | Eickmeyer: thanks - can you sponsor? | 02:01 |
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: I can. :) | 02:02 |
| rbasak | Like there are so many things I need to look up. Does it need to be rebased into a packaging branch somewhere for example? | 02:02 |
| rbasak | Thanks :) | 02:02 |
| Eickmeyer | And yes, there's a packaging branch it needs to go in. | 02:03 |
| rbasak | This came in as a git-ubuntu MP. FWIW, I've been trying to get those into the sponsorship queue, and am asking sponsors to rebase as required without burdening first time contributors with the details. | 02:03 |
| Eickmeyer | Sure, makes sense. I'm pretty sure Kubuntu isn't using git-ubuntu yet. | 02:04 |
| rbasak | The exact workflow for "random" git-ubuntu MPs still needs to be worked out. I just want to make sure contributors can be comfortable submitting requests in a "one size fits all" method that we can universally accept. Feedback appreciated. | 02:04 |
| Eickmeyer | You bet. I'm sure Rik would have something to say about that but I'm pretty sure he's asleep right now. | 02:05 |
| rbasak | No need for "yet" - it's fine for teams not to use git-ubuntu if they have something else. In particular if the packaging originates with us rather than being derived from Debian, then I'm not sure it makes sense to use git-ubuntu anyway, except for accepting contributions. | 02:05 |
| === blahdeblah_ is now known as blahdeblah | ||
| Eickmeyer | rbasak: I commented on the merge request, but I'm not sure if it should be approved or disapproved. | 03:26 |
| cpaelzer | hiho, I'm looking for better alternatives or suggestions - if I have a source package name and a version, now I need to know which Ubuntu release this was for, is there anything faster than rmadison (maybe something that downloads files once and does all processing locally then)? | 09:24 |
| jdstrand | mwhudson: it looks like s390x finally built and that you promoted to stable. thanks! | 13:30 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: this felt faster than rmadison: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/s3mdJQtvXt/ | 14:08 |
| rbasak | Assuming you mean anything currently published for a given source package name and version, as opposed to something historically published and then removed. | 14:08 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Heads up, I'm switching homeservers to matrix.lubuntu.me, so you're going to see @arraybolt3:lubuntu.me show up in here pretty soon, that's normal. | 14:45 |
| arraybolt3[m] | ^ And that's me. | 14:46 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I meant published to any of esm related targets which this would not cover - but thanks for the hint! | 14:57 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: maybe chdist and grep-dctrl? | 15:09 |
| rbasak | Maintaining a big pile of chdists locally does take up a ton of space though | 15:10 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: yeah, but I'd need to pull all potential esm service infos into that environment, nevertheless that might indeed be a much faster way | 15:10 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: also, ESM is driven from PPAs, and I think getPublishedSources() exists for PPAs. | 15:11 |
| cpaelzer | they are no normal PPAs | 15:11 |
| rbasak | But you would have to combine the result of multiple queries I guess | 15:11 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: if you are still doing SRUs today, and are in the mood, this samba one just completed aging and is green in the board: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1993934 | 20:11 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1993934 in samba (Ubuntu Jammy) "Windows 11 22H2 and Samba-AD login issue" [High, Fix Committed] | 20:11 | |
| ahasenack | tomorrow is my day, so it won't be released tomorrow, and after that it's friday, no releases then either, so only monday | 20:11 |
| mwhudson | jdstrand: ah good, i'll promote s390x too | 20:13 |
| mwhudson | jdstrand: thanks for your part :) | 20:13 |
| bdmurray | I'll release samba | 20:20 |
| ahasenack | thanks bdmurray | 20:20 |
| rbasak | Oh | 20:22 |
| rbasak | I was just reviewing it for release, and came to the conclusion that it was good to go. | 20:22 |
| ahasenack | two +1 votes, even better :) | 20:23 |
| ahasenack | thanks | 20:23 |
| rbasak | Yeah but who's doing the actual release between the three of us? :) | 20:23 |
| rbasak | Whichever way, +1, and I don't now care who does it! | 20:23 |
| rbasak | (+1 x3 - not caring about 2 days ageing) | 20:23 |
| ahasenack | I think it's done, I just got the accepted emails | 20:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!