[03:32] <arraybolt3> Does anyone know if pull-lp-source uses https for its downloads or not? I know it's a significant part of the Ubuntu development tools but the frequent inability for it to verify package GPG signatures due to missing keys is worrying.
[03:32] <arraybolt3> If it uses HTTPS, I'll just not worry about it, but otherwise I'll manually verify stuff.
[03:37] <arraybolt3> (btw, would it be useful if I added a feature to pull-lp-source that used the keyring of the current user to help verify packages, so that you can just add the keys of maintainers you trust to your own keyring and have them integrate into pull-lp-source automatically?)
[09:59] <mlankhorst> pbuilder doesn't work to build i386 any more..
[10:02] <JackFrost> Going to guess because you use the aptitude backend?
[10:02] <mlankhorst> yeah, is there a workaround?
[10:04] <JackFrost> Use the apt one instead: PBUILDERSATISFYDEPENDSCMD=/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends-apt
[10:05] <mlankhorst> ah, thanks
[10:05] <mlankhorst> beats trying to compile aptitude for debian first then finding a way to stuff that into the chroot. :)
[10:05] <JackFrost> Sure.  Aptitude handles certain situations better, but oh well.
[13:59] <Laibsch> Hello, can I motivate one of you to sponsor an SRU by adding a necessary run-time dependency to python3-poetry and improve OOTB user experience for jammy LTS as requested in bug 1958227?  debdiff is available, this should be a very low-hanging fruit
[13:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1958227 in poetry (Ubuntu) "Traceback when calling 'poetry' command: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cachecontrol'" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1958227
[15:26] <jbicha> Laibsch: hi, I hope things are going well with you. If Ubuntu 22.10 is also affected, it would be nice to fix this issue there at the same time
[15:35] <rbasak> bdmurray: I released Bionic for bug 1998265, but what's the plan for the others?
[15:35] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1998265 in python-apt (Ubuntu Kinetic) "OverFlow error when using cnf-extractor" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1998265
[15:36] <rbasak> bdmurray: do you consider Focal verified because it's just the autopkgtest in the test plan and that passed?
[15:37] <rbasak> And the same for bug 1998488 I guess?
[15:37] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1998488 in python-apt (Ubuntu Kinetic) "Wrong type annotation in apt.progress.text.AcquireProgress" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1998488
[16:49] <Laibsch> jbicha: Thank you for picking this up.  I usually focus only on LTS.  Kinetic only has a few months of life left in it.  Do you really want to tackle this for kinetic?
[16:51] <arraybolt3> I think Kinetic is supported until July, which is still about 6 months. It only has 9 months of support, so from Kinetic's standpoint, it's young yet.
[16:52] <jbicha> I think my understanding is that it's recommended but not a hard requirement to also SRU the stable releases after the release you are fixing.
[16:53] <jbicha> In this case, it seems like the bugfix verification should be simple and it's a high severity bug so I think it's worth fixing for Kinetic too
[17:08] <Laibsch> yes, very simple verification
[17:13] <Laibsch> updated bug 1958227 with a debdiff for kinetic
[17:13] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1958227 in poetry (Ubuntu Jammy) "Traceback when calling 'poetry' command: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cachecontrol'" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1958227
[17:53] <Laibsch> I believe the fix for bug 1963794 which was sponsored to Lunar on my behalf might introduce a regression.  I don
[17:53] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1963794 in squid-deb-proxy (Debian) "apt-avahi-discover script uses deprecated asyncore module" [Unknown, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1963794
[18:49] <GunnarHj> Laibsch: Sponsored bug #1958227. As regards bug #1963794 I can't help wondering why a Python deprecation warning motivates an SRU.
[18:49] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1958227 in poetry (Ubuntu Jammy) "Traceback when calling 'poetry' command: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cachecontrol'" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1958227
[18:49] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1963794 in squid-deb-proxy (Ubuntu) "apt-avahi-discover script uses deprecated asyncore module" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1963794
[19:03] <GunnarHj> Laibsch: Also, as regards 1958227, it's not fixed in Debian/lunar yet, is it?
[19:23] <GunnarHj> Laibsch: Please disregard my latest remark. I see now that python3-poetry depends on python3-cachecontrol.
[20:15] <mariogrip> Can someone add biometryd to the lto-disabled-list?
[20:15] <mariogrip> it wont work due to some dlopen issue (its plugin system)
[20:16] <mariogrip> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/biometryd/0.0.3~git20230110.a8818c2-1
[20:16] <mariogrip> i tried adding -lto to the rules, but does not seem to have any effect on ubuntu's infra
[20:17] <sarnold> there's some hints on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/LTO
[20:18] <mariogrip> sarnold: i did exactly that, it works with sbuild. here is the diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/645442124/biometryd_0.0.3~git20221003.39b529a-3_0.0.3~git20230110.a8818c2-1.diff.gz
[20:19] <mariogrip> here is the relevant part https://paste.debian.net/1266915/
[20:25] <sarnold> hmm, I wonder if the DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS should have been reported somewhere in the build logs? I don't see it in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/645442589/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-amd64.biometryd_0.0.3~git20230110.a8818c2-1_BUILDING.txt.gz .. it's so weird to see all the -flto=auto and so on in the logs even asking for it to be disabled in the rules
[20:45] <mariogrip> I think i found a bug, since if i use the exact same source and upload to both lunar and kinetic, the one built for kinetic setting -lto works but not on lunar
[20:45] <mariogrip> for kineti: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/645524054/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-amd64.btop_1.2.13-0.1_BUILDING.txt.gz and lunar https://launchpadlibrarian.net/645523879/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-amd64.btop_1.2.13-1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[20:46] <mariogrip> sarnold: ^^
[20:47] <sarnold> mariogrip: oh *nice*! :) That's an awesome finding :)
[20:47] <mariogrip> will report it to dpkg
[20:52] <mariogrip> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2002582
[20:52] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2002582 in dpkg (Ubuntu) "Disabling lto does not work as it should on lunar" [Undecided, New]
[20:54] <rbasak> vorlon or sil2100: reminder to review https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+merge/429629 please. It's four months old now :-/
[20:55] <rbasak> Or maybe you could delegate a peer review to a non-AA person?
[21:56] <Psil0[m]1> genii: hey can you p8jg me when your on
[21:56] <Psil0[m]1> I really need to help somehow lol