| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dhcpcd5 [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [9.4.1-12] | 00:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-indicator-network [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.0.0~git20221216.698b753-2] | 00:00 | |
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| zhsj | please retry yggdrasil autopkgtest, it was badpkg state, dependencies should be avail now. (btw is the right channel for such request? | 03:17 |
|---|---|---|
| tjaalton | RAOF: hey, does your semi-AA powers allow to remove packages from proposed? | 04:36 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: My full-AA powers definitely do :) | 04:37 |
| RAOF | What can I do you for? | 04:37 |
| tjaalton | ooh | 04:37 |
| sarnold | muaahahahahahaha | 04:37 |
| tjaalton | removr directx-headers from jammy-proposed, so that the current mesa sru could build on amd64/arm64 | 04:38 |
| tjaalton | can be added back later when that one has migrated to updates | 04:39 |
| arraybolt3 | RAOF: Hey, whenever you get a free moment, are you available for SRU vanguard stuff? sil2100 never replied to my last ping. | 04:39 |
| tjaalton | then mesa from jammy queue can be dropped | 04:40 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: should be safer this way than patching mesa to build | 04:41 |
| arraybolt3 | (Sorry, failed to check timestamps, didn't realize I was interrupting something else.) | 04:41 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: Seems reasonable. | 04:41 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: Is this request documented in any bug (eg: #1991761)? | 04:44 |
| RAOF | arraybolt3: What's your SRU request? I don't have context. | 04:48 |
| arraybolt3 | RAOF: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-update-notifier/+bug/2002255 | 04:49 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2002255 in lubuntu-update-notifier (Ubuntu Jammy) "lubuntu-update-notifier provides no good way to resolve a forcibly terminated system update" [Critical, In Progress] | 04:49 | |
| RAOF | You want that accepted into {jammy,kinetic}-proposed? | 04:52 |
| arraybolt3 | Yes please. | 04:52 |
| arraybolt3 | I already uploaded it. | 04:52 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: directx-headers removed from proposed; time to get your mesa on! | 04:55 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: thanks! no this approach is something I didn't think of first | 04:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.0.5-0ubuntu0.4] | 04:59 | |
| RAOF | arraybolt3: So, "the update mechanism needs new features to make updates not broken" is something that we're generally sympathetic to in SRU-land. It would *also* be good to make the sddm update not trigger the updater-hangs-indefinitely bug. | 05:00 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: I'll kick the builds once the archive is settled | 05:00 |
| RAOF | (This should be possible, at-worst with the terrible hammer of Pre-Depends?) | 05:00 |
| arraybolt3 | RAOF: The problem is that SDDM didn't do anything wrong here. All it does is trigger a perfectly normal prompt that is supposed to be handled by the end user. The fact that lubuntu-update-notifier couldn't handle it beofre is 100% lubuntu-update-notifier's fault. | 05:00 |
| arraybolt3 | As for Pre-Depends, we sorta tried that, sadly enough. | 05:01 |
| arraybolt3 | (Basically we tried to Pre-Depends on lubuntu-update-notifier in lubuntu-desktop to try and force it to install and configure first, which failed. And we can't Pre-Depends on lubuntu-update-notifier in SDDM since SDDM is used in Kubuntu, which would be damaged by the introduction of lubuntu-update-notifier.) | 05:01 |
| RAOF | Oh, right! That'll ensure the new l-u-n is installed and configured, but the broken process is *already running) | 05:01 |
| arraybolt3 | Right. And apt apparently is like "Sure, I'll configure l-u-n first, then lubuntu-desktop! Just lemme configure SDDM first." :-/ | 05:02 |
| RAOF | Yeah, it's *not possible* for apt to do what you need there, which is "sddm is not an update candidate until the version of l-u-n *that is running* is at least $FOO" | 05:04 |
| RAOF | arraybolt3: You've missed a `-v0.4` in your package build flags; the .changes file doesn't include the relevant changelog entries or LP bug reference. | 05:06 |
| arraybolt3 | RAOF: The LP bug reference is actually in the *previous* version, the real version that's in Lunar. Are duplicate LP: #XYZ entries allowable, or is the one in the Lunar version enough? | 05:07 |
| RAOF | The one in the lunar version is enough, but it needs to make it into the .changes file. | 05:07 |
| arraybolt3 | OK... so, this is something I've not done before - do I manually edit the .changes files? I currently generate them with debuild. | 05:08 |
| arraybolt3 | (Sorry, I didn't know that the reference being in the .changes file was a requirement. The SRU docs only require that "there is a reference to the SRU bug number in the changelog", which I did. This is my first SRU, so I'm not exactly experienced at this yet.) | 05:10 |
| RAOF | You need to pass -v$PREVIOUS_ARCHIVE_VERSION to debuild. | 05:10 |
| RAOF | In this case, -v0.4 looks to be the right incantation. | 05:10 |
| arraybolt3 | Oh. That's what you mean by build flags. OK. Thanks, I'll do that real quick. | 05:10 |
| RAOF | That means "include all changelog entries since 0.4 in the .changes file". | 05:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lubuntu-update-notifier [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.5.1~22.04.1] | 05:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-update-notifier (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.4 => 0.5.1~22.04.2] (lubuntu) | 05:14 | |
| arraybolt3 | RAOF: I think you'll probably want to reject 0.5.1~22.10.1 also. | 05:14 |
| RAOF | I do indeed; just waiting for the tooling to catch up :) | 05:15 |
| arraybolt3 | Ah, makes sense. Thanks for your patience with me while I'm learning how this works. | 05:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lubuntu-update-notifier [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1~22.10.1] | 05:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-update-notifier (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.4 => 0.5.1~22.10.2] (lubuntu) | 05:17 | |
| RAOF | We need to edit the test-case, of course, to not test the PPA packages :) | 05:19 |
