=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
jawn-smith | o/ | 15:59 |
---|---|---|
ginggs | o/ | 16:00 |
jawn-smith | #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team | 16:00 |
meetingology | Meeting started at 16:01:00 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | 16:01 |
meetingology | Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick | 16:01 |
danilogondolfo | o/ | 16:01 |
slyon | o/ | 16:01 |
jawn-smith | The weekly status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-5-january-2023/33029 | 16:01 |
jawn-smith | Let's all take our usual time to read and ask questions | 16:01 |
slyon | waveform: FYI (libcamera), I rejected that MIR recently: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcamera/+bug/1997560 | 16:02 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 1997560 in libcamera (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libcamera" [Undecided, New] | 16:02 | |
slyon | hopefully we'll get it approved in Lunar+1 | 16:02 |
bdmurray | enr0n: was there anything interesting in the upgrade bugs? | 16:03 |
enr0n | bdmurray: No, just the usual suspects | 16:04 |
waveform | slyon, ah, interesting -- I was looking into the state vs upstream (raspios has quite a bit in libcamera that we haven't but then they're actively working on getting the pi camera modules working on it) | 16:04 |
enr0n | Though there was a request to modernize some warning, let me find the bug number | 16:04 |
enr0n | bdmurray: bug 2000416 | 16:05 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2000416 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "Can the upgrade take several hours?" [Low, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2000416 | 16:05 | |
bdmurray | schopin: is there a timeline for this glibc SRU? he said worrying about the queues | 16:05 |
adrien | slyon: the version number (v0.0.x) is not very representative I think: it does a lot of things already and I think it's been fairly stable | 16:05 |
schopin | bdmurray: not yet, but I'm very aware of that :) | 16:05 |
jawn-smith | bdmurray: was pyside2 causing the s390x queue issues? | 16:06 |
slyon | adrien: right. but they didn't have a release process at all up until recently. and there were some other factors that made me feel it's not yet stable enough (though getting more solid now) | 16:06 |
waveform | yeah, it's definitely not "stable" yet :) | 16:07 |
bdmurray | enr0n: removing packages can take a long time https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1874272 | 16:08 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 1874272 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "Stage 'searching for obsolete software' takes a very long time (30 minutes)" [High, Confirmed] | 16:08 | |
adrien | slyon: yup, and it's frustrating because the existing alternatives are quite lacking imho | 16:08 |
mclemenceau_ | o/ | 16:09 |
slyon | full ack. we now have the desktop team signed up to this, and they'll help getting it into a better shape inside Debian & Ubuntu | 16:09 |
jawn-smith | #topic Release incoming bugs | 16:10 |
jawn-smith | #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | 16:10 |
jawn-smith | bug 1998095 | 16:11 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1998095 in pkgconf (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pkgconf, replacement for pkg-config" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1998095 | 16:11 | |
jawn-smith | We talked about this last year | 16:11 |
jawn-smith | The plan is to wait for pkgconf's new version to migrate, right? | 16:11 |
slyon | I think we can untag that. | 16:11 |
slyon | we made the decission to take ownership | 16:11 |
bdmurray | Did we subscribe to the package? | 16:12 |
slyon | we are subscribed | 16:12 |
jawn-smith | Okay slyon can you untag it? | 16:13 |
slyon | done. | 16:13 |
jawn-smith | Thanks! | 16:13 |
jawn-smith | That's it for ll | 16:13 |
jawn-smith | #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | 16:14 |
jawn-smith | bug 1842439 | 16:14 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1842439 in apport (Ubuntu Focal) "apport-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_settings_get_screen(settings=0x0) from gtk_css_value_icon_theme_compute() from gtk_css_static_style_compute_value()" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1842439 | 16:14 | |
jawn-smith | I feel like we've talked about this like 5 times | 16:14 |
schopin | you're low on your count... | 16:14 |
jawn-smith | Looks like the last time we discussed it there was an action item for bdmurray to bring it up at the desktop sync | 16:14 |
jawn-smith | did that happen? | 16:14 |
bdmurray | yes, and they said apport should protect against this type of crash | 16:15 |
