vpa1977 | Hi, would it be possible to retry regressions for junit5. It seems that we were trying to test JDK17 class files with JDK11. | 04:55 |
---|---|---|
vpa1977 | Now that default JDK is 17 it is no longer an issue | 04:55 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=pgpainless&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:55 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=arm64&package=pgpainless&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:55 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=armhf&package=pgpainless&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:55 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=ppc64el&package=pgpainless&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:55 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=s390x&package=pgpainless&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:55 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=snpeff&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:55 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=arm64&package=snpeff&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:55 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=armhf&package=snpeff&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:56 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=ppc64el&package=snpeff&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:56 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=snpsift&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:56 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=arm64&package=snpsift&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:56 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=armhf&package=snpsift&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:56 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=ppc64el&package=snpsift&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:56 |
vpa1977 | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=s390x&package=snpsift&trigger=junit5%2F5.9.1-1 | 04:56 |
vpa1977 | Thanks =) | 04:56 |
amurray | vpa1977: done | 05:06 |
vpa1977 | amurray: Thank you very much =) | 05:06 |
amurray | yw! | 05:08 |
LocutusOfBorg | seb128, hello, you sat update-notifier is failing due to https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf/issues/260 | 10:42 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Issue 260 in pkgconf/pkgconf "Regression: m4 VERSION variable breaks builds" [Open] | 10:42 | |
LocutusOfBorg | but that issue is for version > 1.9.0 and we have 1.8 in lunar | 10:42 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, k, the error seemed similar but I hadn't much time to investigate, it doesn't change my statement that it is a regression report which upstream didn't reply on since august and that update-notifier fails to build due to pkgconf in lunar | 10:46 |
LocutusOfBorg | yep, I'm trying to dig into the issue | 10:46 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, unsure what was the point of your comment though? | 10:46 |
LocutusOfBorg | that we are facing a different issue, and that warning is harmless | 10:48 |
seb128 | it's not harmless, the build fails in lunar | 10:48 |
LocutusOfBorg | I think the failure is somewhere else | 10:49 |
seb128 | anyway, feels like a bit pedantic and tell me off for being slightly incorrect isn't really helping anything | 10:49 |
seb128 | could be, I didn't investigate | 10:49 |
LocutusOfBorg | as said, I'm digging into the issue :D | 10:50 |
seb128 | thanks | 10:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | I just want to make sure we are facing a different issue w.r.t. the upstream one | 10:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | seb128, the failure is not in pkgconf... | 10:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | PACKAGE_VERSION = 2.74.3 | 10:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | 3.24.35 | 10:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | 0.8.1 | 10:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | 2.74.3 | 10:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | 1.8.1 | 10:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | 1.6.6 | 10:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | 237 | 10:53 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, what I said is that it builds fine with pkg-config and fails with pkgconf | 10:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | that variable is supposed to contain only one string, not the version of every pkg-config call :D | 10:54 |
seb128 | well that variable is pkgconf thing | 10:54 |
seb128 | and the same source builds fine with pkg-config | 10:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | indeed, I just found pkg.m4 to be provided by pkg-config and pkgconf | 10:55 |
LocutusOfBorg | and contains that version foo | 10:55 |
stgraber | smoser: ping, did you see yesterday's FOSDEM e-mail? | 16:38 |
bdmurray | I'm taking down one of the autopkgtest web servers to do some database maintenance. | 17:25 |
smoser | stgraber: i did. i'm looking for travel funding. i'll have an answer by monday, I expect a yes. | 17:48 |
stgraber | smoser: excellent! | 17:49 |
bdmurray | That one autopkgtest web server is back, I'll be taking the other one down after a short break. | 18:03 |
bdmurray | Doing the other autopkgtest web server | 18:31 |
bdmurray | and the other one is done | 18:55 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, so after telling me off earlier for being wrong about pkgconf you decided it was the bug anyway? | 20:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | seb128, yes, because even if not present in 1.8 release, debian maintainer cherry-picked the bug | 21:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | lol | 21:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | you were right | 21:53 |
seb128 | ah! :p | 21:53 |
=== klebers_ is now known as klebers | ||
=== klebers_ is now known as klebers |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!