| arraybolt3 | Good point, will do. | 05:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securestring [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securestring [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securestring [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securestring [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:27 | |
| arraybolt3 | Test cases updated. | 05:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securestring [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-update-notifier [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.5.1~22.04.2] | 05:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-update-notifier [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5.1~22.10.2] | 05:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securestring [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2-2] | 05:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securestring [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.2-2] | 05:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securestring [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.2-2] | 05:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securestring [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2-2] | 05:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securestring [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.2-2] | 05:42 | |
| arraybolt3 | RAOF: Thank you for everything! | 05:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securestring [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:57 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello ubuntu-archive, please old binaries left on amd64: librocksdb7.7 (from 7.7.8-1) | 06:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack vorlon thanks | 06:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, https://ci.debian.net/packages/b/bernhard/unstable/arm64/ | 06:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it always failed in debian too | 06:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so maybe we can just hint it? | 06:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (I know its a regression, I'm taking a look anyway, sad that Debian is failing for different reasons) | 06:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | a no change rebuild of bernhard works | 06:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh... pb.py is the culprit | 06:54 |
| * LocutusOfBorg opens an RC in Debain | 06:55 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | so if you can restore protobuf, I can issue the rebuild | 06:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | <BTS> Opened #1028371 in src:bernhard by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «bernhard: needs rebuilds on top of new protobuf». https://bugs.debian.org/1028371 | 07:04 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1028371 in src:bernhard "bernhard: needs rebuilds on top of new protobuf" [Serious, Open] | 07:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: directx-headers (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.600.10-1 => 1.606.4-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset) | 08:51 | |
| tjaalton | ^ this is the same that RAOF removed on request | 08:51 |
| tjaalton | sil2100: so, getting back to the mesa hwe backport.. it'd be time to build the second upload of llvm-15 | 08:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securestring [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2-2] | 08:53 | |
| sil2100 | tjaalton: o/ | 08:53 |
| tjaalton | also directx-headers from above | 08:53 |
| sil2100 | tjaalton: ok, I have an interview in a moment, after that I'll poke you and we can get things reviewed/accepted | 08:53 |
| tjaalton | ack | 08:53 |
| ricotz | hello :), are the s390x autopkgtests meant to be working again? it looks like they are still looping? | 09:49 |
| seb128 | ricotz, hey, those were working for a bit and are having issues again, bdmurray and paride are working with IS on the issue | 09:52 |
| ricotz | seb128, hey :), thank you | 09:53 |
| seb128 | np! | 09:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello ubuntu-archive, please old binaries left on amd64: librocksdb7.7 (from 7.7.8-1) | 10:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | NBS cleanup please? | 10:02 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, it's not only amd64, removed | 10:17 |
| sil2100 | tjaalton: ok, so I'll review the llvm15 and directx-headers uploads in the queue - anything else that needs review for .2? | 10:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep thanks | 10:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | merci! | 10:26 |
| tjaalton | sil2100: after that it is mesa itself, which I need to reupload | 10:28 |
| sil2100 | ACK. Of course I have another meeting just now, but I'll handle that after this one ;p | 10:29 |
| tjaalton | heh, take your time | 11:07 |
| tjaalton | llvm surely will | 11:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lib2geom [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-3] (no packageset) | 11:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lib2geom [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-3] (no packageset) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lib2geom [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-3] (no packageset) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lib2geom [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-3] (no packageset) | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lib2geom [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-3] (no packageset) | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-15 [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:15.0.6-3~ubuntu0.22.10.2] | 11:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-15 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:15.0.6-3~ubuntu0.22.04.2] | 11:32 | |
| sil2100 | tjaalton: hmm, the directx-headers one - the same version already built in the archive. Do you want to resurrect the old binaries? | 11:34 |
| sil2100 | Since launchpad will reject it as is. I can either ressurect the old binaries or you'll have to no-change bump the version number | 11:35 |
| tjaalton | sil2100: ah, you can use the old ones | 11:36 |
