| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** bors[bot] merged [pull request #2740](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2740): Make accidentally closing a mir::Fd a compile error | 00:17 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** RAOF opened [pull request #2743](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2743): Drop server/graphics/gl_extensions_base.cpp; it's dead code | 05:41 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** RAOF opened [pull request #2744](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2744): Add core mmap-backed SHM handling... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/37ff0fa892ba672d520749e3d82e1633740a9160>) | 07:02 | |
| Saviq | Morn' | 08:04 |
|---|---|---|
| alan_g[m] | Morning! | 09:07 |
| alan_g[m] | Saviq you mentioned you had some logic for automating updates to branches when main changes? Where is it so I can plagiarise? | 09:14 |
| Saviq | alan_g here: https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame-vnc/blob/main/.github/workflows/edge.yml - it's quite trivial, but does the trick | 09:16 |
| Saviq | If you're thinking about iot-example-graphical-snap branches, it should be a simple rebase. | 09:16 |
| Saviq | Whether you want it to be atomic (fail all branches in case one fails e.g. due to conflicts) is something to decide | 09:16 |
| alan_g[m] | Actually, this morning I was thinking of ubuntu-frame/mir-build-snap | 09:20 |
| alan_g[m] | (And that too should be a rebase) | 09:20 |
| alan_g[m] | Thanks | 09:20 |
| Saviq | Was thinking the same yesterday :) | 09:21 |
| Saviq | Could be a composite action… but not sure it's worth the indirection | 09:21 |
| Saviq | We could move GIT_{AUTHOR,COMMITTER}_{NAME,EMAIL} to the org environment | 09:22 |
| Saviq | So it doesn't have to be explicit | 09:22 |
| Saviq | Hmm or maybe we could not, there isn't a global environment, just secrets | 09:24 |
| alan_g[m] | Maybe I should let you ponder a while? | 09:24 |
| Saviq | Makes a bit more reason to have a shared action in e.g. MirServer/actions | 09:24 |
| Saviq | It would save maybe 20 lines in the workflow… will toss a coin… | 09:26 |
| alan_g[m] | I've simply rebased manually. You are still having design ideas | 09:27 |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** AlanGriffiths edited [issue #2742](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/issues/2742): [clang] we should rework unqualified call to std::move and std::forward | 09:41 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** AlanGriffiths edited [issue #2742](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/issues/2742): [clang] we should rework unqualified call to std::move and std::forward | 09:42 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq edited [pull request #2741](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2741): ci: fix working with jammy in GitHub Actions | 09:46 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq assigned to [pull request #2744](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2744): Add core mmap-backed SHM handling | 09:59 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq closed [pull request #2645](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2645): platform/buffer_from_wl_shm: Handle clients immediately destroying the buffer | 10:07 | |
| * Saviq sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/7b65453d9ce23bd6cb6eb4cdc32ff1c727fd8a28 | 10:42 | |
| alan_g[m] | I assume "PRs welcome" 🤷 | 10:44 |
| Saviq | Looks like we're a bit lenient on -W in Frame… Also CMake's default should be much more strict :P | 11:56 |
| alan_g[m] | You're welcome to fix | 12:37 |
| alan_g[m] | Hey, did we need egmde fixed for 22.04? | 12:51 |
| Saviq | We didn't, in theory, but I wanted the least changes to Mir CI for base: core22 - if we replace egmde with something else in there, fine | 12:52 |
| alan_g[m] | OK. Maybe someone will find time to do a miriway snap recipe before too long | 12:54 |
| Saviq | alan_g having worked through some of the core22 changes needed I'm starting to think we need to make "how do you _use_ the graphics-core22 interface" a part of the spec. Copy the hooks and wrappers? Make them a part? Extension? | 15:16 |
| Saviq | I know I've been against an extension for long, but now I'm not sure if it isn't the least bad… | 15:16 |
| alan_g[m] | I put references in to the examples as I didn't want to open that debate yet. But you know I have wanted to try the extension approach for a while. (Not that it is all good, but none of the approaches we've tried are either) | 15:20 |
| alan_g[m] | BTW you were discussing the CI failures with Chris when I joined. Do you know why the shm handling fails lxd:ubuntu-22.04:spread/build/sbuild:ubuntu_armhf? | 15:27 |
| Saviq | Yeah that test should be disabled on QEMU, it crashes there. And that disabling is what isn't working | 15:29 |
| Saviq | I.e. the define you suggested wasn't a good name any more | 15:30 |
| alan_g[m] | Are you blaming the name?! | 15:31 |
| Saviq | I'll look into it | 15:40 |
| Saviq | I didn't get far… wild guess is that ptest does not respect test_exclusion_filter | 17:01 |
| alan_g[m] | I'm hoping it will be fixed by Monday 😀 | 17:02 |
| Saviq | Good night all o/ | 17:03 |
| alan_g[m] | Good weekend all! | 18:01 |
| sophie-w | grayson-g: how did you fix your clang headers problem? I think I might be getting the same thing | 21:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!