g4mbit | JanC cool thanks, I'm giving this config a shot: https://bpa.st/TSPVI | 00:05 |
---|---|---|
JanC | I've never done that myself :) | 00:08 |
JanC | I use the client-side equivalent of it though | 00:09 |
g4mbit | JanC like an authenticator app you mean? | 00:21 |
JanC | no, I mean the client side equivalent of changing configuration based on certain matched parameters | 00:23 |
JanC | e.g. allowing certain deprecated encryption algorithms to connect to an old NAS only, or setting up port forwarding to a database server so that I can connect to the remote database "locally" | 00:26 |
g4mbit | oh ok got it | 00:27 |
JanC | changing authentication methods is just another thing to change | 00:27 |
g4mbit | I'm still debating if I want to enable it, which will require me to have to remember to take this key anywhere I go | 00:28 |
g4mbit | seems like yet another item I could forget to take | 00:28 |
g4mbit | phones to me seem so much natural since you already carry them anyway | 00:29 |
g4mbit | I'm considering using OTP instead with like google authenticator | 00:31 |
JanC | you could also make it that one method always works and another method only works from LAN, or whatever | 00:32 |
JanC | if necessary, using multiple daemons | 00:33 |
g4mbit | cool, will think about it since like would be nice to use yubikey but without having to remember to take it everywhere lol | 00:36 |
robertparkerx | if I upgrade ubuntu to 22.04 LTS will it keep my settings for things like apache2, varnish, etc. ? | 04:21 |
robertparkerx | php | 04:25 |
robertparkerx | I understand the versions might change | 04:25 |
Exterminador | robertparkerx: when upgrading, all your current packages will be upgraded also, exception for third party PPAs. be aware, that for example, wordpress doesn't have yet (AFAIK) total support for PHP 8.1 | 06:47 |
Exterminador | robertparkerx: if you want to keep all your PPAs (exception goes for those that are deprecated/unsupported), you need to: `RELEASE_UPGRADER_ALLOW_THIRD_PARTY=1 do-release-upgrade` | 06:51 |
Exterminador | once again, you may still see a warning about third party sources being disabled on upgrade, but those that support the Ubuntu version to which you're upgrading will not be disabled | 06:53 |
=== mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
Arlion | I have a hypervisor running CentOS 7, all patches vs ubuntu 20. The hypervisor is running Ubuntu 20.04. The CentOS 7 kvm hosted vm is only able to 66% cpu utilization during stress test. Where the other guests are able to 100% cpu utilization. Any ideas. I confirmed the kvm params are identical to both guests. | 14:57 |
Arlion | I'm starting to think maybe there is a legacy param i need to enable to fully support the older operating system. | 14:57 |
Arlion | Any ideas? | 14:57 |
ahasenack | are you using virtio drivers? | 15:00 |
ahasenack | in the guest | 15:01 |
Arlion | looking | 15:06 |
Arlion | confirmed, the centos 7 image is using virtio drivers | 15:09 |
pvh_sa | Hi folks... I had a power cut here recently and after it one of my servers didn't come up right. This is a ubuntu 18.04 (upgraded from 16.04) that uses two Intel SSDSC2BB08 80 GB SSDs in RAID-1 as the boot drive | 17:26 |
tomreyn | hi pvh_sa. if you're looking for assistence with this (not just sharing an experience), more details will be needed, such as ... what does "didn't come up right" mean. | 17:28 |
pvh_sa | on the machine that fails it complains that it cannot find /dev/md* - one an identical machine that works, /proc/mdstat shows a container md with two mds - OS and SWAP - see here: https://gist.github.com/pvanheus/a9f7f17e47d89fb8c7bccdcd7b20713f | 17:28 |
pvh_sa | both the working machine and the failed machine seem to have the same kind of md config - mdadmn (on the not-working machine running from a rescue boot disk) shows a metadata=imsm container with two drives like this https://gist.github.com/pvanheus/fef691a08cf24561780a02d32ad1dd0f | 17:30 |
pvh_sa | sorry @tomreyn - was still typing - nearly done with the description | 17:30 |
tomreyn | i noticed i was asking too quickly :) keep going... | 17:30 |
pvh_sa | the two component drives are /dev/sda and /dev/sdb - and mdadm --examine shows them have two subarrays - https://gist.github.com/pvanheus/e675d1d39ab5befc1f5aee640c00d5fb - so far, so good, right? but when I create (in the rescue boot) a /etc/mdadm.conf with DEVICE lines for /dev/sda and /dev/sdb and the ARRAY config as output put mdadmin --examine --scan, and I try and activate it with mdadm -As --auto=yes --run -v, it says that it cannot find a RAID | 17:34 |
pvh_sa | superblock on any of /dev/sda or /dev/sdb | 17:34 |
tomreyn | personally i won't be able to help because i lack experience with IMSM meta data raid. | 17:34 |
pvh_sa | can't cut and paste that but image of the log is here https://pasteboard.co/C8TJTp0bgDnf.png | 17:35 |
pvh_sa | (kernel on the failed machine is 4.15 - I'm using a rescue boot with kernel 5.15 to examine things) | 17:36 |
pvh_sa | thanks @tomreyn - I think this was the default config back in the day when the machines were set up but seems to not be a common config these days :| certainly googling isn't yielding much | 17:36 |
tomreyn | https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RAID_setup#External_Metadata_.282011.29 | 17:38 |
tomreyn | "The second format is the Intel(r) Matrix Storage Manager metadata format." ... | 17:38 |
tomreyn | You're storing the important metadata on the mainboard, the data itselfg (which can only be accessed with the metadata) on the disks. meaning you have a double hardware dependency. is that a good idea? | 17:39 |
tomreyn | maybe that's not the right time to ask this question, but you should ask it once your data is accessible again | 17:41 |
pvh_sa | the metadata is on the mainboard? wow. ok... that actually gives me a clue of where to look. the problem might well not be in the OS level then | 17:42 |
pvh_sa | ok... `mdadm --detail-platform` shows something different on the working server vs the non-working one. going to check in BIOS to see if I can see anything | 17:48 |
pvh_sa | and checking the BIOS the working machine has SATA set to RAID mode and the not working one has it on AHCI - I wonder if the BIOS battery failed and settings got reset to default | 17:59 |
tomreyn | at least on consumer boards you'd usually see it default to RAID mode (and would probably want to change that to AHCI to prevent the issue discussed above) | 18:01 |
pvh_sa | yeah this is a Supermicro server board - just rebooting it with that setting changed and it booted! thank you so much for the tip!! going to write this up in our Confluence | 18:07 |
tomreyn | and while you're at it, reconsider this setup ;) | 18:09 |
pvh_sa | oh absolutely! btw it also came up with /dev/sdX names changed.. and the (legacy) ceph config I've got on here is thus all full of incorrect and broken symlinks | 18:11 |
pvh_sa | (and we're into one of our regular power cut slots (luckily the server room generator is holding this time) so I think this is a good signal to take a break and watch some TV) | 18:13 |
pvh_sa | thanks once again | 18:13 |
tomreyn | heh, you're welcome, enjoy your tv night. | 19:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!