| sil2100 | Ok, rejecting the upload and ressurecting the old one then | 11:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdcm [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.20-2] (kubuntu) | 11:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected directx-headers [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.606.4-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1] | 11:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: directx-headers (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.600.10-1 => 1.606.4-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset) (sync) | 11:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted directx-headers [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.606.4-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1] | 11:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdcm [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [3.0.20-2] | 11:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lib2geom [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.2-3] | 11:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lib2geom [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.2-3] | 11:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lib2geom [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.2-3] | 11:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lib2geom [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.2-3] | 11:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lib2geom [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.2-3] | 11:54 | |
| ginggs | fresh update_excuses... | 12:16 |
| ginggs | hello perl sync :( | 12:16 |
| laney | just found some old-ish messages in moderation for ubuntu-release, don't be too surprised | 12:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd-hwe (kinetic-proposed/main) [251.2.1 => 251.4.2] (no packageset) | 13:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd-hwe (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11.1 => 249.11.3] (no packageset) | 13:19 | |
| slyon | hey ubuntu-sru! Could somebody please drop systemd-hwe 249.11.2 from the Jammy unapproved queue, and systemd-hwe 251.4.1 from the Kinetic unapproved queue? Those got superseeded/bundled with 249.11.3 and 251.4.2 respectively. | 13:22 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 13:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd-hwe [source] (kinetic-proposed) [251.4.1] | 13:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd-hwe [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11.2] | 13:31 | |
| slyon | thx! | 13:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd-hwe (kinetic-proposed/main) [251.2.1 => 251.4.3] (no packageset) | 14:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd-hwe (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11.1 => 249.11.4] (no packageset) | 14:14 | |
| slyon | sorry, there was another bug that could be bundled for those SRUs (LP: #2002065), so we can drop the old ones, again: 251.4.3/kinetic & 249.11.3/jammy ^ | 14:16 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2002065 in systemd-hwe (Ubuntu) "Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell machines (0C41, 0C42)" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2002065 | 14:16 | |
| sil2100 | No problem | 14:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd-hwe [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11.3] | 14:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd-hwe [source] (kinetic-proposed) [251.4.2] | 14:27 | |
| slyon | thank you! | 14:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.6.3-1ubuntu3] (core) | 14:40 | |
| Eickmeyer | bdmurray: If it's not too much trouble, could you possibly push sru bug 1965439 for ubuntustudio-default-settings over the finish line in Jammy? I don't know where RikMills is at with it for kubuntu-settings (he probably forgot about it completely), but it's on the brink of ancient. | 15:29 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1965439 in kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] kdesu fails to authenticate with sudo from Jammy" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1965439 | 15:29 | |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: cleaned up all the "old binaries" NBS listed on update_excuses | 16:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 16:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and if you want to restore protobuf, I can no change rebuild the library | 16:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I can understand if you want to hold it for some bit | 16:08 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: yeah what I want is to get python3-defaults unblocked as quickly as possible, so first I've triggered a retest of bernhard/s390x with the archive in the current state; once that's done, we can bring protobuf and a fixed bernhard back in | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 16:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | please ping once you do, so I can issue the rebuild | 16:11 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: I'll try to keep track of it and let you know | 16:12 |
| vorlon | it's s390x and the queue is still dire, so | 16:13 |
| vorlon | and ick, protobuf being rolled back breaks a *different* autopkgtest (bcnc) because protobuf was an soname change and now libopencv-dnn406 is uninstallable | 16:14 |
| vorlon | ginggs: any idea about the boost* autopkgtest regressions with python3.11? | 16:17 |
| ginggs | vorlon: yes, boost1.74 is fixed in 1.74.0-18.1ubuntu1 | 16:27 |
| ginggs | and boost1.81 is fixed in... | 16:28 |
| vorlon | ginggs: ok then the retry I just did should take care of that one. Does boost1.81 need the same fix? | 16:28 |
| ginggs | 1.74.0-18.1ubuntu1 :) | 16:28 |
| ginggs | because #1028390 | 16:28 |
| ginggs | debian #1028390 | 16:29 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1028390 in src:boost1.81 "boost1.81: autopkgtests test boost-defaults" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1028390 | 16:29 | |
| ginggs | thanks ubottu | 16:29 |
| vorlon | oh lol | 16:29 |
| vorlon | so I should retrigger that one too? | 16:29 |
| vorlon | (or you could hint it as badtest) | 16:29 |
| ginggs | ah, the test should pass with all proposed, but i can hint if you prefer | 16:33 |
| vorlon | ginggs: the hint would mean less need to chase it over the next days wrt e.g. s390x | 16:35 |
| vorlon | and that bug report says to me that the tests are invalid, so it's not wrong to have a version-specific badtest hint | 16:36 |
| ginggs | vorlon: ack, i'll do it | 16:37 |
| vorlon | coreycb: unicode-cldr-core is on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html because python-babel-localedata is Built-Using it. python-babel appears to be an autosynced package owned by the openstack team. Could someone from the openstack team drive an MIR for this please? | 16:40 |
| ginggs | vorlon: to remove numba, did you mean you already did remove 16 source packages, or you would have to? | 17:01 |
