[00:33] <blahdeblah_> teward: #ubuntu-kernel?
[00:33] <teward> blahdeblah_: never had luck getting them there.  I see they have a discourse thread so I'll just stab there
[00:33] <teward> pretty sure xnox or someone'll reply to me xD
[00:34] <blahdeblah_> They eventually got to my questions there.  FWIW>
[00:34] <blahdeblah_> s/>/./
[01:19] <vorlon> teward: uh making an authoritative statement on behalf of the kernel team sounds like a tall order; what's the actual question?
[01:19] <teward> vorlon: the question is whether the mainline PPA is monitored or not
[01:19] <teward> stdby for incoming askubuntu link
[01:19] <teward> ... if i can find the tab again
[01:19] <teward> *has 10000 tabs open for Lubuntu stuff*
[01:19] <vorlon> teward: what does "monitored" mean? it's an archive
[01:20] <teward> vorlon: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1444284/how-are-the-kernel-builds-at-https-kernel-ubuntu-com-kernel-ppa-mainline-moni/  <-- exactly as written and asked
[01:20] <teward> however
[01:20] <vorlon> "can we be sure that the kernel builds staged there are successful" uh no and why do you care
[01:20] <teward> given that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds is stating they're not supported, I already made a presumptive answer on the basis of "not supported" being "not monitored, tested, validated to work, etc."
[01:21] <teward> vorlon: welcome to the usual [CENSORED] we get from average people on Ask Ubuntu
[01:21] <vorlon> "what should I do if I find a failed build" again why are you making work for yourself
[01:21] <vorlon> teward: I mean, I subscribe to the netplan tag on Ask Ubuntu and it's a wonder there aren't more questions from people trying to plug their ethernet into 220V (although maybe that's a self-solving problem)
[01:22] <vorlon> I exaggerate - but I often despair of people failing to understand CIDR :)
[01:22] <teward> vorlon: what you don't see that I do is when people flag questions as "uhhh... offtopic?" with mod flags ;)
[01:23] <teward> very few people notice from here i'm a moderator over there :P
[01:23] <teward> so unfortunately I see a ton of extra crap you don't there :)
[01:23] <vorlon> (uhhuh, yes, ok, you've configured two network interfaces on your machine, using the same network address, and you want to access what? how exactly are you expecting this to work)
[01:23] <teward> unrelated: my current hated thing: CORS.  *hisses in chaos and beats the crap out of his webserver*
[01:24] <vorlon> teward: right so anyway, I can't speak authoritatively for the kernel team, and they may not want to go on the record, hth :)
[01:24] <teward> :P
[01:25] <teward> well if the answer is "we won't go on the record" then my answer which is nbased on the wiki's "not supported' statement is all that exists :)
[01:25] <teward> *yawns and returns to fighting CORS*
[01:38] <sarnold> from my end of things, it seems like the linux-mainline stuff has been broken for so long that we'd be doing everyone a service if we deleted the ppa, deleted the wiki pages that mention it, and reclaim all that disk space for use for other things
[01:38] <sarnold> I don't think those have been installable for months, maybe years, even when they *did* build
[01:51] <rbasak> RikMills: FYI, https://code.launchpad.net/~kbar/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-wallpapers/+git/kubuntu-wallpapers/+merge/431449 exists. I wouldn't want to sponsor without checking with a Kubuntu person first, so maybe you could take a look instead?
[01:59] <Eickmeyer> rbasak: I'm going to put my seldom-used outside of work hours Kubuntu hat on and +1 that, LGTM. I highly doubt Rik would -1 that.
[02:01] <rbasak> Eickmeyer: thanks - can you sponsor?
[02:02] <Eickmeyer> rbasak: I can. :)
[02:02] <rbasak> Like there are so many things I need to look up. Does it need to be rebased into a packaging branch somewhere for example?
[02:02] <rbasak> Thanks :)
[02:03] <Eickmeyer> And yes, there's a packaging branch it needs to go in.
[02:03] <rbasak> This came in as a git-ubuntu MP. FWIW, I've been trying to get those into the sponsorship queue, and am asking sponsors to rebase as required without burdening first time contributors with the details.
[02:04] <Eickmeyer> Sure, makes sense. I'm pretty sure Kubuntu isn't using git-ubuntu yet.
[02:04] <rbasak> The exact workflow for "random" git-ubuntu MPs still needs to be worked out. I just want to make sure contributors can be comfortable submitting requests in a "one size fits all" method that we can universally accept. Feedback appreciated.
[02:05] <Eickmeyer> You bet. I'm sure Rik would have something to say about that but I'm pretty sure he's asleep right now.
[02:05] <rbasak> No need for "yet" - it's fine for teams not to use git-ubuntu if they have something else. In particular if the packaging originates with us rather than being derived from Debian, then I'm not sure it makes sense to use git-ubuntu anyway, except for accepting contributions.
[03:26] <Eickmeyer> rbasak: I commented on the merge request, but I'm not sure if it should be approved or disapproved.
[09:24] <cpaelzer> hiho, I'm looking for better alternatives or suggestions - if I have a source package name and a version, now I need to know which Ubuntu release this was for, is there anything faster than rmadison (maybe something that downloads files once and does all processing locally then)?
[13:30] <jdstrand> mwhudson: it looks like s390x finally built and that you promoted to stable. thanks!
[14:08] <rbasak> cpaelzer: this felt faster than rmadison: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/s3mdJQtvXt/
[14:08] <rbasak> Assuming you mean anything currently published for a given source package name and version, as opposed to something historically published and then removed.
[14:45] <arraybolt3[m]> Heads up, I'm switching homeservers to matrix.lubuntu.me, so you're going to see @arraybolt3:lubuntu.me show up in here pretty soon, that's normal.
[14:46] <arraybolt3[m]> ^ And that's me.
[14:57] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I meant published to any of esm related targets which this would not cover - but thanks for the hint!
[15:09] <rbasak> cpaelzer: maybe chdist and grep-dctrl?
[15:10] <rbasak> Maintaining a big pile of chdists locally does take up a ton of space though
[15:10] <cpaelzer> rbasak: yeah, but I'd need to pull all potential esm service infos into that environment, nevertheless that might indeed be a much faster way
[15:11] <rbasak> cpaelzer: also, ESM is driven from PPAs, and I think getPublishedSources() exists for PPAs.
[15:11] <cpaelzer> they are no normal PPAs
[15:11] <rbasak> But you would have to combine the result of multiple queries I guess
[20:11] <ahasenack> rbasak: if you are still doing SRUs today, and are in the mood, this samba one just completed aging and is green in the board: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1993934
[20:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1993934 in samba (Ubuntu Jammy) "Windows 11 22H2 and Samba-AD login issue" [High, Fix Committed]
[20:11] <ahasenack> tomorrow is my day, so it won't be released tomorrow, and after that it's friday, no releases then either, so only monday
[20:13] <mwhudson> jdstrand: ah good, i'll promote s390x too
[20:13] <mwhudson> jdstrand: thanks for your part :)
[20:20] <bdmurray> I'll release samba
[20:20] <ahasenack> thanks bdmurray
[20:22] <rbasak> Oh
[20:22] <rbasak> I was just reviewing it for release, and came to the conclusion that it was good to go.
[20:23] <ahasenack> two +1 votes, even better :)
[20:23] <ahasenack> thanks
[20:23] <rbasak> Yeah but who's doing the actual release between the three of us? :)
[20:23] <rbasak> Whichever way, +1, and I don't now care who does it!
[20:23] <rbasak> (+1 x3 - not caring about 2 days ageing)
[20:23] <ahasenack> I think it's done, I just got the accepted emails