jawn-smith | So does that mean there's a task for foundations here? | 16:15 |
schopin | bdrung: didn't you say it wasn't possible to detect the bad case from Python? | 16:16 |
bdmurray | "apport should catch the error and work around the issue" he read from the notes | 16:16 |
schopin | catch a segfault? oO | 16:16 |
jawn-smith | Okay bdmurray to update the bug, and we'll discuss again when b_drung is available | 16:17 |
jawn-smith | That's it for kk then | 16:17 |
jawn-smith | #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | 16:17 |
jawn-smith | bug 1957863 | 16:17 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1957863 in update-notifier (Ubuntu) "coding errors in update-motd-fsck-at-reboot script" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1957863 | 16:17 | |
jawn-smith | bdmurray: you tagged this one | 16:18 |
jawn-smith | It appears the submitter has suggested a fix | 16:18 |
bdmurray | It seems like it should be pretty straight forward | 16:19 |
jawn-smith | So we just need a person to work on this | 16:19 |
jawn-smith | bdmurray says someone who is seeking upload rights should work on this | 16:21 |
jawn-smith | enr0n ? | 16:21 |
jawn-smith | I'll review and sponsor | 16:21 |
jawn-smith | Moving on then | 16:22 |
jawn-smith | bug 1999345 | 16:22 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1999345 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "please add luks2 module to the signed grub2 images" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1999345 | 16:22 | |
jawn-smith | juliank says no | 16:22 |
jawn-smith | apparently juliank says maybe | 16:22 |
jawn-smith | juliank to touch base with the security team (specifically Chris) | 16:23 |
adrien | re update-notifier, shellcheck only complains about one instance of that typo (and it's a better way to develop than -u) | 16:23 |
jawn-smith | adrien: good to know, thanks | 16:23 |
jawn-smith | #topic proposed-migration | 16:25 |
jawn-smith | #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs | 16:25 |
jawn-smith | This will be slightly different from normal | 16:25 |
jawn-smith | The s390x and arm64 queues are struggling, so we're going to skip any regressions on those architectures for now | 16:25 |
jawn-smith | dbus-glib has one amd64 regression | 16:26 |
jawn-smith | I just retriggered it because it looks like flakiness | 16:26 |
jawn-smith | git has a few regressions we can look into | 16:27 |
schopin | I can take git. | 16:27 |
jawn-smith | Thanks! | 16:27 |
jawn-smith | adduser has a few that aren't s390 or arm64 | 16:29 |
jawn-smith | I'll take adduser | 16:29 |
jawn-smith | python-werkzeug has some as well | 16:29 |
jawn-smith | any volunteers? | 16:29 |
slyon | I can take that | 16:29 |
jawn-smith | Thanks! | 16:29 |
jawn-smith | sysvinit has some we can look at | 16:30 |
jawn-smith | any volunteers? | 16:30 |
ogayot | I can have a look | 16:30 |
jawn-smith | Excellent, thanks | 16:30 |
jawn-smith | systemd has one ppc64el regression | 16:30 |
jawn-smith | enr0n ? | 16:30 |
enr0n | yeah | 16:30 |
jawn-smith | debootstrap: any volunteers? | 16:31 |
waveform | I can take that; given the u-u regression is already on my plate | 16:31 |
jawn-smith | Thanks | 16:32 |
adrien | I can ha... too slow | 16:32 |
jawn-smith | devscripts is missing builds | 16:32 |
jawn-smith | on all architectures it seems | 16:32 |
ginggs | i'll take it | 16:32 |
jawn-smith | ginggs to work that one | 16:32 |
jawn-smith | coreutils, any volunteers? | 16:32 |
adrien | I'm quite curious as to what "missing builds" mean | 16:33 |
jawn-smith | Generally FTBFS | 16:33 |
adrien | I can look at it | 16:33 |
jawn-smith | perhaps it would be more accurate for it to say "failed builds" | 16:33 |
adrien | nice thing is that coreutils makes coreutils fail | 16:33 |
jawn-smith | but I think that "missing builds" might also include packages that just haven't built yet? | 16:33 |
jawn-smith | Anyway, thanks for taking coreutils adrien | 16:33 |
jawn-smith | libconfig-inifiles-perl | 16:34 |
jawn-smith | Any takers? | 16:34 |
jawn-smith | danilogondolfo: libconfig-inifiles-perl | 16:35 |
jawn-smith | zope.interface: vpa | 16:36 |
jawn-smith | libnet-domain-tld-perl | 16:36 |
jawn-smith | xypron: can you take that one? | 16:37 |
xypron | ok | 16:37 |
jawn-smith | Thanks! | 16:37 |
jawn-smith | apport: bdrung | 16:37 |
jawn-smith | juliank: sbuild? | 16:38 |
jawn-smith | Everyone has one now | 16:40 |
jawn-smith | #topic AOB | 16:40 |
jawn-smith | #endmeeting | 16:44 |
meetingology | Meeting ended at 16:44:48 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-01-05-16.01.moin.txt | 16:44 |
bdmurray | I retried the apport one bdrung | 16:47 |
bdrung | bdmurray, i pressed the retry as well. | 17:00 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!