| coreycb | vorlon: yes, thanks for raising this. I'll take a look. | 17:03 |
| vorlon | ginggs: did remove | 17:08 |
| vorlon | coreycb: thank you! | 17:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-websockets (jammy-backports/universe) [9.1-1 => 10.2-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset) | 17:09 | |
| ginggs | vorlon: ok, thanks, but numba itself not removed? | 17:19 |
| vorlon | ginggs: isn't it? if I didn't already remove it it's because I wanted to re-check reverse-depends output after the spate of removals | 17:19 |
| vorlon | ginggs: removed now | 17:20 |
| ginggs | vorlon: ta | 17:20 |
| === ahasenack_ is now known as ahasenack | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | new perl came just in time for me to fix nodejs merge :D | 18:17 |
| tsimonq2 | 🎉 | 18:17 |
| Eickmeyer | Anybody on the SRU team available? If it's not too much trouble, could you possibly push sru bug 1965439 for ubuntustudio-default-settings over the finish line in Jammy? I don't know where RikMills is at with it for kubuntu-settings (he probably forgot about it completely), but it's on the brink of ancient. | 18:27 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1965439 in kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] kdesu fails to authenticate with sudo from Jammy" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1965439 | 18:27 | |
| bdmurray | I'm looking at ubuntustudio-default-settings. | 19:13 |
| bdmurray | And for the record the bug only got verified this year so the ancientness isn't on the SRU team this time. | 19:16 |
| Eickmeyer | bdmurray: Yeah, that was my fault. :) Last week, my time. | 19:23 |
| Eickmeyer | Actually, I verified it, but lost the bug and forgot it with Prague and all. | 19:24 |
| Eickmeyer | My fault for not marking the bug as such. | 19:25 |
| Eickmeyer | bdmurray: Thanks! To be clear, I wasn't blaming the SRU team for anything. Completely my fault. :) | 19:52 |
| bdmurray | Sometime the SRU team is a bottleneck, just not this time! | 19:57 |
| Eickmeyer | :) | 20:04 |
| vorlon | schopin, athos: hi, I just want to check if the both of you are focused on python3-defaults migration this week for +1 (find-proposed-cluster ;), and if we should coordinate at all to divide and conquer | 20:43 |
| athos | I supposed someone else would focus on that. I ran your new script and decided to tackle some rust stuff, considering someone would go for python3-defoaults. Should I abort and fall back to python3-defaults? :) | 21:20 |
| athos | vorlon: thanks for the test hint on postgresql-common yesterday, btw :) | 21:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd-hwe (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11.1 => 249.11.2] (no packageset) | 21:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd-hwe [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11.4] | 21:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ca-certificates-java [source] (jammy-proposed) [20190909ubuntu1.1] | 21:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd-hwe [source] (kinetic-proposed) [251.4.3] | 22:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd-hwe [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11.2] | 22:15 | |
| vorlon | athos: python3-defaults is bigger by an order of magnitude and there's plenty of work to go around; and the longer it stays the more it risks entanglement with other transitions | 22:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netpbm-free [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2:10.98.00-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netpbm-free [i386] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2:10.98.00-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 23:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: elpa [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2022.11.001-2] (no packageset) | 23:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netpbm-free [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2:10.98.00-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 23:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netpbm-free [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2:10.98.00-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 23:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: elpa [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2022.11.001-2] (no packageset) | 23:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: elpa [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2022.11.001-2] (no packageset) | 23:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netpbm-free [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2:10.98.00-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 23:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: elpa [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2022.11.001-2] (no packageset) | 23:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netpbm-free [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2:10.98.00-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 23:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted elpa [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2022.11.001-2] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted elpa [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2022.11.001-2] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netpbm-free [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2:10.98.00-1] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netpbm-free [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2:10.98.00-1] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netpbm-free [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2:10.98.00-1] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted elpa [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2022.11.001-2] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netpbm-free [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2:10.98.00-1] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netpbm-free [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2:10.98.00-1] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted elpa [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2022.11.001-2] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netpbm-free [i386] (lunar-proposed) [2:10.98.00-1] | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: elpa [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2022.11.001-2] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!